Skip to main content

Origins of the Divine Bureaucracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Divine Bureaucracy and Disenchantment of Social Life

Part of the book series: Contestations in Contemporary Southeast Asia ((CCSA))

  • 316 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter traces the origins of Islam’s bureaucratisation in contemporary Malaysia to the legacy and intentions of British colonial rule. In the first decade after decolonisation, the administration of Islamic law and affairs maintained a secularising framework, and power was limited to the confines of traditional authority consisting of decentralised negeri-based rulings and that of religious elites. Two decades after independence, a Muslim public sphere—often associated with the Muslim resurgent movement—was considerably enlarged, enabling contestations over Islam by agents outside the circle of traditional authority. Fearing fragmentation of the Malay vote bloc due to emergent Muslim contestations, Malay ruling elites of the day redressed Muslim grievances and competition through policies of accommodation, neutralisation and co optation. This included the ironic adoption of the very goals propounded by the mobilisers who themselves had initially been impeded by the state. Such a structural reconstitution of Islam could only be effected through a Divine bureaucratic pathway over Islamic matters as its distinctive character.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Malay word adat means customs or traditions. The word used in the legal sense is also a noun, as there are bodies of traditional laws referred to by colonial scholars as Adat Temenggong or Adat Pepateh.

  2. 2.

    In Arabic, the word dakwah or da’wah literally means the call or invitation. Although it is also meant to denote the act of proselytisation and conversion of non-Muslims into Islam, it has been largely used in the Malay-Indonesian world to mean the reinforcement and expansion of Islamic faith and practice among Muslims themselves (Meuleman 2011, 236). In Malaysia, it is about the ‘return’ to Islam and adoption of Islam as a complete way of life (Ungku Maimunah 1989, 288).

  3. 3.

    This book has been popularly reprinted in Malay. See, for example, the blog, “Karya Ulama: Beberapa catatan untuk diri dan berkongsi bersama”, http://abusyahmin.blogspot.com, accessed: 21 January 2019. This blog has an extensive compilation and explanation of many Arabic texts used by ulama (religious scholars) in the Malay World.

  4. 4.

    British Malaya consisted of three administrative governance units: the Straits Settlements (Penang , Melaka and Singapore, territorial entities without traditional Malay rulers), the Federated Malay States (Perak, Selangor, Negeri Sembilan and Pahang) and the Unfederated Malay States (Kelantan, Terengganu , Kedah, Perlis and Johor). One of the key differences between British rule in the Federated and Unfederated Malay States was that the former had a more active presence of the British Resident in the governance of these States (negeri ), as opposed to the British Adviser in the latter.

  5. 5.

    Following from this colonial nomenclature, statutory provisions passed by State Legislative Assemblies (subnational Parliaments) in postcolonial Malaysia are known as ‘Enactments’ while Federal laws are termed ‘Acts’.

  6. 6.

    Contents of these treaties noted that Islam and Malay customs were to be the only purview of the Malay rulers (Braddell 1931). In the Memorandum between Raffles and the Sultan of Johore, in 1823, it is stated:

    In all cases regarding the ceremonies of religion, and marriages, and the rules of inheritance, the laws and customs of the Malays will be respected, where they shall not be contrary to reason, justice or humanity. In all other cases the laws of the British authority will be enforced with due consideration to the usages and habits of the people.

    In the Pangkor Treaty of 1874, the following was noted:

    That the Sultan [shall] receive and provide a suitable residence for a British Officer to be called a Resident, who shall be accredited to this Court, and whose advice must be asked and acted upon on all questions other than those touching Malay Religion and Custom.

  7. 7.

    See details and commentaries of such cases in Taylor (1937, 15–69).

  8. 8.

    Malaya was the name used to refer to territorial entities under British colonial administration, which included the negeri of the Malay Peninsula as well as the Straits Settlements of Penang, Malacca and Singapore. The term ‘Malaysia’ was only adopted after the formation of the post-independence federation in 1963. Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak became part of the Federation of Malaysia. In 1965, Singapore left this federation.

  9. 9.

    In precolonial Malay society, faith and practice were syncretic in nature; neither Islam nor magic was a “state religion”, as noted by Gullick (1965, 141).

  10. 10.

    The Administration Enactment, No. 4 of 196, and The Rules for Members of the Council of the Islamic Religion and Malay Custom, Kelantan, Enactment No. 14 of 1916 (Abdullah Alwi 1996, xxxv).

  11. 11.

    For example, the Muhammadan Marriage and Divorce Enactment 1911, Administration of Muslim Law Enactment 1952, Islamic Family Law Act 1984 and Syariah Criminal Offences Enactment 2001.

  12. 12.

    See endnote 2 in Chap. 1.

  13. 13.

    Habermas was referring to the European society of the early twentieth century, “The bourgeois public sphere may be conceived above all as the sphere of private people [coming] together as a public; they soon claimed the public sphere regulated from above against the public authorities themselves” (quoted in Bernstein 2012, 767).

  14. 14.

    “[I]n the Sixties, I continued my studies at the University of Iskandariah, also in Egypt… During that time, most of the local radio stations used to play (propaganda) songs in praise of the leadership of Jamal Abdul Nasir. Majority of the Malaysian students who returned from Egypt were influenced by Nasir’s Arab socialism. Only a few remained loyal to Islam. It was here where I met some brothers from Ikhwan al-Muslimin (Muslim Brotherhood) such as Sa’id Ramadhan (son-in-law of Imam Hasan al-Banna), al-Tilmisani, Zainul Abidin, Dr. Shara Basi and a few others whose name I could not remember” (Mohd Dahlan 1996, 20).

  15. 15.

    The original reads, “Kita Yakin Mujaddid itu/Adalah Imamul Mahdi/Pembela yang benar/Pembenteras yang salah/Di waktu itu yang benar pasti menang/Yang salah pasti kalah” (Ashaari 1988b).

  16. 16.

    The group had a special magazine on women and for women, Almukminah: Penyuluh peranan wanita Islam sebenar. In one issue titled “Syurga – Tempat orang yang sanggup berkorban”, Ashaari Muhammad answers hypothetical questions coming from a woman unhappy with her polygamous husband. It goes, “The question is, Ustaz, since getting married, my husband has not given me enough attention. His love and inclination towards his new wife is overwhelming till I feel disgraced and useless altogether”. To which Ustaz Ashaari replies, “A good Muslim wife must be willing to sacrifice herself and her own rights to her husband. She is able to smile to her husband as much as it is bitter”. The question and answer format goes on for two pages, with no fault attributed to the husband (Khadijah 1988, 8–9).

  17. 17.

    The other contending Malay-Muslim party is the Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party or Pas. Although Pas is a visible and forceful competitor to Umno, its base is predominantly in the Malay-majority state of Kelantan. In terms of electoral seats it commands, this is also of no match to that of Umno’s. See Saravanamuttu (2016, 280–285)

  18. 18.

    In Malay: “Meletakkan plaster di tapak tangan sambal menadahnya dan membaca Fatihah sebanyak sepuluh kali; Diikuti dengan ucapan selawat ke atas Nabi sebanyak sepuluh kali; Kedua-dua tapak tangan, seperti dalam keadaan berdoa, di mana disapukan dari muka ke atas rambut dan turun menyaluti seluruh badan dan berakhir di tengah pusat; Seterusnya plaster berlidi pun ditampal di pusat serentak dengan melafazkan “Nawaitul Jiha Fi Sabillillah”…“Sebuah kolah air juga telah dijampi untuk diminum. Menurut Ustaz Ibrahim tangkal dan air jampi itu akan mengelakkan dari bahaya, jadi kebal” (Malaysia 1986, 16–17).

References

  • Abdul Rahman, Tunku Putra Al-Haj (1984) Malaysia: The road to independence, Petaling Jaya: Pelanduk Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Abdullah Alwi, Haji Hassan (1996) The Administration of Islamic law in Kelantan, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad Fauzi, Abdul Hamid (1999) “New trends of Islamic resurgence in contemporary Malaysia: Sufi-revivalism, messianism, and economic activism”, Studia Islamika: Indonesian Journal for Islamic Studies, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2013) “The Aurad Muhammadiah Congregation: Modern transnational Sufism in Southeast Asia”, in Hui Yew-Foong (ed), Encountering Islam: The politics of religious identities in Southeast Asia, Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad Ibrahim (1965) Islamic Law in Malaya, Singapore: Malaysian Sociological Research Institute Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anuar Tahir (1996) “Menjalin Hubungan Antara Bangsa: Sebuah catatan pengalaman” in Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia, 1971–1996, Selangor: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia, pp. 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariffin, Omar (1993) Bangsa Melayu: Malay concepts of democracy and community, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashaari, Muhammad (1988a) “Asy Syeikh Muhammad bin Abdullah As Suhaimi masih hidup”, Al Munir: Penunjuk jalan taqwa, No. 8, August, 18–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1988b) “Imamul Mahdi”, Al Munir: Penunjuk jalan taqwa, No. 9, September, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berita Harian (1981) “Bank Islam Malaysia”, 5 May, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Richard J (2012) “The Normative Core of the Public Sphere”, Political Theory, Vol. 40, No. 6, 767–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsuk, Richard (1978) “Green and White in the Village of the Faithful: Inside Malaysia’s ‘dakwah’ movement”, The Straits Times, 10 October, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braddell, Roland (1931) The Law of the Straits Settlements: A commentary, Second Edition, Singapore: Kelly and Walsh, Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss-Tjen, PP (1958) “Malay Law”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 7, No. 2, Spring.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, Muzaffar (1987) Islamic Resurgence in Malaysia, Petaling Jaya: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheah, Boon Kheng (2002) Malaysia: The making of a nation, Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2006) To’ Janggut: Legends, histories, and perceptions of the 1915 rebellion in Kelantan, Singapore: Singapore University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chernov-Hwang, Julie (2009) Peaceful Islamist Mobilization in the Muslim World: What went right, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Josselin de Jong, P (1960) Islam Versus Adat In Negri Sembilan (Malaya), Bijdragen Tot De Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde, Vol. 116, No. 1, 158–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faaland, Just, JR Parkinson and Rais Saniman (1990) Growth and Ethnic Inequality in Malaysia’s Economic Policy, London: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faruqi, Shad Saleem (2016) “Shariah Laws, Civil Laws and the Federal Constitution”, in G25 Malaysia, Breaking the Silence: Voices of moderation, Islam in a constitutional democracy, Singapore: Marshall Cavendish, 55–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • FMS Government Gazette (1920a), “The Muhammadan Laws Enactment, 1904”, CO 574/25.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1920b) “Federated Malay States, State of Pahang (1920) Enactment No. 1 of 1920, An Enactment to provide for the Registration of Marriages and Divorces of Muhammadans, Pahang 1920”, CO 574/25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullick, JM (1965) Indigenous Political Systems of Western Malaya, New York; The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1981) “Law and Adat Perpateh: A Problem from Jelebu”, Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 54, No. 1, 7–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jurgen (1991) The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society, translated by Thomas Burger with the assistance of Frederick Lawrence, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, TN (1998) The End of Empire and the Making of Malaya, New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, MB (1969) “The Relationship between Adat and State Constitutions of Negri Sembilan”, Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 42, No. 2, 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1971) “Law, Religion, and Bureaucracy in a Malay State: A study in conflicting power centers”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 19, No. 2, 264–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1976) Adat Laws in Modern Malaya: Land tenure, traditional government and religion, Kuala Lumpur: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horowitz, Donald L (1994) “The Qur’an and the Common Law: Islamic law reform and the theory of legal change”, The American Journal of Comparative Law, Vol. 42, No. 2, 233–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hussein, S Ahmad (1988) “Islam and Politics in Malaysia, 1969–1982: The dynamics of competing traditions”, PhD thesis submitted to Yale University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Idrus, Jamhari (1988) “Pembentukkan Zaman Ummah Kedua: Siapa di belakang Imamul Mahdi?”, Al Munir: Penunjuk Jalan Taqwa, No. 9, September, 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ismail, Kassim (1978) “Dakwah Dilemma”, New Nation, 24 October, 10–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johore Government Gazette (1914), ‘Enactment No. 15 of 1914: An Enactment to provide for the registration of Marriages and Divorce of Muhammadans’, CO 653/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, Clive (1980) “Malaysia: Islamic revivalism and political disaffection in a divided society”, Southeast Asia Chronicle, Vol. 75, 3–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadijah, Aam (1988) “Syurga – Tempat orang yang sanggup berkorban”, Almukminah: Penyuluh Wanita Islam Sebenar, May, 8–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khasnor, Johan (1984) The Emergence of the Modern Malay Administrative Elite, New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Raymond LM and Susan E Ackerman (1997) Sacred Tensions: Modernity and religious transformations in Malaysia, Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liow, Joseph Chinyong (2004) “Political Islam in Malaysia: Problematising discourse and practice in the UMNO-PAS ‘Islamisation race’”, Commonwealth & Comparative Politics, Vol. 42, No.2, 184–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2009) Piety and Politics: Islamism in contemporary Malaysia, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Malaya (1944) Malayan Basic Handbook: Malaya and its civil administration prior to Japanese Occupation, Malaya: The War Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malaysia (1986) Kertas Perintah 21, Tahun 1986: Peristiwa Memali (White Paper No 21, 1986: Memali Incident), Kuala Lumpur: Ministry of Home Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maznah, Mohamad (2016a) “The Customary Tenure Enactment and Matrilineal Land Rights in Negeri Sembilan”, Journal of the Malaysian Branch Royal Asiatic Society (JMBRAS), Vol. 89, Part 1, June, 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2016b) “Policing and Protecting Women: Some aspects of Malay-Islamic law-making under British colonialism”, Kajian Malaysia, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2016, 59–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Md Taha, Suhaimi (n.d.) “Jawapan Bagi Tuduhan Terhadap Sejarah Hidup Syeikh Muhammad As-Suhami dan Aurad Muhammadiah”, https://auradmuhammadiah.wordpress.com/manaqib-sheikh-suhaimi-2/, accessed 31 January 2019.

  • Meuleman, Johan (2011) “Dakwah, Competition for Authority and Development”, Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, Vol. 167, No. 2–3, 236–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamad, Abu Bakar (1991) “External influences on contemporary Islamic resurgence in Malaysia”, Contemporary Southeast Asia, Vol. 13, No. 2, 220–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohd Dahlan, Arshad (1996) “Langkah Awalku” in ABIM, Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia, 1971–1996, Selangor: Angkatan Belia Islam Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moustafa, Tamir (2018) Constituting Religion: Islam, liberal rights, and the Malaysian state, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nagata, Judith (1984) The Reflowering of Malaysian Islam: Modern religious radicals and their roots, Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negeri Sembilan Government Gazette (1900) Federated Malay States, Negeri of Negri Sembilan ‘An Enactment to Provide for the Registration of Marriages and Divorces of Muhammadans’, CO 463/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norshahril, Saat (2018) The State, Ulama and Islam in Malaysia and Indonesia, Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurfazilah, Yahaya (2015) “Craving Bureaucracy: Marriage, Islamic law, and the Arab Petitioners in the Straits Settlements”, The Muslim World, Vol. 105, 496–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, Kathleen Malone (2001) “Popular and Talismanic Uses of the Qurʾān”, in Jane Dammen McAuliffe (ed), Encyclopaedia of the Qurʾān, Georgetown University, Washington DC: Brill Reference Online.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perak Government Gazette (1889), ‘Order of Council No. 12 of 1889, Mohamedan Divorce’, CO467/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1890), ‘Order in Council No. 11 of 1890: Constitution and powers of criminal and civil courts’, CO467/1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roff, William R (1967) The Origins of Malay Nationalism, Kuala Lumpur: University of Malaya Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachedina, Abdulaziz (2012) “Mahdi”, in Mark Juergensmeyer and Wade Clark Roof (eds), Encyclopedia of Global Religion, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saravanamuttu, Johan (2016) Power Sharing in a Divided Nation: Mediated communalism and new politics in six decades of Malaysia’s elections. Singapore: ISEAS Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sharifah Zaleha, Syed Hassan (1985) “From Saints to Bureaucrats: A study of the development of Islam in the State of Kedah, Malaysia”, PhD thesis submitted to Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simatupang AH (1988) “Siapa Syeikh Muhammad As Suhaimi?”, Al Munir: Penunjuk Jalan Taqwa, No. 8, August, 16–17, 24–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Free Press and Mercantile Advertiser (1891) “Mohammedan Law in the Straits”, 16 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singapore Herald (1971) “Tunku for Jeddah”, 8 January, 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, EN (1937) “Malay Family Law”, Journal of the Malayan Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, Vol. 15, No. 1, viii-ix, 1–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Straits Times (1935) “Naib Kathis: Need for a Malayan college”, 10 May, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1980) “Saudi Gift”, 24 March, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1988) “Sabah Police Shoot Dead Eight Men Armed with Parangs”, 24 May, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ungku Maimunah, Mohd Tahir (1989) “The notion of ‘Dakwah’ and Its Perceptions in Malaysia’s Islamic Literature of the 1970s and 80s”, Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2, 288–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yegar, Moshe (1979) Islam and Islamic Institutions in British Malaya: Policies and implementation, Jerusalem: The Magnes Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zainah, Anwar (1987) Islamic Revivalism in Malaysia: Dakwah among the students, Petaling Jaya, Selangor: Pelanduk Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maznah Mohamad .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mohamad, M. (2020). Origins of the Divine Bureaucracy. In: The Divine Bureaucracy and Disenchantment of Social Life. Contestations in Contemporary Southeast Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2093-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics