Skip to main content

The Trajectories of Industrial Relations: China and India

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Perspectives on Neoliberalism, Labour and Globalization in India

Abstract

This essay compares the industrial relations trajectories of China and India through different periods of evolution of their industrial relations systems. The basic argument is that, from a functional equivalence point of view, the two systems exhibited considerable convergence in the early periods. However, they have been diverging in later periods. In the current period, I argue that the two IR systems evidence converging divergences. Specifically, they are converging in terms of the objective of constraining the space for labour activism and contention while diverging in the methods used to achieve this objective. In terms of the argument undergirding the chapters in this volume, both countries evidence a transition from strongly regulated and state-dominated labour market institutions to a more marketized model of regulation that increasingly draws upon the discourse of neoliberalism to articulate deregulatory policies. Whether labour is able to challenge this discourse remains an open question in both countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    A process that Lee (2007) calls ‘decentralized legal authoritarianism.’

  2. 2.

    Presidential term limits had been introduced into the Chinese constitution after Mao’s death by his successor Deng Xiaoping, in order to prevent indefinite one-person rule.

References

  • Bhattacharjee, Saurabh. 2015. “Decoding the Draft Labour Code.” Livement, June 10. https://www.livemint.com/Opinion/BRFco6IZb253JgxWuCFUtL/Decoding-the-draft-labour-code.html. Accessed on 17 August 2018.

  • Bhattacherjee, Debashish. 2001. “The Evolution of Indian Industrial Relations. A Comparative Perspective.” Industrial Relations Journal 32(3): 244–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Yongshun. 2002. “The Resistance of Chinese Laid-off Workers in the Reform Period.” The China Quarterly 170: 327–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Anita. 2018. “The Relationship Between Labour NGOs and Chinese Workers in an Authoritarian Regime.” Global Labour Journal 9(1): 1–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Chris King-Chi, and Elaine Hui. 2013. The Development of Collective Bargaining in China. The China Quarterly 217: 221–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, Chris King-Chi, and Pun Ngai. 2009. “The Making of a New Working Class? A Study of Collective Action of Migrant Workers in South China.” China Quarterly 198: 287–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, J.C.M., Ny Li, and D. Sculli. 1989. “Labour Relations and the Foreign Investor in the Shenzhen Special Economic Zone of China.” Journal of General Management 14(4): 53–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, R. 1980. Unions, Politics and the State. A Study of Indian Labour Politics. New Delhi: South Asian Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Feng. 2010. “Trade Unions and the Quadripartite Interactions in Strike Settlement in China.” China Quarterly 201: 104–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, F., and X. Yang. 2017. “Movement-Oriented Labour NGOs in South China: Exit with Voice and Displaced Unionism.” China Information 31(2): 155–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Labour Bulletin. 2015. www.clb.org.hk. Accessed on 20 August 2018.

  • Clarke, S., and T. Pringle. 2009. “Can Party-led Trade Unions Represent Their Members?” Post-Communist Economies 21(1): 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desousa, Valerian. 1999. “Colonialism and Industrial Relations in India.” In Colonialism, Nationalism, and the Institutionalization of Industrial Relations in the Third World, Sarosh Kuruvilla and Bryan Mundell (eds.). Monographs in Organizational Behavior and Industrial Relations, 25. JAI Press, Stamford, CT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfstrom, M., and S. Kuruvilla. 2014. “The Changing Nature of Labor Unrest in China.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 67(2): 453–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franceschini, I., and E. Nesossi. 2018. “State Repression of Chinese Labor NGOs: A Chilling Effect?” The China Journal 80(1): 111–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frenkel, S., and S. Kuruvilla. 2002. “Logics of Action, Globalization, and Changing Employment Relations in China, India, Malaysia, and the Philippines.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 55(3): 387–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E. 2014. Insurgency Trap: Labour Politics in Postsocialist China. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E., and S. Kuruvilla. 2015. “Experimentation and Decentralization in Chinese Industrial Relations.” Human Relations 68(2): 181–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, E., and C.K. Lee. 2010. “Remaking the World of Chinese Labour: A 30‐Year Retrospective.” British Journal of Industrial Relations 48(3): 507–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Froissart, C. 2018. “Negotiating Authoritarianism and Its Limits: Worker-Led Collective Bargaining in Guangdong Province.” China Information 32(1): 23–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, D. 2017. “Fragmented Control: Governing Contentious Labour Organizations in China.” Governance 30(3): 445–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, D., and G. Distelhorst. 2018. “Grassroots Participation and Repression Under Hu Jintao and Xi Jinping.” The China Journal 79(1): 100–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M.E. 2004. “Time Is Money; Efficiency Is Life: The Transformation of Labor Relations in China.” Studies in Comparative International Development 39(2): 11–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M.E. 2011. Contagious Capitalism: Globalization and the Politics of Labor in China. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M.E. 2017. Authoritarian Legality in China: Law, Workers, and the State. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, M.E., C.K. Lee, and S. Kuruvilla. 2011. “Introduction and Argument.” In From Iron Rice Bowl to Informalization: Markets, Workers, and the State in a Changing China, S. Kuruvilla, C.K. Lee, and M.E. Gallagher (eds.). Ithaca, NY: ILR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan, R., and K.R. Shyam Sundar. 2015. “Who Cares of Labour Anyway?” Businessline, May 21. https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/who-cares-for-labour-anyway/article7232069.ece. Accessed on 20 August 2018.

  • Harriss-White, Barbara. 2003. India Working: Essays on Economy and Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, Elizabeth. 2006. “The Indian Industrial Relations System: Struggling to Address the Dynamics of a Globalizing Economy.” Journal of Industrial Relations 51(1): 395–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, H.C., S. Kuruvilla, and L. Turner. 1994. Industrial Relations System Reform in Korea: Principles and Policies in IR Systems Design. Korea Labor Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, Harry C., and Owen Darbishire. 2000. Converging Divergences: Worldwide Changes in Employment Systems. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Pradeep. 1964. “Strikes in India: An Analysis.” The Economic Weekly, October 10. http://www.epw.in/system/files/pdf/1964_16/40/strikes_in_indiaan_analysis.pdf. Accessed on 20 August 2018.

  • Kuruvilla, S. 1996. “The Relationship Between Economic Development Strategies and Industrial Relations: India, Malaysia, Singapore and the Philippines.” Industrial and Labor Relations Review 49(4): 635–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuruvilla, S. 2018. “From Cautious Optimism to Renewed Pessimism: Labour Voice and Labour Scholarship in China.” Industrial and Labour Relations Review 71(5): 1013–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuruvilla, S., and W. Hiers. 2000. Globalization and Industrial Relations in India: A Study of Industries and Firms. Bangkok: ILO, Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuruvilla, S., and H. Zhang. 2016. “Labor Unrest and Incipient Collective Bargaining in China.” Management and Organization Review 12(1): 159–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lansing, P., and S. Kuruvilla. 1986. “Industrial Dispute Resolution in India in Theory and Practice.” International and Comparative Law Review 9(2): 345–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.K. 1999. “From Organized Dependence to Disorganized Despotism: Changing Labour Regimes in Chinese Factories.” China Quarterly 157: 44–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.K. 2007. Against the Law: Labor Protests in China’s Rustbelt and Sunbelt. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C.K. 2017. “After the Miracle: Labour Politics Under China’s New Normal.” Catalyst 1(3): 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littler, C.R., and M. Lockett. 1983. “The Significance of Trade Unions in China.” Industrial Relations Journal 14(4): 31–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naughton, B. 1997. “Danwei: The Economic Foundations of a Unique Institution.” In Danwei: The Changing Chinese Workplace in Historical and Comparative Perspective, X. Lu and E. Perry (eds.). Armonk, New York: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, Albert, and Fang Cai. 2011. “The Informalization of the Chinese Labor Market.” In From Iron Rice Bowl to Informalization: Markets, Workers, and the State in a Changing China, Sarosh Kuruvilla, Ching Kwan Lee, and Mary E. Gallagher (eds.), 17–35. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pun, Ngai. 2005. Made in China: Women Factory Workers in a Global Workplace. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pun, Ngai, and Huilin Lu. 2010. “Unfinished Proletarianization: Self, Anger, and Class Action Among the Second Generation of Peasant-Workers in Present-Day China.” Modern China 36: 493–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramaswamy, E.A. 1983. “The Indian Management Dilemma: Economic vs Political Unions.” Asian Surve 23(8): 976–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, L.I., and S.H. Rudolph. 1987. In Pursuit of Lakshmi: The Political Economy of the Indian State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saha, Bibhas, and Indranil Pan. 1994. “Industrial Disputes in India: An Empirical Analysis.” Economic and Political Weekly 29(18): 1081–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saji Narayanan, C.K. 2018. “Two Decades of Labour Law Reforms in India: Bharatiya Mazdoor Sangh Perspective.” In Contemporary Reforms of Labour Market and Industrial Relations System in India: Ease of Doing Business Versus Labour Rights, K.R. Shyam Sundar (ed.). New Delhi: Academic Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyam Sundar, K.R. 2004. “Lockouts in India 1961–2001.” Economic and Political Weekly 39(39): 4377–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyam Sundar, K.R. 2014. “Labour Rights and Globalisation in India: Challenges for the Trade Union Movement.” Indian Journal of Labour Economics 57(2): 317–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shyam Sundar, K.R. 2016. Aspects and Dynamics of Collective Bargaining and Social Dialogue in the Post-Reform Period in India. New Delhi: Synergy Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solinger, Dorothy. 1999. Contesting Citizenship in Urban China: Peasant Migrants, the State, and the Logic of the Market. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stockmann, D., and M.E. Gallagher. 2011. “Remote Control: How the Media Sustain Authoritarian Rule in China.” Comparative Political Studies 44(4): 436–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkataratnam, C.S. 1993. “Impact of New Economic Policies on the Role of Trade Unions.” Indian Journal of Industrial Relations 29(1): 56–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walder, A.G. 1988. Communist Neo-traditionalism: Work and Authority in Chinese Industry. Oakland: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, S.B. 1987. The Private City: Philadelphia in Three Periods of Its Growth. Pennsylvania: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, S., and B. Webb. 1897. Industrial Democracy. London, New York, and Bombay: Longmans, Green, & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, H., and S. Schmalz. 2017. “Socializing Labour Protest: New forms of Coalition Building in South China.” Development and Change 48(5), 1031–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 10.4.

Table 10.4 Convergence and divergence in IR trajectories in India and China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kuruvilla, S. (2019). The Trajectories of Industrial Relations: China and India. In: Shyam Sundar, K. (eds) Perspectives on Neoliberalism, Labour and Globalization in India. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6972-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6972-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6971-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6972-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics