Abstract
Digitalization of the heat transfer in shell and tube type heat exchanger is what sets the foundation of the future of thermal industry. In traditional computational model design, a simulation model is validated with the experimental results. A digital twin is a virtual representation of the real system or processes and imbibes the validation of the model. The only difference is that the exchange of information is carried out in real time and is more reliable. A digital twin is not a static representation of the real space but rather a dynamic phenomenon connecting the two spaces. In the present analysis, a comparative finite element analysis of the shell and tube heat exchanger has been performed with an intention to enhance the effectiveness of the heat exchanger process. An approach toward development of the next generation of heat exchangers is discussed in this work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Fesanghary M, Damangir E, Soleimani I (2009) Design optimization of shell and tube heat exchangers using global sensitivity analysis and harmony search algorithm. Appl Therm Eng 29(5–6):1026–1031
Hadidi A, Hadidi M, Nazari A (2013) A new design approach for shell-and-tube heat exchangers using imperialist competitive algorithm (ICA) from economic point of view. Energy Convers Manag 67:66–74
Pandiyarajan V, Chinna Pandian M, Malan E, Velraj R, Seeniraj RV (2011) Experimental investigation on heat recovery from diesel engine exhaust using finned shell and tube heat exchanger and thermal storage system. Appl Energy 88(1):77–87
Xiao J, Wang J, Jian G, Wang S, Wen J (2016) Performance investigation on shell-and-tube heat exchangers with different baffles based on fluid-structure interaction, pp 379–384
Pignotti A, Shah RK (1992) Effectiveness-number of transfer units relationships for heat exchanger complex flow arrangements. Int J Heat Mass Transf 35(5):1275–1291
Hesselgreaves JE (2000) Rationalisation of second law analysis of heat exchangers. Int J Heat Mass Transf 43(22):4189–4204
Saxena P, Papanikolaou M, Pagone E, Salonitis K, Jolly MR (2020) Digital manufacturing for Foundries 4.0. In: Tomsett A (ed) Light Metals 2020. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham
Lyu P (2017) Which porous media and subsurface flow interface should I use? COMSOL Blog
Bejan A (1980) Second law analysis in heat transfer. Energy 5(8–9):720–732
Ogiso K (2003) Duality of heat exchanger performance in balanced counter-flow systems. J Heat Transf 125(3):530–532
Ahsan M (2015) Prediction of gasoline yield in a fluid catalytic cracking (FCC) riser using k-epsilon turbulence and 4-lump kinetic models: a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) approach. J King Saud Univ - Eng Sci 27(2):130–136
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singh, H., Mishra, U., Saxena, P., Shetiya, G., Puri, Y.M. (2021). Digital Twin for Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger in Industry 4.0. In: Kalamkar, V., Monkova, K. (eds) Advances in Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7_76
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7_76
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3638-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3639-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)