Advertisement

7.3 Conclusions

After the March 2004 attacks in Madrid, there can be no doubt that European cities are as likely to be targeted by terrorist activities as their US counterparts. The drafters of the EU constitutional treaty have thus rightly foreseen a solidarity clause providing mutual assistance for EU member states in case of terrorist activities. So far, however, ongoing discussions about improving Europe’s security capabilities have focused primarily on expeditionary tasks while neglecting the provision of homeland security. To overcome this problem, the capabilities of First Responders must receive substantial reinforcement. Here the corporate sector can play a useful role. However, the most substantial reform effort will have to be undertaken by the community of First Responders themselves. By adopting a capabilities-based planning approach, First Responders should jointly identify their capabilities at the international and national levels and set up a capability development mechanism. These actions will help coordinate research, procurement, and training. In doing so, First Responders will be able to assume the much needed role of a credible and capable player to complement NATO’s security and defense policy.

Keywords

Homeland Security Disaster Preparedness National Guard Surge Capacity Emergency Responder 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References for Chapter 7

  1. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Fact Sheet. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/2p-emergency-response.html Google Scholar
  2. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Role in 9/11. http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/terrorism/terrorism-response.html Google Scholar
  3. Bioterrorism Week. “SensorNet Proposed as System to Protect Missions Nationwide.” April 5, 2004.Google Scholar
  4. CBS Evening News. December 17, 2003. http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2003/12/17/eveningnews/main589137.shtml Google Scholar
  5. Commission of the European Communities (2001). Civil protection — State of preventive alert against possible emergencies [COM(2001)707, 28 November 2001].Google Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities (2004). Reinforcing the Civil Protection Capacity of the European Union [COM(2004)200, 25 Mach 2004].Google Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control. Smallpox. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/smallpox/overview/disease-facts.asp Google Scholar
  8. Citizen Corps. Medical Reserve Corps. http://www.bt.cdc.gov/stockpile/ Google Scholar
  9. De Wijk, R. Civil Defence and Solidarity Clause — EU Homeland Defense. Policy paper prepared for the Directorate-General for Research of the European Parliament at the request of the European Parliament’s Committee on Foreign Affairs, Common Security and Defense Policy. The Hague. Clingendael Centre for Security Studies, 2004.Google Scholar
  10. Draft Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (2003) [CONV 850/03, 18 July 2003)], <http://europeanconvention.eu.int/docs/Treaty/cv00850.en03.pdf> (accessed 27 April 2004).Google Scholar
  11. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/infopage/cipro/ Google Scholar
  12. Group of Personalities, Research for a Secure Europe. Report of the Group of Personalities in the field of Security Research. Luxemburg. Office for Official Publications of the European Commission, 2004, <http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/security/pdf/gop_en.pdf> (accessed 24 April 2004).Google Scholar
  13. Jenkins, Brian, “Protecting Surface Transportation Systems and Patrons from Terrorist Activity.” http://transweb.sjsu.edu/publications/97-04.pdf Google Scholar
  14. LaTourette, T. et. al., Protecting Emergency Responders. Community Views on Safety and Health Risks and Personal Protection Needs. Santa Monica. RAND; 2003.Google Scholar
  15. Law Enforcement Agency Resource Network. http://www.adl.org/learn/additional_resources/resources_terrorism.asp Google Scholar
  16. Lindley-French, J., A European Defence Strategy. Gütersloh. Bertelsmann Foundation; 2004.Google Scholar
  17. Monaco, A., CMX 04: Terrorists attack NATO. NATO Notes, 2004; 6(2): 7–8.Google Scholar
  18. National Association of City and County Health Officers (NAACHO). SNS. http://www.naccho.org/general398.cfm Google Scholar
  19. Office for Domestic Preparedness http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/odp/docs/video.htm Google Scholar
  20. Van, John, Terrorism fears fuel biotech funding. Chicago Tribune, 2004.Google Scholar
  21. Wohlleben, V. Civil Protection. A General Overview [143 CC 03 E rev. 1]. Brussels. NATO Parliamentary Assembly, 2003, <http://www.nato-pa.int/Docdownload.asp?ID=55> (accessed 30 April 2004).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Personalised recommendations