Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Object of Constitutionality Judgment—Taking “Unconstitutional Event” in Drafting of the Real Rights Law as an Example

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
On the Constitutionality of Compiling a Civil Code of China

  • 182 Accesses

Abstract

The 2005 Real Rights Law (draft) issued for solicitation of public opinions aroused wide concerns from all walks of life. Most of the opinions believed that the Real Rights Law (draft) reflects the fundamental interests of the broad masses of the people, and also fully reflects the basic results of reform and opening-up. Represented by the Public Letter issued by Professor Gong Xiantian of Law School of Peking University, a few opinions believe that the Real Rights Law (draft) is unconstitutional.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Gong Xiantian: “A Real Rights Law (draft) in Violation of the Constitution and against the Socialist Basic Principles”. If no descriptions are made for the viewpoint of Professor Gong Xiantian in the following, the content is quoted from the “Public Letter”.

  2. 2.

    See Lv (2006).

  3. 3.

    See Guo (2006).

  4. 4.

    See He (2006).

  5. 5.

    “NPC of PRC Pay Attention to the Debate of Socialism and Capitalism”, New York Times, available at http://china.dayoo.com/gb/content/2006-03/13/content_2438341.htm, the latest access time: August 31, 2017.

  6. 6.

    See Liang (2000).

  7. 7.

    See Wang (2001).

  8. 8.

    Meng (2002).

  9. 9.

    See Xu (2004).

  10. 10.

    See Liang (2003).

  11. 11.

    See Wang (2004).

  12. 12.

    See Liang (2004).

  13. 13.

    See Wang (2005).

  14. 14.

    See “Advices on the Draft of Real Rights Law from the Masses” and “ Advices on the Draft of Real Rights Law from the Masses (Continued)”, The People’s Congress of China, No. 15, 16, 2005.

  15. 15.

    Liang (2000).

  16. 16.

    The “papers for commentary on draft of real rights law” of the Writer refer to the articles which are collected on www.cnki.net and whose title and subtitle explicitly mention “property rights law” and “draft” key words, excluding the analysis articles of specific institution of Real Rights Law and the articles which are for the draft of Real Rights Law but do not explicitly mention them in the title and subtitle. The range of retrieval time is 2000–2006.

  17. 17.

    See Xu (2006).

  18. 18.

    See the 8 series papers in Property Management No. 8, 2005.

  19. 19.

    Tong (2006).

  20. 20.

    Jiao (2006).

  21. 21.

    Gao (2017).

  22. 22.

    Hao (2006).

  23. 23.

    Ji (2006).

  24. 24.

    Li (2017).

  25. 25.

    Jiao (2006).

  26. 26.

    Han (2006).

  27. 27.

    Zhu (2017).

  28. 28.

    Ma (2017).

  29. 29.

    Tong (2006).

  30. 30.

    Mainly the website of Utopia, http://www.wyzxsx.com.

  31. 31.

    See Tong (2006).

  32. 32.

    See Liu (2005).

  33. 33.

    Ji (2003, p. 18).

  34. 34.

    See Yang (2006).

  35. 35.

    Ji (2003, p. 14).

  36. 36.

    Cui and Li (2017).

  37. 37.

    Yang (2017).

  38. 38.

    Han (2006).

  39. 39.

    Han (2006).

  40. 40.

    See Tong (2006).

  41. 41.

    Han (2006).

  42. 42.

    Yang (2005).

  43. 43.

    See Wei (2013).

  44. 44.

    See Yang (2004).

  45. 45.

    Yang (2005).

  46. 46.

    Yang (2005).

  47. 47.

    Zhang (2006).

  48. 48.

    Ma (2017).

  49. 49.

    China Encyclopaedia (1984).

  50. 50.

    Ma (2017).

  51. 51.

    Zhu (2017).

  52. 52.

    See Hao (2006).

  53. 53.

    Gao (2017).

  54. 54.

    Tang (2004).

  55. 55.

    Chang (2004).

  56. 56.

    Tian (2004).

  57. 57.

    Jiang and Duan (2000).

  58. 58.

    Yang (2000).

  59. 59.

    Zhang (2004).

References

  • Chang Yi, “Three Principle Thoughts on Civil Checking and Supervising”, Modern Law Science, No. 1, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Encyclopaedia, Encyclopaedia of China Publishing House, 1984, p. 52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cui Jianyuan, Li Yongfeng, “The Real Rights Law is the Law to Advance the Reform and Open”, available at http://www.civillaw.com.cn/weizhang/default.asp?id=24961, the latest access time: August 31, 2017.

  • Gao Fuping, “Real Rights Law Issue or Constitution Law Issue—Reflection on whether the Real Rights Law is Unconstitutional”, available at http://www.civillaw.com.cn/WANGkan/msfwk/index.aspx, the latest access time: August 31, 2017.

  • Guo Songmin, “Dose Real Rights Law(Draft) have hidden positions”, Reporters’ Notes, No. 4, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han Dayuan, “Constitutional Issue of the Debate of Real Rights LawDraft”, Law Science, No. 3, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hao Tiechuan, “My Point of view on the Violation of Constitution by the Draft of Real Rights Law “, Law Science, No. 8, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • He Zhongzhou, “Real Rights Law—A Century Bumpy”, China Newsweek, No. 9, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji Xiuping, “On the Equal Protection of Real Rights and the Sacredness of Public Properties”, Seeker, No. 5, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang Wei,Duan Houshen, “On Civil Process Filed by Procuratorial Organ”, Modern Law Science, No, 6, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiao Hongchang, “Constitutionality Analysis of the Real rights law Draft”, Law Science, No. 3, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Shoushuang, “Both Sides Lose in the Real Rights Law(Draft)”, available at http://www.iolaw.org.cn/showNews.asp?id=14664,the latest access time: August 31, 2017.

  • Liang Huixing, “Several Problems in Compiling Chinese Real rights law”, Chinese Journal of Law, No. 4, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Huixing, Draft of Chinese Civil Code with Reasons, Law Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Huixing, Recommended Draft of Real Rights Law of China, Social Sciences Academic Press, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang Huixing, Scholar-proposed Draft of Civil Code of People’s Republic of China, Law Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Baoyu, “Combination of the Categorization of Ownership and the Principle of Equal Protection”, Law Review, No. 6, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv Juan, “Lang-Gu Dispute in Law community”, Law & Life, No. 2, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma Junju, “The Aim and Function of the Real Rights Law and Erossion of State Assets”, available at http://www.civillaw.com.cn/weizhang/default.asp?id=24962, the latest access time: August 31, 2017.

  • Meng Qinguo, “Recommended Draft of Real rights law of China”, Law Review, No. 5, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji Okamura, Civil Law and Socialism, translated by LIU Renhang, ZHANG Mingci, China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang Weijian, “On Several problems of the Scope of Civil Checking and Supervising”, Modern Law Science, No. 1, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian Pingan, “Two Thoughts on Civil Checking and Supervising”,Modern Law Science, No. 1, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong Zhiwei, “Draft Real Rights Law Revisited: Constitutional Issues and Their Solutions”, Law Science, No. 7, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tong Zhiwei, “How Should the Real Rights Law Draft Pass the Door of the Constitution”, Law Science, No. 3, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Liming, Recommended Draft of Real rights law of China and Explanation Thereon, China Legal Publishing House, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Liming, Scholar-proposed Draft of Civil Code of China and the Legislation Reasons, Law Press, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Liming, The draft of Chinese civil code and its interpretation, China Legal Publishing House, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei Zhenying, Separating Civil Liability from Obligation, Peking University Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Guodong, Green Civil Code Draft, Social Sciences Academic Press, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Jian, “The Real Rights Law should Assimilate the Reform Achievements over the Last Decade”, Natural Resource Economics of China, No. 4, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Lixin, “Checking and Supervising on Civil and Administrative litigations and Judicial Justice”, Chinese Journal of Law, No. 4, 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Lixin, Cao Yanchun, “On the Claim System of Protection of the Civil Right and Their Inner Relation”, Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law, No. 4, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Lixin, “Comment on the Distinct Chinese Features of Real Law Draft”, Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law, No. 3, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang Lixin, “Closing Words of the Symposium on the Real Rights Law and the Theory of Constructing Socialist Harmonious Society in China”, available at: http://www.civillaw.com.cn/weizhang/default.asp?id=24985, the latest access time: August 31, 2017.

  • Yang Lixin, On Tort Law(the 2nd Edition), People’s Court Press, 2004, pp. 110–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Qianfan, “Uses and Abuses of the Constitution: How to Deal with the Constitutional Problems of the Real rights law Draft”, Law Science, No. 3, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Wusheng: “On the People’s Procuratorate’s Authority of Starting Retrial and Supervising Other Civil Trial Activity”, Modern Law Science, No, 1, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Jingwen, “Thinking on the Controversy over the Real Rights Law (Draft)”, available at: http://www.civillaw.com.cn/weizhang/default.asp?id=25384,the latest access time: August 31, 2017.

  • Zhu Jingwen, “Understanding from Argument of Draft of Real Rights Law, available at: http://www.civillaw.com.cn/weizhang/default.asp?id=25384, the latest access time: August 31, 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Law School, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

    Zhu Wang

Authors
  1. Zhu Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhu Wang .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 China University of Political Science and Law Press

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wang, Z. (2020). Object of Constitutionality Judgment—Taking “Unconstitutional Event” in Drafting of the Real Rights Law as an Example. In: On the Constitutionality of Compiling a Civil Code of China. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7900-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7900-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7899-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7900-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation