Skip to main content

Northern European Rehabilitation Services in the Context of Changing Healthcare, Welfare, and Labour Market Institutions: A Theoretical Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Dynamics of Disability and Rehabilitation

Abstract

This chapter provides a rough outline of the background to interdisciplinary studies of medical and vocational rehabilitation services in Northern European welfare states. We emphasize the critical role of such services in the early development of welfare state arrangements, closely tied to efforts to build cohesive nation states, and cater for industrial labour markets. Understanding this historical background is important for recognizing how these services are functioning under the current postnational and postindustrial conditions. In establishing a compromise between capital and labour, such services played an instrumental role in mitigating social conflicts. Workers knew they had access to wide-ranging health and vocational services, including assistance for longer-term retraining—provided as statutory citizenship rights—should they ever need it. Comprehensive rehabilitation services, along with general encompassing national healthcare services, instituted health and return-to-work processes as a state responsibility. In the current postnational and postindustrial context, where rehabilitation services no longer constitute the proud flagship of the welfare state, it seems that the state is abdicating responsibilities. Increasing emphasis on governance networks involving non-state actors, public-private partnerships, hyper-efficient hospital services, and place-then-train reemployment models seems to be leading to the individualization of responsibility for health and employability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Album, D., Johannessen, L. E. F., & Rasmussen, E. B. (2017). Stability and change in disease prestige: A comparative analysis of three surveys spanning a quarter of a century. Social Science & Medicine, 180, 45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson, J. (2013). Between growth and security: Swedish social democracy from a strong society to a third way (Critical labour movement studies). Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, H. (2000). Working for a living: Employment, benefits and the living standards of disabled people. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy, R., & Palumbo, A. (2010). From government to governance. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson, S. (2013). Sådan produceres ligebehandling [This is how equal treatment is produced]. In S. Bengtsson, I. S. Bonfils, & L. Olsen (Eds.), Handicap og ligebehandling i praksis [Disability and equal treatment] (pp. 41–60). Copenhagen: SFI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, W. (1942). Social insurance and allied services. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfiglioli Stagni, S., Tomba, P., Viganò, A., Zati, A., & Benedetti, M. G. (2015). The first world war drives rehabilitation toward the modern concepts of disability and participation. European Journal of Physical Rehabilitation Medicine, 51(3), 331–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the Judgement of taste. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brijnath, B., Mazza, D., & Singh, N. (2013). A process evaluation of the new certificate of capacity for compensation claims. Report number 1213-082-R2A, Institute for Safety Compensation and Recovery Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collyer, F. (2018). Envisaging the healthcare sector as a field: Moving from Talcott Parsons to Pierre Bourdieu. Social Theory & Health, 16(2), 111–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, P. W., & McCracken, S. G. (2005). Place first, then train: An alternative to the medical model of psychiatric rehabilitation. Social Work, 50(1), 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danish Directorate for Health. (2011). Hjerneskaderehabilitering—en medicinsk teknologivurdering [Brain injury—A medical technology assessment]. Copenhagen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, H. (2018). EU citizenship and ‘work’: Tensions between formal and substantive equality. In S. Seubert, O. Eberl, & F. van Waarden (Eds.), Reconsidering EU citizenship: Contradictions and constrains (pp. 108–132). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, B. (2017). Gainful gigging: Employment services for the platform economy. London: Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drøpping, J. A. (1996). The other side of de-commodification: Postwar Norwegian and British disability policies. Trondheim: NTNU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drøpping, J. A., Hvinden, B., & Van Oorschot, W. (2000). Reconstruction and reorientation: Changing disability policies in the Netherlands and Norway. European Journal of Social Security, 2(1), 35–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1990). The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, G. (1999). Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freidson, E. (1988). Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232–266). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganssman, H. (2003). Labor force mobilization and the feasibility of comprehensive welfare states. Paper presented at ESPAnet Conference, Copenhagen, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gobelet, C., & Franchignoni, F. (2006). Vocational Rehabilitation. Paris: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80(2), 223–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guldager, R., Poulsen, I., Egerod, I., Mathiesen, L. L., & Larsen, K. (2018). Rehabilitation capital: A new form of capital to understand rehabilitation in a Nordic welfare state. Health Sociology Review, 27(2), 199–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, P. (2006). Work-related travel and family obligations. Work, Employment and Society, 20(3), 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haave, P. (2006). The hospital sector: A four-country comparison of organisational and political development. In N. F. Christiansen, K. Petersen, N. Edling, & P. Haave (Eds.), The Nordic model of welfare: A historical reappraisal (pp. 215–242). Copenhagen: Museum Tusculanum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampson, I., & Junor, A. (2010). Putting the process back in: Rethinking service sector skill. Work, Employment and Society, 24(3), 526–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hantrais, L. (2000). Social policy in the European Union (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsløf, I. (2004, June). Enterprise rehabilitation: Involving enterprises in the vocational rehabilitation efforts in Denmark. Paper presented at the 20th World Congress of Rehabilitation International, Lillestrøm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsløf, I., Scarpa, S., & Andersen, S. N. (2013). Changing population profiles and social risk structures in the Nordic countries. In I. Harsløf & R. Ulmestig (Eds.), Changing social risks and social policy responses in the Nordic welfare states (pp. 25–49). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harsløf, I., Søbjerg Nielsen, U., & Feiring, M. (2017). Danish and Norwegian hospital social workers’ cross-institutional work amidst inter-sectoral restructuring of health and social welfare. European Journal of Social Work, 20(4), 584–595.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendriks, A. (2005). Promoting disability equality after the treaty of Amsterdam: New legal directions and practical expansion strategies. In A. Lawson & C. Gooding (Eds.), Disability rights in Europe from theory to practice: Essays in European law (pp. 187–198). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindhede, A. L., & Larsen, K. (2018). Prestige hierarchies of diseases and specialities in a field perspective. Social Theory & Health, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-018-0074-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, P., Burström, B., Whitehead, M., Diderichsen, F., Dahl, E., Barr, B., et al. (2011). How do macro-level contexts and policies affect the employment chances of chronically ill and disabled people? Part I: The impact of recession and deindustrialization. International Journal of Health Services, 41(3), 395–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Højbjerg, K., & Larsen, K. (2018). At lære at agere i et sundhedsvæsen under forandring [Learning to act in a changing healthcare system]. In S. Hundborg (Ed.), Sundhedsvæsenet under forandring [The changes of the healthcare system] (pp. 9–33). Copenhagen: Munksgaards Forlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Håvold, O. K., Harsløf, I., & Andreassen, T. A. (2018). Externalizing an ‘asset model’ of activation: Creative institutional work by frontline workers in the Norwegian labour and welfare service. Social Policy and Administration, 52(1), 178–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. H. (1996). Komparative velfærdssystemer: Kvinders reproduktionsstrategier mellem familien, velfærdsstaten og arbejdsmarkedet [Comparative welfare systems]. København: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, P. H. (1999). Velfærdsstatens politiske ideologi: En kritik af Esping-Andersen [The political ideology of the welfare state: A critique of Esping-Andersen]. Grus, 20, 84–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, C. (2008). Worlds of welfare services and transfers. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(2), 151–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessel, P., Rosenfield, L., & Anderson, N. B. (2008). Expanding the boundaries of health and social science: Case studies in interdisciplinary innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kvist, J. (2015). ESPN thematic report on social investment–Denmark. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, K., Cutchin, M., & Harsløf, I. (2013). Health capital: New health risks and personal investments in the body in the context of changing Nordic welfare states. In I. Harsløf & R. Ulmestig (Eds.), Changing social risks and social policy responses in the Nordic welfare states (pp. 165–188). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, A. (2008). Disability and equality law in Britain: The role of reasonable adjustment. Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Monde. (1970, May 9). Dans l’histoire de la CECA, du rose et du gris [The history of the ECSC: Good times and bad], p. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leplège, A., Barral, C., & McPherson, K. (2015). Conceptualizing disability to inform rehabilitation: Historical and epistemological perspectives. In K. McPherson, B. E. Gibson, & A. Leplège (Eds.), Rethinking rehabilitation: Theory and practice. Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist, R. (1990). Från folkrörelse till välfärdsbyråkrati: Det svenska sjukförsikringssystemets utveckling 1900–1990 [The popular movement to welfare bureaucracy]. Lund: Arkiv.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindqvist, R. (2000). Att sätta gränser: Organisationer och reformer i arbetsrehabilitering [Organizations and reforms in vocational rehabilitation]. Umeå: Boréa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis, E. (2015). Out of sight: The long and disturbing story of corporations outsourcing catastrophe. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mabbett, D. (2005). The development of rights-based social policy in the European Union: The example of disability rights. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(1), 97–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Employment. (2012). Lov om ændring af lov om en aktiv beskæftigelsesindsats, lov om aktiv socialpolitik, lov om social pension og forskellige andre love (L 53) [Amendments to the Law on active employment].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Labour. (1992). Attføring og arbeid for yrkeshemmede. Sykepenger og uførepensjon, St.meld. nr. 39 1991–1992 [Vocational rehabilitation and work for people with disabilities]. Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, P., & Chan, J. (2012). Global Capital, the State, and Chinese Workers: The Foxconn Experience. Modern China, 38(4), 383–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nudo, R. J. (2013). Recovery after brain injury: Mechanisms and principles. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2008). Sickness, disability and work: Breaking the barriers. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2017). Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinell, P. (2011). The genesis of the medical field: France, 1795–1870. Revue Française de Sociologie, 52(5), 117–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2006). The politics of life itself: Biomedicine, power, and subjectivity in the twenty-first century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scharle, Á., & Váradi, B. (2013). Identifying barriers to institutional change in disability services. WWW for Europe Working Paper 41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schian, H. M. (2006). Vocational rehabilitation and participation in working life: The German model. In C. Gobelet & F. Franchignoni (Eds.), Vocational rehabilitation (pp. 309–328). Paris: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmid, H. (1995). Velfærdsstatens solidaritetsformer [Forms of solidarity of the welfare state]. Dansk Sociologi, 6(3), 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Twaddle, A. C. (1979). Sickness behavior and the sick role. Boston: Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallgårda, S. (1999). The rise, heyday, and incipient decline of specialization: Hospitals in Denmark, 1930–1990. International Journal of Health Services, 29(2), 431–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, L. (1996). Reassessing the employment of people with disabilities in Europe: From quotas to anti-discrimination laws. Comparative Labor Law Journal, 18(1), 62–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington, L. (2001). Evolving disability policies: From social-welfare to human rights: An international trend from a European perspective. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 19(2), 141–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whiteside, N. (2014). The Beveridge report and its implementation: A revolutionary project? Histoire@Politique, 24(3), 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. (2011). World report on disability. Geneva: WHO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigzell, O. (2017). People-centred healthcare: What empowering policies are needed. OECD Observer, 309(Q1), 23.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ivan Harsløf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Harsløf, I., Poulsen, I., Larsen, K. (2019). Northern European Rehabilitation Services in the Context of Changing Healthcare, Welfare, and Labour Market Institutions: A Theoretical Framework. In: Harsløf, I., Poulsen, I., Larsen, K. (eds) New Dynamics of Disability and Rehabilitation. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7346-6_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7346-6_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7345-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7346-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics