Abstract
The level of change needed for humanity to operate within the planet’s limits will almost certainly require fundamentally altering the way we interact with the environment. We need urgent, systemic change.
Accounting theory shows that standards and limits are needed to create serious change. Measuring the changing state of the environment (environmental assets) and human pressures on the environment (environmental flows) is known as environmental accounting. Environmental accounting is used by many countries, cities, regions, and businesses as a tool to help them understand and manage their environmental impacts. However, there is a major limitation in most environmental accounts—the lack of appropriate limits.
Environmental performance targets are typically set based on incremental targets. These are often set based on feasibility, local policies, or industry best practice. They are arbitrary. Achieving industry best practice standards does not equate to maintaining or improving environmental assets. Incremental targets encourage incremental change.
In contrast, absolute limits that defined the end goal for our environmental assets and flows would help us to understand what is needed. Absolute limits can be used to create a vision of the future that is not constrained by the status quo.
The Planetary Boundaries are absolute environmental limits. What is missing is a mechanism to connect these limits to existing environmental accounting practices. A connection is suggested as part of Planetary Accounting. This connection could be used to create a design brief for the future—a platform for disruptive innovation and transformational change.
If I had asked people what they wanted, they would have asked for a faster horse
Henry Ford
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Elon Musk has made the patents from the Tesla vehicle available to anyone. Musk, E. 2014. All Our Patent Are Belong To You [Online]. Tesla. Available: https://www.tesla.com/en_NZ/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you [Accessed 22 April 2018]. Electric vehicle companies who have been slow to transition may thus still be able to keep up with the transition to electrical vehicles. This is an unusual occurrence, but a good example of how an individual can act as a change agent to achieve global change (see Chap. 5).
References
Akenji L, Bengtsson M, Bleischwitz R, Tukker A, Schandl H (2016) Ossified materialism: introduction to the special volume on absolute reductions in materials throughput and emissions. J Clean Prod 132:1
Arvidsson R, Kushnir D, Molander S, Sandén BA (2016) Energy and resource use assessment of graphene as a substitute for indium tin oxide in transparent electrodes. J Clean Prod 132:289–297
Bahadur A, Tanner T (2014) Transformational resilience thinking: putting people, power and politics at the heart of urban climate resilience. Environ Urbaniz 26:200–214
Baumann A (2013) Greenhouse gas emissions associated. Sustainable Development Masters, Uppsala University
Bellis M (2017) A history of electric vehicles. Available: https://www.thoughtco.com/history-of-electric-vehicles-1991603. Accessed 22 Apr 2018
BIS (2012) Low carbon environmental goods and services. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London
Biswas A, Modak P (1999) Conducting environmental impact assessment for developing countries. United Nations University, New York, NY
Cucek L, Klemes JJ, Kravanja Z (2012) A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J Clean Prod 34:9–20
De Boo AJ, Bosch PR, Gorter CN, Keuning SJ (1993) An environmental module and the complete system of national accounts. In: Franz A, Stahmer C (eds) Approaches to environmental accounting. Springer, Heidelberg
Ewing B, Moore D, Goldfinger S, Ourslet A, Reed A, Wackernagel M (2010a) Ecological footprint atlas 2010. Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA
Ewing B, Reed A, Galli A, Kitzes J, Wackernagel M (2010b) Calculation methodology for the national footprint accounts. Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA
Fang K (2015a) Footprint family: concept, classification, theoretical framework and integrated pattern. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecologica Sinica 35:1647–1659
Fang K (2015b) Footprint family: current practices, challenges and future prospects. Shengtai Xuebao/Acta Ecologica Sinica 35:7974–7986
Fang K, Heijungs R, De Snoo GR (2014) Theoretical exploration for the combination of the ecological, energy, carbon, and water footprints: overview of a footprint family. Ecol Indic 36:508
Fong WK, Sotos M, Doust M, Schultz S, Marques A, Deng-Beck C (2014) Global protocol for community-scale greenhouse gas emission inventories - an accounting and reporting standard for cities. Greenhouse gas protocol. World Resources Institute, C40 Cities, and Local Governments for Sustainability, Washington, DC
Galli A, Kitzes J, Wermer P, Wackernagel M, Niccolucci V, Tiezzi E (2007) An exploration of the mathematics behind the Ecological Footprint. Int J Ecodyn 2:250–257
Galli A, Wiedmann T, Ercin E, Knoblauch D, Ewing B, Giljum S (2012) Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecol Indic 16:100–112
Galli A, Wackernagel M, Iha K, Lazarus E (2014) Ecological footprint: implications for biodiversity. Biol Conserv 173:121–132
Gladwell M (2000) The tipping point. Little Brown, New York, NY
Global Footprint Network (2011) National footprint accounts. Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA
Global Footprint Network (2014) Footprint calculator. Available: http://footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/calculators/. Accessed 9 Jun 2014
Gray A (2017) Countries are announcing plans to phase out petrol and diesel cars. Is yours on the list?. World Economic Forum. Available: https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2017/09/countries-are-announcing-plans-to-phase-out-petrol-and-diesel-cars-is-yours-on-the-list/. Accessed 22 Apr 2018
Greenhalgh S, Broekhoff D, Daviet F, Ranganathan J, Acharya M, Corbier L, Oren K, Sundin H (2005) The GHG protocol for project accounting. Greenhouse gas protocol. World Resources Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development, Washington, DC
Guinée J (2012) Life cycle assessment: past, present and future. International Symposium on Life Cycle Assessment and Construction, Nantes, France
Hertwich EG (2005) Consumption and the rebound effect: an industrial ecology perspective. J Indus Ecol 9:85–98
ISO (1997) ISO 14040:1997 Environmental management - life cycle assessment - principles and framework. ISO, Geneva
Kalbar PP, Birkved M, Nygaard SE, Hauschild M (2017) Weighting and aggregation in life cycle assessment: do present aggregated single scores provide correct decision support? J Indus Ecol 21:1591–1600
Kirchain RE Jr, Gregory JR, Olivetti EA (2017) Environmental life-cycle assessment. Nat Mater 16:693–697
Kojima S, Aoki-Suzuki C (2015) Efficiency and fairness of resource use: from a planetary boundary perspective. In: The economics of green growth: new indicators for sustainable societies. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Laurent A, Owsianiak M (2017) Potentials and limitations of footprints for gauging environmental sustainability. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 25:20–27
Monfreda C, Wackernagel M, Deumling D (2004) Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed Ecological Footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy 21:231–246
Musk E (2014) All our patent are belong to you. Tesla. Available: https://www.tesla.com/en_NZ/blog/all-our-patent-are-belong-you. Accessed 22 Apr 2018
Newman P (2005) Can the magic of sustainability revive environmental professionalism? Greener Manag Int 49:11–23
Newman P (2017) The rise and rise of renewable cities. Renew Energ Environ Sustain 2:10
Newman P, Kenworthy J (2006) Urban design to reduce automobile dependance. Opolis 2:35–52
Newman P, Kenworthy J (2015) The end of automobile dependence: how cities are moving beyond car-based planning. Island Press, Washington, DC
Newman P, Beatley T, Boyer H (2017) Resilient cities: overcoming fossil fuel dependence. Island Press, Center for Resource Economics, Washington, DC
OVERLAET (2011) Tesla_Roadster_2.5_(fron_quarter).jpg. Wikimedia
Oxford Dictionary (2018) Systemic. Oxforddictionaries.com. Available: https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/systemic. Accessed 22 Apr 2018
Pelling M, O’Brien K, Matyas D (2015) Adaptation and transformation. Clim Change 133:113–127
Rees WE (1992) Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ Urbaniz 4:121–130
Saebo HV (1994) Natural resource accounting - the Norwegian approach. UNEP/ECE/UNSTAT Workshop on Environmental and Natural Resource Accounting, Modra-Harmonia
Sandin G, Peters GM, Svanström M (2015) Using the planetary boundaries framework for setting impact-reduction targets in LCA contexts. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20:1684–1700
Seijts GH, Gandz J (2018) Transformational change and leader character. Bus Horiz 61:239
SFOSKETT (2005) 1915_Detroit_Electric.jpg. Wikimedia
Termeer K, Dewulf A, Biesbroek R (2017) Transformational change. J Environ Plan Manag 60:558–576
UN (1993) Handbook of national accounting: integrated environmental and economic accounting. United Nations, New York, NY
UN (2014) System of environmental-economic accounting 2012 - central framework. United Nations, New York, NY
UN Statistics Division (2018) SEEA revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Statistics Divisions. Available: https://unstats.un.org/unsd/envaccounting/seearev/
Valada T (2010) Ecological footprint: an indicator of environmental (un)sustainability? A review and further analysis. Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisboa
Wiedmann T (2009) A review of recent multi-region input–output models used for consumption-based emission and resource accounting. Ecol Econ 69:211–222
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Meyer, K., Newman, P. (2020). Environmental Accounting, Absolute Limits, and Systemic Change. In: Planetary Accounting. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1443-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1443-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1442-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1443-2
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)