Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Democracy and Participation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Justice Theory and Practice for Social Work

Abstract

What is the relation of democracy and participation to social justice? While the distributive theory offers an account of social justice at the level of abstracted principle, others focus their attention on specific conditions and practices that allow social injustice to emerge as a condition of social arrangements. Work by the philosopher Iris Marion Young offers a critical account of social justice, particularly in relation to concepts such as difference and oppression, and how these are implicated in social injustices such as exclusion, marginalisation and silencing. There are a number of key aspects related to issues of democracy and participation that could support social work efforts at empowerment, self-determination and inclusion. These are the nation-state and civil society, constitutionalism, freedom and liberty and the options for dealing with diversity within societies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bowden, B. (2006). Civil society, the state, and the limits to global civil society. Global Society, 20(2), 155–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600820600576423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton, B., & Durnan, D. (1993). Australians for reconciliation: Study circle kit. Canberra: Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation (Australia).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, J., Nguyen, H., & Reinardy, J. (2013). Social justice and the capabilities approach: Seeking a global blueprint for the EPAS. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(3), 269–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung, D. (2018). Social work in the domestic violence sector. In M. Alston, S. McCurdy, & J. McKinnon (Eds.), Social work fields of practice (pp. 210–224). South Melbourne, Victoria: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. (2005). Welfare states as nation states: Some conceptual reflections. Social Policy and Society, 4(4), 407–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746405002599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farris, C. J., & Dancy, G. (2017). Measuring the impact of human rights: Conceptual and methodological debates. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13, 273–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, I., & Woodward, R. (2009). Radical social work in practice: Making a difference. Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, K., & Boyd, T. (2013). Understanding political ideas and movements. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, A. (2000). Key concepts in politics. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkinson, V., & Foley, M. W. (2009). Preface. In V. Hodgkinson & M. W. Foley (Eds.), Civil society reader. Hanover, US: Tufts University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, J., Serra, L., Mateeva, A., Taylor, M., Petrov, R., & Miller, C. (2009). Toward a typology of civil society: Understanding non-government public action. In Civil society in comparative perspective (Vol. 26, pp. 71–103). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kesby, A. (2012). The right to have rights: Citizenship, humanity, and international law. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (1995). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. New York, US: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2009). Categorizing groups, categorizing states: Theorizing minority rights in a world of deep diversity. Ethics & International Affairs, 23(4), 371–388. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-7093.2009.00229.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laden, A. S. (2001). Reasonably radical: Deliberative liberalism and the politics of identity. New York, US: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laden, A. S., & Owen, D. (2007). Introduction. In A. S. Laden & D. Owen (Eds.), Multiculturalism and political theory (pp. 1–22). New York, US: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, C. (2006). Challenging social work: The institutional context of practice. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mullaly, R. P. (2007). The new structural social work (3rd ed.). Don Mills, Ontario: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoleon, V., & Friedland, H. (2014). Accessing Tully: Political philosophy for the everyday and the everyone. In R. Nichols & J. Singh (Eds.), Freedom and democracy in an imperial context: Dialogues with James Tully (pp. 175–202). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, R., & Singh, J. (2014). Editor’s introduction. In R. Nichols & J. Singh (Eds.), Freedom and democracy in an imperial context: Dialogues with James Tully (pp. 1–12). New York: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cumberland, US: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Manique, C., & Fourie, P. (2016). Affirming our world: Gender, justice, social reproduction and the sustainable development goals. Development., 59(1–2), 121–126. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41301-017-0066-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsell, C., Eggins, E., & Marston, G. (2017). Human agency and social work research: A systematic search and synthesis of social work literature. The British Journal of Social Work, 47(1), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcv145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettit, P. (2001). Symposium on Amartya Sen’s philosophy: Capability and freedom: A defence of Sen. Economics and Philosophy, 17(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267101000116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2011). Peace and democratic society. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2015). The idea of justice. Retrieved June 17, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oObkriRKlJU.

  • Skinner, Q. (1998). Liberty before liberalism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Q. (2012). So, what does freedom mean to us? Retrieved June 6, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7QooW-0hAo4&list=PLV19SJTJj162krLtUiicQsWWke3GVwdFx&t=22s&index=13.

  • Skinner, Q. (2016). A genealogy of liberty: A lecture by Quentin Skinner. Retrieved June 6, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PjQ-W2-fKUs&list=PLV19SJTJj162krLtUiicQsWWke3GVwdFx&index=20&t=10s.

  • Taylor, C. (1992). Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2017). The Guardian view on white nationalism: A rising danger. The Guardian. Retrieved June 6, 2018, from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/nov/12/the-guardian-view-on-white-nationalism-a-rising-danger.

  • Tully, J. (1995). Strange multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an age of diversity. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (2000). Struggles over recognition and distribution. Constellations, 7(4), 469–482. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.00203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (2002). The unfreedom of the moderns in comparison to their ideals of constitutional democracy. Modern Law Review, 65(2), 204–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (2008a). Modern constitutional democracy and imperialism. Osgoode Hall Law Journal, 46(3), 461–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (2008b). Public philosophy in a new key (Vol. 1). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tully, J. (2012). Charles Taylor on deep diversity: James Tully. Retrieved June 6, 2018, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-raJWEplmxg&t=145s.

  • Tully, J. (2013). Two ways of realizing justice and democracy: Linking Amartya Sen and Elinor Ostrom. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 16(2), 220–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2012.757914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, M. (2012). Globalization. In L. M. Healy & R. J. Link (Eds.), Handbook of international social work (pp. 16–23). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (1990). Justice and the politics of difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I. M. (2007). Structural injustice and the politics of difference. In A. S. Laden & D. Owen (Eds.), Multiculturalism and political theory (pp. 60–89). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Arts and Humanities, Edith Cowan University, Bunbury, WA, Australia

    Lynelle Watts & David Hodgson

Authors
  1. Lynelle Watts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Hodgson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lynelle Watts .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Watts, L., Hodgson, D. (2019). Democracy and Participation. In: Social Justice Theory and Practice for Social Work. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3621-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3621-8_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3620-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3621-8

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation