Skip to main content

Investigating the Social Impacts of High-Density Neighbourhoods Through Spatial Analysis

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer-Aided Architectural Design. "Hello, Culture" (CAAD Futures 2019)

Abstract

Studies argue that higher density areas incur social problems such as lack of safety [1], while other studies provide evidence for the positive impact of high-density urban areas, for instance opportunities for social interactions and equal form of accessibility [2]. This paper argues that design factors can mediate the impacts of density on social aspects. Therefore, this study explores the extent to which design factors can be correlated to the social outcomes of different density areas. To do this, data from an empirical study conducted in the UK, which identified the relationship between density and social sustainability through cases of fifteen neighbourhoods, have been utilised. This paper has conducted further analysis based on these cases using a mixed method with spatial analysis tools. Outcomes show that some of the social results in the UK study such as safety are correlated with spatial factors like normalised angular choice. Moreover, the regression model created from the spatial indices can be used to predict the overall social sustainability index reported by the UK study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The detailed justification, mapping and critical description of the method is presented in another paper which is published as part of the CAADRIA 2019 conference proceedings.

References

  1. Bramley, G., et al.: What is ‘social sustainable’, and how do our existing urban forms perform in nurturing it? In: Proceedings of Planning Research Conference, pp. 1–40 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Newman, P.: Density, the sustainability multiplier: some myths and truths with application to Perth, Australia. Sustainability 6(9), 6467–6487 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Newman, M.E.J.: Networks: An Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hillier, B.: Space is the Machine: A Configurational Theory of Architecture (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Sevtsuk, A., Mekonnen, M.: Urban network analysis toolbox. Int. J. Geomatics Spat. Anal. 22(2), 287–305 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kyttä, M., et al.: Urban happiness: context-sensitive study of the social sustainability of urban settings. Environ. Planning B: Planning Des. 43(1), 34–57 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dempsey, N., Brown, C., Bramley, G.: The key to sustainable urban development in UK cities? The influence of density on social sustainability. Prog. Plann. 77(3), 89–141 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raman, S.: Designing a liveable compact city: physical forms of city and social life in urban neighbourhoods. Built Environ. 36(1), 63–80 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Burton, E.: Housing for an urban renaissance: implications for social equity. Hous. Stud. 18(4), 537–562 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang, Y.: A tale of two cities: physical form and neighborhood satisfaction in metropolitan Portland and Charlotte. J. Am. Planning Assoc. 74(3), 307–323 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bramley, G., et al.: Social sustainability and urban form: evidence from five British cities. Environ. Planning A 41(9), 2125–2142 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kyttä, M., Broberg, A.: The multiple pathways between environment and health. In: Wellbeing: A Complete Reference Guide 2014. Wiley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Berghauser Pont, M.Y., et al.: Space, Density and Urban Form, in Urbanism, TUDelft (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soltani, S., et al.: Social sustainability in the built environment: a critical conceptual framework. In: Unmaking Waste 2018, Adelaide (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Soltani, S., et al.: A computational approach to measuring density through mixed methods. In: The 24th Annual Conference of the Association for Computer-Aided Architectural Design Research in Asia (CAADRIA 2019), Wellington, New Zealand (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Blanchard, P., Volchenkov, D.: Mathematical Analysis of Urban Spatial Networks. Understanding Complex Systems (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hillier, B., Iida, S.: Network and psychological effects in urban movement. In: Cohn, Anthony G., Mark, David M. (eds.) COSIT 2005. LNCS, vol. 3693, pp. 475–490. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11556114_30

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Penn, A., et al.: Configurational modelling of urban movement networks. Environ. Planning B: Planning Des. 25(1), 59–84 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Sevtsuk, A.: Analysis and planning of urban networks. In: Alhajj, R., Rokne, J. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining, pp. 25–37. Springer, New York (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Bramley, G., et al.: Social sustainability and urban form: evidence from five british cities. Environ. Planning A: Econ. Space 41(9), 2125–2142 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Al-sayed, K.: Space Syntax Methodology. Bartlett School of Architecture, UCL, London (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Turner, A.: From axial to road-centre lines: a new representation for space syntax and a new model of route choice for transport network analysis. Environ. Planning B: Planning Des. 34(3), 539–555 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sevtsuk, A., Kalvo, R., Ekmekci, O.: Pedestrian accessibility in grid layouts: the role of block, plot and street dimensions. Urban Morphol. 20(2), 89–106 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Field, A.: Discovering Statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Hillier, B., Yang, T., Turner, A.: Normalising least angle choice in Depthmap and how it opens new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space, vol. 3, pp. 155–193 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Berghauser Pont, M., Haupt, P.A.: The spacemate: density and the typomorphology of the urban fabric, pp. 11–26 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kolovou, I., et al.: Road centre line simplification principles for angular segment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th Space Syntax Symposium, Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon, Portugal (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Hansen, W.G.: How accessibility shapes land use. J. Am. Inst. Plann. 25(2), 73–76 (1959). https://doi.org/10.1080/01944365908978307

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sahar Soltani .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Soltani, S., Gu, N., Paniagua, J.O., Sivam, A., McGinley, T. (2019). Investigating the Social Impacts of High-Density Neighbourhoods Through Spatial Analysis. In: Lee, JH. (eds) Computer-Aided Architectural Design. "Hello, Culture". CAAD Futures 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1028. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8410-3_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8410-3_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-8409-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-8410-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics