Skip to main content

The Australian Landscape and the Making of Counter-Terrorism Laws

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Committees of Influence
  • 456 Accesses

Abstract

Understanding the institutional context of Australia’s parliamentary committee system is critical when evaluating the impact of this system on the case study Acts and identifying options to improve its rights-enhancing capacity. This chapter introduces the Australian parliamentary committee system, with a focus on the four committees studied and how they fit within the broader parliamentary landscape.

This chapter also provides a broader overview of counter-terrorism law making in Australia since September 2011, sketching some of the domestic and international circumstances in which Australia’s modern counter-terrorism framework was developed and introduced. This chapter lays the foundation for a more detailed exploration of how parliamentary committees interact with the different law-making institutions at the federal level and the role they played in directly and indirectly identifying and addressing rights issues within the case study Acts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For example, in the year 2015, the Senate sat for a total of 60 days and passed 177 separate Acts. In 2010, the Senate sat for only 46 days and passed 150 Acts.

  2. 2.

    Select Committees of the Senate emerged as the first parliamentary committees on the Commonwealth scene, followed by the establishment of two joint committees (Public Accounts and Public Works) in 1913. Subsequently, a third category, Standing Committees, was introduced to provide for committees with more permanent membership and powers. See Reid and Forrest 1989 at pp. 368–70; Odgers 2012 Chap. 16.

  3. 3.

    Each committee was comprised of six Senators: three appointed by government, and the other three by the Leader of the Opposition in the Senate in consultation with independents and minor parties. The legislation committees had government-appointed Chairs with casting votes, assuring a government majority. In contrast, the references committees had non-government Chairs, and thus non-government majorities.

  4. 4.

    In 2017, the SSCSB began publishing its scrutiny comments on recently introduced Bills (including responses received on matters previously considered by the committee) in one report, the Scrutiny Digest. However, the Scrutiny Digest continues to be divided into initial reports on the Bill (previously called ‘Alert Digests’, now called ‘Initial Scrutiny’) and concluding reports on the Bill (previously called ‘Reports’ now called ‘Commentary on Ministerial Responses’).

  5. 5.

    For example, the SSCSB reported that: ‘[f]rom 2001 to 2011 the committee considered a total of 2524 bills and commented on 1144 or 45.3 per cent of these bills. During the same period 574 bills or 22.7 per cent of all bills were amended. Of the amended bills the committee commented on 125 amendments or 21.8 per cent.’ SSCSB 2014at para [2.25].

  6. 6.

    In March 2002, the Parliamentary Joint Committee on the Australian Security and Intelligence Organisation, Australian Secret Intelligence Service and Defence Signals Directorate (the PJC ASIO, ASIS and DSD) was established, replacing the former Parliamentary Joint Committee on ASIO, which was provided for under the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Act 1979.

  7. 7.

    The Australian Intelligence Community is comprised of ASIO, ASIS, Australian Geospatial-Intelligence Organisation (AGO), Defence Intelligence organisation (DIO), Australian Signals Directorate (ASD) and Office of National Assessments (ONA).

  8. 8.

    For example in 2012 there were 3 weeks when the House of Representatives was sitting when the Senate was not and 2 weeks when the Senate was sitting when the House was not (out of a total of 20 sitting weeks).

  9. 9.

    For example, the Crimes (Hostages) Act 1989 (Cth) implemented the International Convention Against the Taking of Hostages, and the Crimes (Internationally Protected Person) Act 1976 (Cth) implemented the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons.

  10. 10.

    These laws included: Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2002 (Cth); Border Security Legislation Amendment Act 2002 (Cth); Criminal Code Amendment (Suppression of Terrorist Bombings) Act 2002 (Cth); Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism Act 2002 (Cth); Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth); Crimes Amendment Act 2002 (Cth); Criminal Code Amendment (Offences Against Australians) Act 2002 (Cth); Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act 2002 (Cth); and Criminal Code Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth). In addition to this package of Bills, a range of other legislative measures were introduced in the first half of 2002 that contributed to the Howard Government’s counter-terrorism policy framework and that were subject to scrutiny by parliamentary committees. These include the Proceeds of Crime Bill 2002 (Cth), the Proceeds of Crime (Consequential Amendments and Transitional Provisions) Bill 2002 (Cth), and the Criminal Code Amendment (Espionage and Related Offences) Bill 2002 (Cth).

  11. 11.

    The package of laws reviewed were: Security Legislation Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2002 (Cth); Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism Act 2002 (Cth); Criminal Code Amendment (Suppression of Terrorist Bombings) Act 2002 (Cth); Border Security Legislation Amendment Act 2002 (Cth); Telecommunications Interception Legislation Amendment Act 2002 (Cth) and the Criminal Code Amendment (Terrorism) Act 2003 (Cth).

  12. 12.

    The election was held on 24 November 2007. Under the leadership of Kevin Rudd, the ALP was returned to office with 83 seats. The Coalition lost control of the Senate, but still held 37 seats – five more than the government. The balance of power in the Senate was shared between Nick Xenophon, Steve Fielding and the five Greens.

  13. 13.

    For example, the Bill pursued the amendments proposed in the discussion paper that related to the treason offences in the Criminal Code; the urging violence offences (previously known as the sedition offences) in the Criminal Code; the ‘dead-time provisions’ in the Crimes Act; the bail provisions in the Crimes Act; the introduction into the Crimes Act of a new emergency warrantless entry and search power; and National Security Information (Criminal Proceedings) Act 2004 (Cth).

  14. 14.

    Kevin Rudd became Prime Minister for the second time when he replaced Julia Gillard on 27 June 2013 but was unable to save the ALP from defeat in the 2013 federal election on 7 September 2013, which saw the Coalition Government elected with a comfortable majority in the House.

References

Cases

Bills

Legislation

International Law Materials

  • United Nations Security Council Resolution 1373 SC Res 1373, UN SCOR, 4385th mtg, UN Doc S/RES/1373 (28 September 2001).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Commission on Human Rights, Message by 17 independent experts of the Commission on Human Rights on the occasion of Human Rights Day, S/RES/1805(2008), UN Doc E/CN.4/2002/137 (20 March 2008).

    Google Scholar 

  • UN Human Rights Committee, Consideration of Reports Submitted by States Parties Under Article 40 of the Covenant Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee: Australia, 95th sess, UN doc CCPR/C/AUS/CO/5 (7 May 2009) [11].

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Security Council Resolution SC Res 2178, UN SCOR, 7272nd mtg, UN Doc S/RES/2178 (24 September 2014). http://www.un.org/en/sc/ctc/docs/2015/SCR%202178_2014_EN.pdf.

Parliamentary Materials

    Standing Orders

    Parliamentary Debates

    Parliamentary Committee Reports

    Books/Articles/ Reports/Speeches

    Websites

    Download references

    Author information

    Authors and Affiliations

    Authors

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    Copyright information

    © 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

    About this chapter

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this chapter

    Moulds, S. (2020). The Australian Landscape and the Making of Counter-Terrorism Laws. In: Committees of Influence. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4350-0_3

    Download citation

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-4350-0_3

    • Published:

    • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

    • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-4349-4

    • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-4350-0

    • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

    Publish with us

    Policies and ethics