Abstract
It is a known fact that the usual “deficit” model of teacher professional development (PD) is no longer effective in developing teachers professionally. This chapter presents three models of continuing PD that exemplify a critical development in the professional development of teachers in Singapore and also many parts of the world. This development reflects a shift in the centre of gravity away from the University-based, “supply-side”, “off-line” forms of knowledge production by university professors for teachers towards an emergent school-based, demand-side, on-line, in situ forms of knowledge production by teachers with support from university professors. The first model is a hybrid one that integrates the “training model of PD” with sustained support for mathematics teachers to integrate knowledge gained from the PD into their classroom practice. The second model is the laboratory class, a school-based PD programme for primary school mathematics teachers that evolved from a lesson study process. The third model is networked learning communities. In such communities, teachers work and learn collaboratively to examine and reflect on their practice. As teachers learn from one another, with one another, and on behalf of others, they are engaged in purposeful and sustained developmental activities to co-create knowledge and share it with their fraternity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Abdal-Haqq, I. (1995). Making time for teacher professional development (Digest 95-4). Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Teaching and Teacher Education.
Ball, D. L. (1996). Teacher learning and the mathematics reforms: What do we think we know and what do we need to learn? Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 500–508.
Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Towards a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3–32). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Carpenter, T. P., Fennema, E., Franke, M. L., Levi, L., & Empson, S. B. (1999). Children’s mathematics: Cognitively guided instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Clarke, D. (1994). Ten key principles from research for the professional development of mathematics teachers. In D. B. Aichele & A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Professional development for teachers of mathematics (pp. 37–48). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving impact studies on teachers’ professional development: Toward better conceptualisations and measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199.
Elmore, R. F. (2002). Bridging the gap between standards and achievement: The imperative for professional development in education. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
Fraser, C., Kennedy, A., Reid, L., & Mckinney, S. (2007). Teachers’ continuing professional development: Contested concepts, understandings and models. Journal of In-service Education, 33(2), 153–169.
Fuji, T. (2014). Implementing Japanese lesson study in foreign countries: misconceptions revealed. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 65–83.
Ginsburg, A., Leinwand, S., Anstrom, T., & Pollock, E. (2005). What the United States can learn from Singapore’s world-class mathematics system and what Singapore can learn from the United States: An exploratory study. Washington, D.C.: American Institutes for Research.
Hargreaves, A. (1995). Development and desire: A postmodern perspective. In T. R. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: New paradigms and practices (pp. 9–34). New York: Teachers College Press.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning. Routledge.
Hawley, W. D., & Valli, L. (1999). The essentials of effective professional development: A new consensus. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 127–150). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Hogan, D., Towndrow, P., Chan, M., Kwek, D., & Rahim, R. A. (2013). CRPP core 2 research program: Core 2 interim final report. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Jackson, D., & Temperley, J. (2007). From professional learning community to networked learning community. In L. Stoll & K. S. Louis (Eds.), Professional learning communities: Divergence, depth, and dilemmas (pp. 45–62). Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.
Joubert, M., Back, J., Geest, E. D., Hirst, C., & Sutherland, R. (2010). Professional development for teachers of mathematics: Opportunities and change. In Proceedings of CERME 2009, January 28th–February 1st, Lyon France (pp. 1761–1770).
Katz, S., Earl, L. M., & Jaafar, S. B. (2009). Building and connecting learning communities: The power of networks for school improvement. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
Kaur, B. (2009). Enhancing the pedagogy of mathematics teachers (EPMT): An innovative professional development project for engaged learning. The Mathematics Educator, 12(1), 33–48.
Kaur, B. (2010). The EPMT project: A harbinger for teachers’ meaningful production of pedagogical knowledge. In Y. Shimizu, Y. Sekiguchi, & K. Hino (Eds.), Proceedings of the 5th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 739–746). Tokyo, Japan: Japan Society of Mathematical Education.
Kaur, B. (2011). Enhancing the pedagogy of mathematics teachers (EPMT) project: A hybrid model of professional development. ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43(7), 791–803.
Kaur, B. (2012). Some “What” strategies that advance reasoning and communication in primary mathematics classrooms. In B. Kaur & T. L. Toh (Eds.), Reasoning, communication and connections in mathematics (pp. 75–88). Singapore: World Scientific.
Kaur, B. (2013a). Nurturing active and reflective learners of mathematics—Some insights from the EPMT project. In M. Inprasitha (Ed.), Proceedings 6th East Asia Regional Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 64–73). Khon Kaen, Thailand: Khon Kaen University.
Kaur, B. (2013b). The EPMT project—Integration of “new” knowledge into classroom practice of mathematics teachers. In S. S. Kim, Y. H. Choe, O. N. Kwon, & B. E. Suh (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Mathematical Education (pp. 3–15). Seoul, Korea: Korean Society of Mathematical Education.
Kaur, B. (2015). What matters? From a small scale to a school-wide intervention. ZDM—Mathematics Education, 47(1), 105–116.
Kaur, B., Areepattamannil, S., & Boey, K. L. (2013). Singapore’s perspective: Highlights of TIMSS 2011. Singapore: Centre for International Comparative Studies, National Institute of Education.
Kaur, B., Bhardwaj, D., & Wong, L. F. (2015). Developing Metacognitive skills of mathematics learners. In The Korean Society of Mathematical Education (Ed.), The Korean Society of Mathematics Education Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Mathematics Education (pp. 237–245). Seoul, Korea: The Korean Society of Mathematical Education.
Kaur, B., Bhardwaj, D., & Wong, L. F. (2017). Teaching for metacognition project: Construction of knowledge by mathematics teachers working and learning collaboratively in multi-tier communities of practice. In B. Kaur, O. N. Kwon & Y. H. Leong (Eds.), Professional development of mathematics teachers—An Asian Perspective (pp. 169–187). Springer.
Kaur, B., Boey, K. L., Areepattamannil, S., & Chen, Q. (2012). Singapore’s Perspective: Highlights of TIMSS 2007. Singapore: Centre for International Comparative Studies, National Institute of Education.
Kaur, B., & Ghani, M. (2011). Mathematical tasks that advance reasoning and communication in classrooms. In J. Clarke, B. Kissane, J. Mousley, T. Spencer, & S. Thornton (Eds.), Mathematics: Traditions and [New] Practices—Proceedings of the AAMT-MERGA Conference (pp. 989–994). Adelaide, Australia: AAMT & MERGA.
Kaur, B., Seah, L. H., & Low, H. K. (2005). A window to a mathematics classroom in Singapore—Some preliminary findings. In: Redesigning pedagogy: Research, policy, practice 30 May–1 June 2005. Singapore: Centre for Research in Pedagogy and Practice, National Institute of Education. http://conference.nie.edu.sg/rprpp.
Kaur, B., & Wong, L. F. (2017). Professional development of mathematics teachers in Singapore. In B. Kaur, O. N. Kwon & Y. H. Leong (Eds.), Professional development of mathematics teachers—An Asian perspective (pp. 97–108). Springer.
Kaur, B., Wong, L. F., & Bhardwaj, D. (2016). Mathematics subject mastery—A must for developing 21st century skills. In P. C. Toh & B. Kaur (Eds.), Developing 21st century Competencies in the Mathematics Classroom (pp. 77–94). Singapore: World Scientific.
Kaur, B., & Yeap, B. H. (2009a). Pathways to reasoning and communication in the primary school mathematics classroom. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Kaur, B., & Yeap, B. H. (2009b). Pathways to reasoning and communication in the secondary school mathematics classroom. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Kennedy, A. (2005). Models of continuing professional development: A framework for analysis. Journal of In-Service Education, 31(2), 235–250.
Lewis, C., & Hurd, J. (2011). Lesson study step by step: How teacher learning communities improve instruction. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Lewis, C., & Perry, R. (2014). Lesson study with mathematical resources: A sustainable model for locally-led teacher professional learning. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 16(1), 22–42.
Matos, J. F., Powell, A., & Sztajn, P. (2009). Mathematics teachers’ professional development: Processes of learning in and from practice. In R. Even & D. L. Ball (Eds.), The professional education and development of teachers of mathematics (pp. 167–183). New York: Springer.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2005). Teach less learn more. Singapore: Author.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2011). Growing teacher-leadership. Programme book of Academy Symposium: Celebrating learning, transforming practice. Singapore: AST.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2012). Networked learning communities. Retrieved November 09, 2017 from https://www.academyofsingaporeteachers.moe.gov.sg/networked-learning-communities.
Ministry of Education (MOE). (2017). Guide to effective professional development: Volume 3 networked learning communities. Singapore: AST.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., & Foy, P. (2008). TIMSS 2007: International mathematics report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston College.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., & Arora, A. (2012). TIMSS 2011: International mathematics report. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Centre, Boston College.
Naik, S., & Ball, D. L. (2014). Professional development in a laboratory setting examining evolution in teachers’ questioning and participation. Journal of Mathematics Education, 7(2), 40–54.
OECD. (2010). PISA 2009 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in reading, mathematics and science (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing.
OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What students know and can do: Student performance in mathematics, reading and science (Vol. 1). OECD Publishing.
Seto, C., Lim, W. Y., & Heng, T. (2011). A case study on teachers’ participation in a mathematics networked learning community. Paper presented at the 4th Redesigning Pedagogy International Conference, May 30– June 1, 2011, National Institute of Education, Singapore.
Seto, C., & Fraser, B. J. (2014). Learning environment: Process criteria for evaluating teachers’ participation in a Mathematics Networked Learning Community. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April 3–7, 2014, Philadelphia, USA.
Seto, C., Ng, T., Choon, M. K. & Tan, K. T. (2018). Leadership and capacity-building through networked learning communities for pedagogical excellence. Paper presented at the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement Conference. Singapore.
Stiff, L. V. (2002, March). Study shows high-quality professional development helps teachers most. NCTM News Bulletin, 38(7), 7.
Stigler, J., & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap. New York, NY: The Free Press.
Takahashi, A. (2014). Supporting the effective implementation of a new mathematics curriculum: A case study of school-based lesson study at a Japanese public elementary school. In I. Y. Li & G. Lappan (Eds.), Mathematics curriculum in school education (pp. 417–442). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
Takahashi, A. (2017). Lesson study: The fundamental driver for mathematics teacher development in Japan. In B. Kaur, O. N. Kwon, & Y. H. Leong (Eds.), Professional development of mathematics teachers, mathematics education—An Asian perspective (pp. 47–60). Singapore: Springer.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2014). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd edn.). Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Training and Development Division (TDD). (2010). Schools as professional learning communities. Singapore: Training and Development Division, Ministry of Education.
Wang-Iverson, P., & Yoshida, M. (2005). Building our understanding of lesson study. Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools.
Wilson, S. M., & Berne, J. (1999). Teacher learning and the acquisition of professional knowledge: An examination of research on contemporary professional development. Review of Research in Education, 24, 173–209.
Yeap, B. H., & Kaur, B. (2010). Pedagogy for engaged mathematics learning. Singapore: National Institute of Education.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaur, B., Cheng, L.P., Wong, L.F., Seto, C. (2019). Models of Teacher Professional Development. In: Toh, T., Kaur, B., Tay, E. (eds) Mathematics Education in Singapore. Mathematics Education – An Asian Perspective. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3573-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3573-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3572-3
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3573-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)