Skip to main content

Fused Deposition Modelling and Parametric Optimization of ABS-M30

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Abstract

In the current development of generative manufacturing industries, 3D printing technologies have a significant impact in the production of complex geometry with least time and the absence of human intercession, tools, fixtures and dies. Presently in engineering application, fused deposition modelling (FDM) has better demand in additive manufacturing. The improvement in design quality and manufacturing in FDM is based on the proper selection of principal operational parameters. This paper experimentally describes the influence of stereotypical operational variables, i.e. layer thickness, raster angle, raster width, part build orientation and their reciprocation on the precision of change in length, width, thickness, hole diameter and angle orientation of test part of acrylonitrile butadiene styrene-M30 (ABS-M30) after generated by FDM approach. It was profound that shrinkage predominates along the diameter of hole but an increase in dimension of length, width, thickness and angle of inclination is more than the thirst value of the fabricated specimen. The most favourable parametric combination is followed to optimize the precise responses just as a change in length, width, thickness, hole diameter and angle orientation of build part by using a parametric design of Taguchi’s L9 orthogonal array. As Taguchi’s methodology is not much satisfactory for steady optimal factor amalgamation of each response Grey-Taguchi methods used to investigate the influence of FDM parameters on multi-performance characteristics, combining all the responses into a single response. The correlative effect of significant factors is determined by Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Finally, the ANOVA on Grey relational grade indicates layer thickness, part build orientation and raster width which are significant. Layer thickness is the most influencing factor for part build. The percentage errors are 12.05, 4.55, 2.45, 3.4, 5.07 and 0.74 for change in length, width, thickness, diameter, angle and Grey relational grade, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 349.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Padhi, S.K., Sahu, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S., Das, H.C., Sood, A.K., Patro, B., Mondal, A.K.: Optimization of fused deposition modeling process parameters using a fuzzy inference system coupled with Taguchi philosophy. Adv. Manuf. 5(3), 231–242 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaveh, M., Etefagh, A.H., Badrossamay, M.: Optimization of the printing parameters affecting dimensional accuracy and internal cavity for HIPS material used in fused deposition modeling processes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 226, 280–286 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sahu, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S., Sood, A.K.: A study on dimensional accuracy of fused deposition modelling (FDM) processed parts using fuzzy logic. J. Manuf. Sci. Prod. 13(3), 183–197 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mahapatra, S.S., Sood, A.K.: Bayesian regularization-based Levenberg–Marquardt neural model combined with BFOA for improving surface finish of FDM processed part. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 60, 1223–1235 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S.: Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement. J. Adv. Res. 3, 81–90 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Equbal, A., Sood, A.K., Toppo, V., Ohdar, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S.: Prediction and analysis of sliding wear performance of fused deposition modelling-processed ABS plastic parts. J. Eng. Tribol. 224, 70–80 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Senthilkumaran, K., Pandey, P.M., Rao, P.V.M.: Influence of building strategies on the accuracy of parts in selective laser sintering. Mater. Des. 30, 2946–2954 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Panda, S.K., Padhee, S., Sood, A.K., Mahapatra, S.S.: Optimization of fused deposition modelling (FDM) process parameters using bacterial foraging technique. Intell. Inf. Manage. 1, 89–97 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sood, A.K., Ohdar, R.K., Mahapatra, S.S.: Parametric appraisal of fused deposition modelling process using the grey Taguchi method. J. Eng. Manuf. 224 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wang, R.J., Wang, L., Zhao, L., Liu, Z.: Influence of process parameters on part shrinkage in SLS. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 33, 498–504 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pandey, P., Raghunath, N.: Improving accuracy through shrinkage modelling by using Taguchi method in selective laser sintering. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 47, 985–995 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Campanelli, S.L., Cardano, G., Giannoccaro, R., Ludovic, A.D., Bohez, E.L.J.: Statistical analysis of stereolithographic process to improve the accuracy. Comput. Aided Des. 39(1), 80–86 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chacon, J.M., Caminero, M.A., Garcıa-Plaza, E., Nunez, P.J.: Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection. Mater. Des. 124, 143–157 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nizam, A., Gopal, R.N., Naing, L., Hakim, A.B., Samsudin, A.R.: Dimensional accuracy of the skull models produced by rapid prototyping technology using stereo lithography apparatus. Arch. Orofac. Sci. 32, 60–66 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhu, H.H., Lu, L., Fuh, J.Y.H.: Study on shrinkage behavior of direct laser sintering metallic powder. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. J. Eng. Manuf. 220, 183–190 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang, Y., Lan, H.: Dynamic reverse compensation to increase the accuracy of the rapid prototyping system. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 167, 167–176 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Lehtihet, E., Tong, K., Joshi, S.: Software compensation of rapid prototyping machines. Precis. Eng. 28, 280–292 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Xu, F., Wong, Y.S., Loh, H.T.: Toward generic models for comparative rapid prototyping and manufacturing. J. Manuf. Syst. 19, 283–296 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhou, J., Herscovici, D., Chen, C.C.: Parametric process optimization to improve the accuracy of rapid prototyped stereo lithography parts. Int. J. Mach. Tools Manuf. 40, 363–379 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vasudevarao, B., Natarajan, D.P., Razdan, A., Mark, H.: Sensitivity of RP surface finish to process parameter variation. In: Solid Free Form Fabrication Proceedings, pp. 252–258. The University of Texas, Austin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Es-Said, O.S., Foyos, J., Noorani, R., Mendelson, M., Marloth, R., Pregger, B.A.: Effect of layer orientation on mechanical properties of rapid prototyped samples. Mater. Manuf. Processes 15(1), 107–122 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dao, Q., Frimodig, J.C., Le, H.N., Li, X., Putnam, S.B., Golda, K., Foyos, J., Noorani, R., Fritz, B.: Calculation of shrinkage compensation factors for rapid prototyping (FDM 1650). Comput. Appl. Eng. Educ. 7(3), 186–195 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., Radhakrishnan, P.: Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 118, 385–388 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sasmita Kar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cherkia, H., Kar, S., Singh, S.S., Satpathy, A. (2020). Fused Deposition Modelling and Parametric Optimization of ABS-M30. In: Li, L., Pratihar, D., Chakrabarty, S., Mishra, P. (eds) Advances in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1307-7_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1307-7_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1306-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1307-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics