Abstract
This paper presents an assessment of the comparison of three-degree-of-freedom 2PRP-PPR planar parallel robotic manipulator (x, y, \(\theta_{z}\) motion stage) with other standard planar parallel manipulators such as 3PPR U-base, 3PPR delta (Δ)-base and 3RRR in respect of static structural stiffness, optimal kinematic design and dynamic performances. Adams/View, a multibody dynamics software, has been utilized to analyze the kinematic and dynamic performance of the motion stage. Analysis of static stiffness has been performed and compared by the joint space Jacobian method along with the matrix structural analysis method. Also, static stiffness was verified through NASTRAN, a standard finite element software. The findings of numerical simulation conclude that the 3PPR U-base configuration and the proposed 2PRP-PPR manipulator possess a number of favorable optimum design characteristics such as good isotropy, better manipulability, better dynamic performances (power, energy), higher stiffness and singularity-free workspace as compared to other manipulators. Note: P and R refer to prismatic and revolute, respectively.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Gosselin C, Angeles J (1988) The optimum kinematic design of a planar three-degree-of-freedom parallel manipulator. ASME J Mech Trans Autom 110:35–41
Alvarado JG, Campos JHT (2019) A parallel manipulator with planar configurable platform and three end-effectors. Math Prob Eng 2019
Bolboli J, Khosravi MA, Abdollahi F (2019) Stiffness feasible workspace of cable-driven parallel robots with application to optimal design of a planar cable robot. Robot Auton Syst 114:19–28
Gosselin C (1990) Stiffness mapping for parallel manipulators. IEEE Trans Robot Autom 6:377–382
Wu J, Wang J, You Z (2011) A comparison study on the dynamics of planar 3-DOF 4-RRR, 3-RRR and 2-RRR parallel manipulators. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 27:150–156
Choi KB (2003) Kinematic analysis and optimal design of 3-PPR planar parallel manipulator. KSME Int J 17:528–537
Vinoth V, Singh Y, Santhakumar M (2014) Indirect disturbance compensation control of a planar parallel (2-PRP and1-PPR) robotic manipulator. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 30:556–564
Acknowledgements
Authors acknowledge TEQIP-III under National Institute of Technology, Silchar, for financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Singh, D., Choudhury, R., Singh, Y. (2021). Kinematic, Dynamic and Stiffness Analysis of an Asymmetric 2PRP-PPR Planar Parallel Manipulator. In: Kalamkar, V., Monkova, K. (eds) Advances in Mechanical Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3639-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-3638-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-3639-7
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)