Abstract
This conclusion reiterates the importance of Heine as both a canonical and a worldly writer and illustrates this view in the analyses of selected modern critics. It also briefly compares Heine’s work as a cultural innovator; forerunner of new journalism; philosophical travel writer; art critic; flâneur; theorist of the metropolis; feuilletonist; and modern allegoricist, with the works of modern writers of exile and diasporas. At certain times and certain places—as in the Spain of the Generation of 1898, struggling to keep pace with modernity—Heine became a beacon of hope for progressive groups. Because the Nazis had tarnished his name, his international stature and the monumental role he had played in a world literary context suffered. This postscript ends on a plea for further work in comparative studies, in general, and more comparative readings of Heine in a world literary context, in particular.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsAuthor information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seyhan, A. (2019). Prefatory Postscript. In: Heinrich Heine and the World Literary Map. Canon and World Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3489-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-3489-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-13-3488-7
Online ISBN: 978-981-13-3489-4
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)