Abstract
Most of the existing intuitionistic fuzzy decision-making methods depend on various aggregation operators that provide collective intuitionistic fuzzy values of alternatives to be ranked. Such collective information only depicts the overall characteristics of the alternatives but ignores the detailed contrasts among them. Most important of all, the current decision making procedure is not in accordance with the way that the decision-makers think about the decision making problems. This chapter studies a novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making model in the framework of decision field theory. The decision making model emphasizes the contrasts among alternatives concerning each attribute that competes and influences each other, and thus, the preferences for alternatives can dynamically evolve and provide the final optimal result.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96
Atanassov KT (2012) On intuitionistic fuzzy sets theory. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 283. Springer
Barrenechea E, Fernandez J, Pagola M, Chiclana F, Bustince H (2014) Construction of interval-valued fuzzy preference relations from ignorance functions and fuzzy preference relations application to decision making. Knowl-Based Syst 58:33–44
Berkowitsch NAJ, Scheibehenne B, Rieskamp J (2014) Rigorously testing multialternative decision field theory against random utility models. J Exper Psychol-General 143(3):1331–1348
Busemeyer JR (1985) Decision making under uncertainty: a comparison of simple scalability, fixed-sample, and sequential-sampling models. J Exper Psychol Learn Memory Cogn 11(3):538–564
Busemeyer JR, Diederich A (2002) Survey of decision field theory. Math Soc Sci 43(3):345–370
Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT (1993) Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. Psychol Rev 100(3):432–459
Dymova L, Sevastjanov P (2010) An interpretation of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in terms of evidence theory: Decision making aspect. Knowl-Based Syst 23(8):772–782
Dymova L, Sevastjanov P (2012) The operations on intuitionistic fuzzy values in the framework of Dempster-Shafer theory. Knowl-Based Syst 35:132–143
Hao ZN, Xu ZS, Zhao H, Zhang R (2017) Novel intuitionistic fuzzy decision making models in the framework of decision field theory. Inf Fusion 33:57–70
Hotaling JM, Busemeyer JR, Li JY (2010) Theoretical developments in decision field theory: comment on Tsetsos, Usher, and Chater. Psychol Rev 117(4):1294–1298
Huber J, Puto C (1983) Market boundaries and product choice: Illustrating attraction and substitution effects. J Consum Res 31–44
Roe RM, Busemeyer JR, Townsend JT (2001) Multialternative decision field theory: a dynamic connectionist model of decision making. Psychol Rev 108(2):370–392
Shepard RN (1987) Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science 237(4820):1317–1323
Simonson I (1989) Choice based on reasons: the case of attraction and compromise effects. J Consum Res 158–174
Simonson I, Tversky A (1992) Choice in context: Tradeoff contrast and extremeness aversion. J Market Res 29(3):281
Sjoberg L (1977) Choice frequency and similarity. Scand J Psychol 18(2):103–115
Tversky A (1972) Elimination by aspects—theory of choice. Psychol Rev 79(4):281–299
Tversky A, Simonson I (1993) Context-dependent preferences. Manag Sci 39(10):1179–1189
Unit TEI (2015) Prospects and challenges on China’s “one belt, one road”: a risk assessment report. http://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=OneBeltOneRoad. Accessed 13 Mar 2016
Wedell DH (1991) Distinguishing among models of contextually induced preference reversals. J Exper Psychol Learn Memory Cogn 17(4):767
Xu ZS (2007a) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187
Xu ZS (2007b) Models for multiple attribute decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy information. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowl-Based Syst 15(3):285–297
Xu ZS (2010) Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information. Inf Sci 180(5):726–736
Xu ZS, Cai XQ (2012) Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation. Springer, Berlin
Xu ZS, Xia MM (2011) Induced generalized intuitionistic fuzzy operators. Knowl-Based Syst 24(2):197–209
Xu ZS, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J General Syst 35(4):417–433
Xu ZS, Yager RR (2011) Intuitionistic fuzzy Bonferroni means. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 41(2):568–578
Zhao H, Xu ZS, Ni MF, Liu SS (2010) Generalized aggregation operators for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 25(1):1–30
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hao, Z., Xu, Z., Zhao, H. (2020). Novel Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision Making Models in the Framework of Decision Field Theory. In: Several Intuitionistic Fuzzy Multi-Attribute Decision Making Methods and Their Applications. Uncertainty and Operations Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3891-9_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3891-9_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3890-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3891-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)