Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Problems and Coping Strategies in Conducting Comparative Research in School Bullying Between China and Norway

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Challenges and Opportunities in Qualitative Research

Abstract

Drawn from the empirical experiences of conducting a cross-cultural qualitative research, this chapter presents a list of issues that might be encountered by qualitative researchers, and demonstrates the strategies applied in this study to eliminate the cross-cultural differences and misunderstandings. The encountered problems are illustrated from three perspectives: first, problems relating to participants’ diverse understandings of the research subjects. For example, in this study, the concept of school bullying (Sharp and Smith in School bullying: insights and perspectives. Routledge, 2002; Smith in The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. Psychology Press, 1999), the dynamics of bullying (Swearer et al. in J Emotional Abuse 2:95–121, 2001; Thornberg in Confero: Essays Educ Philos Polit 3:161–203, 2015), as well as bullying prevention and intervention (Espelage et al. in Bullying in American schools: asocial-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Routledge, 2004; Polanin et al. Sch Psychol Rev 41:47, 2012) are all recognized and dealt with very differently between Norway and China. Second, problems relating to various data interpretation of the researchers from different cultures. And third, other problems related to mutual understandings and smooth communication with co-workers in an international research team. The problems appear in various stages of the research process including research design, data collection, and data analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In urban China, in order to be recruited as a middle school teacher, the minimum requirement is the grasp of a college degree. In Chinese higher education system, undergraduate students have to pass the College English Test (CET) Band 4 level (or higher) in order to obtain the graduation diploma. Therefore, middle school teachers especially in urban areas are supposed to have the sufficient English language proficiency allowing them understanding the subtitles in the films.

References

  • Berg, B. L., & Lune, H. (2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Vol. 5). Boston, MA: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biernacki, P., & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L., Gutgsell, E. W., & Swearer, S. M. (2004). Bullying in American schools: A social-ecological perspective on prevention and intervention. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Espelage, D. L., & Swearer, S. M. (2003). Research on school bullying and victimization: What have we learned and where do we go from here? School Psychology Review, 32(3), 365–384.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galletta, A. (2013). Mastering the semi-structured interview and beyond: From research design to analysis and publication. NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guion, L. A. (2002). Triangulation: Establishing the validity of qualitative studies. University of Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, EDIS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, M., & Perry, C. (2000). Comprehensive criteria to judge validity and reliability of qualitative research within the realism paradigm. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 3(3), 118–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho, D. Y.-F., & Chiu, C.-Y. (1994). Component ideas of individualism, collectivism, and social organization: An application in the study of Chinese culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, M. (1990). Linkage between researchers and practitioners: A qualitative study. American Educational Research Journal, 27(2), 363–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hymel, S., & Swearer, S. M. (2015). Four decades of research on school bullying: An introduction. American Psychologist, 70(4), 293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeCompte, M. D., & Millroy, W. L. (1992). The handbook of qualitative research in education. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health Promotion Practice, 1524839915580941.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrell, K. W., Gueldner, B. A., Ross, S. W., & Isava, D. M. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. Educational Publishing Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Revised and expanded from “Case Study Research in Education”. ERIC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, T., Birch, M., Mauthner, M., & Jessop, J. (2012). Ethics in qualitative research. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modecki, K. L., Minchin, J., Harbaugh, A. G., Guerra, N. G., & Runions, K. C. (2014). Bullying prevalence across contexts: A meta-analysis measuring cyber and traditional bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 55(5), 602–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nansel, T. R., Overpeck, M., Pilla, R. S., Ruan, W. J., Simons-Morton, B., & Scheidt, P. (2001). Bullying behaviors among US youth: Prevalence and association with psychosocial adjustment. JAMA, 285(16), 2094–2100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noy, C. (2008). Sampling knowledge: The hermeneutics of snowball sampling in qualitative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olweus, D. (2013). School bullying: Development and some important challenges. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 9, 751–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. Wiley Online Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanin, J. R., Espelage, D. L., & Pigott, T. D. (2012). A meta-analysis of school-based bullying prevention programs’ effects on bystander intervention behavior. School Psychology Review, 41(1), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, J., Lewis, J., Nicholls, C. M., & Ormston, R. (2013). Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, E. (1989). Bullying: the Scandinavian research tradition. Bullying in Schools, 21–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roland, E. (2000). Bullying in school: Three national innovations in Norwegian schools in 15 years. Aggressive Behavior, 26, 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, E., & Galloway, D. (2002). Classroom influences on bullying. Educational Research, 44(3), 299–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roland, E., & Idsøe, T. (2001). Aggression and bullying. Aggressive Behavior, 27(6), 446–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., & Nieminen, E. (2002). Proactive and reactive aggression among school bullies, victims, and bully-victims. Aggressive Behavior, 28(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salmivalli, C., Voeten, M., & Poskiparta, E. (2011). Bystanders matter: Associations between reinforcing, defending, and the frequency of bullying behavior in classrooms. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 40(5), 668–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: New cultural dimensions of values. Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp, S., & Smith, P. K. (2002). School bullying: Insights and perspectives. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for information, 22(2), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherif, B. (2001). The ambiguity of boundaries in the fieldwork experience: Establishing rapport and negotiating insider/outsider status. Qualitative inquiry, 7(4), 436–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K. (1999). The nature of school bullying: A cross-national perspective. Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., Kwak, K., & Toda, Y. (2016). School bullying in different cultures. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K., & Monks, C. P. (2008). Concepts of bullying: Developmental and cultural aspects. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 20(2), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smithmyer, C. M., Hubbard, J. A., & Simons, R. F. (2000). Proactive and reactive aggression in delinquent adolescents: Relations to aggression outcome expectancies. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 29(1), 86–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens, P. (2011). Preventing and confronting school bullying: A comparative study of two national programmes in Norway. British Educational Research Journal, 37(3), 381–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swearer, S. M., Song, S. Y., Cary, P. T., Eagle, J. W., & Mickelson, W. T. (2001). Psychosocial correlates in bullying and victimization: The relationship between depression, anxiety, and bully/victim status. Journal of Emotional Abuse, 2(2–3), 95–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. (2015). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A guidebook and resource. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornberg, R. (2015). The social dynamics of school bullying: The necessary dialogue between the blind men around the elephant and the possible meeting point at the social-ecological square. Confero: Essays on Education, Philosophy and Politics, 3(2), 161–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Media and Social Sciences, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway

    Dian Liu

Authors
  1. Dian Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dian Liu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China

    Kwok Kuen Tsang

  2. Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway

    Dian Liu

  3. School of Humanities, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

    Yanbi Hong

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Liu, D. (2019). Problems and Coping Strategies in Conducting Comparative Research in School Bullying Between China and Norway. In: Tsang, K., Liu, D., Hong, Y. (eds) Challenges and Opportunities in Qualitative Research. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5811-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5811-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5810-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5811-1

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation