Abstract
The notions of studying in an institute and getting an education are instinctively understood as identical in nature, being elusive to the idea that entry into a formal educational system may not always and directly imply the holistic growth and development of an individual. The entry and existence into a formal educational setting provide an individual with a new sphere for socialization. This implies that an individual’s exposure to such a dynamic environment provides new scope for building, changing, disputing or reinforcing one’s attitudes, belief systems, preferences, etc. It creates a new platform to facilitate the process of building one’s self concept, one’s identity. This makes it imperative for us to understand the elements or factors during one’s educational journey that can either enhance or diminish the freedom and efforts of an individual towards striving for holistic well-being. Through the lens of capability approach, the present chapter attempts to understand the factors that may influence or hinder the capacity of a student’s being, throughout his or her educational journey, starting from schooling to postgraduation. The present chapter also attempts to envisage a very tentative idea of certain capabilities of a student that may be considered as fundamental prerequisites for one’s optimal functioning in a formal educational system.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Appadurai, A. (2004). The capacity to aspire: Culture and the terms of recognition. In V. Rao & M. Walton (Eds.), Culture and public action (pp. 59–84). Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Berk, L. E. (2002). Child development. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by design and nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. International Encyclopedia of Education, 3(2), 1643–1647.
Ceci, S. J. (2006). Urie Bronfenbrenner (1917-2005). American Psychologist, 61(2), 173–174.
Gallacher, J., Crossan, B., Field, J., & Merrill, B. (2002). Learning careers and the social space; exploring the fragile identities of adult returners in the new further education. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 21(6), 493–509.
McLaren, L., & Hawe, P. (2005). Ecological perspectives in health research. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59(1), 6–14.
Robeyns, I. (2003). Sen’s capability approach and gender inequality: Selecting relevant capabilities. Feminist Economics, 9(203), 61–91.
Sen, A. (1992). Inequality reexamined. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Tagore, R. (1918). The parrot’s training. Calcutta: Thacker, Spink & Co.
Walker, M. (2006). Towards a capability-based theory of social justice for education policy-making. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 163–185.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lamo, J. (2019). Capabilities of Students. In: Bhushan, S. (eds) The Future of Higher Education in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9061-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-32-9061-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-32-9060-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-32-9061-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)