Skip to main content

Role of Self-Control in Digital Piracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 446 Accesses

Abstract

Self-control is generally considered to regulate undesirable behavior and is a conscious effort to regulate actual behavior. Individuals with low self-control are more likely to project instant gratification. As a result, they are less likely to wait for the original version of digital media. They will be more attracted towards thrill, ease, and immediate acquisition and will be less sensitive towards copyright associated with a particular digital media. The chapter demonstrates the relationship between self-control and digital piracy. In the context of the research findings, this chapter analyses multiple self-control theories and the existing research literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ainslie, G. (1975). Specious reward: A behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychological Bulletin, 82(4), 463–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Heatherton, T. F., & Tice, D. M. (1994). Losing control: How and why people fail at self-regulation. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Gailliot, M., DeWall, C. N., & Oaten, M. (2006). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality, 74, 1773–1801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., & Alquist, J. L. (2009). Self-regulation as a limited resource: Strength model of control and depletion. In J. P. Forgas, R. F. Baumeister, & D. M. Tice (Eds.), Psychology of self-regulation: Cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (pp. 21–34). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(6), 351–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornhorst, T., Ritchie, J. R. B., & Sheehan, L. (2010). Determinants of tourism success for DMOs & Destinations: An empirical examination of stakeholders’ perspectives. Tourism Management, 31, 572–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, C. K. (2013). Understanding factors associated with online piracy behaviour of adolescents. International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, 18(2), 122–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Countries Compared by Crime > Software piracy rate. International Statistics at NationMaster.com. (n.d.). Fifth Annual BSA and IDC Global Software Piracy Study. Aggregates compiled by NationMaster. Retrieved from http://www.nationmaster.com/country-info/stats/Crime/Software-piracy-rate.

  • DeCamp, W., Higgins, G. E., & Gealt, R. E. (2010). Pirating youth: Examining the correlates of digital music piracy among adolescents. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 4(1), 657–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ridder, D. T., Lensvelt-Mulders, G., Finkenauer, C., Stok, F. M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2012). Taking stock of self-control: A meta-analysis of how trait self-control relates to a wide range of behaviors. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(1), 76–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donner, C., Marcum, C., Jennings, W., & Banfield, J. (2014). Low self-control and cybercrime: Exploring the utility of the general theory of crime beyond digital piracy. Computers in Human Behavior, 34, 165–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fifth Annual BSA and IDC Global Software. (2007). Piracy study, business software Alliance (pp. 1–15).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopal, R., Sanders, G. L., Bhattacharjee, S., Agrawal, M., & Wagner, S. (2004). A behavioral model of digital music piracy. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 14, 89–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G. E. (2004). Can low self-control help with the understanding of the software piracy problem? Deviant Behavior, 26(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G. E., & Makin, D. A. (2004). Does social learning theory condition the effects of low self-control on college students’ software piracy. Journal of Economic Crime Management, 2(2), 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G., Fell, B., & Wilson, A. L. (2007). Low self-control and social learning in understanding students’ intentions to pirate movies in the United States. Social Science Computer Review, 25(3), 339–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, G. E., Marcum, C. D., Freiburger, T. L., & Ricketts, M. L. (2012). Examining the role of peer influence and self-control on downloading behavior. Deviant Behavior, 33(5), 412–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S. (2001). Correlates of internet software piracy. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 17, 369–382.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S. (2003). Trends and patterns among online software pirates. Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 49–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S. (2012). General strain, self-control, and music piracy. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 6(1), 951–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Higgins, G. E. (2008). Neutralizing music piracy: An empirical examination. Deviant Behavior, 29(4), 334–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Ingram, J. R. (2008). Self-control and ethical beliefs on the social learning of intellectual property theft. Western Criminology Review, 9(2), 52–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T. (2004). Self-control and crime. In R. F. Baumeister & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 537–552). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohn, D. A., Muftic, L. R., & Wolf, K. (2006). Swashbuckling students: An exploratory study of internet piracy. Security Journal, 19, 110–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C. (1988). Computer hackers follow a Guttman-like progression. Sociology and Social Research, 72, 199–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollinger, R. C. (1993). Crime by computer: Correlates of software piracy and unauthorized account access. Security Journal, 4, 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt, T. J., & Morris, R. G. (2009). An exploration of the relationship between MP3 player ownership and digital piracy. Criminal Justice Studies, 22(4), 381–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, J. R., & Hinduja, S. (2007). Neutralizing music piracy: An empirical examination. Journal Deviant Behavior, 2(4), 334–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inzlicht, M., Schmeichel, B. J., & Macrae, C. N. (2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 127–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marron, D. B., & Steel, D. G. (2000). Which countries protect intellectual property? The case of software piracy. Economic Inquiry, 38(2), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, A., & Bouffard, J. (2007). Something old, something new: A preliminary investigation of Hirschi’s redefined self-control. Justice Quarterly, 24(1), 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popham, J. (2011). Factors influencing music piracy, criminal justice studies: A critical journal crime. Law and Society, 24(2), 199–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/1478601X.2011.561648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, T., & Cullen, F. (2000). The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s general theory of crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology, 38(3), 931–964.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, E. K., & Mayes, L. C. (2011). Impulsivity in adolescents. In J. E. Grant & M. N. Potenza (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of impulse control disorders (pp. 463–475). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumbough, T. (2001). The development and maintenance of interpersonal relationships through computer-mediated communication. Communication Research Reports, 18(3), 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scaria, A. G. (2013). Online piracy of Indian movies: Is the film industry firing at the wrong target. Michigan State University College of Law International Law Review, 21, 647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selwyn, N. (2008). An investigation of differences in undergraduates’ academic use of the internet. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. K., Gopal, R. D., Sanders, G. L., & Whinston, A. B. (2004). Global software piracy revisited. Communications of the ACM, 47(1), 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, W. F., & Fream, A. M. (1997). A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college students. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34, 495–518.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. (1997). Shame and rational choice in offending decisions. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24(2), 234–255. Sage Periodicals Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S., & Myers, D. (1999). Low self-control, rational choice, and student test cheating. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 23(2), 179–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tibbetts, S. G., & Whittimore, J. N. (2002). The interactive effects of low self-control and commitment to school on substance abuse among college students. Psychological Reports, 90(1), 327–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazsonyi, A. T., Mikuška, J., & Kelley, E. L. (2017). It’s time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice, 48, 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Gannon, T. A. (2006). Rehabilitation, etiology, and self-regulation: The comprehensive good lives model of treatment for sexual offenders. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11(1), 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, S. E., & Higgins, G. E. (2009). Explaining deviant peer associations: An examination of low self-control, ethical predispositions, definitions, and digital piracy. Western Criminology Review, 10(1), 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sahni, S.P., Gupta, I. (2019). Role of Self-Control in Digital Piracy. In: Piracy in the Digital Era. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7173-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7173-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7172-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7173-8

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics