Skip to main content

Managing Planting Time for Cotton Production

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Cotton Production and Uses

Abstract

Since cotton is responsive to its surrounding environments, an appropriate planting time is very important to realize its optimum yield potential. The temperature is an important environmental factor for which planting time varies across the world. It may be from few days to weeks, called as planting window. It must be optimized according to yield target, forthcoming weed, pest, disease, and abiotic stress problems. The planting time is considered optimum if it permits the completion of the crop vegetative and reproductive growth stages in an efficient way. There is an optimum planting time and further delay drastically reduced seed cotton yield. It determines the duration of various phenological stages such as appearance of first square, flower, and boll split on 50% population and total crop duration. Generally, early planting results in higher yield by extending growth period, and late planting reduces yield because of shortened season. The planting time has a major role for fiber and seed quality optimization to ensure good-quality yarn and better seed germination. The planting time is strictly monitored and legally implemented in certain regions of the world to prevent disease and pests. The climate change is threatening cotton production throughout the world, and adjustment of planting dates may play an effective role as an adaptation strategy to match fruiting phase to favorable climate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

BB:

Bacterial blight

CCRI:

Central Cotton Research Institute

CIM:

Cotton Institute Multan

CLCuD:

Cotton leaf curl virus disease

ENSO:

El Niño-Southern Oscillation

NIAB:

Nuclear Institute for Agriculture and Biology

RLS:

Ramularia leaf spot

References

  • Abbas Q, Ahmad S (2018) Effect of different sowing times and cultivars on cotton fiber quality under stable cotton-wheat cropping system in southern Punjab, Pakistan. Pak J Life SocSci 16:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Abbas Q, Abbas G, Fatima Z, Rehman AU, Naz S, Younis H, Khan RJ, Nasim W, Rehman MHU, Ahmad A, Rasul G, Khan MA, Hasanuzzaman M (2017) Quantification of climate warming and crop management impacts on cotton phenology. Plan Theory 6:1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Iqbal M, Muhammad T, Mehmood A, Ahmad S, Hasanuzzaman M (2018) Cotton productivity enhanced through transplanting and early sowing. Acta Sci Biol Sci 40:e34610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Raza I (2014) Optimization of management practices to improve cotton fiber quality under irrigated arid environment. J Food Agri Environ 2(2):609–613

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad S, Raza I, Ali H, Shahzad AN, Atiq-ur-Rehman, Sarwar N (2014) Response of cotton crop to exogenous application of glycinebetaine under sufficient and scarce water conditions. Braz J Bot 37(4):407–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Abid SA, Ahmad S, Sarwar N, Arooj M, Mahmood A, Shahzad AN (2013a) Integrated weed management in cotton cultivated in the alternate-furrow planting system. J Food Agri Environ 11(3&4):1664–1669

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Abid SA, Ahmad S, Sarwar N, Arooj M, Mahmood A, Shahzad AN (2013b) Impact of integrated weed management on flat-sown cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). J Anim Plant Sci 23(4):1185–1192

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Afzal MN, Ahmad F, Ahmad S, Akhtar M, Atif R (2011) Effect of sowing dates, plant spacing and nitrogen application on growth and productivity on cotton crop. Int J Sci Eng Res 2(9):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Afzal MN, Ahmad S, Muhammad D (2009) Effect of cultivars and sowing dates on yield and quality of Gossypium hirsutum L. crop. J Food Agric Environ 7(3&4):244–247

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Hameed RA, Ahmad S, Shahzad AN, Sarwar N (2014a) Efficacy of different techniques of nitrogen application on American cotton under semi-arid conditions. J Food Agri Environ 12(1):157–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali H, Hussain GS, Hussain S, Shahzad AN, Ahmad S, Javeed HMR, Sarwar N (2014b) Early sowing reduces cotton leaf curl virus occurrence and improves cotton productivity. Cer Agron Moldova XLVII(4):71–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen SJ (2005) Delayed planting as a control strategy for Fusarium Wilt of cotton in Australia. In: Proc Beltwide Cotton Conf. New Orleans, LA, 4–7 January 2005, vol 1. National Cotton Council Beltwide Cotton Conference, Memphis, TN, pp 131–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Nasim W, Mubeen M, Ahmad A, Nadeem M, Urich P, Fahad S, Ahmad S, Wajid A, Tabassum F, Hammad HM, Sultana SR, Anwar S, Baloch SK, Wahid A, Wilkerson CJ, Hoogenboom G (2018) Simulated CSM-CROPGRO-cotton yield under projected future climate by SimCLIM for southern Punjab, Pakistan. Agric Syst 167:213–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amin A, Nasim W, Mubeen M, Nadeem M, Ali L, Hammad HM, Sultana SR, Jabran K, Habib urRehman M, Ahmad S, Awais M, Rasool A, Fahad S, Saud S, Shah AN, Ihsan Z, Ali S, Bajwa AA, Hakeem KR, Ameen A, Amanullah, Rehman HU, Alghabar F, Jatoi GH, Akram M, Khan A, Islam F, Ata-Ul-Karim ST, Rehmani MIA, Hussain S, Razaq M, Fathi A (2017) Optimizing the phosphorus use in cotton by using CSM-CROPGRO-cotton model for semi-arid climate of Vehari-Punjab, Pakistan. Environ Sci Pollut Res 24(6):5811–5823

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anapalli SS, Pettigrew WT, Reddy KN, Ma L, Fisher DK, Sui R (2016) Climate-optimized planting windows for cotton in the lower Mississippi Delta region. Agronomy 6:46. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy6040046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arshad M, Wajid A, Maqsood M, Hussain K, Aslam M, Ibrahim M (2007) Response of growth, and quality of different cotton cultivars to sowing dates. Pak J Agric 44(2):208–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascari JP, De Araújo DV, Dias LDE, Bagatini GJ, Mendes IRN (2016) Severity of Ramularia leaf spot and seed cotton yield in different sowing times. Rev Caatinga Mossoró 29(3):603–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awan H, Awan I, Mansoor M, Khan EA, Khan MA (2011) Effect of sowing time and plant spacing on fiber quality and seed cotton yield. Sarhad J Agric 27(3):411–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Cotton Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CRI) (2013) Cultivation of cotton in China. Shanghai Science and Technology Press, Shanghai, China. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • da Silva JC, Heldwein A, Martins FB, Streck NA, Guse FI (2007) Risco de stressetérmico para o feijoeiroem Santa Maria RS. Ciência Rural. Santa Maria 37(3):643–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dai J, Dong H (2014) Intensive cotton farming technologies in China: achievements, challenges and countermeasures. Field Crop Res 155:99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallikeri SS, Halemani HL, Patil VC, Palled YB, Patil BC, Katageri IS (2009) Influence of sowing time and moisture regimes on growth, seed cotton yield and fibre quality of Bt-cotton. Karnataka J Agric Sci 22(5):985–991

    Google Scholar 

  • Hariharasudhan V, Chinnusamy C, Prabhakaran NK (2017) Optimum time of sowing and weed management methods on weeds interference and productivity and profitability of Bt cotton hybrid in western zone of Tamil Nadu. Int J Chem Stud 5(3):793–796

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J (2016) Different sowing dates affected cotton yield and yield components. Int J Plant Prod 10(1):63–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal M, Khan MA (2010) Management of cotton leaf curl virus by planting time and plant spacing. Adv Agri Botanics 2(1):25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Iqbal M, Ul-Allah S, Naeem M, Hussain M, Ijaz M, Wasaya A, Ahmad MQ (2018) Reproductive development and seed cotton yield of Gossypium hirsutum L. affected by genotype and planting time. Int J AgricBiol 20(7):1590–1596

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamran M, Afzal I, Basra SMA, Khan SHU, Mahmood A (2017) Improvement of cotton crop performance by estimating optimum sowing and picking time. Int J Agric Biol 19:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan MB, Khaliq A, Ahmad S (2004) Performance of mashbean intercropped in cotton planted in different planting patterns. J Res (Sci) 15(2):191–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Killi F, Bolek Y (2014) Timing of planting is crucial for cotton yield. Acta Agr Scand B-S P 56(2):155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Ma Y, Lv F, Chen J, Zhou Z, Wang Y, Abudurezike A, Oosterhuis DM (2013) Changes of sucrose metabolism in leaf subtending to cotton boll under cool temperature due to late planting. Field Crops Res 144:200–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo Q, Bange M, Braunack M, Johnston D (2016) Effectiveness of agronomic practices in dealing with climate change impacts in the Australian cotton industry—a simulation study. Agric Syst 147:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmood T, Arshad M, Gill MI, Mahmood HT, Tahir M, Hussain S (2003) Burewala strain of cotton leaf curl virus: a threat to CLCuV cotton resistance varieties. Asian J Plant Sci 2:968–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed KA, Yagoub SO, Elsalam AEKA, Abuali AI (2016) Response of sowing dates, cultivars and nitrogen application on growth, yield and oil contents of cotton crop (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth at Nuba Mountain. Scholar J Agric Vet Sci 3(5):351–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed OE, Ahmed NE, Eneji AE, Ma YQ, Ali E, Inanaga S, Sugimoto Y (2003) Effect of sowing dates on the incidence of bacterial blight and yield of cotton. Basic Appl Ecol 4:433–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Berry NB, Faircloth JC, Edmisten KL, Collins GD, Stewart AM, Abaye AO, Herbert DA Jr, Haygood RA Jr (2008) Plant population and planting date effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) growth and yield. J Cotton Sci 12:178–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Paz JO, Woli P, Garcia y Garcia A, Hoogenboom G (2012) Cotton yields as influenced by ENSO at different planting dates and spatial aggregation levels. Agric Syst 111:45–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT, Adamczyk JJ Jr (2006) Nitrogen fertility and planting date effects on lint yield and cry1ac (Bt) endotoxin production. Agron J 98:691–697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT, Dowd MK (2011) Varying planting dates or irrigation regimes alters cotton seed composition. Crop Sci 51:2155–2164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew WT, Meredith WR Jr (2009) Seed quality and planting date effects on cotton lint yield, yield components and fiber quality. J Cotton Sci 13:37–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MH, Ahmad A, Wang X, Wajid A, Nasim W, Hussain M, Ahmad B, Ahmad I, Ali Z, Ishaque W, Awais M, Shelia V, Ahmad S, Fahad S, Alam M, Ullah H, Hoogenboom G (2018) Multi-model projections of future climate and climate change impacts uncertainty assessment for cotton production in Pakistan. Agric For Meteorol 253-254:94–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MH, Ahmad A, Wajid A, Hussain M, Akhtar J, Hoogenboom G (2016) Estimation of temporal variation resilience in cotton varieties using statistical models. Pak J Agri Sci 53(4):787–807

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MH, Ahmad A, Wajid A, Hussain M, Rasul F, Ishaque W, Islam MA, Shelia V, Awais M, Ullah A, Wahid A, Sultana SR, Saud S, Khan S, Fahad S, Hussain M, Hussain S, Nasim W (2017) Application of CSM-CROPGRO-Cotton model for cultivars and optimum planting dates: evaluation in changing semi-arid climate. Field Crops Res 238(2019):139–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2017.07.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah MA, Farooq M, Shahzad M, Khan MB, Hussain M (2017) Yield and phenological responses of BT cotton to different sowing dates in semi-arid climate. Pak J Agri Sci 54(2):233–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Prasad PVV, Sunita K, Giri SN, Reddy KR (2007) Influence of high temperature and breeding for heat tolerance in cotton: a review. Adv Agron 93:313–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sohair EDE, Abdalla AMA, Abdel-Gawad SDN, Wageda AEF (2015) Effect of delaying planting date on yield, fiber and yarn quality properties in some cultivars and promising crosses of Egyptian cotton. American-Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci 15(5):754–763

    Google Scholar 

  • Tariq M, Afzal MN, Muhammad D, Ahmad S, Shahzad AN, Kiran A, Wakeel A (2018) Relationship of tissue potassium content with yield and fiber quality components of Bt cotton as influenced by potassium application methods. Field Crops Res 229:37–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tariq M, Yasmeen A, Ahmad S, Hussain N, Afzal MN, Hasanuzzaman M (2017) Shedding of fruiting structures in cotton: factors, compensation and prevention. Trop Subtrop Agroecosys 20:251–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauseef M, Ihsan F, Nazir W, Farooq J (2012) Weed flora and importance value index (ivi) of the weeds in cotton crop fields in the region of Khanewal, Pakistan. Pak J Weed Sci Res 18(3):319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman K, Ayatullah KN, Khan S (2016) Genotype-by-sowing date interaction effects on cotton yield and quality in irrigated condition of Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. Pak J Bot 48(5):1933–1944

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Ahmad A, Ahmad S, Irshad M, Khaliq T, Wajid A, Hussain K, Nasim W, Chattha TM, Trethowan R, Hoogenboom G (2009) Development and application of crop water stress index for scheduling irrigation in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) under semiarid environment. J Food Agri Environ 7(3&4):386–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Hou Y, Du M, Xu D, Lu H, Tian X, Li Z (2016) Effect of planting date and plant density on cotton traits as relating to mechanical harvesting in the Yellow River valley region of China. Field Crops Res 198:112–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Chen J, Xing F, Han Y, Chen F, Zhang L, Li Y, Li C (2017) Response of cotton phenology to climate change on the North China Plain from 1981 to 2012. Sci Rep 7:6628

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Webster TM, Grey TL, Flanders JT, Culpepper AS (2009) Cotton planting date affects the critical period of Benghal Dayflower (Commelina benghalensis L.) control. Weed Sci 57:81–86

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wei HU, Chen M, Zhao WQ, Chen BL, Wang YH, Wang SS, Zhao ZG (2017) The effects of sowing date on cotton seed properties at different fruiting-branch positions. J Integr Agr 16:1322–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Tariq .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Afzal, M.N., Tariq, M., Ahmed, M., Abbas, G., Mehmood, Z. (2020). Managing Planting Time for Cotton Production. In: Ahmad, S., Hasanuzzaman, M. (eds) Cotton Production and Uses. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1472-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics