Skip to main content

The Biodiversity Quota

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Planetary Accounting
  • 612 Accesses

Abstract

Recent human activity has had more severe impacts on species loss than any other period in human history. Despite efforts to manage this, the impacts are continuing to increase. Biodiversity is very important to the Earth-system function and to humanity directly because of the ecosystem services it provides.

It is extremely difficult to link biosphere health to human activity as there are so many different ways that human activity can be damaging to the biosphere. Human impacts on biodiversity through climate change and pollution are addressed through Planetary Quotas for carbon dioxide, MeNO, aerosols, Montreal gases, and forestland. Habitat destruction and segregation is one of the greatest human drivers of biodiversity loss. A new proxy indicator has been developed by the UNEP to link land use to pressures on biosphere integrity, “percentage disappearing species”. It is an estimation of species extinctions caused through land-use change. This indicator is the best proxy indicator available with which to assess the effects on human activity on global extinction rate.

The Planetary Quota for biodiversity is percentage disappeared fraction of species ≤1 × 10−4/y.

We should preserve every scrap of biodiversity as priceless while we learn to use it and come to understand what it means to humanity

E.O. Wilson

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Environmental indicators can be classified as Drivers, Pressures, States, and Impacts using the EU DPSIR framework. Pressure indicators are the type of indicators used for the Planetary Quotas as they can be easily related to human activity and applied at different scales. See Chap. 6 for more detail.

  2. 2.

    These figures are based on global extinction rates as no global PDF has yet been determined.

References

  • ADB (2012) Special chapter: green urbanization in Asia. Key Indicators for Asia and the Pacific 2012, 43rd edn. Asian Development Bank, Phillipines

    Google Scholar 

  • Asafu-Adjaye J (2003) Biodiversity loss and economic growth: a cross-country analysis. Contemp Econ Policy 21:173–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bibby CJ (1994) Recent past and future extinctions in birds. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 344:35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butchart SHM, Walpole M, Collen B, Van Strien A, Scharlemann JPW, Almond REA, Baillie JEM, Bomhard B, Brown C, Bruno J, Carpenter KE, Carr GM, Chanson J, Chenery AM, Csirke J, Davidson NC, Dentener F, Foster M, Galli A, Galloway JN, Genovesi P, Gregory RD, Hockings M, Kapos V, Lamarque J-F, Leverington F, Loh J, Mcgeoch MA, Mcrae L, Minasyan A, Hernández Morcillo M, Oldfield TEE, Pauly D, Quader S, Revenga C, Sauer JR, Skolnik B, Spear D, Stanwell-Smith D, Stuart SN, Symes A, Tierney M, Tyrrell TD, Vié J-C, Watson R (2010) Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 328:1164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2006) 2nd global biodiversity outlook report. https://www.cbd.int/gbo2/

  • CBD (2014) Pathways of introduction of invasive species, their prioritization and management. UNEP, Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • CBD (2018) History of the convention [Online]. Available: https://www.cbd.int/history/. Accessed 25/01/2018

  • Chapin IFS, Zavaleta ES, Eviner VT, Naylor RL, Vitousek PM, Reynolds HL, Hooper DU, Lavorel S, Sala OE, Hobbie SE, Mack MC, Diaz S (2000) Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 405:234–242

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Costello MJ, Wilson S, Houlding B (2012) Predicting total global species richness using rates of species description and estimates of taxonomic effort. Syst Biol 61(5):871–883. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syr080

  • Cucek L, Klemes JJ, Kravanja Z (2012) A review of footprint analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. J Clean Prod 34:9–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz S, Adger WN (2003) Economic growth, biodiversity loss and conservation effort. J Environ Manag 68:23–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich PR (1994) Energy use and biodiversity loss. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 344:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fahrig L (2001) How much habitat is enough? Biol Conserv 100:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2010) Forestry. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2018) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018—Meeting the sustainable development goals. Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Galli A, Wackernagel M, Iha K, Lazarus E (2014) Ecological footprint: implications for biodiversity. Biol Conserv 173:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Groombridge B (1992) Global biodiversity : status of the earth’s living resources : a report/compiled by the World conservation monitoring centre, London. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanafiah MM, Hendriks AJ, Huijbregts MAJ (2012) Comparing the ecological footprint with the biodiversity footprint of products.(report). J Clean Prod 37:107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MC, Potapov PV, Moore R, Hancher M, Turubanova SA, Tyukavina A, Thau D, Stehman SV, Goetz SJ, Loveland TR, Kommareddy A, Egorov A, Chini L, Justice CO, Townshend JR (2013) High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science 342:850–853

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harper DAT, Hammarlund EU, Rasmussen CM (2014) End Ordovician extinctions: a coincidence of causes. Gondwana Res 25:1294–1307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houdet J, Germaneau C (2014) Accounting for biodiversity and ecosystem services from an ema perspective: towards a standardised biodiversity footprint methodology. Account Biodiver. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203097472

  • IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Part a: global and sectoral aspects. Contribution of working group II to the Fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change [Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ, Mastrandrea MD, Bilir TE, Chatterjee M, Ebi KL, Estrada YO, Genova RC, Girma B, Kissel ES, Levy AN, MacCracken S, Mastrandrea PR, White LL (eds.)], Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr JT, Currie DJ (1995) Effects of human activity on global extinction risk - efectos de la actividad humana sobre el riesgo de extinción global. Conserv Biol 9:1528–1538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitzes J, Berlow E, Conlisk E, Erb K, Iha K, Martinez N, Newman EA, Plutzar C, Smith AB, Harte J (2017) Consumption-based conservation targeting: linking biodiversity loss to upstream demand through a global wildlife footprint. Conserv Lett 10:531–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Foran B, Lobefaro L, Geschke A (2012a) International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486:109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Foran B, Lobefaro L, Geschke A (2012b) International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations–supplementary information. Nature 486:109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy TE (2006) Protected areas: a prism for a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol 21:329–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mace GM, Reyers B, Alkemade R, Biggs R, Chapin FS, Cornell SE, Díaz S, Jennings S, Leadley P, Mumby PJ, Purvis A, Scholes RJ, Seddon AWR, Solan M, Steffen W, Woodward G (2014) Approaches to defining a planetary boundary for biodiversity. Glob Environ Chang 28:289–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margules CR, Nicholls AO, Pressey RL (1988) Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity. Biol Conserv 43:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human Well-being: biodiversity synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washinton, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran D, Petersone M, Verones F (2016) On the suitability of input-output analysis for calculating product-specific biodiversity footprints. Ecol Indic 60:192–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naidoo R, Adamowicz WL (2001) Effects of economic prosperity on numbers of threatened species–efectos de la prosperidad económica sobre los números de especies amenazadas. Conserv Biol 15:1021–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS, Lambin E, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sorlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley J (2009) Planetary boundaries: exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecol Soc 14:32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the CBD (2001) In: DIVERSITY SOT, B CO (eds) Global biodiversity outlook 1. UNEP, CBD, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the CBD (2006) Global biodiversity outlook 2. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the CBD (2010) Global biodiversity outlook 3. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the CBD (2014) Global biodiversity outlook 4. Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulé ME, Sanjayan MA (1998) ECOLOGY: conservation targets: do they help? Science 279:2060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I, Bennett EM, Biggs R, Carpenter SR, de Vries W, de Wit CA, Folke C, Gerten D, Heinke J, Mace GM, Persson LM, Ramanathan V, Reyers B, Sörlin S (2015) Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Brundtland Commission (1987) Our common future. World Commission on Environment and Development

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Morris MG, Hambler C (1994) Patterns, mechanisms and rates of extinction among invertebrates in the United Kingdom [and discussion]. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 344:47–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tittensor DP, Walpole M, Hill SL, Boyce DG, Britten GL, Burgess ND, Butchart SH, Leadley PW, Regan EC, Alkemade R, Baumung R, Bellard C, Bouwman L, Bowles-Newark NJ, Chenery AM, Cheung WW, Christensen V, Cooper HD, Crowther AR, Dixon MJ, Galli A, Gaveau V, Gregory RD, Gutierrez NL, Hirsch TL, Hoft R, Januchowski-Hartley SR, Karmann M, Krug CB, Leverington FJ, Loh J, Lojenga RK, Malsch K, Marques A, Morgan DH, Mumby PJ, Newbold T, Noonan-Mooney K, Pagad SN, Parks BC, Pereira HM, Robertson T, Rondinini C, Santini L, Scharlemann JP, Schindler S, Sumaila UR, Teh LS, van Kolck J, Visconti P, YE Y (2014) A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets. Science 346:241–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UN (2010) Resumed review conference on the agreement relating to the conservation and management of straddling fish stocks and highly migratory fish stocks. United Nations Department of Public Information

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2015) United nations sustainable development goals [Online]. Available: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs. Accessed

  • UNEP (2016) In: Frischknecht R, Jolliet O (eds) Global guidance for life cycle impact assessment indicators. UNEP

    Google Scholar 

  • Vačkář D (2012) Ecological footprint, environmental performance and biodiversity: a cross-national comparison. Ecol Indic 16:40–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel M, Schulz NB, Deumling D, Linares AC, Jenkins M, Kapos V, Monfreda C, Loh J, Myers N, Norgaard R, Randers J (2002) Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:9266–9271

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watts J. (2019) Human society under urgent threat from loss of Earth’s natural life. The Guradian

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worm B, Hilborn R, Baum JK, Branch TA, Collie JS, Costello C, Fogarty MJ, Fulton EA, Hutchings JA, Jennings S, Jensen OP, Lotze HK, Mace PM, Mcclanahan TR, Minto C, Palumbi SR, Parma AM, Ricard D, Rosenberg AA, Watson R, Zeller D (2009) Rebuilding global fisheries. Science 325:578

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Meyer, K., Newman, P. (2020). The Biodiversity Quota. In: Planetary Accounting. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1443-2_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics