Skip to main content

Plurality in China’s South–South Cooperation: The Case of Rice Projects in Mali

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

In recent years, particularly since 2000, there has been much discussion regarding the acceleration of China’s presence in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). China’s increasing engagement with the countries of SSA, and larger South–South development partnerships, has had a ripple effect throughout communities of scholars and development practitioners. Surely, China’s role in South–South cooperation will continue to be of great importance throughout the twenty-first century. As the second largest economy in the world, the increasing international influence held by China, and its multifaceted engagement with other developing countries, gives cause to consider China’s role in relation to “traditional” international development actors. However, discussion has often remained in the realm of macroeconomics and state-to-state analysis, with less attention paid to the details of local- and sectoral-level activities. As such, the current analysis of China’s presence in SSA has too often been very broad, with little examination of the complexities and pluralities of this relationship with regard to entrenched international actors and third-party partnerships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This includes the International Financial Institutions (IFIs), particularly the World Bank, which is discussed in this paper. Relatedly, the reference to “Western” actors is a generalization to represent major actors from countries in the OECD, such United States, United Kingdom, France, Netherlands, Japan, Canada, etc., with the inclusion of IFIs.

  2. 2.

    The Bandung conference was a meeting to encourage cooperation between newly decolonized countries in Asia and Africa. It took place in Indonesia in 1955.

  3. 3.

    China’s policy of “non interference” in the domestic affairs of other countries was first introduced at the Bandung conference by Premier Zhou Enlai (周恩来). This policy has endured since then (Large 2010).

  4. 4.

    Kaplinksy and Morris (2009) indicate that FDI figures between China and Africa are truly estimates, as such Gu’s (2009) is one of several.

  5. 5.

    Part of Bräutigam’s (2009) argument is that China’s current aid-for-infrastructure arrangements with SSA states were initially learned through similar arrangements in the 1980 s and 1990 s where Japan secured Chinese resources for Japanese infrastructure investment. Bräutigam also argues, however, that China’s relations with many countries in SSA have been much more longstanding, and even independent, of strict resource interest.

  6. 6.

    Gu (2009) notes that though China’s EXIM bank’s official estimate is 800 Chinese companies operating in Africa in 2006, the unofficial number is likely higher due to companies that are not registered.

  7. 7.

    A particularly valuable resource on this subject taking into account global dynamics is Kaplinsky et al. 2007.

  8. 8.

    This calculation is derived from figures in a 2009 US Agency for International Development report on Mali’s rice sector. In it, the report states that Mali’s total rice production in 2008 was approximately 1 million tons.

  9. 9.

    Note that the Libyan procurement is a self-declared development initiative, and both the BMGF and MCC are development funding organizations.

  10. 10.

    WB voting structure is loosely based on the amount contributed to the bank. As such, over 50 % of voting power remains in the hands of the 34 OECD countries, and China has increased its share from 2.77 to 4.42 % (Xinhua 2010).

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew Gaudreau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gaudreau, M. (2016). Plurality in China’s South–South Cooperation: The Case of Rice Projects in Mali. In: Cao, H., Paltiel, J. (eds) Facing China as a New Global Superpower. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-823-6_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics