Skip to main content

What Works for School Readiness? Understanding Quality in Preschool Education

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Early Childhood Education and School Readiness in India

Abstract

The IECEI (India Early Childhood Education Impact) study summarized in Chap. 2 demonstrates a positive association between developmentally appropriate curriculum in preschool education and overall school readiness levels of children at the point of school entry. The findings, while documenting very low levels of cognitive readiness in children, also indicate a wide gap between prescribed and actual field practice with the latter dominated by formal, teacher-centered teaching. This chapter moves beyond these findings to explore the association between the nature of the curriculum and school readiness in children through a further analysis of the IECEI data. It statistically probes the nature of the association between two kinds of curriculum, formal and developmentally appropriate, with scores on deconstructed school readiness indicators to gain deeper insights into this relationship. It also identifies a positive association between preschool type and school readiness and flags this as an area requiring further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more details, please refer to the full report (Kaul et al., 2017).

  2. 2.

    Refer to the EFA Global Monitoring Report (2007).

  3. 3.

    For the sampling method and a description of the tools, see Kaul et al. (2017).

  4. 4.

    Quality parameters included physical infrastructure and materials, class management and organization, content and process in terms of language and reasoning experiences (including pre-literacy and numeracy), creative activities, fine and gross motor activities, social development, formal teaching of the three R’s, and teacher disposition.

  5. 5.

    Socioeconomic factors included caste, consumer durables, and mother’s education level and learning environment available at home in terms of the print environment at home and family support in learning activities.

  6. 6.

    The significant coefficient of curricular aspects covered during an assessment of the quality of ECE programs is given against all competencies assessed as part of school readiness; these are plotted in Fig. 7.3. The coefficients plotted in Fig. 7.3 show by what proportion a child’s score in different task/items of school readiness changed if activities for different domains of development were provided. The figure also represents a comparative association/impact of developmentally appropriate practices and formal teaching on different competencies assessed as part of the school readiness instrument .

  7. 7.

    Figure 7.6 represents significant coefficients for different types of ECE programs attended by children where the base category is Anganwadi centers. It plots the possible increase in the children’s scores in a particular competency if the child shifts from an Anganwadi center to any of the mentioned program types, keeping the other variables the same.

  8. 8.

    The coefficients of composite schools plotted in Fig. 7.7 represent the significance associated with different school readiness competencies with base category Anganwadi centers.

References

  • Dalli, C., Barbour, N., Cameron, C., & Miller, L. (2017). Closing comments: Future directions for early childhood policy. In The Sage handbook of early childhood policy (pp. 87–108). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driekurs, R. (2016). quoted in The Importance of Routine for Children in Exploring Your Mind. Retrieved from: https://exploringyourmind.com/discipline-love-educate-child/

  • Farquhar, S., & White, E. J. (2014). Philosophy and pedagogy of early childhood. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(8), 821–832. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.783964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gauvain, M., & Perez, S. M. (2015). The socialization of cognition. In J. E. Grusec & P. D. Hastings (Eds.), Handbook of socialization: Theory and research (pp. 566–589). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gestwicki, C. (1999). Developmentally appropriate practice: Curriculum and development in early education. New York: Delmar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (1986). National policy on education. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Human Resource Development (erstwhile Ministry of Education), Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2013). National Policy for early childhood care and education (NPECCE). In Ministry of Women and Child Development. New Delhi: GOI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2014a). National policy on early childhood care and education. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Women and Child Development, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (2014b). National Curriculum Framework Early Childhood Care and education (NCEFECCE). In Ministry of Women and Child Development. New Delhi: GOI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaga, Y. (2017). The relationship between early childhood & primary education in France and Sweden: A policy review. In L. Miller, C. Cameron, C. Dalli, & N. Barbour (Eds.), The Sage handbook of early childhood policy (pp. 87–108). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, V., Bhattacharjea, S., Chaudhary, A. B., Ramanujan, P., Banerji, M., & Nanda, M. (2017). The India early childhood education impact study. New Delhi, India: UNICEF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaul, V., & Chaudhary, A.B. (2014). Sustainability of ECE impact: A study of learning levels of children at age 6. Unpublished report. New Delhi, India: Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Association for the Education of Young Child. (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice. Position paper-Key Messages. New York: NAEYC. https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/.../position-statements/KeyMessages.pdf

  • Planning Commission. (2011). Evaluation study on integrated child development services (Vol. 1, pp. 13–14). New Delhi, India: Programme Evaluation Organisation, Planning Commission, Government of India.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2017a). Play based vs Formal academic early childhood education. Contributed by Smith, A. J., & Wasmuth, H. Retrieved from Learning Portal, UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2017b). Learning in the sustainable development goals. Retrieved from https://learningportal.iiep.unesco.org/en/issue-briefs/why-learning/learning-in-the-sustainabledevelopment-goals

    Google Scholar 

  • UNICEF. (2017). Policy brief India early childhood education impact study. Retrieved from http://ceced.net/IECEI%20Study%20Policy%20Brief%20July%202017.pdf

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Annexure

Annexure

Table 7.2 Regression analysis model to differentiate between formal teaching and developmental appropriate practices
Table 7.3 Regression analysis model to differentiate between Anganwadi centers and composite schools

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chaudhary, A.B., Kaul, V. (2019). What Works for School Readiness? Understanding Quality in Preschool Education. In: Kaul, V., Bhattacharjea, S. (eds) Early Childhood Education and School Readiness in India. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7006-9_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7006-9_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-7005-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-7006-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics