Skip to main content

Evaluation of Piping Isometric Drawings Using Six Sigma Process

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

  • 1530 Accesses

Abstract

Six Sigma is a business strategy that helps organizations to improve its organizational efficiency and customer satisfaction; it decreases operating cost and increases profits. Six Sigma is a widely used method to improve processes from various industrial sectors. The target failure rate for Six Sigma projects is 3.4 parts per million. Numerous practitioner studies claim that Six Sigma improves organizational performance. However, its implementation to design process is limited. So, in this study, we have implemented the Six Sigma philosophy in piping design process. Piping isometric drawings, which feature their intrinsically topological relation rather than just geometrical shape, are important industrial artworks in the field of Computer-Aided Design (CAD). This study suggests that the link between Six Sigma and piping design process performance can be explained and developed by integrating organizational knowledge creation processes. We have quantified the performance of a design process in terms of sigma level and tried to find the possible ways to improve it. The method used in this study is based on five main steps summarized in the acronym (DMAIC): Define Measure, Analyze, Improve and Control. Application of the method on the design process during the five phases of the method will help to reduce costs and losses of man-hours to strive for optimum results in terms of profit and quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Narula V, Grover S (2015) Six Sigma: literature review and implications for future research. Int J Ind Eng Prod Res 26(1):13–26

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dowaisana TA, Nourelfathb M, Hassan J (2015) Six Sigma performance for non-normal processes. Eur J Oper Res 24(7):968–977

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ganguly K (2012) Improvement process for rolling mill through the Dmaic Six Sigma approach. Int J Qual Res UDK- 378.014.3(497.11) short scientific paper (1.03)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Subramaniyam P, Srinivasan K, Prabaharan M (2011) An innovative Lean Six Sigma approach for engineering design. Int J Innov Manag Technol 2(2):166–170

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sin AB, Zailani S, Iranmanesh M, Ramayah T (2015) Structural equation modelling on knowledge creation in Six Sigma DMAIC project and its impact on organizational performance. Int J Production Econ 168:105–117

    Google Scholar 

  6. Toussouf A, Rachid C, Ion V (2014) Contribution to the optimization of strategy of maintenance by Lean Six Sigma. Phys Procedia 55:512–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Erdogen A, Canatan H (2015) Literature search consisting of the areas of Six Sigma’s usage. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:695–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nakhai B (2009) The challenges of six sigma in improving service quality.  Int J Qual Reliab Manag 26(7):663–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Erbiyika H, Saru M (2015) Six Sigma implementations in supply chain. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 195:2556–2565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gupta N (2013) An application of DMAIC methodology for increasing the yarn quality in textile industry. IOSR J Mech Civil Eng (IOSR-JMCE) 6(1):50–65. e-ISSN: 2278-1684

    Google Scholar 

  11. Dabhole S, Raje A, Khandave S, Ghule P, Shinde A (2017) Review on implementation of Six Sigma for controlling defects. Int J Res Appl Sci Eng Technol (IJRASET) 5(11):1874–1879

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dambhare S, Aphale S, Kakade K, Thote T, Borade A (2013) Productivity improvement of a special purpose machine using DMAIC principles: a case study. Int J Innov Manag Technol 2(2):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Valles A, Sanchez J, Noriega S, Nuñez BG (2009) Implementation of Six Sigma in a manufacturing process: a case study. Int J Ind Eng 16(3):171–181 

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kabir ME, Boby SMMI, Lutfi M (2013) Productivity improvement by using Six-Sigma. Int J Eng Technol 3(12):1056–1086

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abrar Khulli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Khulli, A., Shirodkar, P., Kottur, V.K.N., Khavekar, R. (2020). Evaluation of Piping Isometric Drawings Using Six Sigma Process. In: Vasudevan, H., Kottur, V., Raina, A. (eds) Proceedings of International Conference on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4485-9_79

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4485-9_79

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4484-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4485-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics