Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theoretical Approaches: Gendered Knowledge in Forest, Ecology and Environment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Climate Change Impacts on Gender Relations in Bangladesh

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace ((BRIEFSSECUR,volume 29))

  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter deals with the theoretical approaches of gender knowledge in forest, ecology and environment. How women’s knowledge of the forest can contribute and the relation of gender in forest-related research and environmental security discourse are been discussed here. Moreover, the chapter tries to correlate the research with two widely studied theories, namely, standpoint theory and feminist political ecology theory. It was found that women possess very significant knowledge which can contribute greatly to forest management, but have less opportunity to engage in the decision-making process . This chapter shows that gender has been a noteworthy issue in forest-related studies for a long time. Gender is also a crucial topic in environmental security discourse. The literature reviewed in the chapter talks about the epistemic value of the women’s lives. Thereafter, women’s knowledge has been discussed with reference to feminist political ecology theory. The final section of the chapter shows how the findings of this empirical study can contribute to the current practice in academia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    World Bank , FAO and IFAD 2009, Gender in agriculture sourcebook, Washington, DC.

  2. 2.

    Radel (2012) has employed the concept of identity to refer to the dual construction of the individual both in terms of the individual’s sense of self and in terms of the labelling of the individual by others or by society. Identities should be thought of as shifting, contingent and relational (Haraway 1991; Harding 1998, cited in Radel 2012), and are both constructed and performed through ordinary, daily practices (Butler 1990; McDowell 1995, cited in Radel 2012).

References

  • Agarwal, B. (1997), ‘“Bargaining” and Gender Relations: Within and Beyond the Household’, Feminist Economics, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 1–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, B. (2001), ‘Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry, and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and A Conceptual Framework’, World Development, Vol. 29, No. 10, pp. 1,623–1,648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, B. (2009), ‘Gender and Forest Conservation: The Impact of Women’s Participation in Community Forest Governance’, Ecological Economics, Vol. 68, No. 11, pp. 2,785–2,799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agarwal, B. (2010), ‘Does Women’s Proportional Strength Affect their Participation? Governing Local Forests in South Asia’, World Development, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 98–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal, A. and Chhatre, A. (2006), ‘Explaining Success on the Commons: Community Forest Governance in the Indian Himalaya’, World Development, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 149–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alam, M.J.; Rakkibu, M.G.; Rahman, M.M. (2012), ‘People’s Attitudes Towards Social Forestry: A Case Study in Rajshai’, Environmental and Natural Resources, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 217–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Angelsen, A.; Brockhaus, M.; Sunderlin, W.D.; Verchot, L.V. (eds.) (2012), Analysing REDD+: Challenges and Choices, CIFOR, Bogor, Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandiaky-Badji, S. (2011), ‘Gender Equity in Senegal’s Forest Governance History: Why Policy and Representation Matter’, International Forestry Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 177–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. and Homer-Dixon, T. (1997), ‘Resource Scarcity and Innovation: Can Poor Countries Attain Endogenous Growth?’, Ambio, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 144–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. (2011), The Meaning of Environmental Security: Ecological Politics and Policy in the New Security Era, London: Zed Books Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belcher, B.M.; Ruiz-Perez, M.; Achdiawan, R. (2005), ‘Global Patterns and Trends in the Use and Management of Commercial NTFPs: Implications for Livelihoods and Conservation’, World Development, Vol. 33, No. 9, pp. 1,435–1,452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bose, P, (2011), ‘Forest Tenure Reform: Exclusion of Tribal Women’s Rights in Semi-Arid Rajasthan, India’, International Forestry Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 220–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosold, L.A. (2012), ‘Challenging The “Man” In Mangroves: The Missing Role of Women in Mangrove Conservation’, Student Publications, Paper 14, viewed 19 January 2013, http://cupola.gettysburg.edu/student_scholarship/14.

  • Bondi, L. (2005), ‘Making Connections and Thinking through Emotions: Between Geography and Psychotherapy’, TIBG, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2005.00183.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P.C. (2011), ‘Gender, Climate and REDD+ in the Congo Basin Forests of Central Africa’, International Forestry Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 163–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunnée, J. and Toope, S. (1997), ‘Environmental Security and Freshwater Resources: Ecosystem Regime Building’, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 91, No. 1, pp. 26–59. https://doi.org/10.2307/2954139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, T. (2002), “Gender and Climate Hazards in Bangladesh”, Gender & Development, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 45–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/13552070215906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavendish, W. (2000), ‘Empirical Regularities in the Poverty-Environment Relationship of Rural Households: Evidence from Zimbabwe’, World Development, Vol. 28, pp. 1,979–2,003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, S.J. and Ong, A. (2005), ‘Global Assemblages, Anthropological Problems’. In: A. Ong and S.J. Collier (eds.), Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics and Ethics as Anthropological Problems, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 3–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, E. and Harrison, E. (1998), Whose Development? An Ethnography of Aid, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Detraz, N. (2009), ‘Environmental Security and Gender: Necessary Shifts in an Evolving Debate’, Security Studies, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 345–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dixon, T.F.H. (1999), ‘Environment, Scarcity and Violence’, Human Ecology Review, Vol. 7, No. 1, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhali, H.H. (2009), ‘Sustainable Development, State Policy, and Gender: Examining the effect of the forest policy on gender relations of indigenous people in CHT in Bangladesh’, The Hague: International Institute of Social Studies (I.S.S), pp. 1–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmhirst, R.; Siscawati, M.; Basnett, B.S.; Ekowati, D. (2017), ‘Gender and Generation in Engagements with Oil Palm in East Kalimantan, Indonesia: Insights from Feminist Political Ecology’, The Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 44, No. 6, pp. 1,135–1,157. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1337002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmhirst, R. (2018), ‘Understories of the Political Forest: A Mobile Feminist Political Ecology? Commentary on Nancy L. Peluso’s “The Remittance Forest: Turning Mobile Labour into Agrarian Capital”’, Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, Vol. 39, pp. 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2011), The State of Forests in the Amazon Basin, Congo Basin and Southeast Asia, Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2247e/i2247e00.pdf.

  • Ferrier, S. (2002), ‘Mapping Spatial Pattern in Biodiversity for Regional Conservation Planning: Where to from Here?’, Systematic Biology, Vol. 51, No. 2, pp. 331–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz, T.; Jentschke, S.; Gosselin, N.; Sammler, D.; Peretz, I.; Turner, R.; Friederici, A.D.; Koelsch, S. (2009), ‘Universal Recognition of Three Basic Emotions in Music’, Current Biology, Vol. 19, No. 7, pp. 573–576. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19303300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, D. (1999), ‘Helen Porter’s Everyday Survival Stories: A Literary Encounter with Feminist Standpoint Theory’, Atlantics, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 122–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gezon, L.L. (2006), Global Visions, Local Landscapes: A Political Ecology of Conservation, Conflict, and Control in Northern Madagascar, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield AltaMira Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giri, K. (2012), ‘Gender in Forest Tenure: Pre-requisite for Sustainable Forest Management in Nepal’, Washington DC: Rights and Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gurarascio, F. et al. (2013), Forests, Food Security and Gender: Linkages, Disparities and Priorities for Action (Background paper for the International Conference on Forests for Food Security and Nutrition), Rome: United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, http://www.fao.org/docrep/018/mg488e/mg488e.pdf.

  • Gururani, S. (2002), ‘Construction of Third World Women’s Knowledge in the Development Discourse’, International Social Science Journal, Vol. 54, No. 154, pp. 313–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halim, S. (1999), ‘Invisible Again: Women and Social Forestry in Bangladesh’, Ph.D. Thesis, McGill University, Montreal, Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2004a), ‘A Socially Relevant Philosophy of Science? Resources from Standpoint Theory’s Controversiality’, Hypatia, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 25–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2004b), The Feminist Standpoint Reader (ed.), New York and London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. (2008), Sciences from Below: Feminisms, Postcolonialities, and Modernities, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartsock, N. (1983), ‘The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism’. In: Sandra Harding (ed.) Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 157–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecht, S. (2007), ‘Factories, Forests, Fields and Family: Gender and Neoliberalism in Extractive Reserves’, Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 316–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, S. (1997), ‘Truth and Method: Feminist Standpoint Theory Revisited’, Chicago Journals, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 351–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse-Biber, S.N. (ed.) (2012), Handbook of Feminist Research Theory and Praxis, Boston, MA: SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hossain, M.M. and Islam, M.M. (2017), ‘Community Dependency on the Ecosystem Services from the Sundarbans Mangrove Wetland in Bangladesh’, Wetland Science, pp. 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3715-0_16.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, C. and Schraner, I. (2004), Feminists Standpoints, Knowledge and Truth, Paper No. 2004/02, School of Economics and Finance, University of Western Sydney, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iftekhar, M.S. and Islam, M.R. (2004), ‘Managing Mangroves in Bangladesh: A Strategy Analysis’, Journal of Coastal Conservation, Vol. 10, pp. 139–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes, J.L. (2005), ‘Forests in Environmental Protection’, Forests and Plants, Vol. 1, pp. 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabir, H.M.D. and Hossain, J. (2008), Resuscitating the Sundarbans, Customary Use of Biodiversity and Traditional Practices in Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh: Unnayan Onneshan; The Innovators.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisher, C.; Temsah, G.; Booker, F.; Day, M.; Samberg, L.; Prosnitz, D.; Agarwal, B.; Matthews, E.; Roe, D.; Russel, D.; Sunderland, T.; Wilkie, D. (2016) ‘Does the Gender Composition of Forest and Fishery Management Groups Affect Resource Governance and Conservation Outcomes?: A Systematic Map’, Environmental Evidence, Vol. 5, No. 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13750-016-0057-8.

  • Lamb, V.; Schoenberger, L.; Middleton, C.; Un, B. (2017), ‘Gendered Eviction, Protest and Recovery: A Feminist Political Ecology Engagement with Land Grabbing in Rural Cambodia’, The Journal of Peasant Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2017.1311868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, M. (2007), ‘Earth Mother Myths and Other Ecofeminist Fables: How a Strategic Notion Rose and Fell’, Development and Change, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp. 67–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie, C. (1998), ‘The Choice of Criteria in Ethical Investment’, Business Ethics, Vol. 7, No. 2. pp. 81–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8608.00092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahatb, N. (2010), Women in Bangladesh, Dhaka: Dhaka University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mai, Y.H.; Mwangi, E.; Wan, M; (2011), ‘Gender Analysis in Forestry Research: Looking Back and Thinking Ahead’, International Forestry Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 245–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDougall, C.L.; Leeuwis, C.; Bhattarai, T.; Maharjan, M.R.; Jiggins, J. (2013), ‘Engaging Women and the Poor: Adaptive Collaborative Governance of Community Forests in Nepal’, Agriculture and Human Values, Vol. 30, pp. 569–585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-013-9434-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mjaaland, T. (2013), ‘At the Frontiers of Changes? Women and Girls’ Pursuit of Education in North-Western Tigray, Ethiopia’, Ph.D. thesis, Bergen: University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mies, M. and Shiva, V. (1993), Ecofeminism, London and New Jersey: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, T.C. (2003), Feminism without Borders, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mollett, S. and Faria, C. (2012), ‘Messing with Gender in Feminist Political Ecology’, Geoforum, viewed 1 February 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.10.009.

  • Mukasa, C.; Tibazalika, A.; Mango, A.; Muloki, H.N. (2012), Gender and Forestry in Uganda: Policy, Legal and Institutional Frameworks, Bogor, Indonesia: CIFOR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasrin, F. (2012), ‘Women, Environment and Environmental Advocacy: Challenges for Bangladesh’, Asian Journal for Social Sciences and Humanities, Vol. 1, No 3, pp. 149–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neumann, P.R. (2005), ‘Introduction’, in: P.R. Neumann (ed.), Making Political Ecology, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nyantakyi-Frimpong, H. (2017), ‘Agricultural Diversification and Dietary Diversity: A Feminist Political Ecology of the Everyday Experiences of Landless and Smallholder Households in Northern Ghana’, Geoforum, Vol. 86, pp. 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, C.M.Y. and Daley, E. (2015), ‘Gender, Land and Agricultural Investments in Lao PDR’, in: C.S. Archambault and A. Zoomers (eds.), Global Trends in Land Tenure Reform: Gender Impacts, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pile, S. (2010), ‘Emotions and Affect in Recent Human Geography’, TIBG, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2009.00368.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radel, C. (2012), ‘Gendered Livelihoods and the Politics of Socio-Environmental Identity: Women’s Participation in Conservation Projects in Calakmul, Mexico’, Gender, Place & Culture: A Journal of Feminist Geography, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 61–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D. and Edmunds, D. (1997), ‘Women, Men and Trees: Gender, Power and Poverty in Forest and Agrarian Landscapes’, World Development, Vol. 25, No. 8, pp. 1,351–1,371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocheleau, D.; Thomas-Slayter, B.; Wangari, E. (1996), ‘Gender and Environment: A Feminist Political Ecology Perspective’, in: D. Rocheleau, B. Thomas-Slayter, and E. Wangari (eds.), Feminist Political Ecology: Global Issues and Local Experiences, London and New York: Routledge, pp. 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot, J. and Lee, N.P. (2003), ‘A Theory of Access’, Rural Sociology, Vol. 68, No. 2, pp. 153–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sears, L.J. (1996), Fantasizing the Feminine in Indonesia, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (1990), Development as Freedom, New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shanley, P.; Silva, F.C.D.; MacDonald, T. (2011), ‘Brazil’s Social Movement, Women and Forests: A Case Study from the National Council of Rubber Tappers’, International Forestry Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, S.; Paumgarten, F.; Kassa, H.; Husselman, M.; Zida, M. (2011), ‘Opportunities for Enhancing Poor Women’s Economic Empowerment in the Value Chains of Three African Non-timber Forest Products (NTFPs)’, International Forestry Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 136–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton, C.M. and Shackleton, S.E. (2000), ‘Direct-Use Value of Secondary Resources Harvested from Communal Savannas in the Bushbuckridge Low Veld, South Africa’, Journal of Tropical Forest Products, Vol. 6, pp. 28–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shively, G.E. (1997), ‘Poverty, Technology, and Wildlife Hunting in Palawan’, Environmental Conservation, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siar, S.V. (2003), ‘Knowledge, Gender, and Resources in Small-Scale Fishing: The Case of Honda Bay, Palawan, Philippines’, Environmental Management, Vol. 31, No. 5, pp. 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2872-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (1987), ‘Gentrification and the Rent Gap’, Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 462–465. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1987.tb00171.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stiem, L. and Krause, T. (2016), ‘Exploring the Impact of Social Norms and Perceptions on Women’s Participation in Customary Forest and Land Governance in the Democratic Republic of Congo – Implications for REDD+’, International Forestry Review, Vol. 18, No. 1, pp. 110–122, Commonwealth Forestry Association. http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1505/146554816818206113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sultana, F. (2011), ‘Suffering from Water, Suffering for Water: Emotional Geographies of Resource Access Control and Conflict,’ Geoforum, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 163–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y.; Mwangi, E.; Dick, M.R.; Bose, P.; Shanley, P.; Silva, C.F.; MacDonald, T. (2012), ‘Forests: Gender, Property Rights and Access’, No. 47, Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderland, T.; Achdiawan, R.; Angelsen, A.; Babigumira, R.; Ickowitz, A.; Paumgarten, F.; Reyes-García, V.; Shively, G. (2014), ‘Challenging Perceptions About Men, Women, and Forest Product Use: A Global Comparative Study’, World Development, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. S56–S66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2014.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanny, N.Z.; Rahman, M.W.; Ali, R.N. (2017), ‘Climate-induced Gender Vulnerabilities in Northwestern Bangladesh’, Indian Journal of Gender Studies, Vol. 24, No. 3, pp. 360–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torre-Castro, M.; Fröcklin, S.; Börjesson, S.; Okupnik, J.; Jiddawi, N.S. (2017), ‘Gender Analysis for Better Coastal Management – Increasing Our Understanding of Social-Ecological Seascapes, Marine Policy, Vol. 83, pp. 62–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truelove, Y. (2011), ‘(Re-) Conceptualizing Water Inequality in Delhi, India Through a Feminist Political Ecology Framework’, Geoforum, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyagi, N. and Das, S. (2018), ‘Assessing Gender Responsiveness of Forest Policies in India’, Forest Policy and Economics, Vol. 92, pp. 160–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vázquez-García, V. and Ortega-Ortega, T. (2017), ‘Gender, Local Governance and Non-timber Forest Products. The Use and Management of Satureja Macrostema in Oaxaca’s Central Valleys, Mexico’, Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol. 65, pp. 47–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Culture and Society, Western Sydney University, Penrith, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Sajal Roy

  2. Department of Women and Gender Studies, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Rangpur, Bangladesh

    Sajal Roy

Authors
  1. Sajal Roy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sajal Roy .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roy, S. (2019). Theoretical Approaches: Gendered Knowledge in Forest, Ecology and Environment. In: Climate Change Impacts on Gender Relations in Bangladesh. SpringerBriefs in Environment, Security, Development and Peace, vol 29. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6776-2_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation