Skip to main content

Managerialism and Public Universities in Hong Kong

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 382 Accesses

Part of the book series: Governance and Citizenship in Asia ((GOCIA))

Abstract

This chapter examines the basic relationship between the state and public universities and their governance, and how market and managerial values and practices can be used to regulate university autonomy in Hong Kong. It shows that the institutional autonomy of Hong Kong’s public universities has been reduced since the 1990s. The University Grants Committee (UGC), mediating between the government and public universities, has made use of the international trends of coupling market principles and managerialism to reform university governance and rationalize its increased control over the institutions it funds. The UGC has become a principal actor in shaping the direction of public universities’ institutional development, reviewing and auditing institutional performance in major activities, and downsizing and empowering university councils to ensure fiscal transparency and accountability . As a result, the UGC has established a regulatory regime for higher education, in which public universities are subject to more UGC control, both external, through regular reviews and audits of various domains of university affairs and activities, and internal, through empowering university councils (or governing boards) and increasing the number of external members.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Academic Staff Association of the University of Hong Kong, Confederation of Tertiary Institutes Staff Unions, City University of Hong Kong Staff Association, & Hong Kong Baptist University Faculty and Staff Union. (2017). Open letter on academic activity survey/academic timesheet system. Hong Kong: Academic Staff Association of the University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Audit Commission. (2016). Funding of universities by University Grants Committee. Hong Kong: Audit Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, J., Dill, D., Shah, T., Verkleij, A., & Westerheijden, D. (1999). A campaign for quality: Hong Kong teaching and learning quality process review. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, B. L. (2009). Public management reform in Hong Kong. In S. Goldfinch & J. L. Wallis (Eds.), International handbook of public management reform (pp. 317–335). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, P. (2017, April 2). Universities need autonomy and freedom of speech, says Oxford’s vice-chancellor. South China Morning Post, p. A1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du, X. (2018). Role split phenomenon of academic staff in Chinese higher education: A case study of Fudan University. Higher Education, 75(6), 997–1013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fielden, J. (2008). Global trends in university governance. Washington, D. C.: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong Kong Government. (2017). The chief executive’s 2017 policy address: We connect for hope and happiness. Hong Kong: Government Logistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legislative Council Secretariat. (2007). Academic freedom and institutional autonomy of higher education in the United Kingdom, New Zealand and Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Legislative Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingnan University. (2006). 2005/06 annual report. Hong Kong: Lingnan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lingnan University. (2016). 2015/16 annual report. Hong Kong: Lingnan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mok, K. H. (c. 2017). Asserting institutional autonomy and addressing accountability: The changing university governance in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Lingnan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, P. (2010). Academic freedom, university governance and the state: The Commission of inquiry into the Hong Kong Institute of Education. Journal of Education Policy, 25(5), 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National People’s Congress. (1990). The Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. Hong Kong: HKSAR Basic Law Advisory Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • National People’s Congress Standing Committee. (2015). Zhonghua Renmin Gongheguo Gaodeng Jiaoyufa [The Higher Education Law of the People’s Republic of China (Revised)]. Beijing: China Law Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newby, H. (2015). Governance in UGC-funded higher education institutions in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niland, J. (2009). Five year review of fit for purpose. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan, S.-Y. (2009). University autonomy, the state, and social change in China. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peking University. (2014). Beijing Daxue Zhangcheng [The charter of Peking University]. Beijing: Peking University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Public Accounts Committee, Legislative Council. (2017). Report of the Public Accounts Committee on the Reports of the Director of Audit on the Accounts of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for the Year Ended 31 March 2016 and the Results of Value for Money audits (Report No. 67). Hong Kong: Legislative Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quacquarelli Symonds. (2017). QS world university rankings 2016–2017. Retrieved from https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2016.

  • Research Grants Council. (2017a). Areas of excellence scheme 2018/19 (eighth round). Hong Kong: Research Grants Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Research Grants Council. (2017b). Theme-based research scheme 2018/19 (eighth round). Hong Kong: Research Grants Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Review Panel on the Centenary Ceremony. (2012). Report of review panel on the centenary ceremony held on August 18. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secretary for Education. (2012, December 5). LCQ18: Non-local students enrolled in UGC-funded institutions. Retrieved from http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/201212/05/P201212050310.htm.

  • Stuart, D. (2017, March 1). University challenge. Australian Institute of Company Directors Magazine. Retrieved from http://aicd.companydirectors.com.au/membership/company-director-magazine/2017-back-editions/march/university-challenge.

  • Sutherland, S. R. (2002). Higher education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taskforce for Reviewing the Size and Composition of the Council, Chinese University of Hong Kong. (2016). Second consultation document on the desirable size and composition of the council. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Times Higher Education. (2017). World university rankings 2016–2017. Retrieved from https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2017/world-ranking.

  • University Grants Committee. (1993). Higher education 1991–2001: An interim report. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (1996). Higher education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Government Printer.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (1999). Report for July 1995 and June 1998. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2000). Facts and figures 1999. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2003). Second round teaching and learning quality process reviews: Review template. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2004). Hong Kong higher education: To make a difference, to move with the times. Hong Kong: Printing Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2005). Research assessment exercise 2006—Guidance notes. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2010). Aspirations for the higher education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2011a). Grants for UGC-funded universities as a whole, 2003–04 to 2009–10. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2011b). New quest for excellence in higher education (annual report 2010–11). Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2013a). “3+3+4”—Nurturing our talents (annual report 2012–13). Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2013b). Financial affairs working group report. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2013c). Research assessment exercise 2014—Guidance notes. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2016). 50th anniversary album. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2017a). Annual report 2016–17. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2017b). Grants for UGC-funded universities as a whole, 2009–10 to 2015–16. Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University Grants Committee. (2017c). UGC notes on procedures (2017th ed.). Hong Kong: University Grants Committee.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Hong Kong. (2003). Fit for purpose report: A review of governance and management structures at The University of Hong Kong. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Hong Kong. (2006). The review 2006. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Hong Kong. (2015). Guide and code of practice for members of the council. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • University of Hong Kong. (2016). The review 2016. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zha, Q. (2012). Intellectuals, academic freedom, and University Autonomy in China. In H. G. Schuetze, W. Bruneau, & G. Grosjean (Eds.), University governance and reform: Policy, fads, and experience in international perspective (pp. 209–224). Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wing-Wah Law .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Law, WW. (2019). Managerialism and Public Universities in Hong Kong. In: Politics, Managerialism, and University Governance. Governance and Citizenship in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7303-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7303-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7302-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7303-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics