Adaptive Preference Specifications for Application Sessions

  • Christine Julien
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 4294)


In ubiquitous computing applications, mobile participants must be empowered to opportunistically connect to services available in their local environments. Our previous work has elucidated a model for allowing applications to specify the functional properties of the services to which they need to connect. Our framework then connects applications to dynamic resources through the use of a novel suite of application sessions. In this paper, we revisit this framework to devise a mechanism for applications to specify preferences for one service provider over another. In this investigation, we argue that these preferences are actually provided by a set of session participants: the application itself, the service provider, and, more surprisingly, the network that connects the application and the provider. We develop a framework for each of these parties to specify preferences among various allowable connections. We demonstrate not only what kinds of properties can be expressed in our framework but also implementation paths for integrating them into the communication and application support infrastructure.


Cost Function Preference Function Ubiquitous Computing Service Selection Tuple Space 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Kidd, C., Orr, R., Abowd, G., Atkeson, C., Essa, I., MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., Starner, T., Newstetter, W.: The aware home: A living laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. In: Proc. of CoBuild (1999)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Malan, D., Fulford-Jones, T., Welsh, M., Moulton, S.: CodeBlue: An ad hoc sensor network infrastructure for emergency medical care. In: Proc. of BSN (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Julien, C., Stovall, D.: Enabling ubiquitous coordination using application sessions. In: Ciancarini, P., Wiklicky, H. (eds.) COORDINATION 2006. LNCS, vol. 4038, pp. 130–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Abiteboul, S.: Querying semi-structured data. In: Afrati, F.N., Kolaitis, P.G. (eds.) ICDT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1186, pp. 1–18. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Christensen, E., Gubera, F., Meredith, G., Weerawarana, S.: Web services description language (WSDL) 1.1 (2001); Current as of 2005Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carriero, N., Gelernter, D.: Linda in context. Communications of the ACM 32(4), 444–458 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Julien, C., Roman, G.C.: Egocentric context-aware programming in ad hoc mobile environments. In: Proc. of FSE, pp. 21–30 (2002)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Julien, C., Venkataraman, M.: Resource-directed discovery and routing in mobile ad hoc networks. Technical Report TR-UTEDGE-2005-01, Univ. of Texas (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Back, R., Sere, K.: Stepwise refinement of parallel algorithms. Science of Computer Prog. 13(2-3), 133–180 (1990)zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Andrews, G.: Foundations of Multithreaded, Parallel, and Distributed Programming. Addison Wesley, Reading (1999)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liu, J., Issarny, V.: QoS-aware service location in mobile ad hoc networks. In: Proc. of MDM, pp. 224–235 (2004)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nahrstedt, K., Xu, D., Wichadakul, D., Li, B.: Qos-aware middleware for ubiquitous and heterogeneous environments. IEEE Comm. Magazine, 140–148 (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grimm, R., Davis, J., Lemar, E., MacBeth, A., Swanson, S., Anderson, T., Bershad, B., Borriello, G., Gribble, S., Wetherall, D.: System support for pervasive applications. ACM Trans. on Computer Systems 22(4), 421–486 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Holder, O., Ben-Shaul, I., Gazit, H.: Dynamic layout of distributed applications in FarGo. In: Proc. of ICSE, pp. 163–173 (1999)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Huang, A.C., Steenkiste, P.: Network-sensitive service discovery. Journal of Grid Comput 1(3), 309–326 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Li, B.: QoS-aware adaptive services in mobile networks. In: Wolf, L., Hutchinson, D.A., Steinmetz, R. (eds.) IWQoS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2092, pp. 251–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Li, B., Wang, K.: Nonstop: Continuous multimedia streaming in wireless ad hoc networks with node mobility. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Comm 21(10), 1627–1641 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu, T., Lin, K.J.: Service selection algorithms for composing complex services with multiple QoS constraints. In: Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Traverso, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3826, pp. 130–143. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Siljee, J., Bosloper, I., Nijhuis, J., Hammer, D.: DySOA: Making service systems self-adaptive. In: Benatallah, B., Casati, F., Traverso, P. (eds.) ICSOC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3826, pp. 255–268. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Julien
    • 1
  1. 1.Mobile and Pervasive Computing Group, The Center for Excellence in Distributed Global EnvironmentsThe University of Texas at Austin 

Personalised recommendations