Abstract
This chapter explores the role of healthcare organizations and their professionals in producing and reproducing inequality in health. Ethnographic fieldwork and interviews were conducted with key professionals involved in transferring patients with acquired brain injury from acute to subacute, and from subacute to stable rehabilitation. Our analytical framework combines Bourdieu’s theory of practice with Abbott’s concepts of jurisdiction. The study revealed a descent in specialization level and financial resources during patient trajectories, as well as changing patterns of decision-making practices affecting transfer. Paradoxically, many resources are available to save patients’ lives during the acute stage, but resources dwindle as the patient approaches long-term rehabilitation, thus perpetuating inequality in healthcare.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Licensed practical nurses—or, directly translated, ‘social and healthcare assistants’—complete two years, nine months, and three weeks of education, admitting students with a secondary school diploma. In comparison, registered nurses are admitted with a high school diploma and complete a three-year, six-month baccalaureate education.
References
Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions – An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Abbott, A. (2005). Linked ecologies – States and universities as environments for professions. Sociological Theory, 23, 245–274.
Album, D., Johannessen, L. E., & Rasmussen, E. B. (2017). Stability and change in disease prestige: A comparative analysis of three surveys spanning a quarter of a century. Social Science & Medicine, 180, 45–51.
Andersen, K. K., Dalton, S. O., Steding-Jessen, M., & Olsen, T. S. (2014). Socioeconomic position and survival after a stroke in Denmark, 2003 to 2012: Nationwide hospital-based study. Stroke, 45(12), 3556–3560. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.007046.
Anke, A., Andelic, N., Skandsen, T., Knoph, R., Ader, T., Manskow, U., et al. (2015). Functional recovery and life satisfaction in the first year after severe traumatic brain injury: A prospective multicenter study of a Norwegian national cohort. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 30(4), E38–E49. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000080.
Bambra, C. (2012). Social inequalities in health: The Nordic welfare state in comparative context. In J. Kvist, J. Fritzell, B. Hvinden, & O. Kangas (Eds.), Changing social equality: The Nordic welfare model in the 21st century (pp. 143–164). Bristol: Policy Press.
Bossen, C., Danholt, P., & Klausen, M. (2016). Diagnoser som styringshybrider Diagnoserelaterede grupper i sundhedsvæsenet. Tidsskrift for Forskning i Sygdom og Samfund, 13(25). https://doi.org/10.7146/tfss.v13i25.24995.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1994). De tre former for teoretisk viden (M. Nørholm & K. A. Petersen, Trans.). In S. Callewaert, P. Bourdieu, M. Munk, M. Nørholm, & K. A. Petersen (Eds.), Pierre Bourdieu: Centrale tekster indenfor sociologi og kulturteori (pp. 72–108). Copenhagen: Akademisk. Original work published as: Bourdieu, P. (1973). The three forms of theoretical knowledge. Social Science Information, 12(1), 53–80.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Af praktiske grunde: omkring teorien om menneskelig handlen [Practical reason: On the theory of action]. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels.
Bourdieu, P. (2000a). Homo academicus (Reprint). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2000b). Pascalian meditations. Oxford: Polity Press.
Bourdieu, P. (2002). Distinction – A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (2000). Reproduction in education, society and culture (New ed.). London: Sage.
Devaux, M., & de Looper, M. (2012). Income-related inequalities in health service utilisation in 19 OECD countries, 2008–2009 (OECD health working papers, No. 58). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5k95xd6stnxt-en.
Eikemo, T. A., Bambra, C., Joyce, K., & Dahl, E. (2008). Welfare state regimes and income-related health inequalities: A comparison of 23 European countries. The European Journal of Public Health, 18(6), 593–559.
Engberg, A. W., Liebach, A., & Nordenbo, A. (2006). Centralized rehabilitation after severe traumatic brain injury – A population-based study. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 113(3), 178–184.
Guldager, R. (2018). Inequality in neurorehabilitation: Different practices among patients and relatives during rehabilitation after stroke and severe traumatic brain injury: A qualitative study. Doctoral dissertation, Aalborg Universitetsforlag.
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principles in practice. London: Routledge.
Husted, H., Jensen, C. M., Solgaard, S., & Kehlet, H. (2012). Reduced length of stay following hip and knee arthroplasty in Denmark 2000–2009: From research to implementation. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 132(1), 101–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1396-0.
Kamper-Jørgensen, F., & Rasmussen, J. G. (2008). Ulighed i behandling [Inequality in healthcare]. In F. Diderichsen, J. G. Rasmussen, & N. Döllner (Eds.), Den tunge ende: sandheden om ulighederne og uretfærdighederne i den danske sundhed: debatbog (pp. 27–45). Copenhagen: Dagens Medicin Bøger.
Larsen, K., Cutchin, M. P., & Harsløf, I. (2013). Health capital: New health risks and personal investments in the body in the context of changing Nordic welfare states. In I. Harsløf & R. Ulmestig (Eds.), Changing social risks and social policy responses in the Nordic welfare states (pp. 165–188). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mackenbach, J. P., Stirbu, I., Roskam, A.-J. R., Schaap, M. M., Menvielle, G., Leinsalu, M., & Kunst, A. E. (2008). Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(23), 2468–2481.
National Board of Health. (2011). Hjerneskaderehabilitering – en medicinsk teknologivurdering [Brain injury rehabilitation – A medical technology assessment]. Copenhagen: National Board of Health.
Reay, D. (1998). ‘Always knowing’ and ‘never being sure’: Familial and institutional habituses and higher education choice. Journal of Education Policy, 13(4), 519–529.
Walford, G. (2009). For ethnography. Ethnography and Education, 4(3), 271–282.
Willis, K., Collyer, F., Lewis, S., Gabe, J., Flaherty, I., & Calnan, M. (2016). Knowledge matters: Producing and using knowledge to navigate healthcare systems. Health Sociology Review, 25(2), 202–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2016.1170624.
World Medical Association. (2018). Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declaration-of-helsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-research-involving-human-subjects. Accessed 4 July 2018.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Højbjerg, K., Egerod, I., Poulsen, I. (2019). Transfer Practices During Acquired Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Descent in the Medical Hierarchy. In: Harsløf, I., Poulsen, I., Larsen, K. (eds) New Dynamics of Disability and Rehabilitation. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7346-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7346-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7345-9
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7346-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)