Abstract
Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) have been used increasingly in education. The selection and grading of course content, i.e. the syllabus, constitutes the basis for MOOC development. However, less attention has been paid to the construction of a syllabus from an empirical perspective which this study addresses by designing a syllabus for MOOC, aiming at improving English teachers’ assessment competencies, i.e. assessment literacy. Applying a mixed methods research approach, we firstly administered an open-ended questionnaire to 468 English teachers of Chinese schools to brainstorm initial components of an assessment literacy inventory (ALI). We then surveyed 318 English teachers with a structured questionnaire. With exploratory factor analysis, we extracted six components for the ALI, i.e. basic knowledge, formative assessment, administration and use of results, use of IT, task construction, and doing research, on the basis of which we proposed a syllabus. Lastly, we interviewed five experts to validate the proposed syllabus.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baturay, M.H.: An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 174(1), 427–433 (2015)
Cohen, L., Manion, L., Morrison, K.: Research Methods in Education, 7th edn. Routledge, London (2011)
Davies, A.: Textbook trends in teaching language testing. Lang. Test. 25(3), 327–347 (2008)
De Freitas, S.I., Morgan, J., Gibson, D.: Will MOOCs transform learning and teaching in higher education? Engagement and course retention in online learning provision. Br. J. Educ. Technol. 46(3), 455–471 (2015)
Ebben, M., Murphy, J.S.: Unpacking MOOC scholarly discourse: a review of nascent MOOC scholarship. Learn. Media Technol. 39(3), 328–345 (2014)
Fulcher, G.: Assessment literacy for the language classroom. Lang. Assess. Q. 9(2), 113–132 (2012)
Hew, K.F., Cheung, W.S.: Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): motivations and challenges. Educ. Res. Rev. 12, 45–58 (2014)
Jin, Y.: The place of language testing and assessment in the professional preparation of foreign language teachers in China. Lang. Test. 27(4), 555–584 (2010)
Jordan, K.: Initial trends in enrolment and completion of Massive Open Online Courses. Int. Rev. Res. Open Distance Learn. 15(1), 133–160 (2014)
Lin, D., Gao, M.: Teacher’s assessment literacy: theory and practice. Foreign Lang. Learn. Theor. Pract. 4, 29–37 (2011)
Malone, M.E.: The essentials of assessment literacy: contrasts between testers and users. Lang. Test. 30(3), 329–344 (2013)
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., Littlejohn, A.: Instructional quality of Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs). Comput. Educ. 80, 77–83 (2015)
Mertler, C.A.: Secondary teachers’ assessment literacy: does classroom experience make a difference? Am. Secondary Educ. 33(1), 49–64 (2004)
Park, Y., Jung, I., Reeves, T.C.: Learning from MOOCs: a qualitative case study from the learners’ perspectives. Educ. Media Int. 52(2), 72–87 (2015)
Scarino, A.: Language assessment literacy as self-awareness: understanding the role of interpretation in assessment and in teacher learning. Lang. Test. 30(3), 309–327 (2013)
Stiggins, R.J.: Assessment literacy. Phi Delta Kappan 72(7), 534–539 (1991)
Tang, J.K.T., Xie, H., Wong, T.-L.: A big data framework for early identification of dropout students in MOOC. In: Lam, J., Ng, K.K., Cheung, S.K.S., Wong, T.L., Li, K.C., Wang, F.L. (eds.) ICTE 2015. CCIS, vol. 559, pp. 127–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-48978-9_12
Tang, X.: Discussion on language assessment literacy. Foreign Lang. Test. Teach. 4, 51–59 (2013)
Zhang, Z., Chen, B., Zhu, Y., Liu, J.: The actuality and problems of MOOC research in China. Mod. Educ. Technol. 27(12), 101–107 (2017)
Zheng, D.: Primary and secondary teacher assessment literacy status: a report from Z province. Global Educ. 39(2), 31–42 (2010)
Zhu, M., Sari, A., Lee, M.M.: A systematic review of research methods and topics of the empirical MOOC literature (2014–2016). Internet High. Educ. 37, 31–39 (2018)
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Social Science Fund of China (15BYY080) and the 2017 Teacher Education MOOC Research Funds from the Chinese University MOOCs to the first author. We would like to thank the English Assessment MOOC team of South China Normal University, all participating teachers, postgraduate students and school districts for their contribution.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Huang, L., Xu, M., Chen, Z., Liu, F. (2019). Syllabus Design for Teacher Education MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses): A Mixed Methods Approach. In: Cheung, S., Jiao, J., Lee, LK., Zhang, X., Li, K., Zhan, Z. (eds) Technology in Education: Pedagogical Innovations. ICTE 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1048. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9895-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9895-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9894-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9895-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)