Skip to main content

“Blended Learning” in Construction Cost Network Course

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 1088))

Abstract

Separation of teaching and learning is a prominent problem in distance education, and “vapidness” is one of the primary issues to be solved in network curriculum. Due to the theory and practice properties of Construction Cost, blended learning was used to satisfy students for individualising education, which strengthen students’ motivation and improve availability and interest. The route of guidance-study behaviour-practice-final review goes through cases, actual scenario of occupational training and work office was rebuilt. Blended learning not only reduces the distance that has existed among students and teachers but also increase the interaction between the two sides. The investigation shows that 90% students consider that through cases oriented, the learning scene is more attractive as tied up with actual scenario; there is a significant increase of students’ motivation and achievement as a result of the blended learning model, and a reduction to 30% of vapidness-feeling student. This research provides experiences for teachers to support and promote the students’ interest and includes tactics such as being an involved role model on cases to facilitate help-seeking processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Islam, Syaiful, et al. 2018. To boost students’ motivation and achievement through blended learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1114: 012046.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yang, X.T. 2007. Evaluation of web-based learning. Beijing: Central Radio & TV University Press (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wu, G.X. 2008. Process-oriented examination in modern distance education: Towards a research and practice framework. Distance Education in China 3: 26–31. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tao, S.L. 2008. Reform of computer specialty in modern distance education of RTVU. China Higher Education 10: 55–57. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wu, L.Z., and X.D. Ding. 2008. Sewart’s theory of student support in distance education: Interpretation and inspiration. Distance Education in China 1: 25–29. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Vanslambrouck, Silke, et al. 2019. An in-depth analysis of adult students in blended environments: Do they regulate their learning in an ‘old school’ way? Computers & Education 128: 75–87.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wolters, C.A., P.R. Pintrich, and S.A. Karabenick. 2005. Assessing academic self-regulated learning: What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development, 251–270. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pintrich, P.R., and A. Zusho. 2007. Student motivation and self-regulated learning in the college classroom. In The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective, ed. R.P. Perry and J.C. Smart, 731–810. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lazowski, R.A., and C.S. Hulleman. 2016. Motivation interventions in education: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research 86 (2): 602–640.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Allen, I.E., J. Seaman, and R. Garrett. 2007 Blending. In The extent and promise of blended education in the United States. ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baharun, H., and R. Awwaliyah. 2017. Pendidikan Multikultural dalam Menanggulangi Narasi Islamisme di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education Studies) 5 (2): 224–243.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pintrich, P.R. 2000. Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (3): 544–555.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zimmerman, B.J. 2015. Self-regulated learning: Theories, measures, and outcomes. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences 21: 541–546.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by Open Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Urban Underground Engineering, Ministry of Education (Grant No. TUE2018-03), and Youth Fund for the 13th Five-Year Plan of the Open University of China (Grant No. G18F0031Q).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shu Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Li, S., Cao, L., Shao, Y. (2020). “Blended Learning” in Construction Cost Network Course. In: Huang, C., Chan, YW., Yen, N. (eds) Data Processing Techniques and Applications for Cyber-Physical Systems (DPTA 2019). Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 1088. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1468-5_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics