Advertisement

pp 1-24 | Cite as

Label-Free Monitoring of 3D Tissue Models via Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy

  • Frank AlexanderJr.Email author
  • Sebastian Eggert
  • Dorielle Price
Chapter
Part of the Bioanalytical Reviews book series

Abstract

There is a strong tendency in in vitro testing of drugs or toxins to use 3D tissue models as biological test objects rather than 2D cell monolayers. The latter have been used with increasing success throughout the last decades even though their limitations were well-known. Two-dimensional cell layers cannot fully mimic the complex architecture of real tissue mainly because cell-cell interactions, cell communication, cell signaling, extracellular matrix composition, and all the physicochemical properties of the microenvironment are quite different. Motivated by these shortcoming, 3D tissue models have been developed over the years capable of overcoming some of the limitations of 2D tissue. However, for successful screening campaigns and toxicology assessment, it is not sufficient to only have an appropriate tissue model, and it also takes analytical techniques to read the biological response to a given exposure to drugs or toxins. It has been notoriously difficult to find experimental approaches that are capable of reporting from the inside of a 3D tissue model without destroying it. Because of its noninvasive nature and the ability of AC currents to permeate through tissue, impedance analysis has emerged as one potential technique to fill this gap. The current chapter will summarize the state of the art in impedance-based monitoring of 3D tissue models with particular focus on electrode design and the constraints that are associated with it.

Keywords

Drug screening Impedance analysis Label-free Multi-electrode arrays Spheroids Tissue engineering Tissue models 

References

  1. 1.
    Freshney R (2011) Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic technique and specialized applications. Wiley, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fitzgerald KA, Malhotra M, Curtin CM, O’Brien FJ, O’Driscoll CM (2015) Life in 3D is never flat: 3D models to optimise drug delivery. J Control Release 215:39–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.07.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Edmondson R, Broglie JJ, Adcock AF, Yang L (2014) Three-dimensional cell culture systems and their applications in drug discovery and cell-based biosensors. Assay Drug Dev Technol 12:207–218.  https://doi.org/10.1089/adt.2014.573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartung T (2014) 3D – a new dimension of in vitro research. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 69–70:vi.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2014.04.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander FA, Price DT, Bhansali S (2013) From cellular cultures to cellular spheroids: is impedance spectroscopy a viable tool for monitoring multicellular spheroid (MCS) drug models? IEEE Rev Biomed Eng 6:63–76.  https://doi.org/10.1109/RBME.2012.2222023CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kloss D, Fischer M, Rothermel A, Simon JC, Robitzki AA (2008) Drug testing on 3D in vitro tissues trapped on a microcavity chip. Lab Chip 8(6):879–884Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hildebrandt C, Büth H, Cho S, Impidjati, Thielecke H (2010) Detection of the osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells in 2D and 3D cultures by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. J Biotechnol 148(1):83–90.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2010.01.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seidel D, Krinke D, Jahnke H-G, Hirche A, Kloß D, Mack TG, Striggow F, Robitzki A (2012) Induced tauopathy in a novel 3D-culture model mediates neurodegenerative processes: a real-time study on biochips. PLoS One 7(11):e49150Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McCoy MH, Wang E (2005) Use of electric cell-substrate impedance sensing as a tool for quantifying cytopathic effect in influenza A virus infected MDCK cells in real-time. J Virol Methods 130(1):157–161Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Åberg P, Nicander I, Hansson J, Geladi P, Holmgren U, Ollmar S (2004) Skin cancer identification using multifrequency electrical impedance-a potential screening tool. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 51(12):2097–2102Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang X, Greve D, Nguyen D, Domach M (2003) Impedance based biosensor array for monitoring mammalian cell behavior. Sensors, 2003. Proceedings of IEEE, vol 1. IEEE, PiscatawayGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Judy JW (2001) Microelectromechanical systems (MEMS): fabrication, design and applications. Smart Mater Struct 10(6):1115Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rahman ARA, Justin G, Guiseppi-Elie A (2009) Towards an implantable biochip for glucose and lactate monitoring using microdisc electrode arrays (MDEAs). Biomed Microdevices 11(1):75–85Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park TH, Shuler ML (2003) Integration of cell culture and microfabrication technology. Biotechnol Prog 19(2):243–253Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matysik F-M, Meister A, Werner G (1995) Electrochemical detection with microelectrodes in capillary flow systems. Anal Chim Acta 305(1):114–120Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bard AJ, Faulkner LR, Leddy J, Zoski CG (1980) Electrochemical methods: fundamentals and applications, vol 2. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Wegener J, Keese CR, Giaever I (2000) Electric cell–substrate impedance sensing (ECIS) as a noninvasive means to monitor the kinetics of cell spreading to artificial surfaces. Exp Cell Res 259(1):158–166Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Price DT, Rahman ARA, Bhansali S (2009) Design rule for optimization of microelectrodes used in electric cell-substrate impedance sensing (ECIS). Biosens Bioelectron 24(7):2071–2076Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fosdick LE, Anderson JL (1986) Optimization of microelectrode array geometry in a rectangular flow channel detector. Anal Chem 58(12):2481–2485Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Min J, Baeumner AJ (2004) Characterization and optimization of interdigitated ultramicroelectrode arrays as electrochemical biosensor transducers. Electroanalysis 16(9):724–729Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sandison ME, Anicet N, Glidle A, Cooper JM (2002) Optimization of the geometry and porosity of microelectrode arrays for sensor design. Anal Chem 74(22):5717–5725Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lempka SF, Johnson MD, Barnett DW, Moffitt MA, Otto KJ, Kipke DR, McIntyre CC (2006) Optimization of microelectrode design for cortical recording based on thermal noise considerations. Engineering in medicine and biology society, 2006. EMBS’06. 28th annual international conference of the IEEE. IEEE, PiscatawayGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang L, Wang H, Mitchelson K, Yu Z, Cheng J (2008) Analysis of the sensitivity and frequency characteristics of coplanar electrical cell–substrate impedance sensors. Biosens Bioelectron 24(1):14–21Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    English AE, Moy AB, Kruse KL, Ward RC, Kirkpatrick SS, Goldman MH (2009) Instrumental noise estimates stabilize and quantify endothelial cell micro-impedance barrier function parameter estimates. Biomed Signal Proc Control 4(2):86–93Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Curtis TM, Tabb J, Romeo L, Schwager SJ, Widder MW, Van der Schalie WH (2009) Improved cell sensitivity and longevity in a rapid impedance-based toxicity sensor. DTIC document. J Appl Toxicol 29:374–380Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pejcic B, De Marco R (2006) Impedance spectroscopy: over 35 years of electrochemical sensor optimization. Electrochim Acta 51(28):6217–6229Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rahman ARA, Price DT, Bhansali S (2007) Effect of electrode geometry on the impedance evaluation of tissue and cell culture. Sensors Actuators B Chem 127(1):89–96Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rahman A, Register J, Vuppala G, Bhansali S (2008) Cell culture monitoring by impedance mapping using a multielectrode scanning impedance spectroscopy system (CellMap). Physiol Meas 29(6):S227Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Canali C, Heiskanen A, Muhammad HB, Høyum P, Pettersen F-J, Hemmingsen M, Wolff A, Dufva M, Martinsen ØG, Emnéus J (2015) Bioimpedance monitoring of 3D cell culturing – complementary electrode configurations for enhanced spatial sensitivity. Biosens Bioelectron 63:72–79Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hutmacher DW (2000) Scaffolds in tissue engineering bone and cartilage. Biomaterials 21:2529–2543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Carletti E, Motta A, Migliaresi C (2011) Scaffolds for tissue engineering and 3D cell culture. Methods Mol Biol 695:17–39.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-984-0_2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lanza R, Langer R, Vacanti J (2013) Principles of tissue engineering. Academic Press, San DiegoGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dutta RC, Dutta AK (2009) Cell-interactive 3D-scaffold; advances and applications. Biotechnol Adv 27:334–339.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2009.02.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    O’Brien FJ (2011) Biomaterials & scaffolds for tissue engineering. Mater Today 14:88–95.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(11)70058-XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Rimann M, Graf-Hausner U (2012) Synthetic 3D multicellular systems for drug development. Curr Opin Biotechnol 23:803–809.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2012.01.011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Hutmacher DW (2001) Scaffold design and fabrication technologies for engineering tissues – state of the art and future perspectives. J Biomater Sci Polym Ed 12:107–124.  https://doi.org/10.1163/156856201744489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2007) Biodegradable polymers as biomaterials. Prog Polym Sci 32:762–798.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2007.05.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Drury JL, Mooney DJ (2003) Hydrogels for tissue engineering: scaffold design variables and applications. Biomaterials 24:4337–4351Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tibbitt MW, Anseth KS (2009) Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture. Biotechnol Bioeng 103:655–663.  https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.22361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Billiet T, Vandenhaute M, Schelfhout J, Van Vlierberghe S, Dubruel P (2012) A review of trends and limitations in hydrogel-rapid prototyping for tissue engineering. Biomaterials 33:6020–6041.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.04.050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Fisher RJ, Peattie RA (2007) Controlling tissue microenvironments: biomimetics, transport phenomena, and reacting systems. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 103:1–73Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nair LS, Laurencin CT (2006) Polymers as biomaterials for tissue engineering and controlled drug delivery. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 102:47–90Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Velema J, Kaplan D (2006) Biopolymer-based biomaterials as scaffolds for tissue engineering. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 102:187–238Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lin S-P, Kyriakides TR, Chen J-JJ (2009) On-line observation of cell growth in a three-dimensional matrix on surface-modified microelectrode arrays. Biomaterials 30(17):3110–3117Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Lei KF, Wu M-H, Liao P-Y, Chen Y-M, Pan T-M (2011) Development of a micro-scale perfusion 3D cell culture biochip with an incorporated electrical impedance measurement scheme for the quantification of cell number in a 3D cell culture construct. Microfluid Nanofluid 12(1):117–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10404-011-0854-xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lei KF, Wu M-H, Hsu C-W, Chen Y-D (2014) Real-time and non-invasive impedimetric monitoring of cell proliferation and chemosensitivity in a perfusion 3D cell culture microfluidic chip. Biosens Bioelectron 51:16–21.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2013.07.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Antonijevic M, Petrovic M (2008) Copper corrosion inhibitors. A review. Int J Electrochem Sci 3(1):1–28Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Lei KF, Wu Z-M, Huang C-H (2015) Impedimetric quantification of the formation process and the chemosensitivity of cancer cell colonies suspended in 3D environment. Biosens Bioelectron 74:878–885Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Canali C, Mazzoni C, Larsen LB, Heiskanen A, Martinsen Ø, Wolff A, Dufva M, Emnéus J (2015) An impedance method for spatial sensing of 3D cell constructs – towards applications in tissue engineering. Analyst 140(17):6079–6088Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Lee S-M, Han N, Lee R, Choi I-H, Park Y-B, Shin J-S, Yoo K-H (2016) Real-time monitoring of 3D cell culture using a 3D capacitance biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 77:56–61Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Valero T, Moschopoulou G, Kintzios S, Hauptmann P, Naumann M, Jacobs T (2010) Studies on neuronal differentiation and signalling processes with a novel impedimetric biosensor. Biosens Bioelectron 26(4):1407–1413Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Athanasiou KA, Eswaramoorthy R, Hadidi P, Hu JC (2013) Self-organization and the self-assembling process in tissue engineering. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:115–136.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-bioeng-071812-152423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Chen G, Qi Y, Niu L, DI T, Zhong J, Fang T, Yan W (2015) Application of the cell sheet technique in tissue engineering. Biomed Rep 3:749–757.  https://doi.org/10.3892/br.2015.522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Lin R-Z, Lin R-Z, Chang H-Y (2008) Recent advances in three-dimensional multicellular spheroid culture for biomedical research. Biotechnol J 3:1172–1184.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.200700228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Khetani SR, Berger DR, Ballinger KR, Davidson MD, Lin C, Ware BR (2015) Microengineered liver tissues for drug testing. J Lab Autom 20:216–250.  https://doi.org/10.1177/2211068214566939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Yoon No D, Lee K-H, Lee J, Lee S-H (2015) 3D liver models on a microplatform: well-defined culture, engineering of liver tissue and liver-on-a-chip. Lab Chip 15:3822–3837.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5LC00611BCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Fukuda J, Nakazawa K (2011) Hepatocyte spheroid arrays inside microwells connected with microchannels. Biomicrofluidics 5:22205.  https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3576905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Gevaert E, Dollé L, Billiet T, Dubruel P, van Grunsven L, van Apeldoorn A, Cornelissen R (2014) High throughput micro-well generation of hepatocyte micro-aggregates for tissue engineering. PLoS One 9:e105171.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Napolitano AP, Dean DM, Man AJ, Youssef J, Ho DN, Rago AP, Lech MP, Morgan JR (2007) Scaffold-free three-dimensional cell culture utilizing micromolded nonadhesive hydrogels. Biotechniques 43:494–500.  https://doi.org/10.2144/000112591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Molckovsky A, Wilson B (2001) Monitoring of cell and tissue responses to photodynamic therapy by electrical impedance spectroscopy. Phys Med Biol 46(4):983Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Jahnke H-G, Steel D, Fleischer S, Seidel D, Kurz R, Vinz S, Dahlenborg K, Sartipy P, Robitzki AA (2013) A novel 3D label-free monitoring system of hES-derived cardiomyocyte clusters: a step forward to in vitro cardiotoxicity testing. PLoS One 8(7):e68971Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Poenick S, Jahnke H-G, Eichler M, Frost S, Lilie H, Robitzki AA (2014) Comparative label-free monitoring of immunotoxin efficacy in 2D and 3D mamma carcinoma in vitro models by impedance spectroscopy. Biosens Bioelectron 53:370–376Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Krinke D, Jahnke H-G, Mack TG, Hirche A, Striggow F, Robitzki AA (2010) A novel organotypic tauopathy model on a new microcavity chip for bioelectronic label-free and real time monitoring. Biosens Bioelectron 26(1):162–168Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Bilandzic M, Stenvers KL (2014) Assessment of ovarian cancer spheroid attachment and invasion of mesothelial cells in real time. J Vis Exp 87. https://www.jove.com/video/51655/assessment-ovarian-cancer-spheroid-attachment-invasion-mesothelial
  65. 65.
    Linderholm P, Braschler T, Vannod J, Barrandon Y, Brouard M, Renaud P (2006) Two-dimensional impedance imaging of cell migration and epithelial stratification. Lab Chip 6(9):1155–1162Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Linderholm P, Marescot L, Loke MH, Renaud P (2008) Cell culture imaging using microimpedance tomography. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 55(1):138–146Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Moulton S, Barisci J, Bath A, Stella R, Wallace G (2004) Studies of double layer capacitance and electron transfer at a gold electrode exposed to protein solutions. Electrochim Acta 49(24):4223–4230Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Newman J (1966) Resistance for flow of current to a disk. J Electrochem Soc 113(5):501–502Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Alexander FA Jr, Huey EG, Price DT, Bhansali S (2012) Real-time impedance analysis of silica nanowire toxicity on epithelial breast cancer cells. Analyst 137(24):5823–5828Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Eichler M, Jahnke H-G, Krinke D, Müller A, Schmidt S, Azendorf R, Robitzki AA (2015) A novel 96-well multielectrode array based impedimetric monitoring platform for comparative drug efficacy analysis on 2D and 3D brain tumor cultures. Biosens Bioelectron 67:582–589Google Scholar
  71. 71.
    Thielecke H, Mack A, Robitzki A (2001) Biohybrid microarrays – impedimetric biosensors with 3D in vitro tissues for toxicological and biomedical screening. Fresenius J Anal Chem 369(1):23–29Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Khanna P, Luongo K, Strom JA, Bhansali S (2010) Sharpening of hollow silicon microneedles to reduce skin penetration force. J Micromech Microeng 20(4):045011Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Alexander F (2014) RTEMIS: real-time tumoroid and environment monitoring using impedance spectroscopy and pH sensing. Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5168
  74. 74.
    Wiest J, Stadthagen T, Schmidhuber M, Brischwein M, Ressler J, Raeder U, Grothe H, Melzer A, Wolf B (2006) Intelligent mobile lab for metabolics in environmental monitoring. Anal Lett 39(8):1759–1771Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Otto AM, Brischwein M, Niendorf A, Henning T, Motrescu E, Wolf B (2003) Microphysiological testing for chemosensitivity of living tumor cells with multiparametric microsensor chips. Cancer Detect Prev 27(4):291–296Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Shinawi TF, Kimmel DW, Cliffel DE (2013) Multianalyte microphysiometry reveals changes in cellular bioenergetics upon exposure to fluorescent dyes. Anal Chem 85(24):11677–11680Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Frank AlexanderJr.
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sebastian Eggert
    • 2
  • Dorielle Price
    • 3
  1. 1.The Geneva FoundationRockvilleUSA
  2. 2.Technische Universität MünchenMünchenGermany
  3. 3.University of South FloridaTampaUSA

Personalised recommendations