Skip to main content

A Comparative Study of Two Different Spam Detection Methods

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Dependability in Sensor, Cloud, and Big Data Systems and Applications (DependSys 2019)

Abstract

With the development of the Internet, the problem of spam has become more and more prominent. Attackers can spread viruses through spam or place malicious advertisements, which have seriously interfered with people’s life and internet security. Therefore, it is of great significance to study efficient spam detection methods. Currently using machine learning methods for spam detection has become a mainstream direction. In this paper, the machine learning method of Bayesian linear regression and decision forest regression are used to conduct experiments on a data set from UCI Machine Learning Repository. We use the trained models to predict whether a mail is spam or not, and find better prediction scheme by comparing quantitative results. The experimental results show that the method of decision forest regression can get better performance and is suitable for numerical prediction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Benevenuto, F., Magno, G., Rodrigues, T., Almeida, V.: Detecting spammers on twitter. In: Collaboration, Electronic Messaging, Anti-Abuse and Spam Conference (CEAS), p. 12, July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fu, Q., Feng, B., Guo, D., Li, Q.: Combating the evolving spammers in online social networks. Comput. Secur. 72, 60–73 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Youn, S., Cho, H.C.: Improved spam filter via handling of text embedded image e-mail. J. Electr. Eng. Technol. 10(1), 401–407 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, S., et al.: WAF-based chinese character recognition for spam image filtering. Chin. J. Electron. 27(5), 1050–1055 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rusland, N.F., Wahid, N., Kasim, S., Hafit, H.: Analysis of Naïve Bayes algorithm for email spam filtering across multiple datasets. In: IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering. IOP Publishing, August 2017

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wei, Q. Understanding of the naive Bayes classifier in spam filtering. In: AIP Conference Proceedings. AIP Publishing (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yang, J., Liu, Y., Liu, Z., Zhu, X., Zhang, X.: A new feature selection algorithm based on binomial hypothesis testing for spam filtering. Knowl.-Based Syst. 24(6), 904–914 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Feng, L., Wang, Y., Zuo, W.: Quick online spam classification method based on active and incremental learning. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 30(1), 17–27 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gao, C.Z., Cheng, Q., He, P., Susilo, W., Li, J.: Privacy-preserving Naive Bayes classifiers secure against the substitution-then-comparison attack. Inf. Sci. 444, 72–88 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. He, L.: Identification of product review spam by random forest. J. Chin. Inf. Process. 29(3), 150–154 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Janabi, M., Andras, P.: A systematic analysis of random forest based social media spam classification. In: Yan, Z., Molva, R., Mazurczyk, W., Kantola, R. (eds.) Network and System Security. NSS 2017. LNCS, vol. 10394, pp. 427–438. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64701-2_31

  12. Sun, X., Han, L., Li, K.: One email filtering system based on category feature selection and feedback learning random forest algorithm. Comput. Appl. Softw. 32(4), 67–71 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Huawei Cloud. https://support.huaweicloud.com/algnoderef-mls/mls_02_0054.html. Accessed 05 July 2019

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by CERNET Innovation Project (NGII20180407).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dequan Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, H., Dai, B., Yang, D. (2019). A Comparative Study of Two Different Spam Detection Methods. In: Wang, G., Bhuiyan, M.Z.A., De Capitani di Vimercati, S., Ren, Y. (eds) Dependability in Sensor, Cloud, and Big Data Systems and Applications. DependSys 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1123. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1304-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1304-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-1303-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-1304-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics