Skip to main content

Endangered Species, Fragile Marine Ecosystems, and the Philippines

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Protests at the activities of Chinese fishermen, initially referring to the conservation of marine resources, increasingly relied on considerations of biodiversity. Marine biodiversity is extremely important for the Philippines, for both ecological and economic reasons. These may be illustrated with the example of one endangered species, sea turtles, and of one fragile ecosystem, coral reefs. Sea turtles maintain habitat, maintain a balanced food web, cycle nutrients and provide habitat. The collection of their eggs and to a lesser extent, the consumption of meat is vital for marginalized and indigenous communities. Coral reefs provide physical structure services, biotic services, biogeochemical services, and information services. They are sources of living resources and mining materials as well as major tourist attractions. Coral reefs sustain the livelihood of many coastal communities. Hence it is crucial for the Philippines to preserve this fragile ecosystem. Philippine efforts to conserve sea turtles and coral reefs are undermined by the activities of Chinese fishermen and of China itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    South China Sea Arbitration, Memorial of the Philippines (30 March 2014), Annex 181, Government of the Republic of the Philippines, Transcript of Proceedings Republic of the Philippines-People’s Republic of China Bilateral Talks (10 August 1995), vol. VI, 203 (“MP”), https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20VI%20%28Annexes%20158-221%29.pdf, accessed 26 March 2019; MP, Annex 19, Memorandum from Erlinda F. Basilio, Acting Assistant Secretary, Office of Asian and Pacific Affairs, Department of Foreign Affairs, Republic of the Philippines, to the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines (29 March 1995), vol. III, 215, https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20III%20%28Annexes%201-60%29.pdf, accessed 26 March 2019; MP, Annex 20, Memorandum from Lauro L. Baja, Jr., Assistant Secretary, Office of Asian and Pacific Affairs, Department of Foreign Affairs, Republic of the Philippines, to the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines (7 April 1995), vol. III, 223, https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20III%20%28Annexes%201-60%29.pdf, accessed 26 March 2019. United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, concluded at Montego Bay on 10 December, entered into force on 16 November 1994, http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm, accessed 21 March 2019.

  2. 2.

    Rüdiger Wolfrum and Nele Matz, “The Interplay of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and the Convention on Biological Diversity,” Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law 4 (2000): 448; Nele Matz, Wege zur Koordinierung völkerrechtlicher Verträge. Völkervertragsrechtliche und institutionelle Ansätze [Means to Co-ordinate International Treaties. International Treaty Law Approaches And Institutional Approaches] (Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, 2005), 136.

  3. 3.

    MP, Annex 20, 224.

  4. 4.

    Wolfrum and Matz, 464.

  5. 5.

    MP, Annex 186, Note Verbale from the Department of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines to the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in Manila No. 2000100 (14 January 2000), vol. VI, 259, https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20VI%20%28Annexes%20158-221%29.pdf, accessed 26 March 2019.

  6. 6.

    MP, Annex 45, Memorandum from Willy C. Gaa, Assistant Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Republic of the Philippines to Secretary of Foreign Affairs, Republic of the Philippines (14 February 2001), vol. III, 366, https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20III%20%28Annexes%201-60%29.pdf, accessed 26 March 2019.

  7. 7.

    MP, Annex 48, Memorandum from Josue L. Villa, Embassy of the Republic of the Philippines in Beijing, to the Secretary of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of the Philippines (21 May 2001), vol. III, 390, https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20III%20%28Annexes%201-60%29.pdf, accessed 26 March 2019.

  8. 8.

    MP, Annex 205, Note Verbale from the Department of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Philippines to the Embassy of the People’s Republic of China in Manila, No. 12-0894 (11 April 2012), vol. VI, 377, https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20VI%20%28Annexes%20158-221%29.pdf, accessed 26 March 2019.

  9. 9.

    MP, Annex 210, Note Verbale from the Department of Foreign Affairs of the Philippines to the Embassies of ASEAN Member States in Manila, No. 12-1372 (21 May 2012), vol. VI, 400, https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20VI%20%28Annexes%20158-221%29.pdf, accessed 26 March 2019. The other Member States of ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations) are Brunei Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Lao People’s Democratic Republic, Malaysia, Myanmar, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam.

  10. 10.

    MP, vol. I, 190–93, paras. 6.82–6.89, https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/Memorial%20of%20the%20Philippines%20Volume%20I.pdf, accessed 27 March 2019. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD), signed at Rio de Janeiro, on 5 June 1992, entered into force on 29 December 1993, https://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd-en.pdf, accessed 26 March 2019.

  11. 11.

    Republic of the Philippines, The First Philippine National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity May 1998 [Quezon City: Department of Environment and Natural Resources—Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau, 1998], https://www.cbd.int/reports/search/, accessed 3 May 2019; Republic of the Philippines. The Second Philippine National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity [Quezon City: Department of Environment and Natural Resources—Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau, 2002], https://www.cbd.int/reports/search/, accessed 3 May 2019.

  12. 12.

    A taxon is defined as “any group of organisms to which any rank of taxonomic name is applied.” Larousse Dictionary of Science and Technology (Edinburgh: Larousse plc, 1995), 1086.

  13. 13.

    The First Philippine National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity, 1–3.

  14. 14.

    Republic of the Philippines, The Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 2014 [Quezon City: Department of Environment and Natural Resources—Biodiversity Management Bureau, 2014], 4, https://www.cbd.int/reports/search/, accessed 25 March 2019.

  15. 15.

    MP, Annex 240, “Eastern South China Sea Environmental Disturbances and Irresponsible Fishing Practices and Their Effects on Coral Reefs and Fisheries,” by Kent E. Carpenter, vol. VII, 411 (“First Carpenter Report”), https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20VII%20%28Annexes%20222-255%29.pdf, accessed 27 March 2019.

  16. 16.

    CBD, Article 2.

  17. 17.

    South China Sea Arbitration, Hearing on the Merits and Remaining Issues of Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Transcript, Day 4 (30 November 2015), 145–46 (“Hearing on the Merits”), https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/1550, accessed 27 March 2019. The Tribunal also asked questions concerning the extent of shark fishing conducted by Chinese fishermen and the volume of shark fishing that Dr. Carpenter would consider to constitute over-exploitation.

  18. 18.

    South China Sea Arbitration, Award of 12 July 2016, 29–31, paras. 84, 85, 90, https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/2086, accessed 26 March 2019.

  19. 19.

    Marine Wildlife Watch of the Philippines, Philippine Aquatic Wildlife Rescue and Response Manual to Marine Turtle Incidents (Taguig City: Marine Wildlife Watch of the Philippines, 2014), 2, http://www.mwwphilippines.org/downloads/rm-marineturtles.pdf, accessed 19 March 2019.

  20. 20.

    The following paragraph is summarized from Emirates Wildlife Society (EWS)-World Wildlife Fund (WWF), Marine Turtle Conservation Project. Final Scientific Report. Arabian Region (Abu Dhabi: EWS-WWF, 2015), 15–16, https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/mar/ebsaws-2015-02/other/ebsaws-2015-02-ews-wwf-submission1-en.pdf, accessed 25 March 2019.

  21. 21.

    Receptive means “capable of being effectively pollinated or fertilized.” Larousse Dictionary of Science and Technology, 918.

  22. 22.

    Republic of the Philippines, Assessing Progress Towards the 2010 Biodiversity Targets. The Fourth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity [Quezon City: Department of Environment and Natural Resources—Protected Areas and Wildlife Bureau, 2009], 53–55 (“Philippines Fourth National Report to the CBD”), https://www.cbd.int/reports/, accessed 25 March 2019.

  23. 23.

    Unless otherwise indicated, the following is summarized from Chloe Schauble, Sea Turtles (Hanoi: Marine and Coastal Program/IUCN Vietnam, 2007), 3–5, http://www.ioseaturtles.org/electronic_lib2.php?cat_id=3, accessed 10 March 2017. Photographs of each of the five species may be found on Ocean Ambassadors Track a Turtle, Philippine Turtle Islands, Turtle Biology [2001], http://www.oneocean.org/ambassadors/track_a_turtle/tihpa/pti.html, accessed 31 March 2019. See also Vicky Viray-Mendoza, “Marine Turtles and the Philippine Forest Turtle,” The Maritime Review. The Online Edition of the Maritime League’s Maritime Review Magazine, 24 May 2016, http://maritimereview.ph/2016/05/24/marine-turtles-and-the-philippine-forest-turtle/, accessed 25 March 2019.

  24. 24.

    See Annex 2.1.

  25. 25.

    Carapace is an exoskeleton covering part or all of the dorsal surface of an animal, e.g., the bony dorsal shield of a tortoise. Larousse Dictionary of Science and Technology, 161. See the IUCN criteria for identification of endangered species in Annex 2.1.

  26. 26.

    See the IUCN criteria for identification of critically endangered species in Annex 2.2.

  27. 27.

    Marine Wildlife Watch of the Philippines, 1.

  28. 28.

    Ibid.

  29. 29.

    Ibid.

  30. 30.

    The following is summarized from E. D. Wilson et al., Why Healthy Oceans Need Sea Turtles. The Importance of Sea Turtles to Marine Ecosystems (Washington, DC: Oceana, 2010), 5–15, http://www.oceana.org/sites/default/files/reports/Why_Healthy_Oceans_Need_Sea_Turtles.pdf, accessed 25 March 2019. The references to the scientific literature are to be found in this publication. See also World Wildlife Fund-Philippines, Turtle Islands: Resources and Livelihoods Under Threat. A Case Study on the Philippines (Quezon City: WWF-Philippines, 2005), 6 (“WWF-Philippines, Turtle Islands”), https://wwf.org.ph/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Turtle-Islands-2005.pdf, accessed 28 March 2019 and EWS-WWF, 18.

  31. 31.

    Epibiosis is a relationship in which one organism lives on the surface of another without causing it harm. Plant epibionts are epiphytes, animal epibionts, epizoites. Larousse Dictionary of Science and Technology, 380.

  32. 32.

    Feral refers to a domesticated animal that has reverted to the wild. Ibid., 412.

  33. 33.

    In a detrital food chain, dead organic matter of plants and animals is broken down by decomposers, e.g., bacteria and fungi, and moves to detritivores and then carnivores. In a grazing food chain, energy and nutrients move from plants to the herbivores consuming them, and to the carnivores or omnivores preying upon the herbivores. Dafeng Hui, “Food Web: Concept and Applications,” Nature Education Knowledge 3 (2012): 6, https://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/food-web-concept-and-applications-84077181, accessed 28 March 2019.

  34. 34.

    Christopher N. S. Poonian et al., “Diversity, Habitat Distribution, and Indigenous Hunting of Marine Turtles in the Calamian Islands, Palawan, Republic of the Philippines,” Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 9 (2016): 69.

  35. 35.

    Karen L. Eckert, The Biology and Population Status of Marine Turtles in the North Pacific Ocean, NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS, NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-186 (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, 1993), 21, https://repository.library.noaa.gov/view/noaa/6133/noaa_6133_DS1.pdf?, accessed 19 March 2019; Monnyeen Nida R. Alava and Jose Alfred B. Cantos, “Marine Protected Species in the Philippines,” in Geronimo Silvestre et al. (eds.), In Turbulent Seas: The Status of Philippine Marine Fisheries (Cebu City: Department of Agriculture—Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, 2004), 111, http://oneocean.org/download/db_files/fshprofl.pdf, accessed 25 March 2019.

  36. 36.

    WWF-Philippines, Turtle Islands, 20.

  37. 37.

    Frank Harris Hitchcock, Trade of the Philippine Islands (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1898), 33, https://ia800200.us.archive.org/28/items/tradephilippine00hitcgoog/tradephilippine00hitcgoog.pdf, accessed 20 March 2019. The exact figures (in pounds) are as follows: 1886—1623; 1887—3904; 1888—1974; 1889—4910; and 1890—27,194.

  38. 38.

    Alvin Seale, “Sea Products of Mindanao and Sulu, III: Sponges, Tortoise Shell, Corals and Trepang,” Philippine Journal of Science D. General Biology, Ethnology and Anthropology 13 (1917): 202–203, http://philjournalsci.dost.gov.ph/images/pdf_upload/pjs1917/PJS_Vol_12D_No1_Jan_1917.pdf, accessed 19 March 2019.

  39. 39.

    Jose S. Domantay, “The Turtle Fisheries of the Turtle Islands,” Bulletin of the Fisheries Society of the Philippines 3–4 (1953): 15.

  40. 40.

    Tom Milliken and Hideomi Tokunaga, The Japanese Sea Turtle Trade 1970–1986 (Tokyo: TRAFFIC [Japan] [Wildlife Trade Monitoring Network], 1987), 107–10, https://www.traffic.org/site/assets/files/9659/japanese-sea-turtle-trade-1970-1986.pdf, accessed 19 March 2019. Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora, signed at Washington, DC, on 3 March 1973, amended at Bonn, on 22 June 1979, amended at Gaborone, on 30 April 1983, https://www.cites.org/eng/disc/text.php, accessed 26 March 2019.

  41. 41.

    Memorandum of Understanding on the Conservation and Management of Marine Turtles and Their Habitats of the Indian Ocean and Southeast Asia, Illegal Take and Trade of Marine Turtles in the IOSEA Region, Doc. No. MT-IOSEA/SS.7/Doc. 10.1 (28 August 2014), 14, 18, 20, 21, paras. 34, 46, 54, 58 (“MT-IOSEA”), https://www.cms.int/sites/default/files/publication/MT_IO7_DOC10-1_Illegal_Take%26Trade-final.pdf, accessed 25 March 2019.

  42. 42.

    Angelo L. Alcala, “Observations on the Ecology of the Pacific Hawksbill Turtle in the Central Visayas, Philippines,” Fisheries Resource Journal of the Philippines 5 (1980): 50, http://scinet.dost.gov.ph/union/Downloads/Alcala%20AC%201980%20Observations%20on%20the%20Ecology%20of%20the%20Pacific%20Hawksbill%20Turtle%20in%20the%20Central%20Visayas_3988.pdf, accessed 19 March 2019; Jonathan L. Mayuga, “From Predators to Protectors of ‘Pawikan [Sea turtles]’,” Business Mirror, 26 November 2018 (“Mayuga, ‘From Predators’”), https://businessmirror.com.ph/2018/11/26/from-predators-to-protectors-of-pawikan/, accessed 18 March 2019.

  43. 43.

    MT-IOSEA, 8, paras. 13, 21, 59.

  44. 44.

    Eckert, 22.

  45. 45.

    Domantay, 18.

  46. 46.

    Mayuga, “From Predators.”

  47. 47.

    Alava and Cantos, 113.

  48. 48.

    Pejabat Perikanan Negeri and Siow Kuan Tow, “Observations on the Exploitation of Turtles in the Philippines,” Marine Turtle Newsletter 3 (1977), http://www.seaturtle.org/mtn/PDF/MTN3.pdf, accessed 19 March 2019.

  49. 49.

    The six islands are Taganak, Boan, Lihiman, Langaan, Bakkungan, and Baguan.

  50. 50.

    Dennis L. Maliwanag, “Turtle Islands: Hundreds of Nautical Miles Away from Justice,” Philippine Daily Inquirer, 22 August 2010, https://www.pressreader.com/philippines/philippine-daily-inquirer-1109/20100822/281775625465558, accessed 29 March 2019.

  51. 51.

    Ocean Ambassadors, Track a Turtle, “The Philippine Turtle Islands” [2001], http://www.oneocean.org/ambassadors/track_a_turtle/tihpa/pti.html, accessed 31 March 2019.

  52. 52.

    Raul P. Lejano and Helen Ingram, “Place-Based Conservation: Lessons from the Turtle Islands,” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 49 (2007): 21.

  53. 53.

    National Statistics Office, Statistical Tables on Sample Variables from the Results of 2010 Census of Population and Housing—Tawi-Tawi, 31 July 2014, https://psa.gov.ph/content/statistical-tables-sample-variables-results-2010-census-population-and-housing-tawi-tawi, accessed 18 March 2019.

  54. 54.

    WWF-Philippines, Turtle Islands, 14–15.

  55. 55.

    Romeo B. Trono, “Management and Conservation Program of a Protected Wildlife. Species,” Philippine Journal of Public Administration 26 (1990): 91–92, http://lynchlibrary.pssc.org.ph:8081/bitstream/handle/0/4078/10_Management%20and%20Conservation%20Program.pdf?sequence=1, accessed 25 March 2019.

  56. 56.

    The following discussion is based on WWF-Philippines, Turtle Islands, 20–24.

  57. 57.

    Ibid., 24.

  58. 58.

    Lejano and Ingram, 23.

  59. 59.

    Dennis Atienza Maliwanag, “DOH Team Accused of Turtle Eggs Poaching in Tawi-Tawi,” Philippine Daily Inquirer, 2 March 2017 (“Maliwanag, ‘DOH Team’”), https://newsinfo.inquirer.net/876941/doh-team-accused-of-turtle-eggs-poaching?utm_expid=.XqNwTug2W6nwDVUSgFJXed.1, accessed 18 March 2019.

  60. 60.

    MT-IOSEA, 10, para. 21.

  61. 61.

    Maliwanag, “DOH Team.”

  62. 62.

    WWF-Philippines, Turtle Islands, 23.

  63. 63.

    Lejano and Ingram, 24.

  64. 64.

    Jonathan L. Mayuga, “Saving the Endangered ‘Pawikan’ [Sea Turtles],” Business Mirror, 17 January 2016, http://www.businessmirror.com.ph/saving-the-endangered-pawikan-2/, accessed 25 March 2019.

  65. 65.

    Unless otherwise indicated, the following paragraph is summarized from Poonian et al., 69–73.

  66. 66.

    Republic of the Philippines, National Statistics Office, 2010 Census of Population and Housing. Report No. 2A—Demographic and Housing Characteristics (Non-Sample Variables). Palawan (Manila: National Statistics Office, 2013), 124, https://psa.gov.ph/sites/default/files/PALAWAN_FINAL%20PDF.pdf, accessed 18 March 2019. On the Tagbanua in general, see Celeste Lacuna-Richman, “Subsistence Strategies of an Indigenous Minority in the Philippines: Nonwood Forest Product Use by the Tagbanua of Narra, Palawan,” Economic Botany 58 (2004): 266–85.

  67. 67.

    Poonian et al., 72.

  68. 68.

    “Zambales Turtle Conservation Program 2004–2005 Technical Turtle Seminar,” Environmental Protection of Asia, 2006, http://www.environmentalprotectionofasia.com/ztcp/reports/2004_2005.htm, accessed 13 March 2017.

  69. 69.

    Jonas Reyes, “215 ‘Pawikan’ [Sea Turtles] Hatchlings Released in Subic,” Manila Bulletin, 21 December 2017, https://news.mb.com.ph/2017/12/20/215-pawikan-hatchlings-released-in-subic/, accessed 29 March 2019.

  70. 70.

    Mayuga, “From Predators,” 2018.

  71. 71.

    Republic of the Philippines, Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Biodiversity Management Bureau, Philippines-Malaysia Partnership in Marine Turtle Conservation, 2016, http://www.bmb.gov.ph/index.php/mainmenu-news-events/mainmenu-news/396-philippine-malaysia-partnership-in-marine-turtle-conservation, accessed 29 March 2019. On the management of the Turtle Islands Heritage Protected Area, see Rolando C. Esteban, “The Turtle Island Heritage Protected Area: The Possibilities and Limits of Transborder Conservation,” Ostrom Workshop Indiana University Bloomington, July 2008, http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/993/Esteban_223701.pdf?sequence=1, accessed 31 March 2019; Evangeline Miclat and Enrique Nunez, “The Philippine-Sabah Turtle Island Heritage Protected Area (TIHPA),” in Peter Mackelworth (ed.), Marine Transboundary Conservation and Protected Areas (New York: Routledge, 2016), 32–47.

  72. 72.

    Glenda Cadigal of the Palawan Council on Sustainable Development, quoted in Public Radio International, “High Demand for Sea Turtles in China Sends Poachers Toward Philippines,” PRI’s [Public Radio International] The World, 9 February 2012, https://www.pri.org/stories/2012-02-09/high-demand-sea-turtles-china-sends-poachers-toward-philippines, accessed 29 March 2019; MT-IOSEA, 7, para. 10.

  73. 73.

    Cruz, 63.

  74. 74.

    Mayuga, “Saving.”

  75. 75.

    John B. Virata, “Philippine Police Arrest Sea Turtle Poachers from China,” Reptiles Magazine, 11 May 2014, http://www.reptilesmagazine.com/Turtles-Tortoises/Information-News/Philippine-Police-Arrest-Chinese-Sea-Turtle-Poachers/, accessed 27 March 2019.

  76. 76.

    Cecil Morella, “Turtles’ Vulnerable Start to Life on Philippine Coast,” Phys.org, 29 February 2016, https://phys.org/news/2016-02-turtles-vulnerable-life-philippine-coast.html, accessed 29 March 2019.

  77. 77.

    MTT_IOSEA, 12, para. 31.

  78. 78.

    Romeo Trono, quoted in Morella.

  79. 79.

    Terry Done, “Coral Reef, Definition,” in David Hopley (ed.), Encyclopedia of Modern Coral Reefs. Structure, Form and Process (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011), 261.

  80. 80.

    Ramsar Convention, 8th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties to the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971), “Wetlands: Water, Life, and Culture,” Valencia, Spain, 18–26 November 2002, Resolution VIII.11, Guidance for Identifying and Designating Peatlands, Wet Grasslands, Mangroves and Coral Reefs as Wetlands of International Importance (2002), 10, para. 52, http://archive.ramsar.org/cda/en/ramsar-documents-resol-resolution-viii-11/main/ramsar/1-31-107%5E21521_4000_0__, accessed 31 March 2019. Ramsar Convention. Convention on Wetlands of International Importance Especially as Waterfowl Habitat, signed at Ramsar, Iran, on 2 February 1971, as amended by the Protocol of 3 December 1982 and the Amendments of 28 May 1987, https://www.ramsar.org/sites/default/files/documents/library/current_convention_text_e.pdf, accessed 24 March 2019.

  81. 81.

    Ramsar Convention, Resolution VIII-11 (2002), 11, para. 53.

  82. 82.

    Ibid.

  83. 83.

    An embayment is a shape resembling a bay. Collins English Dictionary (Glasgow: HarperCollins Publishers, 2019), https://www.collinsdictionary.com/dictionary/english/embayment, accessed 10 May 2019.

  84. 84.

    Done, 261.

  85. 85.

    Unless otherwise indicated, the following paragraphs are summarized from John E. N. Veron, “Corals, Biology, Skeletal Disposition and Reef-Building,” in David Hopley (ed.), Encyclopedia of Modern Coral Reefs. Structure, Form and Process (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011), 275–81. Reef formation is also described in Done, 261–66; South China Sea Arbitration, Independent Expert Report. Assessment of the Potential Environmental Consequences of Construction Activities on Seven Reefs in the Spratly Islands in the South China Sea, by Sebastian C. A. Ferse, Peter Mumby, and Selina Ward, 26 April 2016, 11–12 (“Ferse Report”), https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/1809, accessed 24 March 2019; John W. McManus, “Offshore Coral Reef Damage, Overfishing and Paths to Peace in the South China Sea,” The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law 32 (2017): 199–237; also accessible as South China Sea Arbitration, The Philippines Annexes Cited During the Merits Hearing (Annexes 820-59) (30 November 2015), Annex 820, “Offshore Coral Reef Damage, Overfishing and Paths to Peace in the South China Sea,” by John W. McManus, 578–608, https://pcacases.com/web/view/7, accessed 26 March 2019.

  86. 86.

    Done, 261.

  87. 87.

    MP, Annex 240, “Eastern South China Sea Environmental Disturbances and Irresponsible Fishing Practices and Their Effects on Coral Reefs and Fisheries,” by Kent E. Carpenter, vol. VII (30 March 2014), 410 (“First Carpenter Report”), https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Memorial%20-%20Volume%20VII%20%28Annexes%20222-255%29.pdf, accessed 31 March 2019.

  88. 88.

    Veron, 280.

  89. 89.

    Fredrik Moberg and Carl Folke, “Ecological Goods and Services of Coral Reef Ecosystems,” Ecological Economic 29 (1999): 216. The Philippines relied heavily on this document for its arguments. See South China Sea Arbitration, Hearing on the Merits and Remaining Issues of Jurisdiction and Admissibility, Transcript, Day 3 (26 November 2015), 15–17, https://pcacases.com/web/sendAttach/1401, accessed 31 March 2019. It is reproduced in Supplemental Documents of the Philippines (19 November 2015), Annex 262(bis), vol. III, 3–21, https://files.pca-cpa.org/pcadocs/The%20Philippines%27%20Supplemental%20Documents%20-%20Volume%20III%20%28Annexes%20710-756%29.pdf, accessed 31 March 2019.

  90. 90.

    Veron, 277.

  91. 91.

    As corals do not make their own food, they are in fact animals. “Corals Are Animals,” Florida Keys National Marine Sanctuary, 2011, http://floridakeys.noaa.gov/corals/coralanimals.html, accessed 31 March 2019. See also First Carpenter Report, 264.

  92. 92.

    “Corals. Zooxanthellae… What’s That,” NOAA [National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration] Ocean Service Education, 2008, https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/education/tutorial_corals/coral02_zooxanthellae.html, accessed 31 March 2019.

  93. 93.

    Veron, 281.

  94. 94.

    First Carpenter Report, 398.

  95. 95.

    Unless otherwise indicated, the following paragraphs are summarized from Moberg and Folke.

  96. 96.

    Surface-breaking coral reefs reduce wave energy by 97%. McManus, 215.

  97. 97.

    A biotope is a small habitat in a large community. Larousse Dictionary of Science and Technology, 110.

  98. 98.

    Stephen C. Wagner, “Biological Nitrogen Fixation,” Nature Education Knowledge 3 (2011): 15, http://www.nature.com/scitable/knowledge/library/biological-nitrogen-fixation-23570419, accessed 31 March 2019.

  99. 99.

    Carbon sinks are reservoirs that retain carbon and keep it from entering Earth’s atmosphere. Noelle Eckley Selin, “Carbon Sequestration,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 2018, https://www.britannica.com/technology/carbon-sequestration, accessed 31 March 2019.

  100. 100.

    Mole, also spelled mol, in chemistry, a standard scientific unit for measuring large quantities of very small entities such as atoms, molecules, or other specified particles. The mole designates an extremely large number of units, 6.02214179 × 1023, which is the number of atoms determined experimentally to be found in 12 grams of carbon-12. The Editors of Encyclopædia Britannica, “Mole: Chemistry,” Encyclopædia Britannica, 2018, https://www.britannica.com/science/mole-chemistry, accessed 31 March 2019.

  101. 101.

    Porfirio M. Aliño et al., “Philippine Coral Reef Fisheries: Diversity in Adversity,” in Geronimo Silvestre et al. (eds.), In Turbulent Seas: The Status of Philippine Marine Fisheries (Cebu City: Department of Agriculture—Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, 2004), 67, http://oneocean.org/download/db_files/fshprofl.pdf, accessed 25 March 2019.

  102. 102.

    Unless otherwise indicated, the following paragraphs are summarized from Moberg and Folke.

  103. 103.

    Republic of the Philippines, The Fifth National Report to the Convention on Biological Diversity 2014 [Quezon City: Department of Environment and Natural Resources—Biodiversity Management Bureau, 2014], 22 (“Philippines Fifth National Report to the CBD”), https://www.cbd.int/reports/search/, accessed 25 March 2019; Wilfredo Y. Licuanan et al., “The Philippines,” in Charles Sheppard (ed.), World Seas: An Environmental Evaluation, vol. II. The Indian Ocean to the Pacific (London: Academic Press, 2019), 517 (“Licuanan et al., ‘The Philippines’”).

  104. 104.

    Porfirio Aliño, “National Report on Coral Reefs in the Coastal Waters of the South China Sea: Philippines,” in United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Reversing Environmental Degradation Trends in the South China Sea and the Gulf of Thailand. National Reports on Coastal Reefs in the Coastal Waters of the South China Sea (Bangkok: UNEP, 2007), 55–57, http://unepscs.org/remository/startdown/1961.html, accessed 31 March 2019; Licuanan et al., “The Philippines,” 517.

  105. 105.

    Philippines Fourth National Report to the CBD, 45.

  106. 106.

    Licuanan et al., “The Philippines,” 522.

  107. 107.

    Aliño, 62.

  108. 108.

    Philippines Fourth National Report to the CBD, 46. See also Herman S. J. Cesar, “Coral Reefs: Their Threats, Functions and Economic Value,” in Herman S. J. Cesar (ed.), Collected Essays on the Economics of Coral Reefs (Kalmar: Linnaeus University, 2002), 14–39, http://www.reefbase.org/resource_center/publication/pub_12370.aspx, accessed 31 March 2019.

  109. 109.

    Aliño, 55.

  110. 110.

    Henrylito D. Tacio, “Assessing the Status of Endangered Coral Reefs,” EdgeDavao, 18 October 2018, http://edgedavao.net/science/2018/10/18/assessing-the-status-of-endangered-coral-reefs/, accessed 15 March 2019.

  111. 111.

    Philippines Fifth National Report to the CBD, 22.

  112. 112.

    Licuanan et al., “The Philippines,” 526.

  113. 113.

    Aliño, 60.

  114. 114.

    Kristine L. Alave, “PH Center of ‘Illegal’ Live Reef, Aquarium Fish Trade,” Philippine Daily Inquirer, 12 July 2012, https://globalnation.inquirer.net/43917/ph-center-of-%E2%80%98illegal%E2%80%99-live-reef-aquarium-fish-trade, accessed 31 March 2019.

  115. 115.

    Robert S. Pomeroy et al., “Evaluation of Policy Options for the Live Reef Food Fish Trade in the Province of Palawan, Western Philippines,” Marine Policy 32 (2008): 56.

  116. 116.

    WWF-Philippines, Palawan’s Live Reef Food Fish Trade (Quezon City: WWF-Philippines, 2019), https://wwf.org.ph/what-we-do/food/lrfft/, accessed 31 March 2019.

  117. 117.

    Yvonne Sadovy de Mitcheson et al., The Trade in Live Reef Food Fish—Going, Going, Gone, vol. I, Main Report (Hong Kong: ADM Capital Foundation and The University of Hong Kong, 2017), 110, https://www.chooserighttoday.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/LRFFTVol1_Final_12022018.pdf, accessed 31 March 2019.

  118. 118.

    Pomeroy et al., 56.

  119. 119.

    Philippines Fourth National Report to the CBD, 47; Philippines Fifth National Report to the CBD, 22.

  120. 120.

    Licuanan et al., “The Philippines,” 517; see also Ardea M. Licuanan et al., “Initial Findings of the Nationwide Assessment of Philippine Coral Reefs,” Philippine Journal of Science 146 (2017): 177–85 (“Licuanan et al., ‘Initial Findings’”), http://philjournalsci.dost.gov.ph/images/pdf/pjs_pdf/vol146no2/initial_findings_of_the_nationwide_assessment_of_philippine_coral_reefs.pdf, accessed 1 March 2019.

  121. 121.

    Philippines Fifth National Report to the CBD, 22.

  122. 122.

    Ibid., 60.

  123. 123.

    Sadovy de Mitcheson et al., 26.

  124. 124.

    Ibid., 47.

  125. 125.

    Licuanan et al., “The Philippines,” 525.

  126. 126.

    A trophic level refers to a broad class of organisms within an ecosystem characterized by mode of supply. The first trophic level comprises the green plants, the second is the herbivores, and the third is the carnivores that eat the herbivores. Larousse Dictionary of Science and Technology, 1134.

  127. 127.

    Jon C. Day, “Conservation and Marine Protected Areas,” in David Hopley (ed.), Encyclopedia of Modern Coral Reefs. Structure, Form and Process (Dordrecht: Springer, 2011), 231.

  128. 128.

    Lauretta Burke et al., Reefs at Risk Revisited (Washington, DC: World Resources Institute, 2011), 26, https://wriorg.s3.amazonaws.com/s3fs-public/pdf/reefs_at_risk_revisited_hi-res.pdf?_ga=2.243625165.954175598.1554184854-1064952833.1552820007, accessed 17 March 2019.

  129. 129.

    Samuel Mamauag, “The Live Reef Food Fish Trade in the Philippines,” in Geronimo Silvestre et al. (eds.), In Turbulent Seas: The Status of Philippine Marine Fisheries (Cebu City: Department of Agriculture—Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, 2004), 57, http://oneocean.org/download/db_files/fshprofl.pdf, accessed 25 March 2019; Michael Fabinyi and Dante Dalabajan, “Policy and Practice in the Live Reef Fish for Food Trade: A Case Study from Palawan, Philippines,” Marine Policy 35 (2011): 373.

  130. 130.

    Aliño, 60.

  131. 131.

    Sadovy de Mitcheson et al., 51.

  132. 132.

    Mamauag, 57; Fabinyi and Dalabajan, 373.

  133. 133.

    Day, 231.

  134. 134.

    Aliño, 60.

  135. 135.

    Tacio; Philippines Fifth National Report to the CBD, 22.

  136. 136.

    The Tubbataha Reefs Natural Park (Paris: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, 2019), https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/653, accessed 31 March 2019.

  137. 137.

    Philippines Fifth National Report to the CBD, 22.

  138. 138.

    Melvin B. Carlos et al., Restoring the Country’s Coral Reefs Through Filipinnovation, DOST-PCAARRD [Department of Science and Technology—Philippine Council for Aquatic and Natural Resources Research and Development], 12 February 2016, http://www.pcaarrd.dost.gov.ph/home/portal/index.php/quick-information-dispatch/2664-restoring-the-country-s-coral-reefs-through-filipinnovation, accessed 1 April 2019.

  139. 139.

    Licuanan et al., “The Philippines,” 518. See also Jonathan L. Mayuga, “Mission: Reduce Threats to Coral Reefs,” Business Mirror, 25 February 2018 (“Mayuga, ‘Mission’”), https://businessmirror.com.ph/2018/02/25/mission-reduce-threats-to-coral-reefs/, accessed 15 March 2019; Pia Ranada, “Is Coral Transplantation the Way to Save PH Corals?” Rappler, 16 April 2015, https://www.rappler.com/science-nature/environment/90155-coral-transplantation-philippines, accessed 15 March 2019.

  140. 140.

    Licuanan et al., “The Philippines,” 530.

  141. 141.

    Adelina B. Benavente-Villena and Michael N. Pido, “Poaching in Philippine Marine Waters: Intrusion of Chinese Fishing Vessels in Palawan Waters,” in Geronimo Silvestre et al. (eds.), In Turbulent Seas: The Status of Philippine Marine Fisheries (Cebu City: Department of Agriculture—Bureau of Fisheries and Aquatic Resources, 2004), 267, http://oneocean.org/download/db_files/fshprofl.pdf, accessed 25 March 2019.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Annex 2.1: IUCN Criteria for Endangered Species

A taxon is Endangered when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the following criteria (A–E), and it is therefore considered to be facing a very high risk of extinction in the wild:

  1. A.

    Reduction in population size based on any of the following:

    1. 1.

      An observed, estimated, inferred, or suspected population size reduction of ≥70% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the causes of the reduction are clearly reversible AND understood AND ceased, based on (and specifying) any of the following:

      1. (a)

        direct observation;

      2. (b)

        an index of abundance appropriate to the taxon;

      3. (c)

        a decline in area of occupancy, extent of occurrence, and/or quality of habitat;

      4. (d)

        actual or potential levels of exploitation;

      5. (e)

        the effects of introduced taxa, hybridization, pathogens, pollutants, competitors, or parasites.

    2. 2.

      An observed, estimated, inferred, or suspected population size reduction of ≥50% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1.

    3. 3.

      A population size reduction of 350%, projected or suspected to be met within the next 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years), based on (and specifying) any of (b) to (e) under A1.

    4. 4.

      An observed, estimated, inferred, projected, or suspected population size reduction of ≥50% over any 10-year or three-generation period, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future), where the time period must include both the past and the future, and where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1.

  2. B.

    Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) OR B2 (area of occupancy) OR both:

    1. 1.

      Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 5000 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c:

      1. a.

        Severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than five locations.

      2. b.

        Continuing decline, observed, inferred, or projected, in any of the following:

        1. (i)

          extent of occurrence;

        2. (ii)

          area of occupancy;

        3. (iii)

          area, extent and/or quality of habitat;

        4. (iv)

          number of locations or subpopulations;

        5. (v)

          number of mature individuals.

      3. c.

        Extreme fluctuations in any of the following:

        1. (i)

          extent of occurrence;

        2. (ii)

          area of occupancy;

        3. (iii)

          number of locations or subpopulations;

        4. (iv)

          number of mature individuals.

    2. 2.

      Area of occupancy estimated to be less than 500 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c:

      1. a.

        Severely fragmented or known to exist at no more than five locations.

      2. b.

        Continuing decline, observed, inferred, or projected, in any of the following:

        1. (i)

          extent of occurrence;

        2. (ii)

          area of occupancy;

        3. (iii)

          area, extent, and/or quality of habitat;

        4. (iv)

          number of locations or subpopulations;

        5. (v)

          number of mature individuals.

      3. c.

        Extreme fluctuations in any of the following:

        1. (i)

          extent of occurrence;

        2. (ii)

          area of occupancy;

        3. (iii)

          number of locations or subpopulations;

        4. (iv)

          number of mature individuals.

  3. C.

    Population size estimated to number fewer than 2500 mature individuals and either:

    1. 1.

      An estimated continuing decline of at least 20% within five years or two generations, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future), OR

    2. 2.

      A continuing decline, observed, projected, or inferred, in numbers of mature individuals AND at least one of the following (a–b):

      1. a.

        Population structure in the form of one of the following:

        1. (i)

          no subpopulation estimated to contain more than 250 mature individuals, OR

        2. (ii)

          at least 95% of mature individuals in one subpopulation.

      2. b.

        Extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals.

  4. D.

    Population size estimated to number fewer than 250 mature individuals.

  5. E.

    Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 20% within 20 years or five generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years).

Source IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC), IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 3.1 (Gland: IUCN, 2001), 18–20, https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/RL-2001-001.pdf, accessed 27 March 2019.

Annex 2.2: IUCN Criteria for Critically Endangered Species

A taxon is Critically Endangered when the best available evidence indicates that it meets any of the following criteria (A–E), and it is therefore considered to be facing an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild:

  1. A.

    Reduction in population size based on any of the following:

    1. 1.

      An observed, estimated, inferred, or suspected population size reduction of 90% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the causes of the reduction are clearly reversible AND understood AND ceased, based on (and specifying) any of the following:

      1. (a)

        direct observation;

      2. (b)

        an index of abundance appropriate to the taxon;

      3. (c)

        a decline in area of occupancy, extent of occurrence, and/or quality of habitat;

      4. (d)

        actual or potential levels of exploitation;

      5. (e)

        the effects of introduced taxa, hybridization, pathogens, pollutants, competitors, or parasites.

    2. 2.

      An observed, estimated, inferred, or suspected population size reduction of ≥80% over the last 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer, where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1.

    3. 3.

      A population size reduction of 380%, projected or suspected to be met within the next 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years), based on (and specifying) any of (b) to (e) under A1.

    4. 4.

      An observed, estimated, inferred, projected, or suspected population size reduction of ≥80% over any 10-year or three-generation period, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future), where the time period must include both the past and the future, and where the reduction or its causes may not have ceased OR may not be understood OR may not be reversible, based on (and specifying) any of (a) to (e) under A1.

  2. B.

    Geographic range in the form of either B1 (extent of occurrence) OR B2 (area of occupancy) OR both:

    1. 1.

      Extent of occurrence estimated to be less than 100 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c:

      1. a.

        Severely fragmented or known to exist at only a single location.

      2. b.

        Continuing decline, observed, inferred or projected, in any of the following:

        1. (i)

          extent of occurrence;

        2. (ii)

          area of occupancy;

        3. (iii)

          area, extent, and/or quality of habitat;

        4. (iv)

          number of locations or subpopulations;

        5. (v)

          number of mature individuals.

      3. c.

        Extreme fluctuations in any of the following:

        1. (i)

          extent of occurrence;

        2. (ii)

          area of occupancy;

        3. (iii)

          number of locations or subpopulations;

        4. (iv)

          number of mature individuals.

    2. 2.

      Area of occupancy estimated to be less than 10 km2, and estimates indicating at least two of a–c:

      1. a.

        Severely fragmented or known to exist at only a single location.

      2. b.

        Continuing decline, observed, inferred, or projected, in any of the following:

        1. (i)

          extent of occurrence;

        2. (ii)

          area of occupancy;

        3. (iii)

          area, extent, and/or quality of habitat;

        4. (iv)

          number of locations or subpopulations;

        5. (v)

          number of mature individuals.

      3. c.

        Extreme fluctuations in any of the following:

        1. (i)

          extent of occurrence;

        2. (ii)

          area of occupancy;

        3. (iii)

          number of locations or subpopulations;

        4. (iv)

          number of mature individuals.

  3. C.

    Population size estimated to number fewer than 250 mature individuals and either:

    1. 1.

      An estimated continuing decline of at least 25% within three years or one generation, whichever is longer (up to a maximum of 100 years in the future), OR

    2. 2.

      A continuing decline, observed, projected, or inferred, in numbers of mature individuals AND at least one of the following (a–b):

      1. a.

        Population structure in the form of one of the following:

        1. (i)

          no subpopulation estimated to contain more than 50 mature individuals, OR

        2. (ii)

          at least 90% of mature individuals in one subpopulation.

      2. b.

        Extreme fluctuations in number of mature individuals.

  4. D.

    Population size estimated to number fewer than 50 mature individuals.

  5. E.

    Quantitative analysis showing the probability of extinction in the wild is at least 50% within 10 years or three generations, whichever is the longer (up to a maximum of 100 years).

Source IUCN Species Survival Commission (SSC), IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 3.1 (Gland: IUCN, 2001), 16–18, https://portals.iucn.org/library/sites/library/files/documents/RL-2001-001.pdf, accessed 27 March 2019.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Robles Jr., A. (2020). Endangered Species, Fragile Marine Ecosystems, and the Philippines. In: Endangered Species and Fragile Ecosystems in the South China Sea. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9813-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics