Skip to main content

A Review of Studies on Environmental Performance Analysis of Construction and Demolition Waste Management using Life Cycle Assessment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Mining and Sustainable Waste Management

Abstract

Construction and demolition (C&D) activities generate a large amount of waste throughout their life cycle. Demolition of buildings is on the rise owing to rapid urbanization and dynamic demands. Disposal of C&D waste leads to faster depletion of available landfill space. The environmental performance of C&D waste management needs to be analysed from a life cycle perspective to identify better waste management principles. A selective list of research papers from C&D waste literature, which applied life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology has been reviewed in this paper. The primary aim of this review article is to identify the commonality among those research papers and understand the environmental impacts of various practices being adopted in C&D waste management. LCA case studies were found to vary widely on several categories, and we inferred that they could be compared by selecting normalized unit processes in the system boundaries, functional unit, inventory data sources and impact categories. The environmental impact generated due to the operation of C&D waste recycling facility was reported to be negligible in most of the papers. Transportation of C&D waste was reported to cause the highest environmental impact in most of the articles. Recycling of C&D waste has been recommended as a sustainable alternative to landfilling, and large benefits emerge from savings in valuable land space. Furthermore, energy savings of up to 50% and emission reduction in the range of 7–10 times occur due to recycling of recovered materials, especially metals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Blengini, G. A. (2009). Life cycle of buildings, demolition and recycling potential: A case study in Turin, Italy. Building and Environment, 44, 319–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blengini, G. A., & Garbarino, E. (2010). Resources and waste management in Turin (Italy): The role of recycled aggregates in the sustainable supply mix. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 1021–1030.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borghi, G., Pantini, S., & Rigamonti, L. (2018). Life cycle assessment of non-hazardous construction and demolition waste (CDW) management in Lombardy Region (Italy). Journal of Cleaner Production, 184, 815–825.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CML (Centre for Environmental Studies). (2001). University of Leiden, CML 2 baseline method. http://www.leidenuniv.nl/cml/index.html.

  • Coelho, A., & de Brito, J. (2013). Environmental analysis of a construction and demolition waste recycling plant in Portugal—Part I: Energy consumption and CO2 emissions. Waste Management, 33, 1258–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R. H. (2011). Life cycle assessment in the built environment. United Kingdom, Abingdon, Oxon: Spon Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Devi, P., & Palaniappan, S. (2014). A case study on life cycle energy use of residential building in Southern India. Energy and Buildings, 80, 247–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecoinvent. (2008). The life cycle inventory data version 2. Swiss centre for life cycle inventories.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faleschini, F., Zanini, M. A., Pellegrino, C., & Pasinato, S. (2016). Sustainable management and supply of natural and recycled aggregates in a medium-size integrated plant. Waste Management, 49, 146–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goedkoop, M., & Spriensma, R. (2000). The Ecoindicator’99: A damage oriented method for life cycle impact assessment: Methodology report. Amersfoort, The Netherlands: Pré Consultants BV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guinée, J. B., Gorrée, M., Heijungs, R., Huppes, G., Kleijn, R., Koning, A., et al. (2002). Handbook on life cycle assessment. Operational guide to the ISO standards. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Häkkinen, T. (1994). Environmental impact of building materials (Report No. 1590). Espoo: Technical Research Centre of Finland (VTT), p. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M. U., Poon, C. S., Lo, I. M. C., & Cheng, J. C. P. (2016). Comparative environmental evaluation of aggregate production from recycled waste materials and virgin sources by LCA. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 109, 67–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2007). Intergovernmental panel for climate change. http://www.ipcc.ch.

  • ISO 14040. (2006a). Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Principles and framework.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO 14044. (2006b). Environmental management—Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolliet, O., Margni, M., Charles, R., Humbert, S., Payet, J., Rebitzer, G., et al. (2003). IMPACT 2002+ : A new life cycle impact assessment methodology. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8, 324–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mah, C. M., Fujiwara, T., & Ho, C. S. (2018). Life cycle assessment and life cycle costing toward eco-efficiency concrete waste management in Malaysia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 3415–3427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercante, I. T., Bovea, M. D., Ibáñez-Forés, V., & Arena, A. P. (2012). Life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste management systems: A Spanish case study. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 232–241.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Environment Forest and Climate Change. (2016). Construction and demolition waste management rules. G.S.R. 317 (E). The Gazette of India, Part-II, Section-3, Sub-section 317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortiz, O., Pasqualino, J. C., & Castells, F. (2010). Environmental performance of construction waste: Comparing three scenarios from a case study in Catalonia, Spain. Waste Management, 30, 646–654.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Penteado, C. S. G., & Rosado, L. P. (2016). Comparison of scenarios for the integrated management of construction and demolition waste by life cycle assessment: A case study in Brazil. Waste Management Research, 34, 1026–1035.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ram, V., & Kalidindi, S. N. (2017). Estimation of construction and demolition waste using waste generation rates in Chennai, India. Waste Management Research, 35, 610–617.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rosado, L. P., Vitale, P., Penteado, C. S. G., & Arena, U. (2017). Life cycle assessment of natural and mixed recycled aggregate production in Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 151, 634–642.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simion, I. M., Maria, E. F., Bonoli, A., & Gavrilescu, M. (2013). Comparing environmental impacts of natural inert and recycled construction and demolition waste processing using LCA. Journal of Environmental Engineering Landscape Management, 21, 273–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USLCI Database. (2012). U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

    Google Scholar 

  • VDI. (1997). Cumulative energy demand—Terms, definitions, methods of calculation. In VDI-Richtlinien 4600. Verein Deutscher Ingenieure, Düsseldorf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatarama Reddy, B. V., & Jagadish, K. S. (2003). Embodied energy of common and alternative building materials and technologies. Energy and Buildings, 35, 129–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vitale, P., Arena, N., Di Gregorio, F., & Arena, U. (2017). Life cycle assessment of the end-of-life phase of a residential building. Waste Management, 60, 311–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vossberg, C., Mason-Jones, K., & Cohen, B. (2014). An energetic life cycle assessment of C&D waste and container glass recycling in Cape Town, South Africa. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 88, 39–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, T., Wang, J., Wu, P., Wang, J., He, Q., & Wang, X. (2018). Estimating the environmental costs and benefits of demolition waste using life cycle assessment and willingness-to-pay: A case study in Shenzhen. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 14–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel, H., Hauschild, M., & Alting, L. (1997). Environmental assessment of products. Methodology, tools and case studies in product development: Vol. 1. United Kingdom: Chapman & Hall; Hingham, MA, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kishore C. Kumar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kumar, K.C., Ram, V.G., Kalidindi, S.N. (2020). A Review of Studies on Environmental Performance Analysis of Construction and Demolition Waste Management using Life Cycle Assessment. In: Ghosh, S. (eds) Urban Mining and Sustainable Waste Management. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0532-4_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics