Skip to main content

Planning to Enhance Student Learning Outcomes on Innovation Design Projects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research into Design for a Connected World

Part of the book series: Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies ((SIST,volume 135))

  • 1533 Accesses

Abstract

Design studio is the central learning environment for students in design schools. For the major design project, various topic selections can lead to dissimilar design journeys. This module was taught for the first time at one of the international universities in China campus in the 2015 spring semester. After completing the teaching, students suggested that more critiques help them to acquire design knowledge and manage their time more effectively. We adopted their suggestions. However, the learning outcomes in 2016 were not as good as those of the preceding year. To address this issue, we proposed Kolb’s experiential learning cycle as a framework to develop assessment strategies for various design stages, and we argued that assessment strategies designed based on this framework enhance student learning outcomes. We illustrated how the stages of Kolb’s model can be incorporated into the major design project and results presented in the paper.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anthony, K.H.: Design Juries on Trial: The Renaissance of the Design Studio. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ochsner, J.K.: Behind the mask: a psychoanalytic perspective on interaction in the design studio. J. Architect. Ed. 53(4), 194–206 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kolb, D.A.: Experimental Learning: Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Prentice Hall, Enlewood Cliffs (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dunlap, J., Dobrovolny, J., Young, D.: Preparing eLearning designers using Kolb’s model of experiential learning. Innovate: J. Online Ed. 4(4), n4 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Smith, D., Kolb, D.: User’s guide for Learning Style-Inventory: A Manual for Teachers and Trainers. McBer & Company, Boston (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Forrest, C.: Kolb’s learning cycle. In: Fenman’s Train the Trainer Series (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., Marshall, S. (eds.): A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: Enhancing Academic Practice, 2nd edn. Kogan Page, Glasgow (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Romer, A., Pache, M., Weißhahn, G., Lindemann, U., Hacker, W.: Effort-saving product representations in design-results of a questionnaire survey. Des. Stud. 22(6), 473–491 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ibrahim, R., Rahimian, F.P.: Comparison of CAD and manual sketching tools for teaching architectural design. Autom. Construct. 19(8), 978–987 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sobek II, D.K., Jain, V.K.: Two instruments for assessing design outcomes of capstone projects. In: Proceeding of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Buhl, H.: Creative Engineering Design. Iowa State University, Iowa (1960)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Isaksen, S.G., Dorval, K.B., Treffinger, D.J.: Creative Approaches to Problem Solving. Kendall Hunt Publishing Co., Dubuque (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maher, M. L. Poon, J. & Boulanger, S. Formalizing design exploration as co-evolution: a combine general approach. In: Gero, J.S., Sudweeks, F. (ed.), Advances in Formal Design Method for CAD, London, England (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simon, H.A.: Search and reasoning in problem solving. Artif. Intell. 21, 7–29 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Schunn, C.D., Trafton, J.G.: The psychology of uncertainty in scientific data analysis. In: Feist, G., Gorman, M. (eds.) Handbook of the Psychology of Science, pp. 461–483. Springer Publishing, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paletz, S.B.F., Peng, K.: Problem finding and contradiction: examining the relationship between naïve dialectical thinking, ethnicity, and creativity. Creat. Res. J. 21, 139–151 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dorst, K., Cross, N.: Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution. Des. Stud. 22(5), 425–437 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yi Teng Shih .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Shih, Y.T., Sher, W.D. (2019). Planning to Enhance Student Learning Outcomes on Innovation Design Projects. In: Chakrabarti, A. (eds) Research into Design for a Connected World. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol 135. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5977-4_76

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5977-4_76

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5976-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5977-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics