Abstract
This article finds an appreciable rate of reduction in poverty at about 1.6% annually between 2004–05 and 2011–12 in the state of Uttar Pradesh, which has been largely in rural areas and that too among SCs and Others and across economic regions. In contrast, the incidence of poverty increased in urban areas of the state by 1.32% during 2004–05 to 2011–12, showing the urbanisation of rural poverty due to lack of remunerative employment opportunities and social security measures. However, poverty in the state is predominantly rural. In 2011–12, around 48 million out of 60 million poor people in the state were living in its rural area. The article estimates the poverty in the state at more disaggregated level of 17 administrative divisions (ADs) with an objective to suggest effective policy interventions and make a concerted dent on poverty. The incidence of poverty varies significantly across different regions and ADs of the state. The Eastern region has the highest poverty incidence, while Western region has the lowest, the latter being the most developed relatively among the four regions. The ADs with high incidence of poverty are Basti, Chitrakoot, Devipatan and Lucknow in the Eastern and Central economic regions, which are highly deprived and need to be targeted for poverty reduction. Along with the absolute levels of deprivations, there is huge inequality in distribution of income and consumption expenditure particularly in urban areas that severely hampers the pace of poverty reduction. In 2011–12, Gini coefficient of consumption expenditure distribution was 43 and 27%, respectively, for urban and rural areas in the state. It is found that regions and divisions with high urbanisation level and better rural connectivity have lower poverty incidence. Thus, given the large share of rural population, improving agricultural productivity and subsequently developing vibrant and integrated urban centres would be a highly effective strategy to achieve the target of eradicating extreme poverty from the state.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Since DES Uttar Pradesh does not provide separately the estimate for different regions, per capita NDDP of regions is calculated by dividing the total domestic product of all the districts in a region with the population size of the region as per Census 2011.
- 2.
Here, we have taken only SCs and Others for comparison as in Uttar Pradesh STs population is very less and sparsely distributed that too mostly in rural area. Also, the level of poverty incidence of STs and Others is similar.
References
Ahluwalia, M. S. (1978). Rural poverty and agriculture performance in India. Journal of Development Studies, 14(3), 298–323.
Diwakar, D. M. (2009). Intra-regional disparities, inequality and poverty in Uttar Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(26 & 27), 264–273.
Dubey, A., Gangopadhyay, S., & Wadhwa, W. (2001). Occupational structure and incidence of poverty in Indian towns of different sizes. Review of Development Economics, 5(1), 49–59.
GOI. (1979). The report of the task force on projections of minimum needs and effective consumption demand, perspective planning division, planning commission, New Delhi.
GOI. (1997). The report of the expert group on estimation of proportion and number of poor, perspective planning division, planning commission, New Delhi.
GOI. (2009). The report of the expert group to review the methodology for estimation of poverty, perspective planning division, planning commission, New Delhi.
Himanshu. (2007). Recent trends in poverty and inequality: some preliminary results. Economic and Political Weekly, 42(5), 497–508.
India Human Development Surveys (IHDS) 2004–05 and 2011–12, National Council of Applied Economic Research, New Delhi and University of Maryland, USA.
Macmillian, M. S., & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalisation, structural change and productivity growth. Working Paper 17143, National bureau of Economic Research.
Ranjan, S. (2009). Growth of rural non-farm employment in Uttar Pradesh: Reflections from recent data. Economic and Political Weekly, 44(4), 63–70.
Thorat, S., & Dubey, A. (2012). Has growth been socially inclusive in the period between 1993-94-2009-10? Economic and Political Weekly, 47(10), 43–53.
Tiwari, S. (2014). Assessment of growth, poverty, and inequality in Uttar Pradesh: A long term analysis. Journal of Economic and Social Development, 10(1), 31–44.
United Nations. (2015). Transforming the world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, Retrieved on July 25th, 2017 from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf.
World Bank. (2016). Uttar Pradesh: poverty, growth and inequality, Retrieved on July 26th, 2017 from http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/187721467995647501/pdf/105884-BRI-P157572-ADD-SERIES-India-state-briefs-PUBLIC-UttarPradesh-Proverty.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dubey, A., Tiwari, S. (2019). Poverty and Inequality: A Disaggregated Analysis. In: Mamgain, R. (eds) Growth, Disparities and Inclusive Development in India. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6443-3_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6443-3_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6442-6
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6443-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)