Skip to main content

Better Quality Classifiers for Social Media Content: Crowdsourcing with Decision Trees

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Smart Computing Paradigms: New Progresses and Challenges

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 767))

  • 312 Accesses

Abstract

As social media use grows and increasingly becomes a forum for social debate in politics, social issues, sports, and brand sentiment; accurately classifying social media sentiment remains an important computational challenge. Social media posts present numerous challenges for text classification. This paper presents an approach to introduce guided decision trees into the design of a crowdsourcing platform to extract additional data features, reduce task cognitive complexity, and improve the quality of the resulting labeled text corpus. We compare the quality of the proposed approach with off-the-shelf sentiment classifiers and a crowdsourced solution without a decision tree using a tweet sample from the social media firestorm #CancelColbert. We find that the proposed crowdsource with decision tree approach results in a training corpus with higher quality, necessary for effective classification of social media content.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. E. Kouloumpis, T. Wilson, J.D. Moore, Twitter sentiment analysis: The good the bad and the omg!, in ICWSM 11 (2011), pp. 11538–541

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bermingham, A.F. Smeaton, Classifying sentiment in microblogs: Is brevity an advantage?, in 19th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, ACM (2010), pp. 1833–1836

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Yu, V. Hatzivassiloglou, Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences, in EMNLP (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. D. Maynard, M.A. Greenwood, Who cares about sarcastic tweets? Investigating the impact of sarcasm on sentiment analysis, in Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (2014), pp. 4238–4243

    Google Scholar 

  5. A. Reyes, P. Rosso, T. Veale, A multidimensional approach for detecting irony in Twitter, in Language Resources and Evaluation, vol. 47, no. 1 (2013), pp. 239–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. O. Tsur, D. Davidov, A. Rappoport, A great catchy name: Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in online product reviews, in Fourth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. R.W. Gibbs, H.L. Colston, in Irony in Language and Thought (Routledge (Taylor and Francis), New York, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  8. C. Bosco, V. Patti, A. Bolioli, Developing corpora for sentiment analysis: The case of irony and senti-TUT. IEEE Intell. Syst. 28(2), 55–63 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S. Park, M. Ko, J. Kim, Y. Liu, J. Song, The politics of comments: Predicting political orientation of news stories with commenters’ sentiment patterns, in ACM 2011 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, ACM (2011), pp. 113–122

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.-L. Liu, W.-J. Li, M. Guo, Emoticon smoothed language models for twitter sentiment analysis, in AAAI (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. J. Dunn, Facebook totally dominates the list of most popular social media apps, [online] Business Insider, Available at http://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-dominates-most-popular-social-media-apps-chart-2017-7 (2017)

  12. H. Lamba, M.M. Malik, J. Pfeffer, A tempest in a teacup? Analyzing firestorms on twitter, in Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM), 2015 IEEE/ACM International Conference, IEEE (2015), pp. 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. Kang, Campaign to ‘Cancel’ Colbert, [online] The New Yorker, Available at https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/the-campaign-to-cancel-colbert (2014)

  14. F. Morstatter, J. Pfeffer, H. Liu, When is it biased?: Assessing the representativeness of twitter’s streaming API, in 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web ACM (2014), pp. 555–556

    Google Scholar 

  15. M.M. Bradley, P.J. Lang, Affective norms for english words (ANEW) instruction manual and affective ratings, Technical Report C-1, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology University of Florida (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. F.Ã…. Nielsen, A new ANEW: Evaluation of a word list for sentiment analysis in microblogs, arXiv preprint arXiv:1103.2903 (2011)

  17. X. Zhu, S. Kiritchenko, S. Mohammad, NRC-Canada-2014: Recent improvements in the sentiment analysis of tweets, in SemEval@ COLING (2014), pp. 443–447

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Kiritchenko, X. Zhu, S.M. Mohammad, Sentiment analysis of short informal texts. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 50, 723–762 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. B. Liu, Sentiment analysis and opinion mining, in Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies, vol. 5, no. 1 (2012), pp. 1–167

    Google Scholar 

  20. R. Artstein, M. Poesio, Inter-coder agreement for computational linguistics. Comput. Linguist. 34(4), 555–596 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. P.S. Bayerl, K.I. Paul, What determines inter-coder agreement in manual annotations? A meta-analytic investigation. Comput. Linguist. 37(4), 699–725 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A.F. Hayes, K. Krippendorff, Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data, in Communication Methods and Measures, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 77–89 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. K.A. Neuendorf, The Content Analysis Guidebook (Sage, 2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Office of Naval Research, Grant No. N00014-17-1-2981/127025

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ian McCulloh .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

McCulloh, I., Cohen, R., Takacs, R. (2020). Better Quality Classifiers for Social Media Content: Crowdsourcing with Decision Trees. In: Elçi, A., Sa, P., Modi, C., Olague, G., Sahoo, M., Bakshi, S. (eds) Smart Computing Paradigms: New Progresses and Challenges. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 767. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9680-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics