Abstract
This chapter introduces a series of human dimensions studies conducted at Tochigi Prefecture, with a specific focus on the Model District Program. In Sect. 5.1, I explain the background of the Model District Program. The results of the interviews and surveys conducted among local residents to understand the impacts of this program are explained. The two issues faced by the program are then highlighted: the sustainability of the intervention and the broad participation of residents. Section 5.2 explains the results of the surveys conducted among local residents of two model districts. Based on social-psychological theories developed in the USA (the Theory of Planned Behavior and the wildlife acceptance capacity model), the study revealed that social norms significantly explained residents’ behavioral intentions, while risk perceptions significantly explained residents’ capacity for wildlife acceptance. Section 5.3 examines some comparative studies carried out over different years and districts. The results revealed in model districts where participatory interventions were implemented, residents were more likely to engage in damage prevention measures. They were also more satisfied with government performance than in neighboring districts not subject to interventions. Over time, however, the number of the participants in model district interventions decreased, indicating the importance of maintaining motivation among residents.
Please bear in mind that this chapter was written based on academic studies, and the resulting papers written by the author. Section 5.1 is based on Sakurai et al. 2013a; Sect. 5.2 is based on Sakurai et al. 2014a; and Sect. 5.3 is based on Sakurai et al. 2014b.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agee JD, Miller CA. Factors contributing toward acceptance of lethal control of black bears in Central Georgia, USA. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2009;14:198–205.
Ajzen I. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl J, Beckman J, editors. Action control: from cognition to behavior. Heidelberg: Springer; 1985. p. 11–39.
Ajzen I, Fishbein M. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. London: Prentice-Hall International, Inc; 1980. p. 278.
Akiba H, Miller CA, Matsuda H. Factor influencing public preference for raccoon eradication plan in Kanagawa, Japan. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2012;17:207–19.
Baruch-Mordo S, Breck SW, Wilson KR, Broderick J. A tool box half full: how social science can help solve human-wildlife conflict. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2009;14:219–23.
Carpenter LH, Decker DJ, Lipscomb JF. Stakeholder acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2000;5:5–19.
Decker DJ, Purdy KG. Toward a concept of wildlife acceptance capacity in wildlife management. Wildl Soc Bull. 1988;16:53–7.
Decker DJ, Brown TL, Siemer WF. Human dimensions of wildlife management in North America. Bethesda: The Wildlife Society; 2001, 447 pp
Decker DJ, Riley SJ, Siemer WF. Human dimensions of wildlife management. 2nd ed. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 2012.
Enari H, Suzuki T. Risk of agricultural and property damage associated with the recovery of Japanese monkey populations. Landsc Urban Plan. 2010;97:83–91.
Ericsson G, Heberlein T. Attitudes of hunters, locals, and the general public in Sweden now that the wolves are back. Biol Conserv. 2003;111:149–59.
Ferraro PJ, Pattanayak SK. Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. Public Lib Sci Biol. 2006;4(4):482–8.
Gigliotti L, Decker DJ, Carpenter LH. Developing the wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity concept: research needed. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2000;5:76–82.
Hashimoto K, Ko K, Fujinaga H, Lutz R. Predictive ability of the theory of planned behavior for mental health outcomes in Japanese vs. Chinese students. J Health Sci. 2008;30:27–37. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Hayabuchi Y. Spillover effect of environmental education. Kyoto: Nakanishiya Press; 2008. (in Japanese)
Hirose Y. Determinants of environment-conscious behavior. Res Soc Psychol. 1994;10(1):44–55. (in Japanese with English abstract).
Hirose Y, Kobayashi H, Shima T. Clarification of the impact of determinant of preference of non-farmers to the Irrigation Water Wheels on motive of conservation action. J Rural Plan. 2010;32:287–92. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Honda Y. Factors affecting non-farmers’ participation in maintenance of irrigation and drainage canals: focusing on styles of irrigation water management and canal maintenance. J Rural Plan. 2011;30:74–82. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Hrubes D, Ajzen I, Daigle J. Predicting hunting intentions and behavior: an application of the theory of planned behavior. Leis Sci. 2001;23:165–78.
Jonker SA, Organ JF, Muth RM, Zwick RR, Siemer WF. Stakeholder norms toward beaver management in Massachusetts. J Wildl Manag. 2009;73:1158–65.
Kanuma City. Agricultural damage of Kanuma City. 2008. (in Japanese). http://www.city.kanuma.tochigi.jp/resources/content/1943/keikaku.pdf. Accessed 29 Oct 2012.
Kanuma City. Data of Kanuma city. 2010. (in Japanese). http://www.city.kanuma.tochigi.jp/13,20117,147,510.html. Accessed 5 Nov 2013.
Kikuchi N. Revived oriental white stork. Tokyo: Tokyo University; 2006. (in Japanese)
Kimura M, Miyagi A, Ide S. Key factors in sustaining river conservation activities by community associations – case of Jichikais’ in Moriyama, Shiga. Environ Syst Res. 2008;36:475–83. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Kinoshita D, Kuki Y, Hoshino S, Takeyama E. Present state of the group activities to decrease agricultural damage caused by wildlife and possibility of non-farmers’ cooperation on the activities in paddy areas: cases study in Nantan region, Kyoto Prefecture. J Rural Plan. 2009;27:227–32. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Krebs, C. J. 2001. Ecology: Fifth edition. Benjamin Cummings, San Francisco., , 695 pp.
Majic A, Bodonia AMT, Huber D, Bunnefeld N. Dynamics of public attitudes toward bears and the role of bear hunting in Croatia. Biol Conserv. 2011;144:3018–27.
Martin SR, McCurdy K. Wilderness food storage in Yosemite: using the theory of planned behavior to understand backpacker canister use. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2009;14:206–18.
Maruyama T. Study about macaques conservation and management system at cities, towns, and villages. Yaseichojyu Kenkyu Kiyo (Bull Wildl Tochigi Prefecture). 2005;31:34–40. (in Japanese)
Maruyama Y. Environmental issues of macaques and people: between nature conservation and damage regarding Japanese macaques. Kyoto: Showado; 2006. (in Japanese).
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Agricultural damage by wildlife in each prefecture. 2007. (in Japanese). http://www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/tyozyu/higai/h_zyokyo/h19/pdf/ref_data02.pdf. Accessed 8 Feb 2018.
Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Agricultural damage by wildlife in each prefecture. 2015. (in Japanese). http://www.maff.go.jp/j/seisan/tyozyu/higai/h_zyokyo2/h27/attach/pdf/h27-2.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2015.
Misaka K. Development of a model of psychological processes for promotion of environmental education. Environ Educ. 2003;13(1):3–14. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Mizuhara T. Introduction to social psychology. The second edition. Theory and practice. Tokyo: University of Tokyo Press; 1989. 260pp. (in Japanese).
Murase Y, Takada H, Hirose T. Multivariate statistics using SPSS. Tokyo: Ohmsha; 2009. 351pp. (in Japanese)
Nasushiobara City. Statistical record of Nasushiobara city: 2010. 2010. https://www.city.nasushiobara.lg.jp/dbps_data/_material_/_files/000/000/000/930/4dbe5647004.pdf. Accessed 29 Dec 2011.
Nasushiobara City. Statistical record of Nasushiobara city: 2010. 2011. (in Japanese). http://www.city.nasushiobara.lg.jp/191/3094/2934/index.html. Accessed 6 June 2011.
Niibe K, Yano Y, Matsuda N, Takahashi Y, Maruyama T. Population of and damage caused by large mammals based on questionnaire survey. Yaseichojyu Kenkyu Kiyo (Bull Wildl Tochigi Prefecture). 2008;34:39–47. (in Japanese)
Nikko City. Data of the city. 2010. http://www.city.nikko.lg.jp/seisaku/profile/data/. (in Japanese). Accessed 3 Nov 2013.
NTT East Japan. Hello Page: Nasushiobara District of Tochigi Prefecture. Individual names. Tokyo: NTT East Japan; 2011.
Ohtomo S. Dual decision making process of environment-risk behavior and the influence of prototype perception of the environmentally nonconscious person. Environ Educ. 2004;13(2):25–34. (in Japanese with English abstract).
Pouta E, Rekola M. The theory of planned behavior in predicting willingness to pay for abatement of forest regeneration. Soc Nat Resour. 2001;14:93–106.
Riley SJ, Decker DJ. Risk perception as a factor in wildlife stakeholder acceptance capacity for cougars in Montana. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2000;5:50–62.
Roskaft E, Bjerke T, Kaltenborn B, Linnell JDC, Anderson R. Patterns of self-reported fear towards large carnivores among the Norwegian public. Evol Hum Behav. 2003;24:184–98.
Rossi AN, Armstrong JB. Theory of reasoned action vs. theory of planned behavior: testing the suitability and sufficiency of a popular behavior model using hunting intentions. Hum Dimens Wildl. 1999;4:40–56.
Rossi PH, Lipsey MW, Freeman HE. Evaluation: a systematic approach. 7th ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication; 2004.
Ryu Y, Sasaki R. Evaluation theories and techniques. Tokyo: Taga Shuppan; 2010. p. 217. (in Japanese)
Sakurai R. Chapter 9: Collaborative approach for coexistence with wildlife in rural regions of Japan. In: Frank B, Gilkman JA, Marchini S, editors. Human-wildlife interactions: turning conflict into coexistence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2019.
Sakurai R, Ueda G, Jacobson SK. Survey of residents regarding the Asiatic black bear at Tajima region of Hyogo Prefecture: designing and conducting questionnaire survey for policy application and management interventions. Wildl Conserv Jpn. 2012a;12(2):33–46. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Sakurai R, Ueda G, Jacobson SK. Effectiveness of the community bear education seminar – conducting pre and post survey at Hidaka Town of Toyooka City in Hyogo Prefecture. Kyosei Stud. 2012b;6:380–92. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Sakurai R, Matsuda N, Maruyama T, Jacobson SK. Overview of the model district program for reducing human-wildlife conflicts in Tochigi Prefecture. Wildl Hum Soc. 2013a;1:47–54. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Sakurai R, Jacobson SK, Ueda G. Public perceptions of risk and government performance regarding bear management in Japan. Ursus. 2013b;24:70–82.
Sakurai R, Enari H, Matsuda N, Maruyama T. Testing social-psychological theories to predict residents’ behavioral intentions regarding wildlife issues – application of theory of planned behavior and wildlife acceptance capacity model. Honyurui Kagaku (Mamm Sci). 2014a;54(2):219–30. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Sakurai R, Matsuda N, Maruyama T, Takahashi Y. Residents’ perceptions of wildlife conflicts at Momurahonden of Nasushiobara city: comparison with previous year and neighbor communities. Yaseichojyu Kenkyu Kiyo (Bull Wildl Tochigi Prefecture). 2014b;39:61–6. (in Japanese)
Sakurai R, Jacobson SK, Ueda G. Public perceptions of significant wildlife in Hyogo, Japan. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2014c;19:88–95.
Sorice MG, Conner JR. Predicting private landowner intentions to enroll in an incentive program to protect endangered species. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2010;15:77–89.
Sudo H. Determinants of exercise adherence of middle-aged women in the gym. Sport Sci Res. 2008;5:96–107. (in Japanese).
Suwa H, Yamamoto H, Okada I, Ohta T. Path analysis model for development of environmental education program to promote environment-conscious behavior. J Soc Inf. 2006;18(1):59–70. (in Japanese with English abstract).
The Nature Conservation Society of Japan. Wildlife conservation and law from ecological perspectives: toward conservation of biological diversity. Tokyo: Kodansha; 2010. (in Japanese)
Tochigi Prefecture. Biodiversity and Tochigi Strategy: connecting and coexisting lives at Tochigi. Tochigi: Nature Preservation Division, Department of Environment and Forestry, Tochigi Prefecture; 2010. (in Japanese)
Utsunomiya University. The Satoyama wildlife management technologist training program. 2012. (in Japanese). http://ssrc.utsunomiya-u.ac.jp/wmtp/. Accessed 23 Mar 2012.
Watanabe O, Ogura S. Relationship between perceptions toward wildlife values and opinions about wildlife management policy in rural areas of central Japan. Wildl Conserv Jpn. 1996;2(1):1–15. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Yamabata N. Mitigate effect on damage to food crops achieved by collaboration of a whole village for chase-off of monkeys: verification in 6 area of Mie Prefecture. J Rural Plan. 2009;28:273–8. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Yamabata N. Effect of improved countermeasures to agricultural damage by wildlife on farmers’ awareness of farmland management: a study of community in Mie Prefecture. J Rural Plan. 2010;29:245–60. (in Japanese with English abstract).
Yamabata N. Effect of chasing away by village on the home range and appearances of a macaques group: verification in 7 area of Mie Prefecture. J Rural Plan. 2011;30:381–6. (in Japanese with English abstract).
Yamamoto T, Nagasawa T. Motivation factors of local residents’ participation in the maintenance works of irrigation and drainage facilities. J Rural Plan. 2010;28:387–92. (in Japanese with English abstract).
Yorifuji K, Hirose Y. Determinants of children’s waste-reduction behavior. Environ Educ. 2002;12(1):26–36. (in Japanese with English abstract)
Zinn HC, Manfredo MJ, Vaske JJ. Social psychological bases for stakeholder acceptance capacity. Hum Dimens Wildl. 2000;5:20–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sakurai, R. (2019). Human Dimensions Studies on Programs for Reducing Human-Wildlife Conflicts in Tochigi Prefecture, Japan. In: Human Dimensions of Wildlife Management in Japan. Ecological Research Monographs. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6332-0_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6332-0_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-6331-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-6332-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)