Abstract
Both the pro-Beijing Federation of Trade Unions (FTU) and pro-democracy Confederation of Trade Unions (CTU) adopted a strategy of social movement unionism in Hong Kong under the British rule. Yet, a watershed took place in 1997 when the FTU changed its strategy to support tripartism and the HKSAR government wholeheartedly. Rather than supporting the collective bargaining bill initiated by the CTU, the FTU rejected it on political grounds and voted against it just prior to the handover of Hong Kong on July 1, 1997. Immediately after the sovereignty transfer, the FTU supported the move by the Provisional Legislative Council to repeal the collective bargaining legislation. The FTU’s strategic change was due to its need to support the policies of the HKSAR government and the PRC policy toward the maintenance of social and political stability in the territory. However, the FTU’s positional change has made it more politically moderate than before, while simultaneously cooperating with the pro-Beijing political forces to compete with the CTU and pro-democracy candidates in local elections. Although FTU members have succeeded in becoming the Hong Kong members of the National People’s Congress and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference, their numerical inferiority compared to the business people and professionals means that it is far less politically influential at the higher levels of the Hong Kong and mainland Chinese political systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
For example, please refer to Linda Butenhoff, Social Movements and Political Reform in Hong Kong (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1999); Stephen Chiu Wing Kai, Strikes in Hong Kong: A sociological study (Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong, 1987); Stephen Chiu Wing Kai and David A. Levin, “Contestatory Unionism: Trade Unions in the Private Sector,” in Stephen Chiu Wing Kai and Lui Tai Lok, eds., The Dynamics of Social Movement in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press, 2000), pp. 91–138; and Ng Sek-hong and Olivia Ip, “Labour and Society,” in Cheng, Joseph Y. S., ed., The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in Its First Decade (Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, 2007), pp. 443–493.
- 2.
For example, please refer to Kristina, Ahlen, “Swedish Collective Bargaining Under Pressure: Inter-Union Rivalry and Incomes Policies,” British Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 127, no. 3 (November 1989), pp. 330–370; Matti Pohjola, “Union Rivalry and Economic Growth: A Differential Game Approach,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 86, no. 3 (1984), pp. 365–370; Valeria Pulignano, “Union struggle and the crisis of industrial relations in Italy,” Capital & Class, vol. 79 (2003), pp. 1–8; Agnes Akkerman, “Union Competition and Strikes: The Need for Analysis at the Sector Level,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 61, no. 4 (July 2008), pp. 445–459; Anjan Chakrabarti and Anup Kumar Dhar, “Labour, Class and Economy: rethinking Trade Union Struggle,” Economic and Political Weekly (May 31, 2008), pp. 73–81; Miguel Martinez Lucio and Heather Connolly, “Transformation and Continuities in Urban Struggles: Urban Politics, Trade Unions and Migration in Spain,” Urban Studies, vol. 49, no. 3 (February 2012), pp. 669–684; Nick Bernards, “The International Labour Organization and African trade unions: tripartite fantasies and enduring struggles,” Review of African Political Economy, vol. 44, no. 153 (2017), pp. 399–441; Shafiqul Islam, “Gender Difference: How Does It Affect Trade Union Struggle? A Qualitative Study of Female Workers of Bangladeshi RMG Industries,” Socioeconomica: The Scientific Journal for Theory and Practice of Socio-economic Development, vol. 6, no. 12 (2017), pp. 165–178; and Axel West Pedersen; Jon M. Hippe; Anne Skevik Grodem; and Ole Beier Sorensen, “Trade unions and the politics of occupational pensions in Denmark and Norway,” Transfer, vol. 24, no. 1 (2018), pp. 109–122.
- 3.
Benjamin Leung and Steven Chiu, A Social History of Industrial Strikes and the Labor Movement in Hong Kong, 1946–1989 (Hong Kong: Social Sciences Research Center, University of Hong Kong, 1991).
- 4.
Ng Sek-hong and Olivia Ip, “Labour and Society,” in Cheng, Joseph Y. S., ed., The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region in Its First Decade (Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong Press, 2007), pp. 443–493.
- 5.
Ming Chan, “Hong Kong Workers Towards 1997: Unionization, Labor Activism and Political Participation under the China Factor,” Australian Journal of Politics and History, vol. 47, no. 1 (2001), pp. 61–84.
- 6.
Kristina Ahlen, “Swedish Collective Bargaining Under Pressure: Inter-Union Rivalry and Incomes Policies,” British Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 127, no. 3 (November 1989), p. 330.
- 7.
Matti Pohjola, “Union Rivalry and Economic Growth: A Differential Game Approach,” Scandinavian Journal of Economics, vol. 86, no. 3 (1984), p. 365.
- 8.
Ibid., p. 679.
- 9.
Kim Scipes, “Social Movement Unionism or Social Justice Unionism? Disentangling Theoretical Confusion within the Global Labor Movement,” Class, Race and Corporate Power: vol. 2, no. 3 (2014), https://doi.org/10.25148/CRCP.2.3.16092119, in http://digitalcommons.fiu.edu/classracecorporatepower/vol2/iss3/9, access date: May 2, 2018.
- 10.
Axel West Pedersen; Jon M. Hippe; Anne Skevik Grodem; and Ole Beier Sorensen, “Trade unions and the politics of occupational pensions in Denmark and Norway,” Transfer, vol. 24, no. 1 (2018), pp. 109–122.
- 11.
Agnes Akkerman, “Union Competition and Strikes: The Need for Analysis at the Sector Level,” Industrial and Labor Relations Review, vol. 61, no. 4 (July 2008), p. 445.
- 12.
Tyanai Masiya, “Social Movement Trade Unionism: Case of the Congress of South African Trade Unions,” Politikon, vol. 41, no. 3 (2014), p. 445.
- 13.
P. Waterman, “Social-movement Unionism: A New Model for a New World,” no. 110 (The Hague Institute for Social Studies Working Paper Series, 1991).
- 14.
Frege Carola; Edmund Heery; and Lowell Turner, “The New Solidarity Trade Union Coalition-Building in Five Countries,” in Frege Carola and John, Kelly, eds., Varieties of Unionism: Strategies for Union Revitalization in a Globalizing Economy (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 137–158.
- 15.
Chris Chan King-chi; Sophia Chan Shuk-ying; and Lynn Tang, “Reflecting on Social Movement Unionism in Hong Kong: The Case of the Dockworkers’ Strike in 2013,” Journal of Contemporary Asia, vol. 49, issue 1 (2019), pp. 54–77, https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1448429, in https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2018.1448429, access date: May 2, 2018.
- 16.
C. Engeman, “Social movement unionism in practice: organizational dimensions of union mobilization in the Los Angeles immigrant rights marches Social movement unionism in practice: organizational dimensions of union mobilization in the Los Angeles immigrant rights marches,” Work, employment and society, vol. 29, no. 3 (2015), pp. 444–461.
- 17.
Ibid.
- 18.
A. Vandenberg, “Social-movement Unionism in Theory and in Sweden,” Social Movement Studies, vol. 5, no. 2 (2006), pp. 171–191.
- 19.
L. Turner and R. W. Hurd, “Building social movement unionism: The transformation of the American labor movement,” in L. Turner, H. C. Katz and R. W. Hurd, eds., Rekindling the movement: Labor’s quest for relevance in the twenty-first century (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001), pp. 9–16.
- 20.
D. Kelly, “Towards Tripartism: Industrial Relations in the Steel Industry 1978 to 1987,” Journal of Industrial Relations, vol. 30, no. 4 (1988), pp. 511–532.
- 21.
D. Marsh and W. Grant, “Tripartism: Reality or Myth?,” Government and Opposition, vol. 12, no. 2 (1977), pp. 194–211.
- 22.
Janice Fine, “Solving the Problem from Hell: Tripartism as a Strategy for Addressing Labour Standards Non-Compliance in the United States,” Osgoode Hall Law Journal, vol. 50, no. 4 (2013), pp. 813–844.
- 23.
Nick Bernards, “The International Labour Organization and African trade unions: tripartite fantasies and enduring struggles,” Review of African Political Economy, vol. 44, no. 153 (2017), p. 401.
- 24.
Ibid.
- 25.
Ibid.
- 26.
Linda Butenhoff, Social Movements and Political Reform in Hong Kong (Westport, Connecticut: Praeger, 1999), p. 52. See also Joe England and John Rear, Chinese Labour under British Rule: A critical study of labour relations and law in Hong Kong (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1975), p. 90.
- 27.
Butenhoff, Social Movements and Political Reform in Hong Kong, p. 53.
- 28.
Joe England, Industrial Relations and Law in Hong Kong (2nd ed.) (Hong Kong: Oxford University Press, 1989), p. 120. Also see Jeff Loo, “Workers as interest groups: Are they fragmented or powerless?,” in Sonny Shiu-hing Lo, eds. Interest Groups and the New Democracy Movement in Hong Kong (London: Routledge, 2018), pp. 102–114.
- 29.
Chow Yick. A History of the Struggles of Hong Kong Leftists (in Chinese) (Hong Kong: Lee Man, 2002), p. 5.
- 30.
Ibid., p. 10 and pp. 223–260.
- 31.
Ibid., pp. 52–58.
- 32.
Ibid., pp. 55–56.
- 33.
Ibid., p. 42.
- 34.
Ibid., pp. 232–233.
- 35.
Ibid., p. 278.
- 36.
Federation of Trade Unions. Federation of Trade Unions Walking with You: 65th Anniversary of Historical Essays (in Chinese) (Hong Kong: Federation of Trade Unions, 2013), p. 79.
- 37.
Ibid.
- 38.
Federation of Labor Unions. 30th Anniversary of the Federation of Labor Unions (in Chinese) (Hong Kong: Federation of Labor Unions, 2014).
- 39.
Ibid.
- 40.
Wen Wei Po, November 14, 2011, p. A03.
- 41.
Sing Tao Daily, December 10, 1998, p. A9.
- 42.
Tian Tian Daily, December 10, 1998, p. A14.
- 43.
Wen Wei Po, December 4, 1998, p. A03.
- 44.
Sing Tao Daily, November 4, 1998, p. A16.
- 45.
Hong Kong Commercial Daily, October 5, 1998, p. B5.
- 46.
Apple Daily, August 12, 2007, p. A3.
- 47.
Wen Wei Po, August 16, 2007, p. A12.
- 48.
Hong Kong Economic Journal, August 20, 2007, p. 9.
- 49.
Ibid., p. 10.
- 50.
Apple Daily, August 28, 2007, p. A12.
- 51.
Ibid.
- 52.
Ibid., August 29, 2007, p. A20.
- 53.
Wen Wei Po, August 30, 2007, p. A14.
- 54.
Apple Daily, September 3, 2007, p. A23.
- 55.
Wen Wei Po, September 6, 2007, p. A12.
- 56.
Ibid.
- 57.
Apple Daily, September 7, 2007, p. A14.
- 58.
Ibid., September 11, 2007, p. A4.
- 59.
Oriental Daily, August 7, 2010, p. A03.
- 60.
Hong Kong Economic Times, August 11, 2010, p. A22.
- 61.
Hong Kong Economic Journal, August 11, 2010, p. 12.
- 62.
BBC Monitoring Asia Pacific, July 17, 2010.
- 63.
China Economic Review, May 3, 2011.
- 64.
Sing Tao Daily, February 15, 2008.
- 65.
Ming Pao, March 17, 2008.
- 66.
Hong Kong Economic Journal, May 2, 2008.
- 67.
Ibid.
- 68.
Oriental Daily, October 1, 2008.
- 69.
Ta Kung Pao, October 13, 2008.
- 70.
The Sun, March 21, 2008.
- 71.
The Standard, March 15, 2010.
- 72.
The Sun, November 5, 2010.
- 73.
Oriental Daily, March 22, 2010.
- 74.
Apple Daily, March 22, 2010.
- 75.
Wen Wei Po, May 2, 2010.
- 76.
Oriental Daily, May 2, 2010.
- 77.
The Sun, March 27, 2010.
- 78.
Hong Kong Daily News, July 6, 2010.
- 79.
Apple Daily, October 19, 2010.
- 80.
The Sun, September 4, 2010.
- 81.
Oriental Daily, November 11, 2010.
- 82.
The Standard, June 9, 2010.
- 83.
Ta Kung Pao, March 24, 2010.
- 84.
Sing Tao Daily, May 31, 2015, p. A14.
- 85.
Radio Television Hong Kong, May 2018.
- 86.
Ibid.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lo, S.SH., Hung, S.CF., Loo, J.HC. (2019). Inter-Union Rivalry Between Pro-Beijing Federation of Trade Unions and Pro-Democracy Confederation of Trade Unions. In: China’s New United Front Work in Hong Kong. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8483-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8483-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8482-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8483-7
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)