Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Regulatory Model for Digital Rights Management pp 53–89Cite as

Digital Rights Management Dilemma: Theoretical Context

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 272 Accesses

Abstract

Since the emergence of human beings, it is proved that their life has been changed gently from every single aspect. Humans’ wisdom witnesses the rapid development of the whole society that provides a platform for people’s evergreen concern about the relationship between their intellectual output and economic income. The increasingly growing focus upon the private property interest first appeared with its original intention of safeguarding feudal hierarchy. At the beginning of intellectual property system development, the nobles spared no efforts to strive for their private benefit in all fields, especially in culture and knowledge area, which is accepted by the general public to be the origin of intellectual property regime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Williams [1]. Patent, Trade-mark, and Copyright Foundation of the George Washington University, and also see Proceedings of the annual public conference of the George Washington University. Vols. 1–7. 1958.

  2. 2.

    Yu [2].

  3. 3.

    Geller [3], p. 211. Original resource comes from Havelock [4], pp. 93–94.

  4. 4.

    Ibid, p. 211.

  5. 5.

    David Rooney, etc., Hearn et al. [5].

  6. 6.

    c.19, Anne Act. The original title of this statute, known as “An Act for the Encouragement of Learning, by Vesting the Copies of Printed Books in the Authors or Purchasers of such Copies, during the Times therein mentioned”.

  7. 7.

    Geller [3], p. 256.

  8. 8.

    Ibid; Also see Justine Pila, “Pluralism, Principles and Proportionality in Intellectual Property”, Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, p. 4. http://ojls.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2013/10/21/ojls.gqt029.full, access date: 31/12/2013. (Original quoted from Archives Parlementaires de 1787 à 1860, Receuil complet des débats législatifs et politiques des Chambres françaises (vol xxii, Paris 1887) 210.

  9. 9.

    Ibid 130, p. 257.

  10. 10.

    Ibid 130, p. 257.

  11. 11.

    Vanderburg [6], p. 414.

  12. 12.

    Ibid 130, p. 412.

  13. 13.

    Ibid 130, p. 412.

  14. 14.

    Quintanilla [7], pp. 65–71.

  15. 15.

    Dusek [8], p. 50.

  16. 16.

    Bates and Liu [9], pp. 7–26.

  17. 17.

    Potter [10].

  18. 18.

    Redfield et al. [11].

  19. 19.

    Cabassa [12].

  20. 20.

    Padilla and Perez [13].

  21. 21.

    Ibid.

  22. 22.

    Nikolic [14].

  23. 23.

    Maskus [15].

  24. 24.

    Proceedings of the annual public conference of the George Washington University, 1958.

  25. 25.

    Ibid 128.

  26. 26.

    Ibid 143.

  27. 27.

    Ibid 162.

  28. 28.

    Zheng [16].

  29. 29.

    Zhiping [17].

  30. 30.

    Spence [18].

  31. 31.

    Marquette University Law School Legal Studies Research Paper Series, Research Paper No.09-03. “What Plagiarism Was Not: Some Preliminary Observations On Classical Chinese Attitudes Toward What The West Calls Intellectual Property”, Marquette Law Review. 2009.

  32. 32.

    Ibid 150.

  33. 33.

    Li [19].

  34. 34.

    Handong [20].

  35. 35.

    Ibid 154.

  36. 36.

    Ibid 154.

  37. 37.

    Handong [21], p. 64.

  38. 38.

    Ibid.

  39. 39.

    Ibid.

  40. 40.

    Paris Convention for the Protection of Industry Property (1883); Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works (1886).

  41. 41.

    Montesquieu, The Spirit of the Laws. Cambridge University Press, 1989. Cover [22].

  42. 42.

    Cover [22]. Also see Zhu [23].

  43. 43.

    Ibid 182.

  44. 44.

    Ibid 182.

  45. 45.

    Ibid 182.

  46. 46.

    Ibid 173.

  47. 47.

    Ibid 173.

  48. 48.

    Ibid 178.

  49. 49.

    Ibid 178.

  50. 50.

    Ibid 125.

  51. 51.

    Geller [3], p. 233. Original resource see William Briggs, “The Law of international Copyright” 40–41, 1906.

  52. 52.

    Ibid 128. pp. 58–59.

  53. 53.

    Ibid 128, p. 233.

  54. 54.

    Allison and Lin [24].

  55. 55.

    Woodard [25], p. 388, original resource from William Fielding Ogburn, “Social Change”, p. 201.1922.

  56. 56.

    Ibid.

  57. 57.

    “The role played by material inventions, that is, by technology, in social change probably received most emphasis in the work of William F. Ogburn. It was Ogburn, also, who was chiefly responsible for the idea that the rate of invention within society is a function of the size of the existing culture base. He saw the rate of material invention as increasing with the passage of time. Ogburn believed that material and non-material cultures change in different ways. Change in material culture is believed to have a marked directional or progressive character......culture lag is defined as the time between the appearance of a new material invention and the making of appropriate adjustments in corresponding area of non-material culture.”, http://www.sociologyguide.com/basic-concepts/Cultural-Lag.php, access date: 14/09/2015.

  58. 58.

    Brinkman and Brinkman [26], pp. 609–627.

  59. 59.

    Ibid.

  60. 60.

    Ibid.

  61. 61.

    Ibid.

  62. 62.

    Ibid 203.

  63. 63.

    Ibid 203.

  64. 64.

    Ibid 203.

  65. 65.

    Sahay [27].

  66. 66.

    Sansone et al. [28], p. 119. Lewin’s Equation (1939).

  67. 67.

    Karen L. Williams Middleton, “Developing Entrepreneurial Behavior, Facilitating Nascent Entrepreneurship at the University”, p. 23. http://vcplist.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/Doctoral-Thesis-Developing-Entrepreneurial-Behavior_Karen-Williams-Middleton.pdf.

  68. 68.

    Bandura [29].

  69. 69.

    Bandara [30], pp. 344–358.

  70. 70.

    Bandara [31], pp. 122–147.

  71. 71.

    “Reciprocal Determinism”, available at: http://www.integratedsociopsychology.net/reciprocal_determinism.html.

  72. 72.

    Ibid.

  73. 73.

    Ibid.

  74. 74.

    Magnani and Montagnani [32].

  75. 75.

    Eric Brousseau and Nicolas Curien, ‘Internet and Digital Economics: Principles, Methods and Applications’, June 2007.

  76. 76.

    Ibid 221.

  77. 77.

    Solove [33].

  78. 78.

    Weiser [34], p. 534.

  79. 79.

    Ibid 87.

  80. 80.

    Bill Cope and Robin Freeman, ‘Digital Rights Management and Content Development: Technology Drivers across the Book Production Supply Chain, from Creator to Consumer’, Oct 2001.

  81. 81.

    John S. Erickson, Ph.D., Hewlett-Packard Laboratories; D-Lib Magazine February 2002; Volume 8 Number 2 “Digital Rights Management: Business and Technology” http://webdoc.sub.gwdg.de/edoc/aw/d-lib/dlib/february02/02bookreview.html;20/07/2018.

  82. 82.

    Ibid.

  83. 83.

    Eckersley [35], p. 85.

  84. 84.

    John Logie, ‘Peers, Pirates, and Persuasion Rhetoric in the Peer-to-Peer Debates’, available at: http://ebooksgo.org/engineering-technology/PeersPirates.pdf, Access date: 14th/08/2010, Parlor Press, West Lafayette, Indiana.

  85. 85.

    Ibid 28.

  86. 86.

    Drahos [36], p. 4.

  87. 87.

    Melendez-Ortiz and Roffe [37].

  88. 88.

    Samuelson [38], p. 519.

  89. 89.

    “Why DRM is Great”, http://www.info-mech.com/drm_is_great.html, access date: 26th/01/2014.

  90. 90.

    Magnani and Montagnani [32], p. 83.

  91. 91.

    Weiser [34], p. 534.

  92. 92.

    Ibid 49.

  93. 93.

    Tang [39].

  94. 94.

    Ibid.

  95. 95.

    Ibid.

  96. 96.

    Ibid.

  97. 97.

    Ibid.

  98. 98.

    http://www.masternewmedia.org/online-content-distribution-guide-to-the-best-content-syndication-services/, access date: 14th/08/2015.

  99. 99.

    Favale [40].

  100. 100.

    Tran [41].

  101. 101.

    Ibid.

  102. 102.

    Ibid.

  103. 103.

    Ibid.

  104. 104.

    Cahir [42].

  105. 105.

    Ibid.

  106. 106.

    Solum [43], p. 1137.

  107. 107.

    Mazziotti [44], p. 4.

  108. 108.

    Ibid.

  109. 109.

    Ibid.

  110. 110.

    Reducing Digital Copyright Infringement Without Restricting Innovation, Stanford Law Review, Vol. 56, p. 1345, UC Berkeley Public Law Research Paper No. 525662, University of Texas Law, Public Law Research Paper No. 63, University of Texas Law and Economic Research Paper No. 025. (2004).

  111. 111.

    Ibid.

  112. 112.

    Ibid.

  113. 113.

    Liu et al. [45], pp. 49–58.

  114. 114.

    Ibid.

  115. 115.

    Manon Ress, ‘DRM and developing countries’, CPTech, Washington DC, USA on: 29/04/05 available at: http://www.indicare.org/tiki-read_article.php?articleId=97, access date: 15/08/2016.

  116. 116.

    Gordon, Wendy J.; Bahls, Daniel, ‘Public’s Right to Fair Use: Amending Section 107 to Avoid the Fared Use Fallacy’, 2007 Utah Law Review 619, 2007, available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/utahlr2007&div=26&id=&page=, access date: 14/08/2014.

  117. 117.

    Ibid.

  118. 118.

    François Bar, Hernan Galperin, ‘Geeks, Cowboys, and Bureaucrats: Deploying Broadband, the Wireless Way’. The Southern African Journal of Information and Communication, Issue No. 6. available at: http://www.sajic.org.za/index.php/SAJIC/article/viewArticle/155, access date: 08th/08/2013.

  119. 119.

    Vathitphund [46], pp. 9–10.

  120. 120.

    Ibid 16.

  121. 121.

    Paul Ganley, ‘Access to the Individual: Digital Rights Management Systems and the Intersection of Informational and Decisional Privacy Interests’, available at: http://ijlit.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/10/3/241, access date: 15/08/2010.

  122. 122.

    Melendez-Ortiz and Roffe [37].

  123. 123.

    Ibid.

  124. 124.

    Franklin and Morris [47], p. 1213.

  125. 125.

    O’Connor [48], pp. 973–1000, George Mason Center for the Protection of Intellectual Property’s Conference, Common Ground: How Intellectual Property Unites Creators and Innovators, October 2014., University of Washington School of Law Research Paper No. 2015-28.

  126. 126.

    Ibid.

  127. 127.

    Ibid 151.

  128. 128.

    Ibid 173.

  129. 129.

    Guillermo et al. [49].

  130. 130.

    CheunNgen et al. [50].

  131. 131.

    Wei et al. [51].

  132. 132.

    Piero and Daniel [52].

  133. 133.

    Guo and Zhang [53], pp. 3029–3090.

  134. 134.

    Xu and Brussel [54], p. 115.

  135. 135.

    Daniel Freund, Andreas F Raab, Tobias Küster, Sahin Albayrak, and Kai Strunz, ‘Agent-based Integration of an Electric Car Sharing Fleet into a Smart Distribution Feeder’,3rd IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT Europe), Jan, 2012.

  136. 136.

    Tanenbaum [55].

  137. 137.

    Bin et al. [56].

  138. 138.

    Ibid.

  139. 139.

    Jiang et al. [57].

  140. 140.

    Ibid.

  141. 141.

    Ibid.

  142. 142.

    Roberte and Rosa [58].

  143. 143.

    Ibid.

  144. 144.

    Stamp [59].

  145. 145.

    Ibid.

References

  1. Williams R (1985) Keywords: a vocabulary of culture and society. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yu PK (2012) The Confucian challenge to intellectual property reforms. WIPO J. Drake University Law School Research Paper No. 12-37

    Google Scholar 

  3. Geller PE (2000) Copyright history and the future: what’s culture got to do with it? J Copyr Soc USA 47:211

    Google Scholar 

  4. Havelock EA (1963) Preface to plato. Blackwell, pp 93–94

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hearn G, Mandeville T, Joseph R (2003) Public policy in knowledge-based economies: foundations and frameworks - new horizons in public policy series. New horizons in public policy Series. Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vanderburg WH (1985) Technology, society, and culture, a framework for understanding. Technol Soc 7:414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Quintanilla MA (2000) Tolerance and technological culture. Philosophica 66(2):65–71

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dusek V (1993) Philosophy of technology: an introduction. Paragon House, New York, p 50

    Google Scholar 

  9. Bates BJ, Liu T (2010) A cultural approach to DRM implementation in China. Westminst Pap Commun Cult 7(1):7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Potter PB (2005) The Chinese legal system globalization and local legal culture. Taylor and Francis e-Library

    Google Scholar 

  11. Redfield R, Linton R, Herskovits MJ (1936) Memorandum for the study of acculturation, American anthropology, 1921–1945: Papers from the American Anthropologist. University of Wisconsin Press

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cabassa LJ (2003) Measuring acculturation: where we are and where we need to go. Hispanic J Behav Sci 25(2):127–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Padilla AM, Perez W (2003) Acculturation, social identity, and social cognition: a new perspective. Hispanic J Behav Sci 25(1):35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nikolic D (2011) Legal culture and legal transplant, Serbian Report. Isaidat Law Rev 1(1)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maskus KE (2000) Intellectual property rights in the global economy. The Peterson Institute for International Economics

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zheng C (2004) Intellectual property law: a number of research focal points at the beginning of the new century. China Law Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhiping L (1999) The past, current and future of Chinese law. China University of Political Science and Law Press, Beijing

    Google Scholar 

  18. Spence M (2007) Intellectual property. Clarendon Law Series, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li L (2010) How has Chinese traditional culture an impact on China’s intellectual property legal system? Would this influence be a problem in the protection of folklore by the intellectual property legal system?. Int J Interdiscip Soc Sci 5:15

    Google Scholar 

  20. Handong W (2007) A cultural explanation of composition and transfer of IP law. China Legal Sci, 6

    Google Scholar 

  21. Handong W (2005) Essential issues research on intellectual property. Renmin University Press, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cover RM (1993) Narrative, violence, and the law: the essays of Robert cover. University of Michigan Press

    Google Scholar 

  23. Zhu N (2005) A case of legal transplant: the possibility of efficient breach in China. Georgetown J Int Law 36:1145

    Google Scholar 

  24. Allison JR, Lin L (1999) The evolution of Chinese attitudes toward property rights invention and discovery. Univ Pa J Int Econ Law 20

    Google Scholar 

  25. Woodard JW (1934) Critical notes on the culture lag concept. Soc Force 12(3):388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Brinkman RL, Brinkman JE (1997) Cultural lag: conception and theory. Int J Soc Econ 24(6):609–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Sahay (1997, Summer) Cybermaterialism’ and the invention of the cyber-cultural everyday. New Literary Hist 28(3)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sansone C, Morf CC, Panter AT (2004) The Sage handbook of methods in social psychology. Sage Publications Inc, p 119

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bandura A (1977) Social learning theory. General Learning Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bandara A (1978) The self-system in reciprocal determinism. Am Psychol 33:344–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Bandara A (1982) Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. Am Psychol 37:122–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Magnani P, Montagnani ML (2008) Digital rights management systems and competition: what developments within the much debated interface between intellectual property and competition law? Int Rev Intell Prop Compet Law 39:83

    Google Scholar 

  33. Solove DJ (2004) Digital person: technology and privacy in the information age. Law, Technology and Society, Ex Machina

    Google Scholar 

  34. Weiser PJ (2003) Internet, innovation, and intellectual property policy. Column Law Rev 103:534. Available at: http://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?collection=journals&handle=hein.journals/clr103&div=25&id=&page=. Accessed 14 Aug 2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Eckersley P (2004) Virtual markets for virtual goods: the mirror image of digital copyright? Harv J Law Tech 18:85

    Google Scholar 

  36. Drahos P (1996) A philosophy of intellectual property. Dartmouth Publishing Company, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  37. Melendez-Ortiz R, Roffe P (2009) Intellectual property and sustainable development: development Agendas in a changing world (Elgar Intellectual Property and Global Development). In: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd

    Google Scholar 

  38. Samuelson P (1999) Intellectual property and the digital economy: why the anti-circumvention regulations need to be revised. Berkeley Technol Law J 14:519

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tang M (2008) Application of digital right management in music area. University of Electronic Science and Technology of China. http://www.cnki.net/

  40. Favale M (2014) Death and resurrection of copyright between law and technology. Inf Commun Technol Law 23(2):32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Tran JL (2016) A primer on digital rights management technologies. In: Chapter 3 in digital rights managements: a librarian’s guide, August 17, 2015. Scarecrow Press

    Google Scholar 

  42. Cahir J (2007) The structure of control communication system and copyright law. In: Westkamp G (ed) Emerging issues in intellectual property trade, technology, and market freedom: essays in honor of Herchel Smith. Queen Mary Intellectual Property Research Institute, Centre for Commercial Law Studies, University of London

    Google Scholar 

  43. Solum LB (2005) The future of copyright. Tex Law Rev 83:1137

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mazziotti G (2008) EU digital copyright law and the end-user. Springer, Berlin, p 4

    Google Scholar 

  45. Liu Q, Safavi-Naini R, Sheppard NP (2003) Digital rights management for content distribution. In: Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series; Vol. 34, Adelaide, Australia, pp 49–58

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vathitphund T (2010) Access to knowledge difficulties in developing countries: a balanced access to copyrighted works in the digital environment. Int Rev Law Comput Technol 24(1):9–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Franklin JA, Morris RJ (2002) Symposium on constructing international intellectual property law: the role of national courts: international jurisdiction and enforcement of judgments in the era of global networks: irrelevance of, goals for, and comments on the current proposals. Chicago-Kent Law Rev, 1213

    Google Scholar 

  48. O’Connor SM (2015) Creators, innovators, and appropriation mechanisms. George Mason Law Rev 22(4):973–1000

    Google Scholar 

  49. Guillermo N, Babak F, Rissanen S (2003) Constrained delegation in XML-based access control and digital rights management standards. In: Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Communication, Network, and Information Security, New York, NY, United States. International Association of Science and Technology for Development

    Google Scholar 

  50. CheunNgen C, Ricardo C, Jeroen D (2006) LicenseScript: a logical language for digital rights management. Annales des Telecommun 61(3):284–331

    Google Scholar 

  51. Wei X, Jinpeng H, Yunhao L (2005) Access control policy negotiation for remote hot-deployed grid services. In: The First International Conference on e-Science and Grid Computing, Melbourne, Australia. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society

    Google Scholar 

  52. Piero B, Daniel O (2007) Rule-based policy representation and reasoning for the semantic web. In: Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Dresden, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  53. Guo Q, Zhang M (2009) A novel approach for multi-agent-based intelligent manufacturing system. Inf Sci 179:3029–3090

    Google Scholar 

  54. Xu H, Brussel HV (1997) A behaviour-based blackboard architecture for reactive and efficient task execution of an autonomous robot. Robot Autonom Syst 22(2):115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Tanenbaum AS (1996) Computer networks, 3nd edn. Prentice-Hall

    Google Scholar 

  56. Bin Z, Min F, Shipeng L (2005) Secure key management for flexible digital rights management of scalable codestreams. In: IEEE 7th Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Computer Society, Shanghai, China

    Google Scholar 

  57. Jiang Z, Bin L, ShiQiang Y (2005) FLMP: a flexible license management protocol for digital rights management. In: Proceedings of SPIE - The International Society for Optical Engineering. International Society for Optical Engineering, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  58. Roberte G, Rosa G (2006) An OWL copyright ontology for semantic digital rights management. In: Lecture notes in bioinformatics. Springer, Montpellier, France

    Google Scholar 

  59. Stamp M (2003) Digital rights management: the technology behind the hype. J Electronic Commerce Res 4(3). http://www.csulb.edu/web/journals/jecr/issues/20033/paper3.pdf. Accessed 14 Aug 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Law School, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China

    Cong Xu

Authors
  1. Cong Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Xu, C. (2020). Digital Rights Management Dilemma: Theoretical Context. In: Regulatory Model for Digital Rights Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1995-6_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1995-6_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1994-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1995-6

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation