Skip to main content

Write Up and Research Translation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conducting Quantitative Research in Education

Abstract

Now you know how to run and report statistical analyses, you will be keen to share your findings with the world at large. Very few researchers in contemporary research environments conduct research with the sole aim of producing a thesis; most of us want our findings to get out into schools, homes and communities and lead to change. An academic thesis is not always the most effective vehicle for achieving this!

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://authors.elsevier.com/a/1UgVS1HucdAJy9

  2. 2.

    http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=381519903117510;res=IELHSS

  3. 3.

    http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/10.1108/10748120110424816

  4. 4.

    http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2465&context=edupapers

  5. 5.

    http://www.mdpi.com/2304-6775/3/4/237/pdf

  6. 6.

    http://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=381519903117510;res=IELHSS

  7. 7.

    http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/generalcapabilities/information-and-communication-technology-capability/introduction/introduction

  8. 8.

    https://www.amazon.com/Shallows-What-Internet-Doing-Brains/dp/0393339750

  9. 9.

    https://www.overdrive.com/

  10. 10.

    http://www.gutenberg.org/

  11. 11.

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1041608013000642

  12. 12.

    https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisainfocus/48624701.pdf

  13. 13.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eie.12126/abstract

  14. 14.

    http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01930826.2016.1185854

  15. 15.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eie.12026/full

  16. 16.

    http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0004944114565115

  17. 17.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eie.12043/full

  18. 18.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eie.12043/abstract

  19. 19.

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eie.12071/full

References

  • Cherney, A., Povey, J., Head, B., Boreham, P., & Ferguson, M. (2012). What influences the utilisation of educational research by policy-makers and practitioners?: The perspectives of academic educational researchers. International Journal of Educational Research, 56, 23–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Plano, C. V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W., & Tashakkori, A. (2007). Developing publishable mixed methods manuscripts. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 107–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Featherstone, R. (2014). Scholarly tweets: Measuring research impact via altmetrics. Journal of the Canadian Health Libraries Association/Journal De l’Association Des Bibliothèques De La Santé Du Canada, 35(2), 60–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ha, T. C., Tan, S. B., & Soo, K. C. (2006). The journal impact factor: Too much of an impact? Annals-Academy of Medicine Singapore, 35(12), 911.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopewell, S., Clarke, M. J., Stewart, L., & Tierney, J. (2007). Time to publication for results of clinical trials. The Cochrane Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, S. A. (2016). The social and psychological costs of peer review: Stress and coping with manuscript rejection. Journal of Management Inquiry, 25(1), 11–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, A. M. (2012). Charting a course for a successful research career (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamler, B. (2008). Rethinking doctoral publication practices: Writing from and beyond the thesis. Studies in Higher Education, 33(3), 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2008). The failure of dissertation advice books: Toward alternative pedagogies for doctoral writing. Educational Researcher, 37(8), 507–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, L. V., & Steinbach, T. A. (2008). Selecting an appropriate publication outlet: A comprehensive model of journal selection criteria for researchers in a broad range of academic disciplines. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 3, 59–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leech, N. L., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Combs, J. P. (2011). Writing publishable mixed research articles: Guidelines for emerging scholars in the health sciences and beyond. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(1), 7–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonard, E. (2010). Elmore Leonard’s rules for writers. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/books/2010/feb/24/elmore-leonard-rulesfor-writers

  • Levin, B. (2011). Mobilising research knowledge in education. London Review of Education, 9(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, S. & Merga, M. K. (2018). Integrating publications in the social science doctoral thesis by publication. Higher Education Research & Development. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/07294360.2018.1498461

  • McGrail, M. R., Rickard, C. M., & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merga, M. (2015). Thesis by publication in education: An autoethnographic perspective for educational researchers. Issues in Educational Research, 25(3), 291–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merga, M. K. & Mat Roni, S. (2017). Children prefer to read books on paper rather than screens. The Conversation. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/children-prefer-to-read-books-on-paper-rather-than-screens-74171#comment_1234533

  • Merga, M. K., Mason, S. & Morris, J. (2018). Early Career experiences of navigating journal article publication: Lessons learnt using an autoethnographic approach. Learned Publishing. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1192

  • Sugimoto, C. R., Larivière, V., Ni, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). Journal acceptance rates: A cross-disciplinary analysis of variability and relationships with journal measures. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 897–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). The new era of mixed methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1, 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mat Roni, S., Merga, M.K., Morris, J.E. (2020). Write Up and Research Translation. In: Conducting Quantitative Research in Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9132-3_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics