Skip to main content

Effect of Water Absorbing Polymer Amendment on Water Retention Properties of Cohesionless Soil

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computer Methods and Geomechanics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering ((LNCE,volume 55))

Abstract

Water absorbing polymers (WAP) are chemically cross-linked structures formed with different hydrophilic groups (hydroxyl, amine, and carboxyl) capable of absorbing and storing a huge quantity of water within its three-dimensional network. Due to its high water absorbing capacity, these polymers find applications in improving the water retention behavior of the soil, particularly in arid and semiarid regions. Therefore, it is very important to study the improvement in water retention behavior of soil with different concentration of WAP amendment. The objective of this work is to investigate the effect of different rates (0, 1 g, 2 g, and 4 g/kg of soil) of WAP application on the water retention behavior of a locally available cohesionless soil. For this purpose, water retention characteristics curve (WRCC) of the soil was obtained by monitoring the soil suction and water content variation from saturated state to air-dried condition. The saturated water content and field capacity of the soil was found to be increased by 1.9 times and 2 times with highest amount of WAP addition than the control condition (without WAP). The results indicated that the water retention properties as well as the plant available water content (PAWC) significantly increased with WAP application, which indirectly indicates an increase in plant survival time in water stress conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. 5TM Water Content and Temperature Sensors (2017) Operator’s manual. METER Group Inc., USA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Abedi-Koupai J, Sohrab F, Swarbrick G (2008) Evaluation of hydrogel application on soil water retention characteristics. J Plant Nutr 31(2):317–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Agaba H, Baguma Orikiriza LJ, Osoto Esegu JF, Obua J, Kabasa JD, Hüttermann A (2010) Effects of hydrogel amendment to different soils on plant available water and survival of trees under drought conditions. Clean Soil Air Water 38(4):328–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Akhter J, Mahmood K, Malik KA, Mardan A, Ahmad M, Iqbal MM (2004) Effects of hydrogel amendment on water storage of sandy loam and loam soils and seedling growth of barley, wheat and chickpea. Plant Soil Environ 50(10):463–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Andry H, Yamamoto T, Irie T, Moritani S, Inoue M, Fujiyama H (2009) Water retention, hydraulic conductivity of hydrophilic polymers in sandy soil as affected by temperature and water quality. J Hydrol 373:177–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arbona V, Iglesias DJ, Jacas J, Primo-Millo E, Talon M, Gómez-Cadenas A (2005) Hydrogel substrate amendment alleviates drought effects on young citrus plants. Plant Soil 270(1):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bai W, Zhang H, Liu B, Wu Y, Song J (2010) Effects of super-absorbent polymers on the physical and chemical properties of soil following different wetting and drying cycles. Soil Use Manag 26:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bao Y, Ma J, Li N (2011) Synthesis and swelling behaviors of sodium carboxymethyl cellulose-g-poly (AA-co-AM-co-AMPS)/MMT superabsorbent hydrogel. Carbohydr Polym 84(1):76–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bhardwaj AK, McLaughlin RA, Shainberg I, Levy GJ (2009) Hydraulic characteristics of depositional seals as affected by exchangeable cations, clay mineralogy, and polyacrylamide. Soil Sci Soc Am J 73(3):910–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bhardwaj AK, Shainberg I, Goldstein D, Warrington D, Levy GJ (2007) Water retention and hydraulic conductivity of cross-linked polyacrylamides in sandy soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71(2):406–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowman DC, Evans RY (1991) Calcium inhibition of polyacrylamide gel hydration is partially reversible by potassium. HortScience 26(8):1063–1065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dorraji SS, Golchin A, Ahmadi A (2010) The effects of hydrophilic polymer and soil salinity on corn growth in sandy and loamy soils. Clean Soil Air Water 38(7):584–591

    Google Scholar 

  13. El-Tohamy WA, El-Abagy HM, Ahmed EM, Aggor FS, Hawash SI (2014) Application of super absorbent hydrogel poly (acrylate/acrylic acid) for water conservation in sandy soil. Trans Egypt Soc Chem Eng 40(2):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  14. Farrell C, Ang XQ, Rayner JP (2013) Water-retention additives increase plant available water in green roof substrates. Ecol Eng 52:112–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng D, Bai B, Ding C, Wang H, Suo Y (2014) Synthesis and swelling behaviors of yeast-g-poly (acrylic acid) superabsorbent co-polymer. Ind Eng Chem Res 53(32):12760–12769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Geng SM, Yan DH, Zhang TX, Weng BS, Zhang ZB, Qin TL (2015) Effects of drought stress on agriculture soil. Nat Hazards 75(2):1997–2011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Huttermann A, Orikiriza LJB, Agaba H (2009) Application of superabsorbent polymers for improving the ecological chemistry of degraded or polluted lands. Clean Soil Air Water 37 (7):517–526

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huttermann A, Zommorodi M, Reise K (1999) Addition of hydrogels to soil for prolonging the survival of pinus halepensis seedlings subjected to drought. Soil Tillage Res 50:295–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. IS 2720, Part II (1973) Methods of test for soils: determination of water content. Indian Standards Institute, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  20. IS 2720, Part III (1973) Methods of test for soils: determination of specific gravity. Indian Standards Institute, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  21. IS 2720, Part IV (1985) Methods of test for soils: grain size analysis. Indian Standards Institute, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  22. IS 2720, Part V (1985) Methods of test for soils: determination of liquid limit and plastic limit. Indian Standards Institute, New Delhi, India

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ismail H, Irani M, Ahmad Z (2013) Starch-based hydrogels: present status and applications. Int J Polym Mater 62(7):411–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kabiri K, Omidian H, Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ, Doroudiani S (2011) Superabsorbent hydrogel composites and nanocomposites: a review. Polym Compos 32(2):277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kala CP (2017) Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of drought in India: lessons for drought management. Sci Educ 5(2):43–48

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Kalhapure A, Kumar R, Singh VP, Pandey DS (2016) Hydrogels: a boon for increasing agricultural productivity in water-stressed environment. Curr Sci 111(11):1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Likos WJ, Yao J (2014) Effects of constraints on van Genuchten parameters for modeling soil-water characteristic curves. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 140(12):06014013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lu N, Likos WJ (2004) Unsaturated soil mechanics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mbonimpa M, Aubertin M, Maqsoud A, Bussière B (2006) Predictive model for the water retention curve of deformable clayey soils. J. Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 132(9):1121–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mohawesh O, Durner W (2017) Effect of bentonite, hydrogel and biochar amendments on soil hydraulic properties from saturation to oven dryness. Pedosphere

    Google Scholar 

  31. Montesano FF, Parente A, Santamaria P, Sannino A, Serio F (2015) Biodegradable superabsorbent hydrogel increases water retention properties of growing media and plant growth. Agric Agric Sci Proc 4:451–458

    Google Scholar 

  32. MPS-6 Dielectric Water Potential Sensor (2015) Operator’s manual. Decagon Devices, USA

    Google Scholar 

  33. MPS-6 Dielectric Water Potential Sensor (2015) Operator’s manual. METER Group, Inc., USA

    Google Scholar 

  34. Narjary B, Aggarwal P, Singh A, Chakraborty D, Singh R (2012) Water availability in different soils in relation to hydrogel application. Geoderma 187:94–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Nnadi F, Brave C (2011) Environmentally friendly superabsorbent polymers for water conservation in agricultural lands. J Soil Sci Environ Manag 2(7):206–211

    Google Scholar 

  36. Orikiriza LJB, Agaba H, Tweheyo M, Eilu G, Kabasa JD, Hüttermann A (2009) Amending soils with hydrogels increases the biomass of nine tree species under nonwater stress conditions. Clean Soil Air Water 37(8):615–620

    Google Scholar 

  37. Richards D, Lane M, Beardsell DV (1986) The influence of particle-size distribution in pinebark: sand: brown coal potting mixes on water supply, aeration and plant growth. Sci Hortic 29(1–2):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Sepaskhah AR, Shahabizad V (2010) Effects of water quality and PAM application rate on the control of soil erosion, water infiltration and runoff for different soil textures measured in a rainfall simulator. Biosyst Eng 106(4):513–520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Shi Y, Li J, Shao J, Deng S, Wang R, Li N, Zheng X (2010) Effects of Stockosorb and Luquasorb polymers on salt and drought tolerance of populus popularis. Sci Hort 124(2):268–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sivakumar Babu GL, Peter J, Mukesh MD, Gartung E (2005) Significance of soil suction and soil water characteristic curve parameters. Geotech Test J 28(1):102–107

    Google Scholar 

  41. UMS GmbH (Umwelt-Monitoring-Systeme) 2001 T5 user manual. Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  42. van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wei Y, Durian DJ (2013) Effect of hydrogel particle additives on water-accessible pore structure of sandy soils: a custom pressure plate apparatus and capillary bundle model. Phys Rev E 87(5):053013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang X, Obringer R, Wei C, Chen N, Niyogi D (2017) Droughts in India from 1981 to 2013 and implications to wheat production. Sci Rep 7:44552

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abhisekh Saha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Saha, A., Rattan, B., Sreedeep, S., Manna, U. (2020). Effect of Water Absorbing Polymer Amendment on Water Retention Properties of Cohesionless Soil. In: Prashant, A., Sachan, A., Desai, C. (eds) Advances in Computer Methods and Geomechanics . Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol 55. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0886-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0886-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0885-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0886-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics