Abstract
Dexterity is commonly defined by the quality of fine, voluntary movements used to manipulate objects during a specific task involving the movement of wrist, hands, arm, and fingers. Dexterity assessment kits are used to determine a person’s skilled task abilities through performance parameters such as speed, accuracy, and precision. This study proposes that one parameter that is as critical as the traditionally measured parameters is finger strength which could be measured as the amount of force or effort that a human hand exerts during object manipulation through fingers. In this paper, a detailed literature review was conducted of the traditional dexterity assessment methods and their kits used in the past. Thereafter, a novel dexterity kit has been proposed which incorporates measurement of finger strength data in addition to the traditional dexterity parameters during hand dexterity assessment. An experiment suggested that a significantly greater finger force is required for peg manipulation in the new test kit than in the traditional one.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Backman C, Gibson SCD, Parsons J (1992) Assessment of hand function: the relationship between pegboard dexterity and applied dexterity. Can J Occup Ther 59(4):208–213
Williams ME, Hadler NM, Earp JAL (1982) Manual ability as a marker of dependency in geriatric women. J Chronic Dis 35(2):115–122
Gallus J, Mathiowetz Vl (2003) Test–retest reliability of the Purdue Pegboard for persons with multiple sclerosis. Am J Occupational Ther 57(1):108–111
Merker B, Podell K (2011) Grooved pegboard test. In: Encyclopedia of clinical neuropsychology. Springer, New York, pp 1176–1178
Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Hébert R, Bravo G (1997) The Minnesota manual dexterity test: reliability, validity and reference values studies with healthy elderly people. Can J Occupational Ther 64(5):270–276
Aaron DH, Jansen CWS (2003) Development of the Functional Dexterity Test (FDT): construction, validity, reliability, and normative data. J Hand Ther 16(1):12–21
Mathiowetz V, Volland G, Kashman N, Weber K (1985) Adult norms for the box and block Test of manual dexterity. Am J Occupational Ther 39(6):386–391
Berger MA, Krul AJ, Daanen HA (2009) Task specificity of finger dexterity tests. Appl Ergon 40(1):145–147
Shimoyama I, Ninchoji T, Uemura K (1990) The finger-tapping test: a quantitative analysis. Arch Neurol 47(6):681–684
Moberg E (1958) Objective methods for determining the functional value of sensibility in the hand. J bone Joint Surg. Br Volume 40(3):454–476
Jebsen RH, Taylor NEAL, Trieschmann RB, Trotter MJ, Howard LA (1969) An objective and standardized test of hand function. Arch Phys Med Rehabilitation 50(6):311–319
Tiffin J (1968) Purdue Pegboard examiner manual. Science Research Associates Inc., Chicago, Illinois
Fleishman EA (1953) Testing for psychomotor abilities by means of apparatus tests. Psychol Bull 50(4):241
Duff SV, Aaron DH, Gogola GR, Valero-Cuevas FJ (2015) Innovative evaluation of dexterity in pediatrics. J Hand Ther 28(2):144–150
Lee-Valkov PM, Aaron DH, Eladoumikdachi F, Thornby J, Netscher DT (2003) Measuring normal hand dexterity values in normal 3-, 4-, and 5-year-old children and their relationship with grip and pinch strength. J Hand Ther 16(1):22–28
Manual, SolidWorks–Users (2009) Dassault Systems Solid Works Corporation. SolidWorks Corp,Concord
Sharp ED (1962) Maximum torque exertable on knobs of various sizes and rim surfaces. No. MRL-TDR-62-17. Air Force Aerospace Medical Research Lab Wright-Patterson AFB OH
Amis AA (1987) Variation of finger forces in maximal isometric grasp tests on a range of cylinder diameters. J Biomed Eng 9(4):313–320
Kong Y-K, Lowe BD (2005) Optimal cylindrical handle diameter for grip force tasks. Int J Ind Ergon 35(6):495–507
Bell A, Walton K, Yoxall A (2017) Measure for measure: pack performance versus human dexterity and grip strength. Packag Technol Sci 30(4):117–126
Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Kashman N, Volland G (2016) Adult norms for the Nine Hole Peg Test of finger dexterity. Occup Ther J Res 5(1):24–38
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Saraf, G., Bisht, D.S. (2020). Novel Dexterity Kit Concept Based on a Review of Hand Dexterity Literature. In: Deepak, B., Parhi, D., Jena, P. (eds) Innovative Product Design and Intelligent Manufacturing Systems. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2696-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2696-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2695-4
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2696-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)