On the Consistency of Poverty Lines

  • Martin Ravallion
  • Michael Lokshin
Part of the Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being book series (EIAP, volume 1)


Poverty Line Price Relative Consumption Expenditure Indifference Curve Quantity Index 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Blackorby, C., and D. Donaldson. 1987. “Welfare Ratios and Distributionally Sensitive Cost-Benefit Analysis”, Journal of Public Economics 34, pp. 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Citro, Constance F., and Michael, Robert T. 1995. Measuring Poverty: A New Approach,. Washington DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  3. Dandekar, V.M., and N. Rath. 1971. Poverty in India. Pune: Indian School of Political Economy.Google Scholar
  4. Deaton, Angus and John Muellbauer. 1980. Economics and Consumer Behavior, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Greer, J., and Erik Thorbecke. 1986. “A Methodology for Measuring Food Poverty Applied to Kenya,” Journal of Development Economics 24, pp. 59–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ministry of Labor and Social Development (MLSD). 2000. “Prozhitochnui Minimum v Rosiiskoi Federacii (The Subsistence Minimum in Russian Federation).” MLSD, Moscow, Russia.Google Scholar
  7. Orshansky, Molly. 1963. “Children of the Poor,” Social Security Bulletin 26, pp. 3–29.Google Scholar
  8. Osmani, Siddiqur. 1982. Economic Inequality and Group Welfare Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Palmer-Jones, Richard and Kunal Sen. 2001. “On India’s Poverty Puzzles and Statistics of Poverty,” Economic and Political Weekly, January 20, pp. 211–217.Google Scholar
  10. Paul, Satya. 1989. “A Model of Constructing the Poverty Line,” Journal of Development Economics 30, pp. 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pradhan, Menno and Martin Ravallion. 2000. “Measuring Poverty Using Qualitative Perceptions of Consumption Adequacy”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 82(3), pp. 462–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ravallion, Martin. 1994. Poverty Comparisons, Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Press.Google Scholar
  13. ____,. 1998. Poverty Lines in Theory and Practice, LSMS Paper 133, Washington DC, World Bank.Google Scholar
  14. Ravallion, Martin and Benu Bidani. 1994. “How Robust is a Poverty Profile?” World Bank Economic Review, 8(1), pp. 75–102.Google Scholar
  15. Ravallion, Martin and Michael Lokshin (2002), “Self-Rated Economic Welfare in Russia,” European Economic Review, 46, pp. 1453–1473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. ____ and _____. 2004. “Testing Poverty Lines,” Development Research Group, World Bank.Google Scholar
  17. Ravallion, Martin and Binayak Sen. 1996. “When Method Matters: Monitoring Poverty in Bangladesh,” Economic Development and Cultural Change, 44, pp. 761–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Samuelson, Paul. 1938. “A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer Behaviour” Economics 5, pp. 61–71.Google Scholar
  19. Sen, Amartya. 1979. “The Welfare Basis of Real Income Comparisons: A Survey,” Journal of Economic Literature 17, pp. 1–45.Google Scholar
  20. ____. 1985. Commodities and Capabilities, Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
  21. ____. 1992. Inequality Rexamined, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. VTsUZH. 2002. “Living Standards of the Population of the Russian Federation. Legal Basis for Minimal Monetary Incomes.” Part 1, Moscow, pp. 220–225.Google Scholar
  23. Wodon, Quentin. 1997. “Food Energy Intake and Cost of Basic Needs: Measuring Poverty in Bangladesh,” Journal of Development Studies 34, pp. 66–101.Google Scholar
  24. World Health Organization (WHO). 1985. Energy and Protein Requirements, WHO, Technical Report Series 724, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin Ravallion
    • 1
  • Michael Lokshin
    • 1
  1. 1.Development Research GroupWorld BankUSA

Personalised recommendations