Skip to main content

Management of Routine Surgery in Diabetes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Towards Optimal Management of Diabetes in Surgery

Abstract

Routine or elective minor and major surgery in diabetes must be taken equally seriously as the emergency surgery, in each and every aspect related to it. In emergency surgery, each stakeholder is prepared for a certain element of adverse or untoward happening. There is no guarantee that something similar may not happen in the elective cases, be it minor or major surgery, a distinction between the two made below. If it does happen it reflects extremely adversely over all those involved in the process, the hospital set up and can result in unseemly incidents which can undermine the morale of all concerned. In particular, explanation and documentation of the risk factors and the percentage possibility that it can happen in the said elective surgery would be the paramount, among other factors of care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    An aphorism used by one of the authors is no patient is unfit for anesthesia unless dead. He is only at a higher risk.

  2. 2.

    In the last 10 years of the practice of first author, there was a hardly a patient with type 2 diabetes who had gained more than 10 kg of weight who was not on pioglitazone with frank edema. Many could relate the weight gain to the beginning of glitazones.

References

  1. Australian Diabetes Society. Peri-operative diabetes management guidelines, July 2012, ADS working group of Vincent Wong, Glynis Ross, Jennifer Wong and David Chipps (chair).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kelkar SK. Observations on office staff in a remote thermal electric power plant MP India; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Guillermo U, Umpierrez E, Smiley D, Jacobs S, Peng L, Temponi A, Mulligan P, Umpierrez D, Newton C, Olson D, Rizzo M. Randomized study of basal-bolus insulin therapy in the inpatient management of patients with type 2 diabetes undergoing general surgery (RABBIT 2 surgery). Diabetes Care. 2011;34:256–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998;352:837–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dluhy RG, McMahon GT. Intensive glycemic control in the ACCORD and ADVANCE trials. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2630–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Little RR, Rohlfing CL. The long and winding road to optimal HbA1c measurement. Clin Chim Acta. 2013;418:63–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindholm P, Minn H, Leskinen-Kallio S, Bergman J, Ruotsalainen U, Joensuu H. Influence of the blood glucose concentration on FDG uptake in cancer – a PET study. J Nucl Med. 1993;34(1):6–11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ishizu K, Nishizawa S, Yonekura Y, Sadato N, Magata Y, Tamaki N, Tsuchida T, Okazawa H, Miyatake S, Ishikawa M. Effects of hyperglycemia on FDG uptake in human brain and glioma. J Nucl Med. 1994;35(7):1104–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhuang HM, Cortes-Blanco A, Pourdehnad M, Adam LE, Yamamoto AJ, Martinez-Lazaro R, Lee JH, Loman JC, Rossman MD, Alavi A. Do high glucose levels have differential effect on FDG uptake in inflammatory and malignant disorders? Nucl Med Commun. 2001;22(10):1123–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Mears SC, Lipsett PA, Brager MD, Riley LH III. Metformin-associated lactic acidosis after elective cervical spine fusion: a case report. Spine. 2002;27(22):E482–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mercker SK, Maier C, Neumann G, Wulf H. Lactic acidosis as a serious perioperative complication of antidiabetic biguanide medication with metformin. Anesthesiology. 1997;87(4):1003–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chan NN, Feher MD. Metformin and perioperative risk. Br J Anaesth. 1999;83(3):540–1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bailey CJ, Turner RC. Metformin. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(9):574–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomsen HS, Morcos SK. Contrast media and metformin: guidelines to diminish the risk of lactic acidosis in non-insulin-dependent diabetics after administration of contrast media. ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee. Eur Radiol. 1999;9(4):738–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Jamet P, Lebas de Lacour JC, Christoforov B, Stern M. Fatal case of metformin-induced lactic acidosis after urography in a diabetic patient. Sem Hop. 1980;56(9–10):473–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klow NE, Draganov B, Os I. Metformin and contrast media—increased risk of lactic acidosis? Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2001;121(15):1829.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McCartney MM, Gilbert FJ, Murchison LE, Pearson D, McHardy K, Murray AD. Metformin and contrast media—a dangerous combination? Clin Radiol. 1999;54(1):29–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Joslin EP. Joslin’s textbook of diabetes mellitus. 14th ed. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, USA 2005, Indian Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pareek A, et al. Efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus: a double blind, randomized comparison with pioglitazone. Curr Med Res Opin. 2014;30(7):1257–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Quatraro A, Consoli G, Magno M, et al. Hydroxychloroquine in decompensated, treatment-refractory noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: a new job for an old drug? Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:678–81.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Krentz A, Bailey C. Oral anti-diabetic agents: current role in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2006;65:385–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fessler B, Alarcon G, McGwin G, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in three ethnic groups: XVI. Association of hydroxychloroquine use with reduced risk of damage accrual. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;52:1473–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kelkar, S., Muley, S., Ambardekar, P. (2019). Management of Routine Surgery in Diabetes. In: Towards Optimal Management of Diabetes in Surgery. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7705-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7705-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7704-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7705-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics