Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Regulatory Model for Digital Rights Management pp 131–149Cite as

Digital Rights Management Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 295 Accesses

Abstract

Computers, internet and digital communication technologies have surrounded our daily life globally. The development of digital technologies, especially networks, facilitates knowledge spreading. The communication of information has broken through the national boundary, which seems a limitation in physical circumstance. On the contrary, excessively restriction may result in the public’s privacy or other issues. Digital technologies improved people’s life greatly, which initiates an innovated business model for copyright protection. iTunes Music Store model has been deemed as one of the classic case on digital rights management in digital copyright times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Farrand [1], pp. 508–513.

  2. 2.

    Yang [2].

  3. 3.

    Gasser [3].

  4. 4.

    Sharpe and Arewa [4], p. 331.

  5. 5.

    Rayna [5].

  6. 6.

    Klebanow and Wu [6].

  7. 7.

    Ibid.

  8. 8.

    Solo [7], p. 169.

  9. 9.

    Ibid 407.

  10. 10.

    Heald [8].

  11. 11.

    Ibid 407.

  12. 12.

    Rowe [9].

  13. 13.

    Ibid.

  14. 14.

    The Recorded Music Industry and the Emergence of Online Music Distribution: Innovation in the Absence of Copyright (Reform) George Washington Law Review, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property & Competition Law Research Paper No.11-09.Vol.79, Issue 6, pp. 1783–1813 (2011).

  15. 15.

    Ibid.

  16. 16.

    Ibid.

  17. 17.

    Laurence Frost [10].

  18. 18.

    Fisher [11].

  19. 19.

    http://freemusicarchive.org/member/chriszabriskie/blog/Why_I_Went_CC_BY, Access date: 14/09/2015.

  20. 20.

    Ze Mer [12].

  21. 21.

    Ibid 407.

  22. 22.

    Larkey [13].

  23. 23.

    Campbell [14], p. 1.

  24. 24.

    Ibid.

  25. 25.

    Lehdonvirta [15].

  26. 26.

    Hovenkamp [16].

  27. 27.

    Desai [17].

  28. 28.

    Ibid.

  29. 29.

    http://blog.foxitsoftware.com/the-basics-of-pdf-security/, access date: 14/09/2015.

  30. 30.

    Andrei Dumitrescu, ‘Nintendo, Blizzard and Ubisoft Are the Best Videogame Developers’, https://twitter.com/intent/follow?screen_name=softpediagames, access date: 14/09/2015.

  31. 31.

    Ibid.

  32. 32.

    Ibid.

  33. 33.

    http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-08/01/ubisoft, access date: 14/09/2015.

  34. 34.

    Ibid.

  35. 35.

    “Dear Ubisoft and Blizzard: Please stop this madness”, http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2011-08/01/ubisoft, access date: 14/09/2015.

  36. 36.

    Ibid.

  37. 37.

    “Blizzard ‘Surprised’ By Fans Outrage Over Diablo 3 Online Requirement”, http://megagames.com/news/blizzard-%E2%80%98surprised%E2%80%99-fans-outrage-over-diablo-3-online-requirement. August 7, 2011.

  38. 38.

    Hilbert Hagedoorn, “Blizzard: DRM a ‘losing battle’”, http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/blizzard-drm-a-losing-battle.html. 05/28/2010.

  39. 39.

    http://www.nlc.gov.cn/dsb_footer/gygt/ghgy/. Access date: 14/09/2015.

  40. 40.

    Ibid.

  41. 41.

    http://news.xinhuanet.com/it/2002-05/27/content_411044.htm.

  42. 42.

    http://www.nlc.gov.cn/index_old.htm, access date: 14/09/2015.

  43. 43.

    http://www.cdlc.cn/, access date: 14/09/2015.

  44. 44.

    http://www.yuan0.cn/Article/462698.html, access date: 14/09/2015.

  45. 45.

    http://lib.jlau.edu.cn/wxcd.htm, access date: 14/09/2015.

  46. 46.

    Ibid.

  47. 47.

    Ibid.

  48. 48.

    http://www.huawei.com/cn/, access date: 14/09/2015.

  49. 49.

    http://www.yhwit.com/list.asp?ProdId=0171, access date: 14/09/2015.

  50. 50.

    http://www.enet.com.cn/article/2010/1105/A20101105771379_2.shtml, access date: 14/09/2015.

  51. 51.

    Ibid.

  52. 52.

    ‘Digital Rights Management Approved Version 1.0–15, Open Mobile Alliance OMA-Download-DRM-V1_0-20040615-A’, http://technical.openmobilealliance.org/Technical/release_program/docs/DRM/V1_0-20040625-A/OMA-Download-DRM-V1_0-20040615-A.pdf, June 2004.

  53. 53.

    Deng et al. [18].

  54. 54.

    http://3gca.org/newsletter-june-2013/, access date: 14/09/2015.

  55. 55.

    http://www.well.com/user/lonewolf/main/vera.html, access date: 14/09/2015.

  56. 56.

    Russell Shaw, ‘Will OMA DRM 2.0 be the solution?’, OMA digital rights management, http://www.zdnet.com/article/will-oma-drm-2-0-be-the-solution/, IP Telephony, February 16, 2007access date: 14/09/2015.

  57. 57.

    ‘The Future Of Music Copyright In A Digital World’, http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/mar99/articles/copyright.htm, access date: 14/09/2015.

  58. 58.

    Ibid.

  59. 59.

    ‘OMA’s Race to Construct in China’, http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/stories/2006-11-09/omas-race-to-construct-in-chinabusinessweek-business-news-stock-market-and-financial-advice/, access date: 14/09/2015.

  60. 60.

    http://www.educity.cn/tx/928884.html, access date: 14/09/2015.

  61. 61.

    http://gw.apabi.com/partners/press/.

  62. 62.

    http://www.enet.com.cn/article/2004/0907/A20040907341363.shtml.

References

  1. Farrand B (2009) The case that never was: an analysis of the Apple iTunes case presented by the Commission and potential future issues. Eur Intellect Prop Rev 31(10):508–513

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang C-T, Chen C-J, Chen H-Y, Hsu C-H (2008) A Peer-to-Peer file resource sharing system for mobile devices. In: Conference: Grid and Pervasive Computing Workshops, 2008

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gasser U (2004) iTunes: how copyright, contract, and technology shape the business of digital media-a case study. Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School Research Publication No. 2004-07

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sharpe NF, Arewa O (2007) Is apple playing fair? Navigating the iPod FairPlay DRM Controversy. Northw J Technol Intellect Prop 5:331 (Northwestern Public Law Research Paper No. 07-18)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rayna T (2009) The economics of digital goods: selling vs. renting music online. DIME Intellectual Property Rights Working Paper No. 13

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klebanow A, Wu T (2015) Is music the next eBooks? An antitrust analysis of Apple’s conduct in the music industry. Columb J Law Arts, July 14 2015

    Google Scholar 

  7. Solo A (2014) The role of copyright in an age of online music distribution. Media Arts Law Rev 19:169

    Google Scholar 

  8. Heald PJ (2014) The demand for out-of-print works and their (un) availability in alternative markets. Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 14-31

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rowe EA (2009) Foreword, technology and intellectual property: new rules for an old game? J Technol Law Policy, vol 14. http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/66. Accessed 14 Sept 2015

  10. Frost L (2006) French draft law threatens iPod’s future. Associated Press. http://msl1.mit.edu/furdlog/docs/2006-03-17_apwire_french_interop.pdf

  11. Fisher WW III (2004) Promises to keep: technology, law, and the future of entertainment. Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ze Mer L (2006) Rethinking copyright alternatives. International Journal of Law and Information Technology. Springer

    Google Scholar 

  13. Larkey M (2015) Cooperative play: anticipating the problem of copyright infringement in the new business of live video game webcasts. Rutgers J Law Public Policy 13:52–109

    Google Scholar 

  14. Campbell T (2015) The E-Books conspiracy: crossing the line between applying and creating law. Univ Miami Law Rev Caveat 69:1, Chapman University, Fowler Law Research Paper No. 15-13

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lehdonvirta V (2012) A history of the digitalization of consumer culture: from Amazon through Pirate Bay to Farmville. In: Denegri-Knott J, Molesworth M (eds) Digital virtual consumption. Routledge, New York, pp 11–28

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hovenkamp HJ (2014) Antitrust and information technologies. In: Florida law review, Forthcoming. U Iowa Legal Studies Research Paper No.15-05

    Google Scholar 

  17. Desai DR (2014) The new steam: on digitization, decentralization, and disruption. Hast Law J 65(6):1469–1482

    Google Scholar 

  18. Deng M, Fritsch L, Kursawe K, Arenberg K (2006) Personal rights management: taming cameraphones for individual privacy management. In: Danezis G, Golle P (eds) Privacy Enhancing Technologies-Proceedings of the 6th workshop on privacy enhancing technologies PET2006, 29 June 2006

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Law School, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China

    Cong Xu

Authors
  1. Cong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Xu, C. (2020). Digital Rights Management Practices. In: Regulatory Model for Digital Rights Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1995-6_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1995-6_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1994-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1995-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation