Skip to main content

Achieving the Resilience of Production Networks During Economic Crisis: The Case of Chinese SMEs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Supply Chain Resilience
  • 1984 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews and analyzes the effects of rising labor costs, CNY appreciation, and the 2008 Global Financial Crisis on the performance of Chinese SMEs. Chinese SMEs have spearheaded the integration of the Chinese economy with the world economy through their involvement and partnership with the Asian regional and global production networks and supply chains. While they have acted as important linkages for the national economy with the world economy, they have also become important conduits of the impact of world events on the national economy. This chapter focuses on the impact of the 2008 Global Financial Crisis against the background of rising labor costs and currency appreciation that had already been exerting great strains on SMEs in China.

This research is conducted as a part of the project ‘Reducing the Vulnerability of Supply Chains and Production Networks’ of the Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia (ERIA). The authors are deeply indebted to Shandre THANGAVEL, Fukunari KIMURA, Venkatachalam ANBUMOZHI and other members of the project team for their invaluable comments and suggestions on earlier drafts, and to ZHU Yongqing and ZHANG Lingyu for research assistance. The opinions expressed in this paper are the sole responsibility of the authors and do not reflect the views of ERIA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Despite the increasing prominence of SMEs and their contribution to development, there is actually no unified definition of SMEs. For example, definitions have varied widely among the East Asian economies by phase of development, prevailing social conditions, and industry. A number of measures have routinely been used to define SMEs and they include the number of employees, volume of invested capital, total amount of assets, sales volume, and some other measure of production capability (Harvie 2004). A more common measure is, however, the number of employees a firm hires. According to ADB (2009, p. 26), a major study on SMEs in the Asia-Pacific region in recent years, “small enterprises are taken to be enterprises with 5–49 workers, medium-sized ones those with 50–199 workers, and large enterprises those with 200 or more workers.” But other studies may well use different measures and definitions.

  2. 2.

    Although the greatest beneficiaries from regional and global production fragmentations and production chains are likely to be the SMEs from developing countries, competing models of global value chain exist that have implications for the related production chains, which in turn have implications for the role of SMEs in these production chains. APEC (2012) identifies three main types of value chain: producer-driven, buyer-driven, and multi-polar. These value chains differ according to the position and the role of the lead firm (the transnational corporation that controls the value chain) vis-à-vis those of the other players in the chain. It is, however, not possible to go into detail here over these competing models and their implications for the role and opportunity offered to a developing country SME.

  3. 3.

    Note, however, that different definitions of SMEs may have been used in different countries for the collection of the statistics. Nevertheless, the comparison should be of value. For details on this see ADB (2015).

  4. 4.

    Certainly, in terms of value of participation in global supply chains presented in Fig. 10.5, China contrasts very sharply indeed with India.

  5. 5.

    By China’s official classifications, medium-sized firms are those (1) hiring between 300–2000 workers (inclusive); (2) having annual sales between CNY 30–300 million (inclusive); (3) with fixed assets between CNY 40–400 million (inclusive). Firms which surpass all of these three criteria are large-sized firms. Firms which fall below any one of these criteria are small-sized firms. Some revisions to this classification system were made in 2011, but do not appear to be followed in subsequent statistical reporting.

  6. 6.

    In China’s classification, foreign funded enterprises include equity joint ventures, cooperative joint ventures and wholly foreign funded enterprises. Variable fe measures the sum total of trade by all these enterprises.

  7. 7.

    Note that fcrisis = 1 for 2008 and all post-2008 years, and fcrisis = 0 for all pre-2008 years. Similarly, yr2011 = 1 for 2011 and all subsequent years, and yr2011 = 0 for all pre-2011 years.

  8. 8.

    Adequate institutional infrastructures for effective participation of SMEs in global chains are of course also important, but in the case of China they are, in general, not province-specific. Other measures of the degree of physical connectedness are also possible but they are unlikely to have mattered to SMEs as critically as highway density.

References

  • ADB (2009) Enterprises in Asia: fostering dynamism in SMEs. Special chapter in key indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2009. Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  • ADB (2015) Integrating SMEs into global value chains: challenges and policy actions in Asia. Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines

    Google Scholar 

  • APEC (2012) Concepts and trends in global supply, global value and global production chains. Issue paper no. 1. APEC Policy Support Unit

    Google Scholar 

  • APEC (2013) SMEs’ participation in global production chains. Issues paper no. 3. APEC Policy Support Unit

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen MA, Huchzermeier A (1999) Global supply chain network management under price/exchange rate risk and demand uncertainty. In: Muffato M, Paswar KS (eds) Logistics in the information age, pp 219–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse JF (2006) Globalization and the evolution of the supply chain: Who gains and who loses? Int Econ Rev 47(3):811–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvie C (2004) East Asian SME capacity building, competitiveness and market opportunities in a global economy. Faculty of business economics working paper 04–16. University of Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvie C (2010) East Asian production networks—the role and contribution of SMEs. Int J Bus Dev Stud 2(1):27–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvie C, Narjoko D, Oum S (2010) Firm characteristic determinants of SME participation in production networks. ERIA discussion paper series 2010–11. Economic Research Institute for ASEAN and East Asia, Jakarta

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones R, Kierzkowski H (1999) The role of services in production and international trade: a theoretical framework. Am J Roentgenol 165(6):1485–1486

    Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner U, Maklan S (2011) Supply chain resilience in the global financial crisis: an empirical study. Supply Chain Manage 16(4):246–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman R, William Powers (2010) Give credit where credit is due: tracing value added in global production chains. NBER working paper series. Cambridge MA, Sept 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes JR, Ghosh S (2010) Outsourcing congruence with competitive priorities: impact on supply chain and firm performance. J Oper Manage 28(2):124–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim H, Kimura F (2009) The internationalization of small and medium enterprises in regional and global value chains. Idb Publ 113(3):273–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Zugang, Nagurney A (2011) Supply chain outsourcing under exchange rate risk and competition. Omega 39(5):539–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013) Interconnected economies: benefiting from global value chains. Synthesis report. OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Peck H (2005) Drivers of supply chain vulnerability: an integrated framework. Int J Phys Distrib Logistics Manage 35(4):210–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheffi Y (2001) supply chain management under the threat of international terrorism. Int J Logistics Manage 12(2):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sodhi M, Mohan S, Chopra S (2004) Managing risk to avoid supply-chain breakdown. Mit Sloan Manage Rev 46(1):53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Standard Chartered Global Research (2015) Global supply chains: new directions. Standard Chartered Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Thun JH, Hoenig D (2011) An empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in the German automotive industry. Int J Prod Econ 131(1):242–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thun J, Drüke M, Hoenig D (2011) Managing uncertainty—an empirical analysis of supply chain risk management in small and medium-sized enterprises. Int J Prod Res 49(18):5511–5525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (2001) Integrating SMEs in global value chains

    Google Scholar 

  • US Small Business Administration (2011) Summary of size standards by industry. http://www.sba.gov/contractingopportunities/officials/size/SUMM_SIZE_STANDARDS_INDUSTRY.html. Accessed 31 July 2009

  • Vachon S, Mao Z (2008) Linking supply chain strength to sustainable development: a country-level analysis. J Clean Prod 16(15):1552–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SM, Bode C (2008) An empirical examination of supply chain performance along several dimensions of risk. J Bus Logistics 29(1):307–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner SM, Neshat N (2010) Assessing the vulnerability of supply chains using graph theory. Int J Prod Econ 126(11):121–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong C (2011) The fiscal stimulus program and problems of macroeconomic management in China. Working party of senior budget officials. Public Governance Committee, Public Governance and Territorial Development Directorate, OECD

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Yeniyurt S, Kim D, Cavusgil ST (2006) The impact of information technology on supply chain capabilities and firm performance: a resource-based view. Ind Mark Manage 35(4):493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Shi M, Li N, Yuan Y (2011) Effects of Chinese economic stimulus package on economic growth in the post-crisis China. Econ Res Int 2011: 492325

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang J, Vandenberg P, Huang Y (2012) Growing beyond the low-cost advantage: how the People’s Republic of China can avoid the middle-income trap. Asian Development Bank

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Minquan Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, M., Tai, H. (2020). Achieving the Resilience of Production Networks During Economic Crisis: The Case of Chinese SMEs. In: Anbumozhi, V., Kimura, F., Thangavelu, S. (eds) Supply Chain Resilience. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2870-5_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics