Skip to main content

Novel Dexterity Kit Concept Based on a Review of Hand Dexterity Literature

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

Dexterity is commonly defined by the quality of fine, voluntary movements used to manipulate objects during a specific task involving the movement of wrist, hands, arm, and fingers. Dexterity assessment kits are used to determine a person’s skilled task abilities through performance parameters such as speed, accuracy, and precision. This study proposes that one parameter that is as critical as the traditionally measured parameters is finger strength which could be measured as the amount of force or effort that a human hand exerts during object manipulation through fingers. In this paper, a detailed literature review was conducted of the traditional dexterity assessment methods and their kits used in the past. Thereafter, a novel dexterity kit has been proposed which incorporates measurement of finger strength data in addition to the traditional dexterity parameters during hand dexterity assessment. An experiment suggested that a significantly greater finger force is required for peg manipulation in the new test kit than in the traditional one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Backman C, Gibson SCD, Parsons J (1992) Assessment of hand function: the relationship between pegboard dexterity and applied dexterity. Can J Occup Ther 59(4):208–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams ME, Hadler NM, Earp JAL (1982) Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. J Chronic Dis 35(2):115–122

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gallus J, Mathiowetz Vl (2003) Test–retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard for persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occupational Ther 57(1):108–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Merker B, Podell K (2011) Grooved pegboard test. In: Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. Springer, New York, pp 1176–1178

    Google Scholar 

  5. Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Hébert R, Bravo G (1997) The Minnesota manual dexterity test: reliability, validity and reference values studies with healthy elderly people. Can J Occupational Ther 64(5):270–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aaron DH, Jansen CWS (2003) Development of the Functional Dexterity Test (FDT): construction, validity, reliability, and normative data. J Hand Ther 16(1):12–21

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K (1985) Adult norms for the box and block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occupational Ther 39(6):386–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Berger MA, Krul AJ, Daanen HA (2009) Task specificity of finger dexterity tests. Appl Ergon 40(1):145–147

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shimoyama I, Ninchoji T, Uemura K (1990) The finger-tapping test: a quantitative analysis. Arch Neurol 47(6):681–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Moberg E (1958) Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand. J bone Joint Surg. Br Volume 40(3):454–476

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jebsen RH, Taylor NEAL, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA (1969) An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabilitation 50(6):311–319

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tiffin J (1968) Purdue Pegboard examiner manual. Science Research Associates Inc., Chicago, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fleishman EA (1953) Testing for psychomotor abilities by means of apparatus tests. Psychol Bull 50(4):241

    Google Scholar 

  14. Duff SV, Aaron DH, Gogola GR, Valero-Cuevas FJ (2015) Innovative evaluation of dexterity in pediatrics. J Hand Ther 28(2):144–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lee-Valkov PM, Aaron DH, Eladoumikdachi F, Thornby J, Netscher DT (2003) Measuring normal hand dexterity values in normal 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children and their relationship with grip and pinch strength. J Hand Ther 16(1):22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Manual, SolidWorks–Users (2009) Dassault Systems Solid Works Corporation. SolidWorks Corp,Concord

    Google Scholar 

  17. Sharp ED (1962) Maximum torque exertable on knobs of various sizes and rim surfaces. No. MRL-TDR-62-17. Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Lab Wright-Patterson AFB OH

    Google Scholar 

  18. Amis AA (1987) Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters. J Biomed Eng 9(4):313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kong Y-K, Lowe BD (2005) Optimal cylindrical handle diameter for grip force tasks. Int J Ind Ergon 35(6):495–507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bell A, Walton K, Yoxall A (2017) Measure for measure: pack performance versus human dexterity and grip strength. Packag Technol Sci 30(4):117–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G (2016) Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 5(1):24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gaurav Saraf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saraf, G., Bisht, D.S. (2020). Novel Dexterity Kit Concept Based on a Review of Hand Dexterity Literature. In: Deepak, B., Parhi, D., Jena, P. (eds) Innovative Product Design and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2696-1_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2696-1_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2695-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2696-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics