Advertisement

The Empirical Measurement of Well-Being

Part of the Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being book series (EIAP, volume 2)

Abstract

The empirical assessment of poverty and equity is customarily carried out using data on households and individuals. These data can be administrative (i.e., stored in government files and records), they can come from censuses of the entire population, or (most commonly) they can be generated by probabilistic surveys on the socio-demographic characteristics and living conditions of a population of households or individuals. We focus on this latter case in this chapter.

Keywords

Household Size Equivalence Scale Reference Price Consumption Expenditure Household Type 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

2.5 References for Chapters 1 and 2

  1. Aaberge, R. and I. Melby (1998): “The Sensitivity of Income Inequality to Choice of Equivalence Scales,” Review of Income and Wealth, 44, 565–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aaberge, R., A. Bjorklund, M. Jantti, M. Palme, P. Pedersen, N. Smith, and T. Wennemo (2002): “Income Inequality and Income Mobility in the Scandinavian Countries Compared to the United States,” Review of Income and Wealth, 48, 443–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anand, S. and M. Ravallion (1993): “Human Development in Poor Countries: On the Role of Private Incomes and Public Services,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7, 133–50.Google Scholar
  4. Araar, A. (2002): “L’impact des variations des prix sur les niveaux d’inégalité et de bienêtre: Une application a la Pologne durant la période de transition. (With English summary.),” L’Actualité Economique/Revue D’Analyse Economique, 78, 221–42.Google Scholar
  5. Arkes, J. (1998): “Trends in Long-Run versus Cross-Section Earnings Inequality in the 1970s and 1980s,” Review of Income and Wealth, 44, 199–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banks, J. and P. Johnson (1994): “Equivalence Scale Relativities Revisited,” Economic Journal, 104, 883–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrett, G., T. Crossley, and C. Worswick (2000a): “Consumption and Income Inequality in Australia,” Economic Record, 76, 116–38.Google Scholar
  8. — (2000b): “Demographic Trends and Consumption Inequality in Australia between 1975 and 1993,” Review of Income and Wealth, 46, 437–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhorat, H. (1999): “Distinguishing between Individual-and Household-Level Poverty,” Development Southern Africa, 16, 157–62.Google Scholar
  10. Bjorklund, A. (1993): “A Comparison between Actual Distributions of Annual and Lifetime Income: Sweden 1951–89,” Review of Income and Wealth, 39, 377–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blackorby, C. and D. Donaldson (1993): “Adult-Equivalence Scales and the Economic Implementation of Interpersonal Comparisons of Well-Being,” Social Choice and Welfare, 10, 335–61.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Blacklow, P. and R. Ray (2000): “A Comparison of Income and Expenditure Inequality Estimates: The Australian Evidence, 1975–76 to 1993–94,” Australian Economic Review, 33, 317–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blundell, R. (1998): “Equivalence Scales and Household Welfare: What Can Be Learned from Household Budget Data?” in The distribution of welfare and household production: International perspectives, ed. by S. P. Jenkins, A. Kapteyn, and B. M. S. van Praag, Cambridge; New York and Melbourne: Cambridge University Press, 364–80Google Scholar
  14. Blundell, R. and A. Lewbel (1991): “The Information Content of Equivalence Scales,” Journal of Econometrics, 50, 49–68.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. Blundell, R. and I. Preston (1998): “Consumption Inequality and Income Uncertainty,” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 603–40.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bodier, M. and D. Cogneau, eds. (1998): L’evolution de la structure des prix et les inegalites de niveau de vie en France de 1974 a 1995. (Price Structure Trends and Standard of Living Inequalities in France from 1974 to 1995. With English summary.), vol. 135 of Economic et Prevision.Google Scholar
  17. Bosch, A. (1991): “Economies of Scales, Location, Age, and Sex Discrimination in Household Demand,” European Economic Review, 35, 1589–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bradbury, B. (1997): “Measuring Poverty Changes with Bounded Equivalence Scales: Australia in the 1980s,” Economica, 64, 245–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Buhmann, B., L. Rainwater, G. Schmaus, and T. Smeedtng (1988): “Equivalence Scales, Well-Being, Inequality and Poverty: Sensitivity Estimates Across Ten Countries Using the Luxembourg Income Study Database,” Review of Income and Wealth, 34, 15–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Burkhauser, R. and J. Poupore (1997): “A Cross-National Comparison of Permanent Inequality in the United States and Germany,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 79, 10–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Burkhauser, R., T. Smeeding, and J. Merz (1996): “Relative Inequality and Poverty in Germany and the United States Using Alternative Equivalence Scales,” Review of Income and Wealth, 42, 381–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cantillon, S. and B. Nolan (2001): “Poverty within Households: Measuring Gender Differences Using Nonmonetary Indicators,” Feminist Economics, 7, 5–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Carlson, M. and S. Danziger (1999): “Cohabitation and the Measurement of Child Poverty,” Review of Income and Wealth, 45, 179–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Creedy, J. (1997): “Lifetime Inequality and Tax Progresstvity with Alternative Income Concepts,” Review of Income and Wealth, 43, 283–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. — (1999a): “Lifetime versus Annual Income Distribution,” in Handbook of income inequality measurement. With a foreword by Amartya Sen, ed. by J. Silber, Boston; Dordrecht and London: Kluwer Academic, Recent Economic Thought, 513–33.Google Scholar
  26. Conniffe, D. (1992): “The Non-constancy of Equivalence Scales,” Review of Income and Wealth, 38, 429–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Coronado, J., D. Fullerton, and T. Glass (2000): “The Progressivity of Social Security,” Tech. Rep. 7520, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  28. Coulter, F., F. Cowell, and S. Jenkins (1992a): “Differences in Needs and Assessment of Income Distributions,” Bulletin of Economic Research, 44, 77–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. — (1992b): “Equivalence Scale Relativities and the Measurement of Inequality and Poverty,” The Economic Journal, 102, 1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cutler, D. and L. Katz (1992): “Rising Inequality? Changes in the Distribution of Income and Consumption in the 1980’s,” The American Economic Review, 82, 546–551.Google Scholar
  31. Dasgupta, P. (1993): An inquiry into well-being and destitution, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Davies, H., H. Joshi, and L. Clarke (1997): “Is It Cash That the Deprived Are Short Of?” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, 160, 107–26.Google Scholar
  33. De Gregorio, J. and J. Lee (2002): “Education and Income Inequality: New Evidence from Cross-Country Data,” Review of Income and Wealth, 48, 395–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. de Vos, K. and A. Zaidi (1997): “Equivalence Scale Sensitivity of Poverty Statistics for the Member States of the European Community,” Review of Income and Wealth, 43, 319–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Deaton, A. (1988): “Quality, Quantity, and Spatial Variation of Price,” The American Economic Review, 78, 419–430.Google Scholar
  36. Desai, M. and A. Shah (1988): “An Econometric Approach to the Measurement of Poverty,” Oxford Economic Papers, 40, 505–522.Google Scholar
  37. Donaldson, D. (1992): “On the Aggregation of Money Measures of Well-Being in Applied Welfare Economics,” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 17, 88–102.Google Scholar
  38. Duclos, J.-Y. and M. Mercader Prats (1999): “Household Needs and Poverty: With Application to Spain and the U.K,” Review of Income and Wealth, 45, 77–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ebert, U. (1999): “Using Equivalent Income of Equivalent Adults to Rank Income Distributions,” Social Choice and Welfare, 16, 233–58.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Erbas, N. and C. Sayers (1998); “Is the United States CPI Biased Across Income and Age Groups?” Tech. Rep. WP/98/136, International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  41. Ebert, U. and P. Moyes (2003): “Equivalence Scales Reconsidered,” Econometrica, 71, 319–43.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ferreira, L., R. Buse, and J. P. Chavas (1998): “Is There Bias in Computing Household Equivalence Scales?” Review of Income and Wealth, 44, 183–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fields, G. (1994): “Data for Measuring Poverty and Inequality Changes in the Developing’s,” Journal of Development Economics, 44, 87–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Finke, M., W. Chern, and J. Fox (1997): “Do the Urban Poor Pay More for Food? Issues in Measurement,” Advancing the Consumer Interest, 9, 13–17.Google Scholar
  45. Fleurbaey, M., C. Hagneré, and A. Trannoy (2003): “Welfare Comparisons with Bounded Equivalence Scales,” Journal of Economic Theory., 110, 309–96.zbMATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  46. Formby, J., H. Kim, and B. Zheng (2001): “Sen Measures of Poverty in the United Slates; Cash versus Comprehensive Incomes in the 1990s” Pacific Economic Review, 6, 193–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Gibson, J., J. Huang, and S. Rozelle (2001): “Why Is Income Inequality So Low in China Compared to Other Countries? The Effect of Household Survey Methods,” Economics Letters, 71, 329–33.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Glewwe, P. (1991): “Household Equivalence Scales and the Measurement of Inequality: Transfers from the Poor to the Rich Could Decrease Inequality,” Journal of Public Economics, 44, 211–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Gustafsson, B. and N. Makonnen (1993): “Poverty and Remittances in Lesotho,” Journal of African Economies, 2, 49–73.Google Scholar
  50. Gustafsson, B. and L. Shi (1997): “Types of Income and Inequality in China at the End of 1980s,” Review of Income and Wealth, 43, 211–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Haddad, L. and R. Kanbur (1990): “How Serious is the Neglect of Intra-Household Inequality?” The Economic Journal, 100, 866–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hagenaars, A. (1986): The Perception of Poverty, Amsterdam: North Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  53. Harding, A. (1995): “The Impact of Health, Education and Housing Outlays upon Income Distribution in Australia in the 1990s,” Australian Economic Review, 0, 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Haveman, R. and A. Bershadker (2001): “The “Inability to be Self-Reliant” As an indicator of Poverty: Trends for the U.S., 1975–97,” Review of Income and Wealth, 47, 335–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hentschel, J. and P. Lanjouw (1996): “Constructing an Indicator of Consumption for the Analysis of Poverty: Principles and Illustrations with Reference to Ecuador,” Working Paper 124, World Bank, Living Standards Measurement Study.Google Scholar
  56. Idson, T. and C. Miller (1999): “Calculating a Price Index for Families with Children: Implications for Measuring Trends in Child Poverty Rates,” Review of Income and Wealth, 45, 217–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Jenkins, S. and F. Cowell (1994): “Parametric Equivalence Scales and Scale Relativities,” Economic Journal, 104, 891–900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jenkins, S. and N. O’leaby (1996): “Household Income Plus Household Production; The Distribution of Extended Income in the U.K.” Review of Income and Wealth, 42, 401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jensen, R. and K. Richter (2001): “Understanding the Relationship between Poverty and Children’s Health,” European Economic Review, 45, 1031–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Jorgenson, D. (1998): “Did We Lose the War on Poverty?” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 79–96.Google Scholar
  61. Juster, T. and K. Kuester (1991): “Differences in the Measurement of Wealth, Wealth Inequality and Wealth Composition Obtained from Alternative U.S. Wealth Surveys,” Review of income and Wealth, 37, 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kanbur, R. and L. Haddad (1994): “Are Better Off Households More Unequal or Less Unequal?” Oxford Economic Papers, 46, 445–458.Google Scholar
  63. Klasen, S. (2000): “Measuring Poverty and Deprivation it) South Africa,” Review of Income and Wealth, 46, 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lancaster, G. and R. Ray (2002): “International Poverty Comparisons on Unit Record Data of Developing and Developed Countries,” Australian Economic Papers, 41, 129–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lanjouw, J. and P. Lanjouw (2001): “How to Compare Apples and Oranges; Poverty Measurement Based on Different Definitions of Consumption,” Review of Income and Wealth, 47, 25–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Lanjouw, P. and M. Ravallion (1995): “Poverty and Household Size,” Economic Journal, 105, 1415–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Layte, R., B. Maitre, B. Nolan, and C. Whelan (2001): “Persistent and Consistent Poverty in the 1994 and 1995 Waves of the European Community Household Panel Survey,” Review of Income and Wealth, 47, 427–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lazear, E. and R. Michael (1988): Allocation of Income Within the Household, Chicago: The University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Lewbel, A. (1989): “Household Equivalence Scales and Welfare Comparisons,” Journal of Public Economics, 39, 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Lundberg, S., R. Pollak, and T. Wales (1997): “Do Husbands and Wives Pool Their Resources? Evidence from the United Kingdom Child Benefit,” Journal of Human Resources, 32, 463–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Lyssiotou, P. (1997); “Comparison of Alternative Tax and Transfer Treatment of Children Using Adult Equivalence Scales,” Review of Income and Wealth, 43, 105–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Meenakshi, J. V. and R. Ray (2002): “Impact of Household Size and Family Composition on Poverty in Rural India,” Journal of Policy Modeling, 24, 539–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Mitrakos, T. and P. Tsakloglou (1998): “Decomposing Inequality under Alternative Concepts of Resources: Greece 1988,” Journal of Income Distribution, 8, 241–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Muller, C. (2002): “Prices and Living Standards: Evidence for Rwanda,” Journal of Development Economics, 68, 187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Narayan, D. and M. Walton (2000): Voices of the poor: Crying out for change. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press for the World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Nicol, C. (1994): “Identifiability of Household Equivalence Scales through Exact Aggregation: Some Empirical Results,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 27, 307–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. O’Neill, D. and O. Sweetman (2001): “Inequality in Ireland 1987–1994: A Comparison Using Measures of Income and Consumption,” Journal of Income Distribution, 10, 23–39.Google Scholar
  78. Parker, S. and F. Siddiq (1997): “Seeking a Comprehensive Measure of Economic Well-Being: Annuitisation versus Capitalisation,” Economics Letters, 54, 241–44.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pendakur, K. (1999): “Semiparametric Estimates and Tests of Base-Independent Equivalence Scales,” Journal of Econometrics, 88, 1–40.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. — (2002): “Taking Prices Seriously in the Measurement of Inequality,” Journal of Public Economics, 86, 47–69.Google Scholar
  81. Phipps, S. (1993): “Measuring Poverty among Canadian Households: Sensitivity to Choice of Measure and Scale,” Journal of Human Resources, 28, 162–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. — (1998): “What Is the Income “Cost of a Child”? Exact Equivalence Scales for Canadian Two-Parent Families,” Review of Economics and Statistics, 80, 157–64.Google Scholar
  83. Phipps, S. and P. Burton (1995): “Sharing within Families: Implications for the Measurement of Poverty among Individuals in Canada,” Canadian Journal of Economics, 28, 177–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Phipps, S. and T. Garner (1994): “Are Equivalence Scales the Same for the United States and Canada?” Review of Income and Wealth, 40, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Pollak, R. (1991): “Welfare Comparisons and Situation Comparisons,” Journal of Econometrics, 50, 31–48.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  86. Propper, C. (1990): “Contingent Valuation of Time Spent on NHS Waiting Lists,” The Economic Journal, 100, 193–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Quisumbing, A., L. Haddad, and C. Pena (2001): “Are Women Overrepresented among the Poor? An Analysis of Poverty in 10 Developing Countries,” Journal of Development Economics, 66, 225–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Radner, D. (1997): “Noncash Income, Equivalence Scales, and the Measurement of Economic Well-Being,” Review of Income and Wealth, 43, 71–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rao, V. (2000): “Price Heterogeneity and “Real” Inequality: A Case Study of Prices and Poverty in Rural South India,” Review of Income and Wealth, 46, 201–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Ruiz Castillo, J. (1998): “A Simplified Model for Social Welfare Analysis: An Application to Spain, 1973–74 to 1980–81,” Review of Income and Wealth, 44, 123–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sahn, D. and D. Stifel (2000): “Poverty Comparisons Over Time and Across Countries in Africa,” World Development, 28, 2123–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Sefton, T. (2002): “Targeting Fuel Poverty in England: Is the Government Getting Warm?” Fiscal Studies, 23, 369–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Sen, A. (1981): Poverty and Famine: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation, Clarendon Press, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  94. — (1983): “Poor, Relatively Speaking,” Oxford Economic Papers, 35, 153–169.Google Scholar
  95. — (1985): Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  96. Skoufias, E. (2001): “Changes in Regional Inequality and Social Welfare in Indonesia from 1996 to 1999,” Journal of International Development, 13, 73–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Slesnick, D. (1993): “Gaining Ground: Poverty in the Postwar United States,” Journal of Political Economy, 101, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. — (2002): “Prices and Regional Variation in Welfare,” Journal of Urban Economics, 51, 446–68.Google Scholar
  99. Smeeding, T. and D. Weinberg (2001): “Toward a Uniform Definition of Household Income,” Review of Income and Wealth, 47, S-24.Google Scholar
  100. Smeeding, T., P. Saunders, J. Coder, S. Jenkins, J. Fritzell, A. Hagenaars, R. Hauser, and M. Wolfson (1993): “Poverty, Inequality, and Family Living Standards Impacts across Seven Nations: The Effect of Noncash Subsidies for Health, Education and Housing,” Review of Income and Wealth, 39, 229–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Streeten, P., S. Burki, M. Ul Haq, N. Hicks, and F. Stewart (1981): First Things First. Meeting Basic Human Needs in the Developing World, New York and Oxford: World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  102. Sutherland, H. (1996): “Households, Individuals and the Redistribution of Income,” Tech. Rep. University of Cambridge, Department of Applied Economics Working Paper, Amalgamated Series: 9614Google Scholar
  103. Townsend, P. (1979): Poverty in the United Kingdom: A Survey of Household Resources and Standards of Living, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  104. Van den Bosch, K. (1998): “Poverty and Assets in Belgium,” Review of Income and Wealth, 44, 215–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Wolff, E. (1998): “Recent Trends in the Size Distribution of Household Wealth,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12, 131–50Google Scholar
  106. Woolley, F. and J. Marshall (1994): “Measuring Inequality within the Household,” Review of Income and Wealth, 40, 415–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Yates, J. (1994): “Imputed Rent and Income Distribution,” Review of Income and Wealth, 40, 43–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zaidi, A. and K. de Vos (2001): “Trends in Consumption-Based Poverty and Inequality in the European Union during the 1980s,” Journal of Population Economics, 14, 367–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Personalised recommendations