Skip to main content

Creative Modalities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Creative Measures of the Anthropocene
  • 335 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores both historical and contemporary art practices and examples that set out the three themes of experience: sensation, scale, and spatiality. A brief history of art practices and site-specific interventions is compiled to draw attention to the way that humans measure themselves in relation to other humans, nonhumans, and the planetary changes that lay ahead. These thematic surveys highlight the increasing intersection of creative arts practice and geographical inquiries. The chapter concludes by advocating that shifting modes of attention can be facilitated through attentions to sensations, scales, and spatiality in both art practice and in the practices of everyday life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, B., Kearnes, M., McFarlane, C., & Swanton, D. (2012). On assemblage and geography. Dialogues in Human Geography, 2(2), 171–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe half way: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, K. (2017). The aesthetics of aircraft safety cards: Spatial negotiations and affective mobilities in diagrammatic instructions. Mobilities, 12(3), 365–385.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry, K., & Keane, J. (2017). Moving within mobilities: Expanding spatial experiences through the artwork PAN & ZOOM. Applied Mobilities, 2(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, M. (2014). Of (stressed) mice and men. Nature Methods, 11, 623–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC 4. (2019, January 27). Women who walk. The art of now. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/m0000nmn.

  • Bennett, J. (2012). Practical aesthetics: Events, affects and art after 9/11. London: I.B. Tauris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boettger, S. (2002). Earthworks: Art and the landscape of the sixties. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Duve, T. (1993). x Situ. In A. Benjamin (Ed.). Installation art (pp. 24–30). London: Academy Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2016). Assemblage theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eidelman, R. (2011). The separation wall in Palestine: Artists love to hate it. In B. O. Firat & A. Kuryel (Eds.), Cultural activism: Practices, dilemmas, and possibilities (pp. 95–114). Amsterdam: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edensor, T., & Sumartojo, S. (2018). Reconfiguring familiar worlds with light projection: The Gertrude Street Projection Festival, 2017. GeoHumanities, 4(1), 112–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eggebeen, J. (2011). ‘Between two worlds’: Robert Smithson and aerial art. Public Art Dialogue, 1(1), 87–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forensic Architecture. (2018). Project: Forensic Architecture. Available at: https://www.forensic-architecture.org/project/.

  • Gardner, P., & Jenkins, B. (2016). Bodily intra-actions with biometric devices. Body & Society, 22(1), 3–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as a perceptual system. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K., Rose, D. B., & Fincher, R. (Eds.). (2015). Manifesto for living in the Anthropocene. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gins, M., & Arakawa. (2002). Architectural body. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hannah, D. (2015). Constructing barricades and creating borderline events. Theatre and Performance Design, 1(1–2), 126–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (2015). Anthropocene, Capiltalocene, Planfaionocene, Chthulucene: Making kin. Environmental Humanities, 6, 159–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heddon, D., & Turner, C. (2012). Walking women: Shifting the tales and scales of mobility. Contemporary Theatre Review, 22(2), 224–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2010). Footprints through the weather-world: Walking, breathing, knowing. In Making Knowledge: Explorations of the indissoluble relation between mind, body, and environment (pp. 115–132). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, T. (2012). Introduction. In M. Janowski & T. Ingold (Eds.), Imagining landscape: Past, present & future (pp. 1–18). Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2014). Agency at the time of the Anthropocene. New Literary History, 45(1), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2013). ANT and politics: Working in and on the world. Qualitative Sociology, 36(4), 485–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lekan, T. M. (2014). Fractal Eaarth: Visualizing the global environment in the Anthropocene. Environmental Humanities, 5, 171–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey, D. (2007). For space. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKee, Y. (2010). Land art in parallax: Media, violence, political ecology. In K. Baum (Ed.), Nobody’s property: Art, land, space, 2000–2010 (pp. 45–64). New Haven: Princeton University Art Museum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriman, P. (2016). Mobilities II: cruising. Progress in Human Geography, 40(4), 555–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2016). Dark ecology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, T. (2018). Being ecological. London: Pelican.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, M. (Ed.). (2018). The art of antibiotics. Vienna: myMorawa/Biofaction publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smithson, R. (1979 [1969]). Aerial art. In N. Holt (Ed.), The writings of Robert Smithson (pp. 92–93). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern, J. (2015). Locative awareness: A mobilities approach to locative art. Leonardo Electronic Almanac, 21(1), 178–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, I. (2015). In catastrophic times. London: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, J., Gapenne, O., & Di Paolo, E. A. (Eds.). (2010). Enaction: Towards a new paradigm for cognitive science. Cambridge and London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2017). Mind in life: Biology, phenomenology and the sciences of the mind. Cambridge, MA and London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tufnell, B. (2006). Land art. London: Tate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urry, J. (2016). Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Roach, E. (1992). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zurkow, M. (2014). The Petroleum Manga: A project by Marina Zurkow. Brooklyn, NY: Punctum Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kaya Barry .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Barry, K., Keane, J. (2019). Creative Modalities. In: Creative Measures of the Anthropocene. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9648-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics