Abstract
The EEG signals could be used to assess the communication between brain regions. Various techniques have been developed in order to quantify the EEG connectivity of scalp-level EEG signals or source-level activities. Briefly speaking, four kinds of EEG connectivity measures are evaluated in literatures, including coherence-based measures, phase synchronization-based measures, generalized synchronization-based measures, and granger causality-based measures. All measures have their own advantages and disadvantages. Here, we illustrated the common sources problem in EEG analysis, the measures in EEG connectivity analysis, how to conduct EEG connectivity analysis using resting-state EEG signals and event-related EEG signals, and source-level connectivity. Moreover, we provided two examples of EEG connectivity, along with the EEG datasets and MATLAB codes, which are focused on the EEG connectivity of resting-state signals and event-related signals, respectively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrams DA, Lynch CJ, Cheng KM, Phillips J, Supekar K, Ryali S, Uddin LQ, Menon V. Underconnectivity between voice-selective cortex and reward circuitry in children with autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(29):12060–5.
Astolfi L, Cincotti F, Mattia D, Salinari S, Babiloni C, Basilisco A, Rossini PM, Ding L, Ni Y, He B, Marciani MG, Babiloni F. Estimation of the effective and functional human cortical connectivity with structural equation modeling and directed transfer function applied to high-resolution EEG. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;22(10):1457–70.
Baccalá LA, Sameshima K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biol Cybern. 2001;84(6):463–74.
Buckner RL, Andrewshanna JR, Schacter DL. The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2008;1124(1):1–38.
Cohen MX. Effects of time lag and frequency matching on phase-based connectivity. J Neurosci Methods. 2015;250:137–46.
Dhamala M, Rangarajan G, Ding M. Analyzing information flow in brain networks with nonparametric Granger causality. NeuroImage. 2008;41(2):354–62.
Ding M, Bressler SL, Yang W, Liang H. Short-window spectral analysis of cortical event-related potentials by adaptive multivariate autoregressive modeling: data preprocessing, model validation, and variability assessment. Biol Cybern. 2000;83(1):35–45.
Duann JR, Ide JX. Functional connectivity delineates distinct roles of the inferior frontal cortex and presupplementary motor area in stop signal inhibition. J Neurosci. 2009;29(32):10171–9.
Ercan ES, Suren S, Bacanlı A, Yazıcı KU, Callı C, Ardic UA, Aygunes D, Kosova B, Ozyurt O, Aydın C, ROhde LA. Altered structural connectivity is related to attention deficit/hyperactivity subtypes: a DTI study. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging. 2016;256:57–64.
Friston KJ, Harrison LM, Penny WD. Dynamic causal modeling. NeuroImage. 2003;19(4):1273–302.
Gao Q, Duan X, Chen H. Evaluation of effective connectivity of motor areas during motor imagery and execution using conditional Granger causality. NeuroImage. 2011;54(2):1280–8.
Granger CWJ. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica. 1969;37(3):424–38.
Heise V, Filippini N, Trachtenberg AJ, Suri S, Ebmeier KP, Mackay CE. Apolipoprotein E genotype, gender and age modulate connectivity of the hippocampus in healthy adults. NeuroImage. 2014;98(7):23–30.
Huster RJ, Plis SM, Lavallee CF, Calhoun VD, Herrmann CS. Functional and effective connectivity of stopping. NeuroImage. 2014;94(6):120–8.
Kamiński MJ, Blinowska KJ. A new method of the description of the information ow in the brain structures. Biol Cybern. 1991;65(3):203–10.
Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ. Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp. 1999;8(4):194–208.
Lutkepohl H. New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Berlin: Springer; 2005.
Niso G, Bruña R, Pereda E, Gutiérrez R, Bajo R, Maestú F, del-Pozo F. HERMES: towards an integrated toolbox to characterize functional and effective brain connectivity. Neuroinformatics. 2013;11(4):405–34.
Nolte G, Bai O, Wheaton L, Mari Z, Vorbach S, Hallett M. Identifying true brain interaction from EEG data using the imaginary part of coherency. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(10):2292–307.
Nolte G, Ziehe A, Nikulin VV, Schlögl A, Krämer N, Brismar T, Müller KR. Robustly estimating the flow direction of information in complex physical systems. Phys Rev Lett. 2007;100(23):234101.
Nunez PL, Srinivasan R, Westdorp AF, Wijesinghe RS, Tucker DM, Silberstein RB, Cadusch PJ. EEG coherency : I: statistics, reference electrode, volume conduction, Laplacians, cortical imaging, and interpretation at multiple scales. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1997;103(5):499–515.
O’Reilly C, Lewis JD, Elsabbagh M. Is functional brain connectivity atypical in autism? A systematic review of EEG and MEG studies. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0175870.
Rasero J, Amoroso N, La Rocca M, Tangaro S, Bellotti R, Stramaglia S. Multivariate regression analysis of structural MRI connectivity matrices in Alzheimer’s disease. PLoS One. 2017;12(11):e0187281.
Sommerlade L, Henschel K, Wohlmuth J, Jachan M, Amtage F, Hellwig B, Lücking CH, Timmer J, Schelter B. Time-variant estimation of directed influences during Parkinsonian tremor. J Physiol-Paris. 2009;103(6):348–52.
Srinivasan R, Winter WR, Ding J, Nunez PL. EEG and MEG coherence: measures of functional connectivity at distinct spatial scales of neocortical dynamics. J Neurosci Methods. 2007;166(1):41–52.
Stam CJ, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A. Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum Brain Mapp. 2007;28(11):1178–93.
Stam CJ, van Dijk BW. Synchronization likelihood: an unbiased measure of generalized synchronization in multivariate data sets. Physica D. 2002;163(3):236–51.
Sun Y, Lim J, Kwok K, Bezerianos A. Functional cortical connectivity analysis of mental fatigue unmasks hemispheric asymmetry and changes in small-world networks. Brain Cogn. 2014;85(1):220–30.
van den Broek SP, Reinders F, Donderwinkel M, Peters MJ. Volume conduction effects in EEG and MEG. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1998;106(6):522–34.
Vicente R, Wibral M, Lindner M, Pipa G. Transfer entropy--a model-free measure of effective connectivity for the neurosciences. J Comput Neurosci. 2011;30(1):45–67.
Vinck M, Oostenveld R, van Wingerden M, Battaglia F, Pennartz CMA. An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. NeuroImage. 2011;55(4):1548–65.
Wiener N. The theory of prediction. In: Beckenbach EF, editor. Modern mathematics for the engineer. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1956.
Yao D, Wang L, Arendt-Nielsen L, Chen ACN. The effect of reference choices on the spatio-temporal analysis of brain evoked potentials: the use of infinite reference. Comput Biol Med. 2007;37(11):1529–38.
Yao D, Wang L, Oostenveld R, Nielsen KD, Arendtnielsen L, Chen AC. A comparative study of different references for EEG spectral mapping: the issue of the neutral reference and the use of the infinity reference. Physiol Meas. 2005;26(3):173–84.
Yu D. Additional brain functional network in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a phase synchrony analysis. PLoS One. 2013;8(8):e54516.
Zalesky A, Fornito A, Bullmore ET. Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. NeuroImage. 2010;53(4):1197–207.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
12.1 Supplementary Electronic Material (S)
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jia, H. (2019). Connectivity Analysis. In: Hu, L., Zhang, Z. (eds) EEG Signal Processing and Feature Extraction. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9113-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9113-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-9112-5
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-9113-2
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)