Abstract
Non-representational theory opens up ways to make sense of non-cognitive, bodily, emotional, and affective processes in corporeal movement. Many theories of dance have focused on the continuity of movement, the process of passing seamlessly from one position to another. However, such expectations are readily disrupted by impaired bodies, which, despite their own internal continuity, are read through a normative body. This leads to registering movement in terms of an absence or lack of an expected movement. This prompts the viewer to shift from a direct consideration of the body–space relationship as a field of expression to representational structures that seek to explain the impairment. While this chapter approaches dance through non-representational theory, the authors argue that representation still shapes the conditions for affectual relationships in performance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Albright, A. C. (2011). Situated dancing: Notes from three decades in contact with phenomenology. Dance Research Journal,43, 7–18.
Barbour, K., & Hitchmouth, A. (2014). Experiencing affect through site-specific dance. Emotion, Space and Society, 12, 63–72.
Benjamin, A. (1998). Cabbages and kings: Disability, dance and some timely considerations. In A. Carter & J. O’Shea (Eds.), The Routledge dance studies reader (pp. 111–121). New York, NY: Routledge.
Boon, M. (2016, February 11). Claire Cunningham: Conversations with crutches. Limelight. Retrieved 6 February 2018 from http://www.limelightmagazine.com.au/features/claire-cunningham-conversations-with-crutches/.
Brown, C. (1998). Making spaces, speaking spaces. In A. Carter & J. O’Shea (Eds.), The Routledge dance studies reader (pp. 58–72). New York, NY: Routledge.
Calvo-Merino, B., Jola, C., Glaser, D., & Haggard, P. (2008). Towards a sensorimotor aesthetics of performing art. Consciousness and Cognition,17, 911–922.
CanDoCo Dance Company. Retrieved from http://www.candoco.co.uk/the-work/candoco/12.
Caputo, J. (2007). The weakness of god. Bloomington and London: Indiana University Press.
Casey, E. (1993). Getting back into place: Toward a renewed understanding of the place-world. Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.
Cresswell, T. (2006). ‘You cannot shake that shimmie here’: Producing mobility on the dance floor. Cultural Geographies,13, 55–77.
Cunningham, C. (n.d.). About Claire Cunninham. Retrieved 3 March 2018 from http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/2011/10/reference-twins.html.
Dewsbury, J.-D. (2010). Dancing: The secret slowness of the fast. In T. Cresswell & P. Merriman (Eds.), Geographies of mobilities: Practices, spaces, subjects (pp. 51–67). London, UK: Routledge.
Duffy, M., & Atkinson, P. (2014). Unnatural movements: Modernism’s shaping of intimate relations in Stravinsky’s Le sacre du printemps. Affirmations of the Modern, 2.
Foster, S. L. (1995). Choreographing history. In S. L. Foster (Ed.), Choreographing history (pp. 3–21). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Foster, S. L. (Ed.). (1996). Corporealities: Dancing knowledge, culture and power. London and New York: Routledge.
Foster, S. L., Rothfield, P., & Dunagan, C. (2005). Philosophy and dance. Topoi,24, 255–256.
Franko, M. (1996). Five theses on laughter after all. In G. Morris (Ed.), Moving words: Re-writing dance (pp. 43–62). London, UK: Routledge.
Kuppers, P. (2003). Disability and contemporary performance: Bodies on the edge. London, UK: Routledge.
Langer, S. K. (1953). Feeling and form: A theory of art developed from philosophy in a new key. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Langer, S. K. (1957). Problems of art: Ten philosophical lectures. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Laurie, V. (2016, January 25). Claire Cunningham: Battling the body fascists. The Australian. Retrieved 6 February 2018 from http://www.theaustralian.com.au/arts/stage/claire-cunningham-battling-the-body-fascists/news-story/0c82dfc89ac43dd134c746ada6bed0de.
Malloch, S. (2005). Why do we like to dance and sing? In R. Grove, C. Stevens, & S. McKechnie (Eds.), Thinking in four dimensions (pp. 14–28). Carlton, Australia: Melbourne University Press.
Manning, E. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Durham, NC and London, UK: Duke University Press.
Massumi, B. (2011). Semblance and event: Activist philosophy and the occurrentarts. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Montero, B. (2016). Aesthetic effortlessness. In S. Irvin (Ed.), Body aesthetics (pp. 180–191). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Murphy, A. (2016, September 30). Review: Curtis and Cunningham at CounterPulse. The Mercury News. Retrieved 4 March 2018 from http://www.mercurynews.com/2016/09/30/review-curtis-and-cunningham-at-counterpulse/.
Reason, M., & Reynolds, D. (2010). Kinesthesia, empathy, and related pleasures: An inquiry into audience experiences of watching dance. Dance Research Journal,42, 49–75.
Reed, S. (1998). The politics and poetics of dance. Annual Review of Anthropology,27, 503–532.
Rice, C., Chandler, E., Harrison, E., Liddiard, K., & Ferrari, M. (2015). Project Re•Vision: Disability at the edges of representation. Disability & Society,30, 513–527.
Sandahl, C., & Auslander, P. (2005a). Introduction: Disability studies in commotion with performance studies. In C. Sandahl & P. Auslander (Eds.), Bodies in commotion: Disability and performance (pp. 1–12). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sandahl, C., & Auslander, P. (Eds.). (2005b). Bodies in commotion: Disability and performance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Sheets, M. (1970). Phenomenology: An approach to dance. In M. Nadel & C. Nadel (Eds.), The dance experience: Readings in dance appreciation (pp. 33–48). New York: Praeger.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1981). Thinking in movement. The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 39, 399–407.
Sheets-Johnstone, M. (1999). The primacy of movement. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Siebers, T. (2016). In/visible: Disability on stage. In S. Irvin (Ed.), Body aesthetics (pp. 141–152). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Sklar, D. (2000). Reprise: On dance ethnography. Dance Research Journal,32, 70–77.
Sparshott, F. (2004). The philosophy of dance: Bodies in motion, bodies at rest. In P. Kivy (Ed.), The Blackwell guide to aesthetics (pp. 276–290). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Van Camp, J. (2009). Dance. In S. Davies, K. M. Higgins, R. Hopkins, R. Stecker, & D. E. Cooper (Eds.), A companion to aesthetics (2nd ed., pp. 76–78). Malden, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duffy, M., Atkinson, P., Wood, N. (2019). Thresholds of Representation: Physical Disability in Dance and Perceptions of the Moving Body. In: Boyd, C.P., Edwardes, C. (eds) Non-Representational Theory and the Creative Arts. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5749-7_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-5749-7_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-5748-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-5749-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)